Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 5/2019

Open Access 01-05-2019 | Original Contribution

Barriers and facilitators to shared decision making in child and youth mental health: clinician perspectives using the Theoretical Domains Framework

Authors: D. Hayes, J. Edbrooke-Childs, R. Town, M. Wolpert, N. Midgley

Published in: European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Shared decision making (SDM) is increasingly being suggested as an integral part of mental health provision. Yet, there is little research on what clinicians believe the barriers and facilitators around practice to be. At the same time, there is also increasing recognition of a theory–practice gap within the field, with calls for more pragmatic uses of theory to inform and improve clinical practice. Using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), a comprehensive, theoretical-led framework, underpinned by 33 behaviour change theories and 128 constructs, clinician perceived barriers and facilitators to SDM are investigated. The sample comprised of 15 clinicians across two sites in England, who took part in qualitative semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Transcripts were analysed using a deductive thematic analysis, and themes were coded under each theoretical domain. Overall, 21 barriers and facilitators for SDM in child and youth mental health were identified across ten domains of the TDF. Under capability, barriers and facilitators were found for knowledge, skills, memory/attention/decision making processes, and behavioural regulation. For opportunity, barriers and facilitators were found for social influences, as well as environmental context and resources. Finally, for motivation, domains covered included: beliefs about consequences, beliefs about capabilities, emotions, and professional role and identity. Findings suggest that a range of barriers and facilitators affect clinicians’ abilities to engage in SDM with young people and parents. Interventions which target different domains related to capability, opportunity and motivation should be developed to better facilitate young people and their families in care and treatment decisions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Da Silva D (2012) Helping people share decision making. The Health Foundation, London Da Silva D (2012) Helping people share decision making. The Health Foundation, London
2.
go back to reference Coulter A, Collins A (2011) Making shared decision making a reality. No decision about me, without me. King’s Fund, London Coulter A, Collins A (2011) Making shared decision making a reality. No decision about me, without me. King’s Fund, London
8.
go back to reference Hayes D (2018) Developing an intervention to promote shared decision making in child and youth mental health: integrating theory, research and practice. Univiersity College London, London Hayes D (2018) Developing an intervention to promote shared decision making in child and youth mental health: integrating theory, research and practice. Univiersity College London, London
9.
go back to reference Elwyn G, Stiel M, Durand MA, Boivin J (2011) The design of patient decision support interventions: addressing the theory-practice gap. J Eval Clin Pract 17:565–574CrossRefPubMed Elwyn G, Stiel M, Durand MA, Boivin J (2011) The design of patient decision support interventions: addressing the theory-practice gap. J Eval Clin Pract 17:565–574CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S (2012) Validation of the Theoretical Domains Framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci 7:37CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S (2012) Validation of the Theoretical Domains Framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci 7:37CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Fink E, Patalay P, Sharpe H, Holley S, Deighton J, Wolpert M (2015) Mental health difficulties in early adolescence: a comparison of two cross-sectional studies in England from 2009 to 2014. J Adolesc Health 56:502–507CrossRefPubMed Fink E, Patalay P, Sharpe H, Holley S, Deighton J, Wolpert M (2015) Mental health difficulties in early adolescence: a comparison of two cross-sectional studies in England from 2009 to 2014. J Adolesc Health 56:502–507CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Deighton J, Lereya ST, Patalay P, Casey P, Humphrey N, Wolpert M (2018) Mental health problems in young people, aged 11 to 14: results from the first HeadStart annual survey of 30,000 children. CAMHS Press, London Deighton J, Lereya ST, Patalay P, Casey P, Humphrey N, Wolpert M (2018) Mental health problems in young people, aged 11 to 14: results from the first HeadStart annual survey of 30,000 children. CAMHS Press, London
16.
