Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 4/2010

01-08-2010 | Original Article

The effect of thread design on stress distribution in a solid screw implant: a 3D finite element analysis

Authors: Oğuz Eraslan, Özgür İnan

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 4/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

The biomechanical behavior of implant thread plays an important role on stresses at implant-bone interface. Information about the effect of different thread profiles upon the bone stresses is limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different implant thread designs on stress distribution characteristics at supporting structures. In this study, three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) stress-analysis method was used. Four types of 3D mathematical models simulating four different thread-form configurations for a solid screw implant was prepared with supporting bone structure. V-thread (1), buttress (2), reverse buttress (3), and square thread designs were simulated. A 100-N static axial occlusal load was applied to occlusal surface of abutment to calculate the stress distributions. Solidworks/Cosmosworks structural analysis programs were used for FE modeling/analysis. The analysis of the von Mises stress values revealed that maximum stress concentrations were located at loading areas of implant abutments and cervical cortical bone regions for all models. Stress concentration at cortical bone (18.3 MPa) was higher than spongious bone (13.3 MPa), and concentration of first thread (18 MPa) was higher than other threads (13.3 MPa). It was seen that, while the von Mises stress distribution patterns at different implant thread models were similar, the concentration of compressive stresses were different. The present study showed that the use of different thread form designs did not affect the von Mises concentration at supporting bone structure. However, the compressive stress concentrations differ by various thread profiles.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Beer FP, DeWolf JT, Johnston ER (2005) Mechanics of materials, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill International, Singapore, pp 360–378 Beer FP, DeWolf JT, Johnston ER (2005) Mechanics of materials, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill International, Singapore, pp 360–378
2.
go back to reference Brunski JB (1999) In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental–implant interface. Adv Dent Res 13:99CrossRefPubMed Brunski JB (1999) In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental–implant interface. Adv Dent Res 13:99CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Chen J, Xu L (1994) A finite element analysis of the human temporomandibular joint. J Biomech Eng 116:401–407CrossRefPubMed Chen J, Xu L (1994) A finite element analysis of the human temporomandibular joint. J Biomech Eng 116:401–407CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Chun HJ, Cheong SY, Han JH, Heo SJ, Chung JP, Rhyu IC, Choi YC, Baik HK, Ku Y, Kim MH (2002) Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil 29:565–574CrossRefPubMed Chun HJ, Cheong SY, Han JH, Heo SJ, Chung JP, Rhyu IC, Choi YC, Baik HK, Ku Y, Kim MH (2002) Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil 29:565–574CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Cook SD, Klawitter JJ, Weinstein AM (1982) A model for the implant-bone interface characteristics of porous dental implants. J Dent Res 61:1006–1009PubMed Cook SD, Klawitter JJ, Weinstein AM (1982) A model for the implant-bone interface characteristics of porous dental implants. J Dent Res 61:1006–1009PubMed
6.
go back to reference Cruz M, Wassall T, Toledo EM, Barra LP, Lemonge AC (2003) Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18:675–684PubMed Cruz M, Wassall T, Toledo EM, Barra LP, Lemonge AC (2003) Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18:675–684PubMed
7.
go back to reference Geng JP, Ma XX (1995) A differential mathematical model to evaluate side-surface of an Archimede implant. Shanghai Shengwu Gongcheng Yixue 50:19 Geng JP, Ma XX (1995) A differential mathematical model to evaluate side-surface of an Archimede implant. Shanghai Shengwu Gongcheng Yixue 50:19
8.
go back to reference Geng JP, Ma QS, XU W, Tan KBC, Liu GR (2004) Finite element analysis of four thread-form configurations in a stepped screw implant. J Oral Rehabil 31:233–239CrossRefPubMed Geng JP, Ma QS, XU W, Tan KBC, Liu GR (2004) Finite element analysis of four thread-form configurations in a stepped screw implant. J Oral Rehabil 31:233–239CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hansson S, Werke M (2003) The implant thread as a retention element in cortical bone: the effect of thread size and thread profile: a finite element study. J Biomech 36:1247–1258CrossRefPubMed Hansson S, Werke M (2003) The implant thread as a retention element in cortical bone: the effect of thread size and thread profile: a finite element study. J Biomech 36:1247–1258CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ivanoff CH, Grönhahl K, Sennerby L, Bergström C, Lekholm U (1999) Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14:173–180PubMed Ivanoff CH, Grönhahl K, Sennerby L, Bergström C, Lekholm U (1999) Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14:173–180PubMed
11.
go back to reference Kong L, Hu K, Li D, Song Y, Yang J, Wu Z, Liu B (2008) Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 23:65–74PubMed Kong L, Hu K, Li D, Song Y, Yang J, Wu Z, Liu B (2008) Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 23:65–74PubMed
