Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Rheumatology 3/2012

01-03-2012 | Original Article

Incidental computed tomography sacroiliitis: clinical significance and inappropriateness of the New York radiological grading criteria for the diagnosis

Authors: Gleb Slobodin, Simona Croitoru, Natalia Starikov, Said Younis, Nina Boulman, Doron Rimar, Itzhak Rosner, Michael Rozenbaum, Majed Odeh

Published in: Clinical Rheumatology | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

The clinical implications of computed tomography (CT) detected sacroiliac joint (SIJ) changes compatible with sacroiliitis has been rarely discussed in the literature. The aim of the present study was to describe prevalence and clinical correlations of sacroiliitis, noted incidentally by abdominal CT in patients referred for non-musculoskeletal complaints, utilizing the New York radiological grading criteria for reference. Five hundred ninety-eight CT scans of the abdomen of patients 18–55 years old, performed at a community medical center, were prospectively examined for the presence of imaging changes consistent with sacroiliitis. Patients with the evidence of bilateral sacroiliitis of grade ≥2 were interviewed and underwent a rheumatologic examination. Twenty-two patients (13 females) were enrolled. Only eight patients (six males) had a history and clinical picture compatible with previously undiagnosed axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). Only the presence of erosions/joint space irregularity and/or inhomogeneous osseous sclerosis around SIJs on CT correlated with the clinical diagnosis of axial SpA. Dense homogenous osseous sclerosis was unrelated to axial SpA and was seen almost exclusively in females. The prevalence of incidental CT sacroiliitis is low, while the New York radiological grading criteria for diagnosing sacroiliitis may be inappropriate for CT imaging. CT noted erosions of the SIJ appear to be a reliable diagnostic sign of sacroiliitis, while the significance of the osseous sclerosis, seen on CT adjacent to SIJs requires better understanding.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, Listing J, Akkoc N, Brandt J et al (2009) The development of assessment of spondyloarthritis international society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis 68:777–783PubMedCrossRef Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, Listing J, Akkoc N, Brandt J et al (2009) The development of assessment of spondyloarthritis international society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis 68:777–783PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Geijer M, Gothlin GG, Gothlin JH (2007) The clinical utility of computed tomography compared to conventional radiography in diagnosing sacroiliitis. A retrospective study on 910 patients and literature review. J Rheumatol 34:1561–1565PubMed Geijer M, Gothlin GG, Gothlin JH (2007) The clinical utility of computed tomography compared to conventional radiography in diagnosing sacroiliitis. A retrospective study on 910 patients and literature review. J Rheumatol 34:1561–1565PubMed
3.
go back to reference Guglielmi G, Scalzo G, Cascavilla A, Carotti M, Salaffi F, Grassi W (2009) Imaging of the sacroiliac joint involvement in seronegative spondylarthropathies. Clin Rheumatol 28:1007–1019PubMedCrossRef Guglielmi G, Scalzo G, Cascavilla A, Carotti M, Salaffi F, Grassi W (2009) Imaging of the sacroiliac joint involvement in seronegative spondylarthropathies. Clin Rheumatol 28:1007–1019PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Van Tubergen A, Heuft-Dorenbosch L, Schulpen G, Landewé R, Wijers R, van der Heijde D, van Engelshoven J, van der Linden S (2003) Radiographic assessment of sacroiliitis by radiologists and rheumatologists: does training improve quality? Ann Rheum Dis 62:519–525PubMedCrossRef Van Tubergen A, Heuft-Dorenbosch L, Schulpen G, Landewé R, Wijers R, van der Heijde D, van Engelshoven J, van der Linden S (2003) Radiographic assessment of sacroiliitis by radiologists and rheumatologists: does training improve quality? Ann Rheum Dis 62:519–525PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Geijer M, Gadeholt Göthlin G, Göthlin JH (2009) The validity of the New York radiological grading criteria in diagnosing sacroiliitis by computed tomography. Acta Radiol 50:664–673PubMedCrossRef Geijer M, Gadeholt Göthlin G, Göthlin JH (2009) The validity of the New York radiological grading criteria in diagnosing sacroiliitis by computed tomography. Acta Radiol 50:664–673PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A (1984) Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis: a proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 27:361–368PubMedCrossRef Van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A (1984) Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis: a proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 27:361–368PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Puhakka KB, Jurik AG, Egund N, Schiottz-Christensen B, Stengaard-Pedersen K, van Overeem HG, Christiansen JV (2003) Imaging of sacroiliitis in early seronegative spondyloarthropathy. Assessment of abnormalities by MRI in comparison with radiography and CT. Acta Radiol 44:218–229PubMedCrossRef Puhakka KB, Jurik AG, Egund N, Schiottz-Christensen B, Stengaard-Pedersen K, van Overeem HG, Christiansen JV (2003) Imaging of sacroiliitis in early seronegative spondyloarthropathy. Assessment of abnormalities by MRI in comparison with radiography and CT. Acta Radiol 44:218–229PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dihlmann W, Hering L (1998) Dense bone around the sacroiliac joint: a radiological review of the differential diagnosis. Eur J Radiol 27:241–249PubMedCrossRef Dihlmann W, Hering L (1998) Dense bone around the sacroiliac joint: a radiological review of the differential diagnosis. Eur J Radiol 27:241–249PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Incidental computed tomography sacroiliitis: clinical significance and inappropriateness of the New York radiological grading criteria for the diagnosis
Authors
Gleb Slobodin
Simona Croitoru
Natalia Starikov
Said Younis
Nina Boulman
Doron Rimar
Itzhak Rosner
Michael Rozenbaum
Majed Odeh
Publication date
01-03-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0770-3198
Electronic ISSN: 1434-9949
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-011-1871-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Clinical Rheumatology 3/2012 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine