Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 6/2010

01-12-2010 | Original Article

Ex vivo radiographic tooth length measurements with the reference sphere method (RSM)

Authors: Felix Roeder, Dan Brüllmann, Bernd d’Hoedt, Ralf Schulze

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 6/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

A reference-based radiographic “reference sphere method” (RSM) for accurate length measurements in (dental) projection radiographs for the assessment of tooth length in dry human mandible sections is evaluated. RSM determines the depth coordinates of reference spheres placed in the object plane from the elliptical distortion of their shadows. Two segments (one canine and one molar) of dry human mandibles were exposed 95 times at different angulations (0–40°) on a dental charge-coupled device receptor. Three steel spheres (diameters d 1 = 2.00 mm, d 2 = 3.00 mm) were attached roughly coplanar with the tooth’s main axis. Radiographs were assessed once by visual inspection plus manual landmark identification with a mouse-driven cursor. The results were compared to the true tooth length assessed after extraction and to a conventional method (C), i.e., the rule of proportion based on magnification of the sphere shadows. Mean relative length error was 2.28% (d 1) and 0.46% (d 2) for RSM and −13.58% (d 1) and −9.90% (d 2) for C. For both methods, length errors were significantly (p < 0.0001) correlated with the inclination relative to the receptor. RSM allows for complete a posteriori determination of the imaging geometry under the assumption of a known source-to-receptor distance. One specific application is foreshortening correction of objects coplanar with the reference spheres. Remaining errors are mainly due to incorrect landmark definition. In our setup, these were exaggerated by the visual/manual image-evaluation process. Automated image analysis has been shown for similar tasks to minimize these errors considerably.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Van Aken J (1969) Optimum conditions for intraoral roentgenograms. Oral Surg 27:475–491CrossRef Van Aken J (1969) Optimum conditions for intraoral roentgenograms. Oral Surg 27:475–491CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Schulze R, d’Hoedt B (2002) A method to calculate angular disparities between object and receptor in “paralleling technique”. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 31:32–38CrossRefPubMed Schulze R, d’Hoedt B (2002) A method to calculate angular disparities between object and receptor in “paralleling technique”. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 31:32–38CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kim TS, Obst C, Zehaczek S, Geenen C (2008) Detection of bone loss with different X-ray techniques in periodontal patients. J Periodontol 79:1141–1149CrossRefPubMed Kim TS, Obst C, Zehaczek S, Geenen C (2008) Detection of bone loss with different X-ray techniques in periodontal patients. J Periodontol 79:1141–1149CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Steffensen B, Suzuki H, Caffesse RG, Ash MM (1987) Repair of periodontal angular bony defects evaluated by one- and two-dimensional radiographic analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 63:109–114 Steffensen B, Suzuki H, Caffesse RG, Ash MM (1987) Repair of periodontal angular bony defects evaluated by one- and two-dimensional radiographic analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 63:109–114
5.
go back to reference Benn DK (1990) A review of the reliability of radiographic measurements in estimating alveolar bone changes. J Clin Periodontol 17:14–21CrossRefPubMed Benn DK (1990) A review of the reliability of radiographic measurements in estimating alveolar bone changes. J Clin Periodontol 17:14–21CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Eickholz P, Riess T, Lenhard M, Haßfeld S, Staehle HJ (1999) Digital radiography of interproximal bone loss. J Clin Periodontol 26:294–300CrossRefPubMed Eickholz P, Riess T, Lenhard M, Haßfeld S, Staehle HJ (1999) Digital radiography of interproximal bone loss. J Clin Periodontol 26:294–300CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Williams CB, Joyce AP, Roberts S (2006) A comparison between in vivo radiographic working length determination and measurement after extraction. J Endod 32:624–627CrossRefPubMed Williams CB, Joyce AP, Roberts S (2006) A comparison between in vivo radiographic working length determination and measurement after extraction. J Endod 32:624–627CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Schulze R, d’Hoedt B (2001) Mathematical analysis of projection errors in “paralleling technique” with respect to implant geometry. Clin Oral Implants Res 12:364–371CrossRefPubMed Schulze R, d’Hoedt B (2001) Mathematical analysis of projection errors in “paralleling technique” with respect to implant geometry. Clin Oral Implants Res 12:364–371CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Payne AGT, Solomons YF, Lowine JF (1999) Standardization of radiographs