Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 6/2012

01-12-2012 | Original Article

Prosthetic mesh contamination during NOTES® transgastric hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial with swine explants

Authors: D. B. Earle, J. R. Romanelli, T. McLawhorn, P. Omotosho, P. Wu, C. Rossini, H. Swayze, D. J. Desilets

Published in: Hernia | Issue 6/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES®) is a developing field in minimally invasive surgery that has been applied across a wide range of procedures; however, infectious concerns remain. Most of the applications have been for extraction, rather than reconstructive procedures. Prosthetic hernia repair, is a constructive procedure, has the unique challenge of avoiding contamination and infection of a permanent implant. Utilizing a novel device, we hypothesize that we can significantly reduce or eliminate prosthetic contamination during a transgastric approach for delivery of a clinically relevant, permanent, synthetic prosthetic.

Methods

20 swine explants of stomach with attached esophagus were prepared by placing an ultraviolet (UV) light sensitive gel within the lumen of the stomach. Each stomach then underwent endoscopic gastrotomy utilizing a needle, wire guide, and 18-mm balloon dilator. A 10 × 15 cm polypropylene prosthetic was rolled and tied with a 2-0 silk suture, and delivered with one of two methods. Group A (control) utilized a snare to grasp the prosthetic adjacent to the endoscope, which was used to drag it through the gastrotomy. Group B (device) utilized a modified esophageal stent delivery system to deliver the prosthetic through the gastrotomy. Each prosthetic was then digitally photographed with UV illumination, with the contaminated areas illuminating brightly. Software analysis was performed on the photographs to quantify areas of contamination for each group. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed t test with unequal variance.

Results

Group A demonstrated a mean of 57 % of the surface area of the prosthetic contaminated with UV light sensitive gel. Group B (experimental group) showed a mean of 0.01 % of the surface area contaminated (p < 0.0001). 95 % confidence intervals indicated that the unprotected delivery technique exposes approximately 6,000 times more of the surface area to contamination than the delivery device.

Conclusion

Use of this modified stent delivery system can nearly eliminate prosthetic contamination when placed via a transgastric approach in a swine explants model. Theoretically, the reduced inoculum size would reduce or eliminate clinical infection. Since the inoculum size required for clinical prosthetic infection for intraperitoneal mesh is unknown, further study is warranted to test the ability to eliminate clinical infection related to prosthetic delivery with this technique.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rattner D, Kalloo A, ASGE/SAGES Working Group (2006) ASGE/SAGES working group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 20(2):329–333PubMedCrossRef Rattner D, Kalloo A, ASGE/SAGES Working Group (2006) ASGE/SAGES working group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 20(2):329–333PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hu B, Kalloo AN, Chung SSC, Cotton PB, Gostout CJ, Hawes RH, Pasricha PJ, Isakovich NV, Nakajima KK, Kantsevoy SV (2007) Peroral transgastric endoscopic primary repair of a ventral hernia in a porcine model. Endoscopy 39:390–393PubMedCrossRef Hu B, Kalloo AN, Chung SSC, Cotton PB, Gostout CJ, Hawes RH, Pasricha PJ, Isakovich NV, Nakajima KK, Kantsevoy SV (2007) Peroral transgastric endoscopic primary repair of a ventral hernia in a porcine model. Endoscopy 39:390–393PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fong DG, Ryou M, Pai RD, Tavakkolizadeh A, Rattner DW, Thompson CC (2007) Transcolonic ventral wall hernia mesh fixation in a porcine model. Endoscopy 39(10):865–869PubMedCrossRef Fong DG, Ryou M, Pai RD, Tavakkolizadeh A, Rattner DW, Thompson CC (2007) Transcolonic ventral wall hernia mesh fixation in a porcine model. Endoscopy 39(10):865–869PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Jacobsen GR, Thompson K, Spivack A, Fischer L, Wong B, Cullen J, Bosia J, Whitcomb E, Lucas E, Talamini M, Horgan S (2010) Initial experience with transvaginal incisional hernia repair. Hernia 14(1):89–91PubMedCrossRef Jacobsen GR, Thompson K, Spivack A, Fischer L, Wong B, Cullen J, Bosia J, Whitcomb E, Lucas E, Talamini M, Horgan S (2010) Initial experience with transvaginal incisional hernia repair. Hernia 14(1):89–91PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Earle DB, Desilets DD, Romanelli JR (2010) NOTES transgastric abdominal wall hernia repair in a porcine model. Hernia 14:517–522PubMedCrossRef Earle DB, Desilets DD, Romanelli JR (2010) NOTES transgastric abdominal wall hernia repair in a porcine model. Hernia 14:517–522PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Oh DS, Manning MM, Emmanuel J, Broyles SE, Stone HH (2002) Repair of full-thickness defects in alimentary tract wall with patches of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene. Ann Surg 235(5):708–712PubMedCrossRef Oh DS, Manning MM, Emmanuel J, Broyles SE, Stone HH (2002) Repair of full-thickness defects in alimentary tract wall with patches of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene. Ann Surg 235(5):708–712PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Guarner-Argente C, Beltran M, Martinez-Palli G, Navarro-Ripoll R, Martine Zamora MA, Cordova H et al (2011) Infection during natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery peritoneoscopy: a randomized comparative study in a survival porcine model. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18(6):741–746PubMedCrossRef Guarner-Argente C, Beltran M, Martinez-Palli G, Navarro-Ripoll R, Martine Zamora MA, Cordova H et al (2011) Infection during natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery peritoneoscopy: a randomized comparative study in a survival porcine model. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18(6):741–746PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Buck L, Michalek J, Van Sickle K, Schwesinger W, Bingener J (2008) Can gastric irrigation prevent infection during NOTES mesh placement? J Gastrointest Surg 12(11):2010–2014PubMedCrossRef Buck L, Michalek J, Van Sickle K, Schwesinger W, Bingener J (2008) Can gastric irrigation prevent infection during NOTES mesh placement? J Gastrointest Surg 12(11):2010–2014PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lomanto D, Dhir U, So JB, Cheah WK, Moe MA, Ho KY (2009) Total transvaginal endoscopic abdominal wall hernia repair: a NOTES survival study. Hernia 13(14):415–419PubMedCrossRef Lomanto D, Dhir U, So JB, Cheah WK, Moe MA, Ho KY (2009) Total transvaginal endoscopic abdominal wall hernia repair: a NOTES survival study. Hernia 13(14):415–419PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sporn E, Astudillo JA, Bachman SL, Mayfield TP, Thaler K, Miedema BW (2009) Transgastric biologic mesh delivery and abdominal wall hernia repair in a porcine model. Endoscopy 41(12):1062–1068PubMedCrossRef Sporn E, Astudillo JA, Bachman SL, Mayfield TP, Thaler K, Miedema BW (2009) Transgastric biologic mesh delivery and abdominal wall hernia repair in a porcine model. Endoscopy 41(12):1062–1068PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prosthetic mesh contamination during NOTES® transgastric hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial with swine explants
Authors
D. B. Earle
J. R. Romanelli
T. McLawhorn
P. Omotosho
P. Wu
C. Rossini
H. Swayze
D. J. Desilets
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Hernia / Issue 6/2012
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-0944-z

Other articles of this Issue 6/2012

Hernia 6/2012 Go to the issue