Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Science 6/2012

01-11-2012 | Original Article

The failure mode of two reabsorbable fixation systems: Swivelock with Fibertape versus Bio-Corkscrew with Fiberwire in bovine rotator cuff

Authors: Angelo De Carli, Riccardo Maria Lanzetti, Edoardo Monaco, Luca Labianca, Luigi Mossa, Andrea Feretti

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Science | Issue 6/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite technical advances in rotator cuff surgery, recurrent or persistent defects in the repaired tendon continue to occur. The improved strength of sutures and suture anchors has shown that the most common site of failure is the suture–tendon interface. The purpose of this study was to compare two different types of repair under both cyclic and load-to-failure conditions. The hypothesis is that the use of a fixation system with knotless anchor and taped suture results in better biomechanical performance, under both cyclic and load-to-failure conditions.

Methods

Thirty bovine shoulder specimens were randomly assigned to two group tests: the Swivelock 5-mm anchor with Fibertape (Group A) and the Bio-Corkscrew 5 mm with Fiberwire (Group B). We simulated the reconstruction of a rotator cuff tear with a single-row technique, performing a tenodesis with types A and B fixation.
Each specimen underwent cyclic testing from 5 to 30 N for 30 cycles, followed by load-to-failure testing, in order to calculate the ultimate failure load (UFL).

Results

Load-to-failure tests revealed a significantly higher UFL in Group A than in Group B. Wire fixing failed at the anchor loop whereas tape fixing failed at the sutures, suture–tendon interface, and anchors. Cyclic testing revealed no significantly greater slippage between the two groups. Stiffness values were not statistically significantly different. In all cases, tendons remained intact until the end of the cyclic testing.