for mandibular implant-supported overdentures: review and innovation. Clin Oral Implants Res 10:307–319CrossRefPubMed Payne AGT, Solomons YF, Lowine JF (1999) Standardization of radiographs for mandibular implant-supported overdentures: review and innovation. Clin Oral Implants Res 10:307–319CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Dixon CA, Hildebolt CF (2005) An overview of radiographic film holders. Dentmaxillofac Radiol 34:67–73CrossRef Dixon CA, Hildebolt CF (2005) An overview of radiographic film holders. Dentmaxillofac Radiol 34:67–73CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Dubrez B, Jacot-Dsecombes S, Cimasoni G (1995) Reliability of a paralleling instrument for dental radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 80:358–364CrossRefPubMed Dubrez B, Jacot-Dsecombes S, Cimasoni G (1995) Reliability of a paralleling instrument for dental radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 80:358–364CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Zappa U, Simona C, Graf H, van Aken J (1991) In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel filmholder and an x-ray beam manipulator. J Periodontol 62:674–683PubMed Zappa U, Simona C, Graf H, van Aken J (1991) In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel filmholder and an x-ray beam manipulator. J Periodontol 62:674–683PubMed
13.
go back to reference Eickholz P, Hausmann E (2000) Accuracy of radiographic assessment of interproximal bone loss in intrabony defects using linear measurements. Eur J Oral Sci 108:70–73CrossRefPubMed Eickholz P, Hausmann E (2000) Accuracy of radiographic assessment of interproximal bone loss in intrabony defects using linear measurements. Eur J Oral Sci 108:70–73CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Behneke N, Tetsch P (1985) Diagnostik und Planung von Implantaten im zahnlosen Unterkiefer. Fortsch Zahnärztl Implantol 1:266–271 Behneke N, Tetsch P (1985) Diagnostik und Planung von Implantaten im zahnlosen Unterkiefer. Fortsch Zahnärztl Implantol 1:266–271
15.
go back to reference Schulze R, Bruellmann DD, Roeder F, d’Hoedt B (2004) Determination of projection geometry from quantitative assessment of the distortion of spherical references in single-view projection radiography. Med Phys 31:2849–2854CrossRefPubMed Schulze R, Bruellmann DD, Roeder F, d’Hoedt B (2004) Determination of projection geometry from quantitative assessment of the distortion of spherical references in single-view projection radiography. Med Phys 31:2849–2854CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Hilbert D, Cohn-Vossen S (1999) The cylinder, the cone, the conic sections and their surfaces of revolution. In: Geometry and the imagination, 2nd edn. Chelsea Publishing Company, New York, pp 7–9 Hilbert D, Cohn-Vossen S (1999) The cylinder, the cone, the conic sections and their surfaces of revolution. In: Geometry and the imagination, 2nd edn. Chelsea Publishing Company, New York, pp 7–9
17.
go back to reference Bronstein IN, Semendjajew KA, Musiol G, Mühlig H (2000) Analytische Geometrie des Raumes. In: Taschenbuch der Mathematik, 5th edn. Verlag Harri Deutsch, Thun und Frankfurt am Main, pp 220–226 Bronstein IN, Semendjajew KA, Musiol G, Mühlig H (2000) Analytische Geometrie des Raumes. In: Taschenbuch der Mathematik, 5th edn. Verlag Harri Deutsch, Thun und Frankfurt am Main, pp 220–226
18.
go back to reference Schropp L, Stavropoulos A, Gotfredsen E, Wenzal A (2009) Calibration of radiographs by a reference metal ball affects preoperative selection of implant size. Clin Oral Invest (in press) Schropp L, Stavropoulos A, Gotfredsen E, Wenzal A (2009) Calibration of radiographs by a reference metal ball affects preoperative selection of implant size. Clin Oral Invest (in press)
19.
go back to reference Tyndall AA, Brooks SL (2000) Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89:630–637CrossRefPubMed Tyndall AA, Brooks SL (2000) Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89:630–637CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference BouSerhal C, Jacobs R, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D (2002) Imaging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 4:156–172CrossRefPubMed BouSerhal C, Jacobs R, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D (2002) Imaging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 4:156–172CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Volchansky A, Cleaton-Jones P, Drummond S, Bönecker M (2006) Technique for linear measurement on panoramic and periapical radiographs: a pilot study. Quintessence Int 37:191–197PubMed Volchansky A, Cleaton-Jones P, Drummond S, Bönecker M (2006) Technique for linear measurement on panoramic and periapical radiographs: a pilot study. Quintessence Int 37:191–197PubMed
22.
