Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neurological Sciences 10/2017

Open Access 01-10-2017 | Original Article

Safety and efficacy of Cerebrolysin in motor function recovery after stroke: a meta-analysis of the CARS trials

Authors: Alla Guekht, Johannes Vester, Wolf-Dieter Heiss, Eugene Gusev, Volker Hoemberg, Volker W. Rahlfs, Ovidiu Bajenaru, Bogdan O. Popescu, Edith Doppler, Stefan Winter, Herbert Moessler, Dafin Muresanu

Published in: Neurological Sciences | Issue 10/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

This meta-analysis combines the results of two identical stroke studies (CARS-1 and CARS-2) assessing efficacy of Cerebrolysin on motor recovery during early rehabilitation. Cerebrolysin is a parenterally administered neuropeptide preparation approved for the treatment of stroke. Both studies had a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Treatment with 30 ml Cerebrolysin once daily for 3 weeks was started 24–72 h after stroke onset. In addition, patients participated in a standardized rehabilitation program for 21 days that was initiated within 72 h after stroke onset. For both studies, the original analysis data were used for meta-analysis (individual patient data analysis). The combination of these two studies by meta-analytic procedures was pre-planned, and the methods were pre-defined under blinded conditions. The nonparametric Mann-Whitney (MW) effect size of the two studies on the ARAT score on day 90 indicated superiority of Cerebrolysin compared with placebo (MW 0.62, P < 0.0001, Wei-Lachin pooling procedure, day 90, last observation carried forward; N = 442). Also, analysis of early benefit at day 14 and day 21 by means of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, which is regarded as most sensitive to early improvements, showed statistical significance (MW 0.59, P < 0.002). The corresponding number-needed-to-treat (NNT) for clinically relevant changes in early NIHSS was 7.1 (95% CI: 4 to 22). Cerebrolysin had a beneficial effect on motor function and neurological status in early rehabilitation patients after acute ischemic stroke. Safety aspects were comparable to placebo, showing a favourable benefit/risk ratio.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Muresanu DF (2010) Neuromodulation with pleiotropic and multimodal drugs – future approaches to treatment of neurological disorders. Acta Neurochir Suppl 106:291–294CrossRefPubMed Muresanu DF (2010) Neuromodulation with pleiotropic and multimodal drugs – future approaches to treatment of neurological disorders. Acta Neurochir Suppl 106:291–294CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Riley C, Hutter-Paier BU, Windisch M, Doppler E, Moessler H, Wronski R (2006) A peptide preparation protects cells in organotypic brain slices against death after glutamate intoxication. J Neural Transm 113:103–110CrossRefPubMed Riley C, Hutter-Paier BU, Windisch M, Doppler E, Moessler H, Wronski R (2006) A peptide preparation protects cells in organotypic brain slices against death after glutamate intoxication. J Neural Transm 113:103–110CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Muresanu DF, Heiss WD, Hoemberg V, Bajenaru O, Popescu CD, Vester JC et al (2016) Cerebrolysin and Recovery after Stroke (CARS): A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind. Multicenter Trial Stroke 47(1):151–159CrossRefPubMed Muresanu DF, Heiss WD, Hoemberg V, Bajenaru O, Popescu CD, Vester JC et al (2016) Cerebrolysin and Recovery after Stroke (CARS): A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind. Multicenter Trial Stroke 47(1):151–159CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Wilcoxon F (1945) Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biom Bull 1:80–83CrossRef Wilcoxon F (1945) Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biom Bull 1:80–83CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mann HB, Whitney DR (1947) On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann Math Statistic 18:50–60CrossRef Mann HB, Whitney DR (1947) On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann Math Statistic 18:50–60CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Armitage P, Bery G, Matthews JNS (2002) Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 4th edn. Blackwell Science, MaldenCrossRef Armitage P, Bery G, Matthews JNS (2002) Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 4th edn. Blackwell Science, MaldenCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sprent P, Smeeton NC (2001) Applied Nonparametric Statistical Methods, 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton Sprent P, Smeeton NC (2001) Applied Nonparametric Statistical Methods, 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton
