Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 2/2013

01-04-2013 | Original Article

Combined laparoscopic and open extraperitoneal approach to scrotal hernias

Authors: G. S. Ferzli, S. Rim, E. D. Edwards

Published in: Hernia | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic repair of scrotal hernias is often a difficult endeavor to successfully complete. The longstanding nature of these hernias often results in significant adhesions and anatomic distortion of the inguinal floor. These two issues make reduction of the hernia arduous and subsequent reinforcement of the parietal sac difficult. We have previously described techniques to increase the chances of success when attempting laparoscopic repair of scrotal hernias. Here, we describe some of those techniques as well as a combined laparoscopic and open approach to achieve a robust preperitoneal repair of incarcerated scrotal hernias when the usual totally extraperitoneal approach does not work.

Patients and methods

We performed a retrospective review of 1890 TEP hernia repairs we performed from 1990 to 2010. Rate of conversion to an open approach or a combined laparoscopic and open approach was examined. Incidence of complications or recurrences was assessed over a 12-month follow-up period.

Results

Among the 1890 TEP repairs, 94 large scrotal hernias were identified. Of these, nine cases (9.5 %) required conversion to an open procedure due to an incarcerated and indurated omentum. Three were completed with a conventional open preperitoneal whereas six patients (6.4 %) underwent repair with the combined approach. In this group, no recurrences or complications were found over a 12-month period.

Conclusion

In cases where a large scrotal hernia may be difficult or dangerous to reduce laparoscopically, immediate conversion to an open repair may not be necessary. A combined laparoscopic and open approach can greatly assist in the visualization and dissection of the preperitoneal space, thereby facilitating reduction of the hernia and placement of the mesh.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Neumayer LA, Gawande AA, Wang J, Giobbie-Hurder A, Itani KM, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Reda D, Jonasson O, CSP #456 Investigators (2005) Proficiency of surgeons in inguinal hernia repair: effect of experience and age. Ann Surg 242(3):344–348 (discussion 348–352)PubMed Neumayer LA, Gawande AA, Wang J, Giobbie-Hurder A, Itani KM, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Reda D, Jonasson O, CSP #456 Investigators (2005) Proficiency of surgeons in inguinal hernia repair: effect of experience and age. Ann Surg 242(3):344–348 (discussion 348–352)PubMed
2.
go back to reference Bittner R, Arregui ME, Bisgaard T, Dudai M, Ferzli GS et al (2011) Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal Hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)]. Surg Endosc 25(9):2773–2843PubMedCrossRef Bittner R, Arregui ME, Bisgaard T, Dudai M, Ferzli GS et al (2011) Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal Hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)]. Surg Endosc 25(9):2773–2843PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ferzli GS, Edwards ED (2011) Laparoscopic inguinal herniorraphy. In: Cameron JL, Cameron AM (eds) Current surgical therapy, 10th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1197–1210CrossRef Ferzli GS, Edwards ED (2011) Laparoscopic inguinal herniorraphy. In: Cameron JL, Cameron AM (eds) Current surgical therapy, 10th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1197–1210CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ferzli GS, Kiel T (1997) The role of the endoscopic extraperitoneal approach in large inguinal scrotal hernias. Surg Endosc 11:299–302PubMedCrossRef Ferzli GS, Kiel T (1997) The role of the endoscopic extraperitoneal approach in large inguinal scrotal hernias. Surg Endosc 11:299–302PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hollinsky C, Sandberg S, Koch T, Seidler S (2008) Biomechanical properties of lightweight versus heavyweight meshes for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and their impact on recurrence rates. Surg Endosc 22:2679–2685PubMedCrossRef Hollinsky C, Sandberg S, Koch T, Seidler S (2008) Biomechanical properties of lightweight versus heavyweight meshes for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and their impact on recurrence rates. Surg Endosc 22:2679–2685PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hollinsky C, Hollinsky K (1999) Static calculations for mesh fixation by intraabdominal pressure in laparoscopic extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 9:106–109PubMedCrossRef Hollinsky C, Hollinsky K (1999) Static calculations for mesh fixation by intraabdominal pressure in laparoscopic extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 9:106–109PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ferzli GS, Edwards ED, Khoury GE (2007) Chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy. J Am Coll Surg 205(2):333–341PubMedCrossRef Ferzli GS, Edwards ED, Khoury GE (2007) Chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy. J Am Coll Surg 205(2):333–341PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Palanivelu C, Rangarajan M, John SJ (2007) Modified technique of laparoscopic intraperitoneal hernioplasty for irreducible scrotal hernias (omentoceles): how to remove the hernial contents. World J Surg 31(9):1889–1891PubMedCrossRef Palanivelu C, Rangarajan M, John SJ (2007) Modified technique of laparoscopic intraperitoneal hernioplasty for irreducible scrotal hernias (omentoceles): how to remove the hernial contents. World J Surg 31(9):1889–1891PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Combined laparoscopic and open extraperitoneal approach to scrotal hernias
Authors
G. S. Ferzli
S. Rim
E. D. Edwards
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Hernia / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-0970-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Hernia 2/2013 Go to the issue