12.
go back to reference Misch CE (2005) Dental implant prosthetics. Mosby, St Louis, pp 322–347 Misch CE (2005) Dental implant prosthetics. Mosby, St Louis, pp 322–347
13.
go back to reference Pegoretti A, Fambri L, Zappini G, Bianchetti M (2002) Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials 23:2667–2682CrossRefPubMed Pegoretti A, Fambri L, Zappini G, Bianchetti M (2002) Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials 23:2667–2682CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Pierrisnard L, Bohin F, Renault P, Barquins M (2002) Corono-radicular reconstruction of pulpless teeth: a mechanical study using finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 88:442–448CrossRefPubMed Pierrisnard L, Bohin F, Renault P, Barquins M (2002) Corono-radicular reconstruction of pulpless teeth: a mechanical study using finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 88:442–448CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Rieger MR, Adams WK, Kinzel GL (1990) Finite element survey of eleven endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 63:457CrossRefPubMed Rieger MR, Adams WK, Kinzel GL (1990) Finite element survey of eleven endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 63:457CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sevimay M, Usumez A, Eskitascioglu G (2005) The influence of various occlusal materials on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: a three-dimensional finite-element study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 73:140–147PubMed Sevimay M, Usumez A, Eskitascioglu G (2005) The influence of various occlusal materials on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: a three-dimensional finite-element study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 73:140–147PubMed
17.
go back to reference Singley JE, Mischke CR (1989) Mechanical engineering design, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 123–157 Singley JE, Mischke CR (1989) Mechanical engineering design, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 123–157
18.
go back to reference Timoshenko S, Young DH (1968) Elements of strength of materials, 5th edn. Wadsworth, Florence, p 377 Timoshenko S, Young DH (1968) Elements of strength of materials, 5th edn. Wadsworth, Florence, p 377
19.
go back to reference Ugural AC, Fenster SK (2003) Advanced strength and applied elasticity, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, New York, pp 155–157 Ugural AC, Fenster SK (2003) Advanced strength and applied elasticity, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, New York, pp 155–157
20.
go back to reference Valen M (1983) The relationship between endosteal implant design and function: maximum stress distribution with computerformed three-dimensional Flexi-cup blades. J Oral Implantol 11:49PubMed Valen M (1983) The relationship between endosteal implant design and function: maximum stress distribution with computerformed three-dimensional Flexi-cup blades. J Oral Implantol 11:49PubMed
21.
go back to reference Valen M, Locante WM (2000) LaminOss immediate-load implants: 1. Introducing osteocompression in dentistry. J Oral Implantol 26:177CrossRefPubMed Valen M, Locante WM (2000) LaminOss immediate-load implants: 1. Introducing osteocompression in dentistry. J Oral Implantol 26:177CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Van Oosterwyck H, Duyck J, Vander S, Van der Perre G, De Cooman M, Lievens S, Puers R, Naert I (1998) The influence of bone mechanical properties and implant fixation upon bone loading around oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 9:407CrossRefPubMed Van Oosterwyck H, Duyck J, Vander S, Van der Perre G, De Cooman M, Lievens S, Puers R, Naert I (1998) The influence of bone mechanical properties and implant fixation upon bone loading around oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 9:407CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Weinstein AM, Klawitter JJ, Cook SD (1980) Implant-bone interface characteristic of bioglass dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res 14:23–29CrossRefPubMed Weinstein AM, Klawitter JJ, Cook SD (1980) Implant-bone interface characteristic of bioglass dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res 14:23–29CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Wiskott HW, Belser UC (1999) Lack of integration of smooth titanium surfaces: a working hypothesis based on strains generated in the surrounding bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 10:429–444CrossRefPubMed Wiskott HW, Belser UC (1999) Lack of integration of smooth titanium surfaces: a working hypothesis based on strains generated in the surrounding bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 10:429–444CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Yang HS, Lang LA, Molina A, Felton DA (2001) The effects of dowel design and load direction on dowel-and-core restorations. J Prosthet Dent 85:558–567CrossRefPubMed Yang HS, Lang LA, Molina A, Felton DA (2001) The effects of dowel design and load direction on dowel-and-core restorations. J Prosthet Dent 85:558–567CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The effect of thread design on stress distribution in a solid screw implant: a 3D finite element analysis
Authors
Oğuz Eraslan
Özgür İnan
Publication date
01-08-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 4/2010
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0305-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2010

Clinical Oral Investigations 4/2010 Go to the issue