Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 4/2011

01-08-2011 | Original Article

Measurement of cement thickness under lithium disilicate crowns using an impression material technique

Authors: Sven Reich, Sophia Uhlen, Stephan Gozdowski, Ulrich Lohbauer

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

According to the literature, marginal gaps below 120 μm are recommended for conventionally cemented crown restorations. Therefore, the null hypothesis tested was as follows: the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval of the marginal accuracy of chair-side generated lithium disilicate crowns lies below 120 μm. Prior to definite insertion, the accuracy of 20 lithium disilicate crowns (e.max CAD LT) was evaluated by a replica technique. A light-body silicone was used to document the gap between crown and abutment. The thickness of the light-body silicone layer was examined under microscope (MM40, Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan; magnification, ×50) at four different landmarks (LM): LM1 = marginal discrepancy, LM2 = mid-axial discrepancy of the inner crown surface, LM3 = axio-occlusal discrepancy, and LM4 = mid-occlusal discrepancy. At LM1, the mean marginal discrepancy revealed 100 μm (SD, ±61 μm); the median was 81 μm. The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval was 90 μm, and the upper bound was 110 μm. The means of internal gaps at LM2, LM3, and LM4 showed 148 μm (SD, ±61 μm), 227 μm (SD, ±83 μm), and 284 μm (SD, ±95 μm), respectively. The lower bounds of the 95% confidence interval revealed values between 137 μm (LM2) and 269 μm (LM4). The upper bounds were between 158 μm (LM2) and 300 μm (LM4). The null hypothesis was not rejected. Within the limits of the study, the chair-side generated lithium disilicate crowns exhibited a sufficient clinical accuracy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wiedhahn K (2007) From blue to white: new high-strength material for Cerec—IPS e.max CAD LT. Int J Comput Dent 10:79–91PubMed Wiedhahn K (2007) From blue to white: new high-strength material for Cerec—IPS e.max CAD LT. Int J Comput Dent 10:79–91PubMed
2.
go back to reference Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Luthy H, Hammerle CH (2007) Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 20:383–388PubMed Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Luthy H, Hammerle CH (2007) Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 20:383–388PubMed
3.
go back to reference Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, Luthy H, Gauckler LJ, Scharer P et al (2006) Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up. Quintessence Int 37:685–693PubMed Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, Luthy H, Gauckler LJ, Scharer P et al (2006) Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up. Quintessence Int 37:685–693PubMed
4.
go back to reference Quante K, Ludwig K, Kern M (2008) Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology. Dent Mater 24:1311–1315PubMedCrossRef Quante K, Ludwig K, Kern M (2008) Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology. Dent Mater 24:1311–1315PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Holmes JR, Sulik WD, Holland GA, Bayne SC (1992) Marginal fit of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 67:594–599PubMedCrossRef Holmes JR, Sulik WD, Holland GA, Bayne SC (1992) Marginal fit of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 67:594–599PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA (1971) The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 131:107–111PubMedCrossRef McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA (1971) The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 131:107–111PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schwickerath H (1979) Marginal cleft and solubility. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 34:664–669PubMed Schwickerath H (1979) Marginal cleft and solubility. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 34:664–669PubMed
8.
go back to reference Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Zwahlen M, Hammerle CH (2007) A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part I: single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 18(3):73–85PubMedCrossRef Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Zwahlen M, Hammerle CH (2007) A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part I: single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 18(3):73–85PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fransson B, Oilo G, Gjeitanger R (1985) The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dent Mater 1:197–199PubMedCrossRef Fransson B, Oilo G, Gjeitanger R (1985) The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dent Mater 1:197–199PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Felton DA, Kanoy BE, Bayne SC, Wirthman GP (1991) Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 65:357–364PubMedCrossRef Felton DA, Kanoy BE, Bayne SC, Wirthman GP (1991) Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 65:357–364PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.
go back to reference Boening KW, Wolf BH, Schmidt AE, Kastner K, Walter MH (2000) Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent 84:419–424PubMedCrossRef Boening KW, Wolf BH, Schmidt AE, Kastner K, Walter MH (2000) Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent 84:419–424PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Molin M, Karlsson S (1993) The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 51:201–206PubMedCrossRef Molin M, Karlsson S (1993) The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 51:201–206PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD (1989) Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 62:405–408PubMedCrossRef Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD (1989) Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 62:405–408PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rahme HY, Tehini GE, Adib SM, Ardo AS, Rifai KT (2008) In vitro evaluation of the “replica technique” in the measurement of the fit of Procera crowns. J Contemp Dent Pract 9:25–32PubMed Rahme HY, Tehini GE, Adib SM, Ardo AS, Rifai KT (2008) In vitro evaluation of the “replica technique” in the measurement of the fit of Procera crowns. J Contemp Dent Pract 9:25–32PubMed
16.
go back to reference Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R (2007) Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM. J Dent 35:68–73PubMedCrossRef Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R (2007) Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM. J Dent 35:68–73PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tuntiprawon M, Wilson PR (1995) The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. Aust Dent J 40:17–21PubMedCrossRef Tuntiprawon M, Wilson PR (1995) The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. Aust Dent J 40:17–21PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Laurent M, Scheer P, Dejou J, Laborde G (2008) Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns—validation of the silicone replica method. J Oral Rehabil 35:116–122PubMedCrossRef Laurent M, Scheer P, Dejou J, Laborde G (2008) Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns—validation of the silicone replica method. J Oral Rehabil 35:116–122PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Weaver JD, Johnson GH, Bales DJ (1991) Marginal adaptation of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 66:747–753PubMedCrossRef Weaver JD, Johnson GH, Bales DJ (1991) Marginal adaptation of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 66:747–753PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wang CJ, Millstein PL, Nathanson D (1992) Effects of cement, cement space, marginal design, seating aid materials, and seating force on crown cementation. J Prosthet Dent 67:786–790PubMedCrossRef Wang CJ, Millstein PL, Nathanson D (1992) Effects of cement, cement space, marginal design, seating aid materials, and seating force on crown cementation. J Prosthet Dent 67:786–790PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Reich S, Kappe K, Teschner H, Schmitt J (2008) Clinical fit of four-unit zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses. Eur J Oral Sci 116:579–584PubMedCrossRef Reich S, Kappe K, Teschner H, Schmitt J (2008) Clinical fit of four-unit zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses. Eur J Oral Sci 116:579–584PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P (2005) Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 113:174–179PubMedCrossRef Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P (2005) Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 113:174–179PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wolfart S, Wegner SM, Al-Halabi A, Kern M (2003) Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation. Int J Prosthodont 16:587–592PubMed Wolfart S, Wegner SM, Al-Halabi A, Kern M (2003) Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation. Int J Prosthodont 16:587–592PubMed
24.
go back to reference Pfeiffer J (1999) Dental CAD/CAM technologies: the optical impression (II). Int J Comput Dent 2:65–72PubMed Pfeiffer J (1999) Dental CAD/CAM technologies: the optical impression (II). Int J Comput Dent 2:65–72PubMed
Metadata
Title
Measurement of cement thickness under lithium disilicate crowns using an impression material technique
Authors
Sven Reich
Sophia Uhlen
Stephan Gozdowski
Ulrich Lohbauer
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0414-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Clinical Oral Investigations 4/2011 Go to the issue