Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 2/2005

01-05-2005 | Original Article

Discordance between the patient’s and surgeon’s perception of complications following hernia surgery

Authors: U. Fränneby, U. Gunnarsson, S. Wollert, G. Sandblom

Published in: Hernia | Issue 2/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: The study was undertaken in order to assess the degree of concordance between the patient’s and surgeon’s perceptions of adverse events after groin hernia surgery.
Methods: 206 patients who underwent elective surgery for groin hernia at Samariterhemmet, Uppsala, Sweden in 2003 were invited to a follow-up visit after 3–6 weeks. At this visit the patient was instructed to answer a questionnaire including 12 questions concerning postoperative complications. A postoperative history was taken and a clinical examination performed by a surgeon who was not present at the operation and did not know the outcome of the questionnaire. All complications noted by the physician were recorded for corresponding questions in the questionnaire.
Results: 174 (84.5%) patients attended the follow up, 161 men and 13 women. A total of 190 complications were revealed by the questionnaire, 32 of which had caused the patient to seek help from the health-care system. There were 131 complications registered as a result of the follow-up clinical examinations and history. Kappa levels ranged from 0.11 for urinary complications to 0.56 for constipation.
Conclusion: In general, the concordance was poor. These results emphasise the importance of providing detailed information about the usual postoperative course prior to the operation. Whereas the surgeon, from a professional point of view, has a better idea about what should be expected in the postoperative period and how any complications should be categorised, only the patient has a complete picture of the symptoms and adverse events. This makes it impossible to reach complete agreement between the patient’s and surgeon’s perceptions of complications, even under the most ideal circumstances.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nilsson E, Haapaniemi S, Gruber G, Sandblom G (1998) Methods of repair and risk for reoperation in Swedish hernia surgery from 1992 to 1996. Brit J Surg 85:1686–1691 Nilsson E, Haapaniemi S, Gruber G, Sandblom G (1998) Methods of repair and risk for reoperation in Swedish hernia surgery from 1992 to 1996. Brit J Surg 85:1686–1691
2.
go back to reference Sandblom G, Gruber G, Kald A, Nilsson E (2000) Audit and recurrence rates after hernia surgery. Eur J Surg 166:154–158CrossRefPubMed Sandblom G, Gruber G, Kald A, Nilsson E (2000) Audit and recurrence rates after hernia surgery. Eur J Surg 166:154–158CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Nilsson E, Haapaniemi S (1998) Hernia registers and specialization. Surg Clin North Am 78:1141–1155PubMed Nilsson E, Haapaniemi S (1998) Hernia registers and specialization. Surg Clin North Am 78:1141–1155PubMed
4.
go back to reference Haapaniemi S, Nilsson E (2002) Recurrence and pain three years after groin hernia repair. Validation of postal questionnaire and selective physical examination as a method of follow-up. Eur J Surg 168:22–28CrossRefPubMed Haapaniemi S, Nilsson E (2002) Recurrence and pain three years after groin hernia repair. Validation of postal questionnaire and selective physical examination as a method of follow-up. Eur J Surg 168:22–28CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Sandblom G, Haapaniemi S, Nilsson E (1999) Femoral hernias: a register analysis of 588 repairs. Hernia 3:131–134 Sandblom G, Haapaniemi S, Nilsson E (1999) Femoral hernias: a register analysis of 588 repairs. Hernia 3:131–134
6.
go back to reference Gunnarsson U (2003) Quality assurance in surgical oncology—colorectal cancer as an example. Eur J Surg Oncol 29:89–94 Gunnarsson U (2003) Quality assurance in surgical oncology—colorectal cancer as an example. Eur J Surg Oncol 29:89–94
7.
go back to reference Gunnarsson U, Heuman R (1999) Patient experience ratings in surgery for recurrent hernia. Hernia 3:69–73 Gunnarsson U, Heuman R (1999) Patient experience ratings in surgery for recurrent hernia. Hernia 3:69–73
8.
go back to reference Armitage P, Berry G (1994) Further analysis of categorical data. In: Armitage P, Berry G (eds) Statistical methods in medical research. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 443–7 Armitage P, Berry G (1994) Further analysis of categorical data. In: Armitage P, Berry G (eds) Statistical methods in medical research. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 443–7
9.
