Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neurological Sciences 3/2011

01-01-2011 | Session II – Natalizumab: Italian Experience

Natalizumab treatment in multiple sclerosis: the experience of S. Andrea MS Centre in Rome

Authors: L. Prosperini, G. Borriello, F. Fubelli, F. Marinelli, Carlo Pozzilli

Published in: Neurological Sciences | Special Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

We reported a post-marketing experience of 190 patients affected by relapsing multiple sclerosis on treatment with natalizumab. Clinical findings during pre-treatment period and throughout the study were documented. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were performed at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months of therapy. Cumulative proportions of patients disease activity free (i.e. absence of relapses, disability progression, MRI activity) were measured as efficacy endpoints. Despite that the baseline characteristics suggested a more severe course of disease in our sample than that of the AFFIRM trial, data on effectiveness of natalizumab were comparable. At 1 year of treatment we found 80 and 70% patients free from relapses and MRI activity, respectively, that is similar to 75 and 62% detected in the AFFIRM trial. Moreover, only 5% of our patients showed a progression of disability after a mean follow-up time of 15 months. Finally, the presence of antibodies anti-Natalizumab was strongly related to the occurrence of relapses (p = 0.002) and MRI activity (p < 0.001) even in the post-marketing experience.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Yednock TA, Cannon C, Fritz LC et al (1992) Prevention of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by antibodies against alpha 4 beta 1 integrins. Nature 356:63–66CrossRefPubMed Yednock TA, Cannon C, Fritz LC et al (1992) Prevention of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by antibodies against alpha 4 beta 1 integrins. Nature 356:63–66CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Polman CH, O’Connor PW, Havrdova E et al (2006) A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 354:899–910CrossRefPubMed Polman CH, O’Connor PW, Havrdova E et al (2006) A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 354:899–910CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Havrdova E, Galetta S, Hutchinson M et al (2009) Effect of natalizumab on clinical and radiological disease activity in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective analysis of the natalizumab safety and efficacy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (AFFIRM) study. Lancet Neurol 8:254–260CrossRefPubMed Havrdova E, Galetta S, Hutchinson M et al (2009) Effect of natalizumab on clinical and radiological disease activity in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective analysis of the natalizumab safety and efficacy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (AFFIRM) study. Lancet Neurol 8:254–260CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Rudick RA, Stuart WH, Calabresi PA et al (2006) Natalizumab plus Interferon Beta-1a for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med 354:911–923CrossRefPubMed Rudick RA, Stuart WH, Calabresi PA et al (2006) Natalizumab plus Interferon Beta-1a for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med 354:911–923CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Hartung HP (2009) New cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy after treatment with natalizumab. Lancet Neurol 8:28–31CrossRefPubMed Hartung HP (2009) New cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy after treatment with natalizumab. Lancet Neurol 8:28–31CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G et al (2001) Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 50:121–127CrossRefPubMed McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G et al (2001) Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 50:121–127CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kurtzke JF (1993) Rating neurological impairment in multiple sclerosis: an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Neurology 33:1444–1452 Kurtzke JF (1993) Rating neurological impairment in multiple sclerosis: an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Neurology 33:1444–1452
8.
go back to reference Miller DH, Albert PS, Barkhof F et al (1996) Guidelines for the use of magnetic resonance techniques in monitoring the treatment of multiple sclerosis US National MS Society Task Force. Ann Neurol 39:6–16CrossRefPubMed Miller DH, Albert PS, Barkhof F et al (1996) Guidelines for the use of magnetic resonance techniques in monitoring the treatment of multiple sclerosis US National MS Society Task Force. Ann Neurol 39:6–16CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Oturai AB, Koch-Henriksen N, Petersen T et al (2009) Efficacy of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis patients with high disease activity: a Danish nationwide study. Eur J Neurol 16:420–423CrossRefPubMed Oturai AB, Koch-Henriksen N, Petersen T et al (2009) Efficacy of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis patients with high disease activity: a Danish nationwide study. Eur J Neurol 16:420–423CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Putzki N, Yaldizli O, Mäurer M et al (2009) Efficacy of natalizumab in second-line therapy of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results from a multi-center study in German speaking countries. Eur J Neurol 17:31–37 Putzki N, Yaldizli O, Mäurer M et al (2009) Efficacy of natalizumab in second-line therapy of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results from a multi-center study in German speaking countries. Eur J Neurol 17:31–37
12.
go back to reference Outteryck O, Ongagna JC, Zéphir H et al (2010) Demographic and clinic characteristics of French patients treated with natalizumab in clinical practice. J Neurol 257:207–211CrossRefPubMed Outteryck O, Ongagna JC, Zéphir H et al (2010) Demographic and clinic characteristics of French patients treated with natalizumab in clinical practice. J Neurol 257:207–211CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hutchinson M, Kappos L, Calabresi PA et al (2009) The efficacy of natalizumab in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: subgroup analyses of AFFIRM and SENTINEL. J Neurol 256:405–415CrossRefPubMed Hutchinson M, Kappos L, Calabresi PA et al (2009) The efficacy of natalizumab in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: subgroup analyses of AFFIRM and SENTINEL. J Neurol 256:405–415CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Calabresi PA, Giovannoni G, Confavreux C et al (2007) The incidence and significance of anti-natalizumab antibodies: results from AFFIRM and SENTINEL. Neurology 69:1391–1403CrossRefPubMed Calabresi PA, Giovannoni G, Confavreux C et al (2007) The incidence and significance of anti-natalizumab antibodies: results from AFFIRM and SENTINEL. Neurology 69:1391–1403CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kappos L, Bates D, Hartung HP et al (2007) Natalizumab treatment for multiple sclerosis: recommendations for patient selection and monitoring. Lancet Neurol 6:431–441CrossRefPubMed Kappos L, Bates D, Hartung HP et al (2007) Natalizumab treatment for multiple sclerosis: recommendations for patient selection and monitoring. Lancet Neurol 6:431–441CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Dorsey ER, Thompson JP, Noyes K et al (2007) Quantifying the risks and benefits of natalizumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Neurology 68:1524–1528CrossRefPubMed Dorsey ER, Thompson JP, Noyes K et al (2007) Quantifying the risks and benefits of natalizumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Neurology 68:1524–1528CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Tedeschi G, Amato MP, D’Alessando R et al (2009) The pharmacovigilance program on natalizumab in Italy: 2 years of experience. Neurol Sci 30(Suppl 2):S163–S165CrossRefPubMed Tedeschi G, Amato MP, D’Alessando R et al (2009) The pharmacovigilance program on natalizumab in Italy: 2 years of experience. Neurol Sci 30(Suppl 2):S163–S165CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Natalizumab treatment in multiple sclerosis: the experience of S. Andrea MS Centre in Rome
Authors
L. Prosperini
G. Borriello
F. Fubelli
F. Marinelli
Carlo Pozzilli
Publication date
01-01-2011
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Neurological Sciences / Issue Special Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 1590-1874
Electronic ISSN: 1590-3478
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-010-0348-8

Other articles of this Special Issue 3/2011

Neurological Sciences 3/2011 Go to the issue

Session II – Natalizumab: Italian Experience

The cohort of the multiple sclerosis center of Cagliari

Session II – Natalizumab: Italian Experience

Natalizumab: state of the art and open questions

Session I – Natalizumab: International Experience

Three years of experience: the Italian registry and safety data update