go back to reference Polanczyk GV, Salum GA, Sugaya LS, Caye A, Rohde LA (2015) Annual research review: a meta-analysis of the worldwide prevalence of mental disorders in children and adolescents. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 56:345–365CrossRefPubMed Polanczyk GV, Salum GA, Sugaya LS, Caye A, Rohde LA (2015) Annual research review: a meta-analysis of the worldwide prevalence of mental disorders in children and adolescents. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 56:345–365CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Hayes D, Fleming I, Wolpert M (2015) Developing safe care in mental health for children and young people: drawing on UK experience for solutions to an under-recognised problem. Curr Treat Options Pediatr 1:309–319CrossRef Hayes D, Fleming I, Wolpert M (2015) Developing safe care in mental health for children and young people: drawing on UK experience for solutions to an under-recognised problem. Curr Treat Options Pediatr 1:309–319CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kovshoff H, Williams S, Vrijens M, Danckaerts M, Thompson M, Yardley L et al (2012) The Decisions Regarding ADHD MAnagement (DRAMa) study: uncertainties and complexities in assessment, diagnosis and treatment, from the clinician’s point of view. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 21:87–99CrossRefPubMed Kovshoff H, Williams S, Vrijens M, Danckaerts M, Thompson M, Yardley L et al (2012) The Decisions Regarding ADHD MAnagement (DRAMa) study: uncertainties and complexities in assessment, diagnosis and treatment, from the clinician’s point of view. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 21:87–99CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Pelto-Piri V, Engström K, Engström I (2013) Paternalism, autonomy and reciprocity: ethical perspectives in encounters with patients in psychiatric in-patient care. BMC Med Ethics 14:49CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pelto-Piri V, Engström K, Engström I (2013) Paternalism, autonomy and reciprocity: ethical perspectives in encounters with patients in psychiatric in-patient care. BMC Med Ethics 14:49CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Tam-Seto L, Versnel J (2015) Occupational therapy shared decision making in adolescent mental health. Occup Ther Ment Health 31:168–186CrossRef Tam-Seto L, Versnel J (2015) Occupational therapy shared decision making in adolescent mental health. Occup Ther Ment Health 31:168–186CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 19:349–357CrossRefPubMed Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 19:349–357CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3:77–101CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3:77–101CrossRef
27.
go back to reference QSR International (2014) NVivo qualitative data analysis software, version 10. QSR International Pty Ltd QSR International (2014) NVivo qualitative data analysis software, version 10. QSR International Pty Ltd
28.
go back to reference Michie S, Atkins L, West W (2014) The behaviour change wheel: a guide to designing interventions. Silverback Publishing, London Michie S, Atkins L, West W (2014) The behaviour change wheel: a guide to designing interventions. Silverback Publishing, London
29.
go back to reference Coulter A (2009) Implementing shared decision making in the UK. The Health Foundation, London Coulter A (2009) Implementing shared decision making in the UK. The Health Foundation, London
33.
go back to reference Alderson P (2017) Children’s consent and the zone of parental discretion. Clin Ethics 12:55–62CrossRef Alderson P (2017) Children’s consent and the zone of parental discretion. Clin Ethics 12:55–62CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Alderson P, Montgomery J (1996) Health care choices: making decisions with children, vol 2. Institute for Public Policy Research, London Alderson P, Montgomery J (1996) Health care choices: making decisions with children, vol 2. Institute for Public Policy Research, London
35.
go back to reference Alderson P, Sutcliffe K, Curtis K (2006) Children’s competence to consent to medical treatment. Hastings Cent Rep 36:25–34CrossRefPubMed Alderson P, Sutcliffe K, Curtis K (2006) Children’s competence to consent to medical treatment. Hastings Cent Rep 36:25–34CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Sutcliffe K, Alderson P, Curtis K, Tyler K (2004) Children as partners in their diabetes care: an exploratory research study September–December 2003. Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, London Sutcliffe K, Alderson P, Curtis K, Tyler K (2004) Children as partners in their diabetes care: an exploratory research study September–December 2003. Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, London
39.
go back to reference Legare F, Thompson-Leduc P (2014) Twelve myths about shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns 96:281–286CrossRefPubMed Legare F, Thompson-Leduc P (2014) Twelve myths about shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns 96:281–286CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Barriers and facilitators to shared decision making in child and youth mental health: clinician perspectives using the Theoretical Domains Framework
Authors
D. Hayes
J. Edbrooke-Childs
R. Town
M. Wolpert
N. Midgley
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 1018-8827
Electronic ISSN: 1435-165X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-018-1230-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 5/2019 Go to the issue