Conclusions

The tape structure is biomechanically stronger than the wire structure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lo IK, Burkhart SS. Double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: re-establishing the footprint of the rotator cuff. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(9):1035–42.PubMedCrossRef Lo IK, Burkhart SS. Double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: re-establishing the footprint of the rotator cuff. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(9):1035–42.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kim SH, Ha KI, Park JH, Kang JS, Oh SK, Oh I. Arthroscopic versus mini-open salvage repair of the rotator cuff tear: outcome analysis at 2–6 years’ follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(7):746–54.PubMedCrossRef Kim SH, Ha KI, Park JH, Kang JS, Oh SK, Oh I. Arthroscopic versus mini-open salvage repair of the rotator cuff tear: outcome analysis at 2–6 years’ follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(7):746–54.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Severud EL, Ruotolo C, Abbott DD, Nottage WM. All-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a long-term retrospective outcome comparison. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(3):234–8.PubMedCrossRef Severud EL, Ruotolo C, Abbott DD, Nottage WM. All-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a long-term retrospective outcome comparison. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(3):234–8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fealy S, Kingham TP, Altchek DW. Mini-open rotator cuff repair using a two-row fixation technique: outcomes analysis in patients with small, moderate, and large rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 2002;18(6):665–70.PubMedCrossRef Fealy S, Kingham TP, Altchek DW. Mini-open rotator cuff repair using a two-row fixation technique: outcomes analysis in patients with small, moderate, and large rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 2002;18(6):665–70.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gerber C, Fuchs B, Hodler J. The results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2000;82(4):505–15. Gerber C, Fuchs B, Hodler J. The results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2000;82(4):505–15.
6.
go back to reference Apreleva M, Ozbaydar M, Fitzgibbons PG, Warner JJ. Rotator cuff tears: the effect of the reconstruction method on three-dimensional repair site area. Arthroscopy. 2002;18(5):519–26.PubMedCrossRef Apreleva M, Ozbaydar M, Fitzgibbons PG, Warner JJ. Rotator cuff tears: the effect of the reconstruction method on three-dimensional repair site area. Arthroscopy. 2002;18(5):519–26.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tuoheti Y, Itoi E, Yamamoto N, Seki N, Abe H, Minagawa H, Okada K, Shimada Y. Contact area, contact pressure, and pressure patterns of the tendon–bone interface after rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(12):1869–74.PubMedCrossRef Tuoheti Y, Itoi E, Yamamoto N, Seki N, Abe H, Minagawa H, Okada K, Shimada Y. Contact area, contact pressure, and pressure patterns of the tendon–bone interface after rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(12):1869–74.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cole BJ, ElAttrache NS, Anbari A. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: an anatomic and biomechanical rationale for different suture–anchor repair configurations. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(6):662–9.PubMedCrossRef Cole BJ, ElAttrache NS, Anbari A. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: an anatomic and biomechanical rationale for different suture–anchor repair configurations. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(6):662–9.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Anderson K, Boothby M, Aschenbrener D, van Holsbeeck M. Outcome and structural integrity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using 2 rows of fixation: minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(12):1899–905.PubMedCrossRef Anderson K, Boothby M, Aschenbrener D, van Holsbeeck M. Outcome and structural integrity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using 2 rows of fixation: minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(12):1899–905.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bishop J, Klepps S, Lo IK, Bird J, Gladstone JN, Flatow EL. Cuff integrity after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair: a prospective study. J Should Elbow Surg. 2006;15(3):290–9.CrossRef Bishop J, Klepps S, Lo IK, Bird J, Gladstone JN, Flatow EL. Cuff integrity after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair: a prospective study. J Should Elbow Surg. 2006;15(3):290–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Boileau P, Brassart N, Watkinson DJ, Carles M, Hatzidakis AM, Krishnan SG. Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal? J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2005;87(6):1229–40.CrossRef Boileau P, Brassart N, Watkinson DJ, Carles M, Hatzidakis AM, Krishnan SG. Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal? J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2005;87(6):1229–40.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Galatz LM, Ball CM, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Yamaguchi K. The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2004;86-A(2):219–24. Galatz LM, Ball CM, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Yamaguchi K. The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2004;86-A(2):219–24.
13.
go back to reference Kim DH, Elattrache NS, Tibone JE, Jun BJ, DeLaMora SN, Kvitne RS, Lee TQ. Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(3):407–14.PubMedCrossRef Kim DH, Elattrache NS, Tibone JE, Jun BJ, DeLaMora SN, Kvitne RS, Lee TQ. Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(3):407–14.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Baleani M, Schrader S, Veronesi CA, Rotini R, Giardino R, Toni A. Surgical repair of the rotator cuff: a biomechanical evaluation of different tendon grasping and bone suture fixation techniques. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2003;18(8):721–9.CrossRef Baleani M, Schrader S, Veronesi CA, Rotini R, Giardino R, Toni A. Surgical repair of the rotator cuff: a biomechanical evaluation of different tendon grasping and bone suture fixation techniques. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2003;18(8):721–9.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference De Carli A, Vadalà A, Monaco E, Labianca L, Zanzotto E, Ferretti A. Effect of cyclic loading on new polyblend suture coupled with different anchors. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(2):214–9.PubMedCrossRef De Carli A, Vadalà A, Monaco E, Labianca L, Zanzotto E, Ferretti A. Effect of cyclic loading on new polyblend suture coupled with different anchors. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(2):214–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bisson LJ, Manohar LM, Wilkins RD, Gurske-Deperio J, Ehrensberger MT. Influence of suture material on biomechanical behaviour of suture–tendon specimens: a controlled study in bovine rotator cuff. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(5):907–12.PubMedCrossRef Bisson LJ, Manohar LM, Wilkins RD, Gurske-Deperio J, Ehrensberger MT. Influence of suture material on biomechanical behaviour of suture–tendon specimens: a controlled study in bovine rotator cuff. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(5):907–12.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Koganti AK, Adamson GJ, Gregersen CS, Pink MM, Shankwiler JA. Biomechanical comparison of traditional and locked suture configurations for arthroscopic repairs of the rotator cuff. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(11):1832–8.PubMedCrossRef Koganti AK, Adamson GJ, Gregersen CS, Pink MM, Shankwiler JA. Biomechanical comparison of traditional and locked suture configurations for arthroscopic repairs of the rotator cuff. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(11):1832–8.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Petit CJ, Boswell R, Mahar A, Tasto J, Pedowitz RA. Biomechanical evaluation of a new technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(6):849–53.PubMed Petit CJ, Boswell R, Mahar A, Tasto J, Pedowitz RA. Biomechanical evaluation of a new technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(6):849–53.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Schneeberger AG, von Roll A, Kalberer F, Jacob HA, Gerber C. Mechanical strength of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques: an in vitro study. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2002;84-A(12):2152–60. Schneeberger AG, von Roll A, Kalberer F, Jacob HA, Gerber C. Mechanical strength of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques: an in vitro study. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2002;84-A(12):2152–60.
