Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 1/2014

Open Access 01-02-2014 | Original Article

European Hernia Society classification of parastomal hernias

Authors: M. Śmietański, M. Szczepkowski, J. A. Alexandre, D. Berger, K. Bury, J. Conze, B. Hansson, A. Janes, M. Miserez, V. Mandala, A. Montgomery, S. Morales Conde, F. Muysoms

Published in: Hernia | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

A classification of parastomal hernias (PH) is needed to compare different populations described in various trials and cohort studies, complete the previous inguinal and ventral hernia classifications of the European Hernia Society (EHS) and will be integrated into the EuraHS database (European Registry of Abdominal Wall Hernias).

Methods

Several members of the EHS board and invited experts gathered for 2 days to discuss the development of an EHS classification of PH. The discussions were based on a literature review and critical appraisal of existing classifications.

Results

The classification proposal is based on the PH defect size (small is ≤5 cm) and the presence of a concomitant incisional hernia (cIH). Four types were defined: Type I, small PH without cIH; Type II, small PH with cIH; Type III, large PH without cIH; and Type IV, large PH with cIH. In addition, the classification grid includes details about whether the hernia recurs after a previous PH repair or whether it is a primary PH. Clinical validation is needed in the future to assess if the classification allows us to differentiate the treatment strategy and if the classification impacts outcome in these different subgroups.

Conclusion

A classification of PH divided into subgroups according to size and cIH was formulated with the aim of improving the ability to compare different studies and their results.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Miserez M, Alexandre JH, Campanelli G (2007) The european hernia society groin hernia classification: simple and easy to remember. Hernia 11:113–116PubMedCrossRef Miserez M, Alexandre JH, Campanelli G (2007) The european hernia society groin hernia classification: simple and easy to remember. Hernia 11:113–116PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Muysoms F, Campanelli G, Champault GG (2012) EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia 16:239–250PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Muysoms F, Campanelli G, Champault GG (2012) EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia 16:239–250PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rubin MS, Schoetz DJ, Matthews JB (1994) Parastomal hernia. Is stoma relocation superior to fascial repair? Arch Surg 129:413–418PubMedCrossRef Rubin MS, Schoetz DJ, Matthews JB (1994) Parastomal hernia. Is stoma relocation superior to fascial repair? Arch Surg 129:413–418PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Devlin HB, Kingsnorth A (1998) Management of abdominal hernias. London, Hodder Arnold Publishers, pp 177–178 Devlin HB, Kingsnorth A (1998) Management of abdominal hernias. London, Hodder Arnold Publishers, pp 177–178
6.
go back to reference Moreno-Matias J et al (2009) The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification. J Colorectal Dis 11:173–177CrossRef Moreno-Matias J et al (2009) The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification. J Colorectal Dis 11:173–177CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gil G, Szczepkowski MS (2011) A new classification of parastomal hernias—from the experience at Bielański Hospital in Warsaw. Pol J Surg 83:430–437 Gil G, Szczepkowski MS (2011) A new classification of parastomal hernias—from the experience at Bielański Hospital in Warsaw. Pol J Surg 83:430–437
9.
go back to reference Hansson BME, Morales-Conde S, Mussac T et al (2013) The laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker technique is safe and has a low recurrence rate: a multicenter cohort study. Surg Endosc 27:494–500PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hansson BME, Morales-Conde S, Mussac T et al (2013) The laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker technique is safe and has a low recurrence rate: a multicenter cohort study. Surg Endosc 27:494–500PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
European Hernia Society classification of parastomal hernias
Authors
M. Śmietański
M. Szczepkowski
J. A. Alexandre
D. Berger
K. Bury
J. Conze
B. Hansson
A. Janes
M. Miserez
V. Mandala
A. Montgomery
S. Morales Conde
F. Muysoms
Publication date
01-02-2014
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Hernia / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1162-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Hernia 1/2014 Go to the issue

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO REFEREES

Acknowledgement to referees 2013