go back to reference Schulze R, Heil U, Weinheimer O, Gross D, Bruellmann DD, Thomas E, Schwanecke U, Schoemer E (2008) Accurate registration of random radiographic projections based on three spherical references for the purpose of few-view 3D reconstruction. Med Phys 35:546–555CrossRefPubMed Schulze R, Heil U, Weinheimer O, Gross D, Bruellmann DD, Thomas E, Schwanecke U, Schoemer E (2008) Accurate registration of random radiographic projections based on three spherical references for the purpose of few-view 3D reconstruction. Med Phys 35:546–555CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Schulze R, Weinheimer O, Bruellmann DD, Roeder F, d’Hoedt B, Schoemer E (2005) Software for automated application of a reference-based method for a posteriori determination of the effective radiographic image geometry. Dentmaxillofac Radiol 34:205–211CrossRef Schulze R, Weinheimer O, Bruellmann DD, Roeder F, d’Hoedt B, Schoemer E (2005) Software for automated application of a reference-based method for a posteriori determination of the effective radiographic image geometry. Dentmaxillofac Radiol 34:205–211CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Weijers RE, Kessels AG, Walenkamp GH, van Mameren H, Kemerink GJ (2005) Effect of tube angulation on the measurement of intermetatarsal angles. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 95:370–375PubMed Weijers RE, Kessels AG, Walenkamp GH, van Mameren H, Kemerink GJ (2005) Effect of tube angulation on the measurement of intermetatarsal angles. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 95:370–375PubMed
25.
go back to reference Weijers R, Kemerink G, van Mameren H, Walenkamp G, Kessels AG (2005) The intermetatarsal and metatarsal declination angles: geometry as a source of error. Foot Ankle Int 26:387–393PubMed Weijers R, Kemerink G, van Mameren H, Walenkamp G, Kessels AG (2005) The intermetatarsal and metatarsal declination angles: geometry as a source of error. Foot Ankle Int 26:387–393PubMed
26.
go back to reference Camasta CA, Pontious J, Boyd RB (1991) Quantifying magnification in pedal radiographs. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 81:545–548PubMed Camasta CA, Pontious J, Boyd RB (1991) Quantifying magnification in pedal radiographs. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 81:545–548PubMed
27.
go back to reference Cheng AC, Lew KK, Bhole S (1997) Head positioning and projection errors in submentovertex radiographic analysis. Singapore Dent J 22:13–17PubMed Cheng AC, Lew KK, Bhole S (1997) Head positioning and projection errors in submentovertex radiographic analysis. Singapore Dent J 22:13–17PubMed
28.
go back to reference Malkoc S, Sari Z, Usumez S, Koyuturk AE (2005) The effect of head rotation on cephalometric radiographs. Eur J Orthod 27:315–321CrossRefPubMed Malkoc S, Sari Z, Usumez S, Koyuturk AE (2005) The effect of head rotation on cephalometric radiographs. Eur J Orthod 27:315–321CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Yoon YJ, Kim KS, Hwang MS, Kim HJ, Choi EH, Kim KW (2001) Effect of head rotation on lateral cephalometric radiographs. Angle Orthod 71:396–403PubMed Yoon YJ, Kim KS, Hwang MS, Kim HJ, Choi EH, Kim KW (2001) Effect of head rotation on lateral cephalometric radiographs. Angle Orthod 71:396–403PubMed
30.
go back to reference Yoon YJ, Kim DH, Yu PS, Kim HJ, Choi EH, Kim KW (2002) Effect of head rotation on posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs. Angle Orthod 72:36–42PubMed Yoon YJ, Kim DH, Yu PS, Kim HJ, Choi EH, Kim KW (2002) Effect of head rotation on posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs. Angle Orthod 72:36–42PubMed
31.
go back to reference Frobin W, Brinckmann P, Leivseth G, Biggemann M, Reikeras O (1996) Precision measurement of segmental motion from flexion–extension radiographs of the lumbar spine. Clin Biomech 11:457–465CrossRef Frobin W, Brinckmann P, Leivseth G, Biggemann M, Reikeras O (1996) Precision measurement of segmental motion from flexion–extension radiographs of the lumbar spine. Clin Biomech 11:457–465CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Leivseth G, Kolstad F, Nygaard OP, Zoega B, Frobin W, Brinckmann P (2006) Comparing precision of distortion-compensated and stereophotogrammetric roentgen analysis when monitoring fusion in the cervical spine. Eur Spine J 15:774–779CrossRefPubMed Leivseth G, Kolstad F, Nygaard OP, Zoega B, Frobin W, Brinckmann P (2006) Comparing precision of distortion-compensated and stereophotogrammetric roentgen analysis when monitoring fusion in the cervical spine. Eur Spine J 15:774–779CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Owens EF Jr (1992) Line drawing analysis of static cervical X ray used in chiropractic. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 15:442–449PubMed Owens EF Jr (1992) Line drawing analysis of static cervical X ray used in chiropractic. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 15:442–449PubMed
Metadata
Title
Ex vivo radiographic tooth length measurements with the reference sphere method (RSM)
Authors
Felix Roeder
Dan Brüllmann
Bernd d’Hoedt
Ralf Schulze
Publication date
01-12-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 6/2010
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0350-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2010

Clinical Oral Investigations 6/2010 Go to the issue