go back to reference Durieux P, Bissery A, Dubois S, Gasquet I, Coste J (2004) Comparison of health care professionals’ self-assessments of standards of care and patients’ opinions on the care they received in hospital: observational study. Qual Saf Health Care 13:198–202 Durieux P, Bissery A, Dubois S, Gasquet I, Coste J (2004) Comparison of health care professionals’ self-assessments of standards of care and patients’ opinions on the care they received in hospital: observational study. Qual Saf Health Care 13:198–202
10.
go back to reference Lawrence K, McWhinnie D, Goodwin A, Doll H, Gordon A, Gray A, Britton J, Collin J (1995) Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia: early results. Brit Med J 311:981–985 Lawrence K, McWhinnie D, Goodwin A, Doll H, Gordon A, Gray A, Britton J, Collin J (1995) Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia: early results. Brit Med J 311:981–985
11.
go back to reference Kald A, Nilsson E (1991) Quality assessment in hernia surgery. Qual Assur Health Care 3:205–210 Kald A, Nilsson E (1991) Quality assessment in hernia surgery. Qual Assur Health Care 3:205–210
12.
go back to reference McManus PL, Wheatley KE (2003) Consent and complications: risk disclosure varies widely between individual surgeons. Ann Roy Coll Surg 85:79–82 McManus PL, Wheatley KE (2003) Consent and complications: risk disclosure varies widely between individual surgeons. Ann Roy Coll Surg 85:79–82
13.
go back to reference Gilbert AI (1993) Medical/legal aspects of hernia surgery. Personal risk management. Surg Clin North Am 73:583–593 Gilbert AI (1993) Medical/legal aspects of hernia surgery. Personal risk management. Surg Clin North Am 73:583–593
14.
go back to reference Ragab AA (2003) Validity of self-assessment outcome questionnaires: patient-physician discrepancy in outcome interpretation. Biomed Sci Instrum 39:579–584 Ragab AA (2003) Validity of self-assessment outcome questionnaires: patient-physician discrepancy in outcome interpretation. Biomed Sci Instrum 39:579–584
15.
go back to reference Gunnarsson U, Heuman R, Wendel-Hansen V (1996) Patient evaluation of routines in ambulatory hernia surgery. Ambulat Surg 4:11–13 Gunnarsson U, Heuman R, Wendel-Hansen V (1996) Patient evaluation of routines in ambulatory hernia surgery. Ambulat Surg 4:11–13
16.
go back to reference Bonsanto MM, Hamer J, Tronnier V, Kunze S (2001) A complication conference for internal quality control at the Neurosurgical Department of the University of Heidelberg. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 78:139–145 Bonsanto MM, Hamer J, Tronnier V, Kunze S (2001) A complication conference for internal quality control at the Neurosurgical Department of the University of Heidelberg. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 78:139–145
17.
go back to reference Herbert MA, Prince SL, Williams JL, Magee MJ, Mack MJ (2004) Are unaudited records from an outcomes registry database accurate? Ann Thorac Surg 77:1960–1964 Herbert MA, Prince SL, Williams JL, Magee MJ, Mack MJ (2004) Are unaudited records from an outcomes registry database accurate? Ann Thorac Surg 77:1960–1964
18.
go back to reference Hanto DW (2003) Reliability of voluntary and compulsory databases and registries in the United States. Transplantation 75:2162–2164 Hanto DW (2003) Reliability of voluntary and compulsory databases and registries in the United States. Transplantation 75:2162–2164
19.
go back to reference Wynn A, Wise M, Wright MJ, Rafaat A, Wang YZ, Steeb G, McSwain N, Beuchter KJ, Hunt JP (2001) Accuracy of administrative and trauma registry databases. J Trauma 51:464–468 Wynn A, Wise M, Wright MJ, Rafaat A, Wang YZ, Steeb G, McSwain N, Beuchter KJ, Hunt JP (2001) Accuracy of administrative and trauma registry databases. J Trauma 51:464–468
20.
go back to reference Gunnarsson U, Seligsohn E, Jestin P, Pahlman L (2003) Registration and validity of surgical complications in colorectal cancer surgery. Brit J Surg 90:454–459 Gunnarsson U, Seligsohn E, Jestin P, Pahlman L (2003) Registration and validity of surgical complications in colorectal cancer surgery. Brit J Surg 90:454–459
21.
go back to reference Dreisler E, Schou L, Adamsen S (2001) Completeness and accuracy of voluntary reporting to a national case registry of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int J Qual Health Care 13:51–55 Dreisler E, Schou L, Adamsen S (2001) Completeness and accuracy of voluntary reporting to a national case registry of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int J Qual Health Care 13:51–55
Metadata
Title
Discordance between the patient’s and surgeon’s perception of complications following hernia surgery
Authors
U. Fränneby
U. Gunnarsson
S. Wollert
G. Sandblom
Publication date
01-05-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Hernia / Issue 2/2005
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-004-0310-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2005

Hernia 2/2005 Go to the issue