20.
go back to reference Park MC, Pirolo JM, Park CJ, Tibone JE, McGarry MH, Lee TQ. The effect of abduction and rotation on footprint contact for single-row, double-row, and modified double-row rotator cuff repair techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(8):1599–608.PubMedCrossRef Park MC, Pirolo JM, Park CJ, Tibone JE, McGarry MH, Lee TQ. The effect of abduction and rotation on footprint contact for single-row, double-row, and modified double-row rotator cuff repair techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(8):1599–608.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Mihata T, Fukuhara T, Jun BJ, Watanabe C, Kinoshita M. Effect of shoulder abduction angle on biomechanical properties of the repaired rotator cuff tendons with 3 types of double-row technique. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(3):551–6.PubMedCrossRef Mihata T, Fukuhara T, Jun BJ, Watanabe C, Kinoshita M. Effect of shoulder abduction angle on biomechanical properties of the repaired rotator cuff tendons with 3 types of double-row technique. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(3):551–6.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Burkhart SS. The deadman theory of suture anchors: observations along a south Texas fence line. Arthroscopy. 1995;11(1):119–23.PubMedCrossRef Burkhart SS. The deadman theory of suture anchors: observations along a south Texas fence line. Arthroscopy. 1995;11(1):119–23.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Liporace FA, Bono CM, Caruso SA, Weiner B, Penny K, Feldman AJ, Grossman MG, Haher TR. The mechanical effects of suture anchor insertion angle for rotator cuff repair. Orthopedics. 2002;25(4):399–402.PubMed Liporace FA, Bono CM, Caruso SA, Weiner B, Penny K, Feldman AJ, Grossman MG, Haher TR. The mechanical effects of suture anchor insertion angle for rotator cuff repair. Orthopedics. 2002;25(4):399–402.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Ma CB, Comerford L, Wilson J, Puttlitz CM. Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: double-row compared with single row fixation. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2006;88(2):403–10.CrossRef Ma CB, Comerford L, Wilson J, Puttlitz CM. Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: double-row compared with single row fixation. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2006;88(2):403–10.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Park MC, Tibone JE, ElAttrache NS, Ahmad CS, Jun BJ, Lee TQ. Part II: biomechanical assessment for a footprint-restoring transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique. J Should Elbow Surg. 2007;16(4):469–76.CrossRef Park MC, Tibone JE, ElAttrache NS, Ahmad CS, Jun BJ, Lee TQ. Part II: biomechanical assessment for a footprint-restoring transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique. J Should Elbow Surg. 2007;16(4):469–76.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ma CB, MacGillivray JD, Clabeaux J, Lee S, Otis JC. Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff stitches. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2004;86-A(6):1211–6. Ma CB, MacGillivray JD, Clabeaux J, Lee S, Otis JC. Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff stitches. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2004;86-A(6):1211–6.
27.
go back to reference Curtis AS, Burbank KM, Tierney JJ, Scheller AD, Curran AR. The insertional footprint of the rotator cuff: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(6):609.e1. Curtis AS, Burbank KM, Tierney JJ, Scheller AD, Curran AR. The insertional footprint of the rotator cuff: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(6):609.e1.
28.
go back to reference Meier SW, Meier JD. Rotator cuff repair: the effect of double row fixation on three-dimensional repair site. J Should Elbow Surg. 2006;15(6):691–6.CrossRef Meier SW, Meier JD. Rotator cuff repair: the effect of double row fixation on three-dimensional repair site. J Should Elbow Surg. 2006;15(6):691–6.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Mazzocca AD, Millett PJ, Guanche CA, Santangelo SA, Arciero RA. Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(12):1861–8.PubMedCrossRef Mazzocca AD, Millett PJ, Guanche CA, Santangelo SA, Arciero RA. Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(12):1861–8.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Franceschi F, Ruzzini L, Longo UG, Martina FM, Zobel BB, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Equivalent clinical result of arthroscopic single-row and double-row suture anchor repair for rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(8):1254–60.PubMedCrossRef Franceschi F, Ruzzini L, Longo UG, Martina FM, Zobel BB, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Equivalent clinical result of arthroscopic single-row and double-row suture anchor repair for rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(8):1254–60.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Trantalis JN, Boorman RS, Pletsch K, Lo Ik. Medial rotator cuff failure after arthroscopic double row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(6):727–31.PubMedCrossRef Trantalis JN, Boorman RS, Pletsch K, Lo Ik. Medial rotator cuff failure after arthroscopic double row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(6):727–31.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Dugas JR, Campbell DA, Warren RF, Robie BH, Millett PJ. Anatomy and dimensions of rotator cuff insertions. J Should Elbow Surg. 2002;11(5):498–503.CrossRef Dugas JR, Campbell DA, Warren RF, Robie BH, Millett PJ. Anatomy and dimensions of rotator cuff insertions. J Should Elbow Surg. 2002;11(5):498–503.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Ruotolo C, Fow JE, Nottage WM. The supraspinatus footprint: an anatomic study of the supraspinatus insertion. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(3):246–9.PubMedCrossRef Ruotolo C, Fow JE, Nottage WM. The supraspinatus footprint: an anatomic study of the supraspinatus insertion. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(3):246–9.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The failure mode of two reabsorbable fixation systems: Swivelock with Fibertape versus Bio-Corkscrew with Fiberwire in bovine rotator cuff
Authors
Angelo De Carli
Riccardo Maria Lanzetti
Edoardo Monaco
Luca Labianca
Luigi Mossa
Andrea Feretti
Publication date
01-11-2012
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Science / Issue 6/2012
Print ISSN: 0949-2658
Electronic ISSN: 1436-2023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-012-0275-z

Other articles of this Issue 6/2012

Journal of Orthopaedic Science 6/2012 Go to the issue