11.
go back to reference Rothmann MD, Wiens BL, Chan IS (2011) Design and Analysis of Non-Inferiority Trials. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton Rothmann MD, Wiens BL, Chan IS (2011) Design and Analysis of Non-Inferiority Trials. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton
12.
go back to reference Munzel U, Hauschke D (2003) A nonparametric test for proving non-inferiority in clinical trials with ordered categorical data. Pharmaceut Statist 2:31–37. doi:10.1002/pst.17 CrossRef Munzel U, Hauschke D (2003) A nonparametric test for proving non-inferiority in clinical trials with ordered categorical data. Pharmaceut Statist 2:31–37. doi:10.​1002/​pst.​17 CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kieser M, Friede T, Gondan M (2013) Assessment of statistical significance and clinical relevance. Stat Med 32:1707–1719CrossRefPubMed Kieser M, Friede T, Gondan M (2013) Assessment of statistical significance and clinical relevance. Stat Med 32:1707–1719CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Rahlfs VW, Zimmermann H, Lees KL (2014) Effect size measures and their relationships in stroke studies. Stroke 45:627–633CrossRefPubMed Rahlfs VW, Zimmermann H, Lees KL (2014) Effect size measures and their relationships in stroke studies. Stroke 45:627–633CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
16.
go back to reference Colditz GA, Miller JN, Mosteller F (1988) Measuring gain in the evaluation of medical technology: the probability of a better outcome. Int J Technol Assessment Health Care 4:637–642 Colditz GA, Miller JN, Mosteller F (1988) Measuring gain in the evaluation of medical technology: the probability of a better outcome. Int J Technol Assessment Health Care 4:637–642
18.
go back to reference Brott TG, Adams HP, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V et al (1989) Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 20:864–870CrossRefPubMed Brott TG, Adams HP, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V et al (1989) Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 20:864–870CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kerr DM, Fulton RL, Lees KR (2012) Seven-Day NIHSS Is a Sensitive Outcome Measure for Exploratory Clinical Trials in Acute Stroke. Stroke 43:1401–1403CrossRefPubMed Kerr DM, Fulton RL, Lees KR (2012) Seven-Day NIHSS Is a Sensitive Outcome Measure for Exploratory Clinical Trials in Acute Stroke. Stroke 43:1401–1403CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference van Swieten J, Koudstaal P, Visser M, Schouten H et al (1988) Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 19(5):604–607CrossRefPubMed van Swieten J, Koudstaal P, Visser M, Schouten H et al (1988) Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 19(5):604–607CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Lachin JM (2000) Biostatistical methods. The assessment of relative risks. Wiley, New York Lachin JM (2000) Biostatistical methods. The assessment of relative risks. Wiley, New York
22.
go back to reference Frick H (1994) A maximin linear test and its application to Lachin’s Data. Commun Statist - Theory and Methods 23:1021–1029CrossRef Frick H (1994) A maximin linear test and its application to Lachin’s Data. Commun Statist - Theory and Methods 23:1021–1029CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Frick H (1995) Comparing trials with multiple outcomes: The multivariate one-sided hypothesis with unknown covariances. Biom J 8:909–917CrossRef Frick H (1995) Comparing trials with multiple outcomes: The multivariate one-sided hypothesis with unknown covariances. Biom J 8:909–917CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Gail M, Simon R (1985) Testing for qualitative interactions between treatment effects and patient subsets. Biometrics 41:361–372CrossRefPubMed Gail M, Simon R (1985) Testing for qualitative interactions between treatment effects and patient subsets. Biometrics 41:361–372CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Hedges LV, Olkin J (1985) Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego Hedges LV, Olkin J (1985) Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego
26.
28.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–1558CrossRefPubMed Higgins JPT, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–1558CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Borenstein M, Hedges L, Rothstein H (2007) Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Wiley, New York Borenstein M, Hedges L, Rothstein H (2007) Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Wiley, New York
30.
go back to reference Borenstein M, Hedges L, Higgins J, Rothstein H (2009) Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef Borenstein M, Hedges L, Higgins J, Rothstein H (2009) Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Deeks JJ, Higgins JP, Altman DG. Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-analysis. In: Higgins JP, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Deeks JJ, Higgins JP, Altman DG. Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-analysis. In: Higgins JP, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
32.
go back to reference Chang BS, Lowenstein DH (2003) Practice parameter: antiepileptic drug prophylaxis in severe traumatic brain injury: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 60:10–16CrossRefPubMed Chang BS, Lowenstein DH (2003) Practice parameter: antiepileptic drug prophylaxis in severe traumatic brain injury: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 60:10–16CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Biester K, Lange S, Kaiser T, Potthast R (2006) High dropout rates in trials included in Cochrane Reviews. Paper presented at: XIV Cochrane Colloquium; Dublin, Ireland Biester K, Lange S, Kaiser T, Potthast R (2006) High dropout rates in trials included in Cochrane Reviews. Paper presented at: XIV Cochrane Colloquium; Dublin, Ireland
34.
go back to reference Higgins JP, Altman DG, Sterne JA. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Sterne JA. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
35.
go back to reference Group NS (1995) Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA stroke study group. N Engl J Med 333(24):1581–1587CrossRef Group NS (1995) Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA stroke study group. N Engl J Med 333(24):1581–1587CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Morris JH, van Wijck (2010) Upper limb activity limitation after stroke: identifying severity subgroups using the Action Resarch Arm Test and the Nine Hole Peg Test. Int J Stroke 5(Suppl. 3):56 Morris JH, van Wijck (2010) Upper limb activity limitation after stroke: identifying severity subgroups using the Action Resarch Arm Test and the Nine Hole Peg Test. Int J Stroke 5(Suppl. 3):56
37.
go back to reference Hsueh I, Hsieh C (2002) Responsiveness of two upper extremity function instruments for stroke inpatients receiving rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 16:617–624CrossRefPubMed Hsueh I, Hsieh C (2002) Responsiveness of two upper extremity function instruments for stroke inpatients receiving rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 16:617–624CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Yozbatiran N, Der-Yaghiaian L, Cramer SC (2008) A Standardized approach to performing the action research arm test. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22:78–90CrossRefPubMed Yozbatiran N, Der-Yaghiaian L, Cramer SC (2008) A Standardized approach to performing the action research arm test. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22:78–90CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Nijland R, van Wegen E, Verbunt J, van Wijk R, van Kordelaar J, Kwakkel G (2010) A comparison of two validated tests for upper limb function after stroke: the Wolf Motor function test and the action research arm test. J Rehabil Med 42:694–696CrossRefPubMed Nijland R, van Wegen E, Verbunt J, van Wijk R, van Kordelaar J, Kwakkel G (2010) A comparison of two validated tests for upper limb function after stroke: the Wolf Motor function test and the action research arm test. J Rehabil Med 42:694–696CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Safety and efficacy of Cerebrolysin in motor function recovery after stroke: a meta-analysis of the CARS trials
Authors
Alla Guekht
Johannes Vester
Wolf-Dieter Heiss
Eugene Gusev
Volker Hoemberg
Volker W. Rahlfs
Ovidiu Bajenaru
Bogdan O. Popescu
Edith Doppler
Stefan Winter
Herbert Moessler
Dafin Muresanu
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Neurological Sciences / Issue 10/2017
Print ISSN: 1590-1874
Electronic ISSN: 1590-3478
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-3037-z

Other articles of this Issue 10/2017

Neurological Sciences 10/2017 Go to the issue