Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Women's Mental Health 6/2010

01-12-2010 | Original Article

Women’s responses to postnatal self-report mood and experience measures: does anonymity make a difference?

Authors: Stephen Matthey, Tracey White, Sarah Rice

Published in: Archives of Women's Mental Health | Issue 6/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate whether endorsement of “difficulty coping” questions on two self-report measures would be affected by whether or not women had to put their name on the questionnaires. In addition, a small survey of mental health professionals was conducted to see what they thought the study would find. Women (n = 211) attending maternal and child health clinics completed two self-report measures of mood and experience of motherhood. Women were either asked to write their name on the forms and were told that the project officer would check their forms once completed (“named” condition) or asked not to put their name on the forms and that the forms would not be looked at (“anonymous” condition). Perinatal mental health professionals (n = 44) completed an anonymous survey asking them what they considered the study would find. Most health professionals (77.3%) expected that the anonymous condition would result in more “honest” responding by women—that is, there would be a higher rate of women admitting to not coping in the anonymous condition. To the contrary, however, this was not found. There were no differences between the rates of endorsement of “not currently coping” by women in the two conditions, a finding only expected by 13.6% of the professionals. There was a small, but statistically significant, difference in women reporting whether they had a prior history of difficulty coping, with more women in the named condition endorsing this. Rates of postnatal distress or depression, based upon responses to self-report mood or similar questionnaires, are unlikely to be affected by whether participants are required to put their name on the measures or not or whether they anticipate that their responses will be scrutinized. This is an unexpected finding by a sample of mental health professionals interested in the perinatal mental health field, and thus, the study has “new knowledge” significance.
Literature
go back to reference Appolonio KK, Fingerhut R (2008) Postpartum depression in a military sample. Mil Med 173:1085–1091PubMed Appolonio KK, Fingerhut R (2008) Postpartum depression in a military sample. Mil Med 173:1085–1091PubMed
go back to reference Backstrom M, Bjorklund F, Larsson MR (2009) Five-factor inventories have a major general factor related to social desirability which can be reduced by framing items neutrally. J Res Pers 43:335–344CrossRef Backstrom M, Bjorklund F, Larsson MR (2009) Five-factor inventories have a major general factor related to social desirability which can be reduced by framing items neutrally. J Res Pers 43:335–344CrossRef
go back to reference Campbell TC (2005) An introduction to clinical significance: an alternative index of intervention effect for group experimental designs. J Early Interv 27:210–227CrossRef Campbell TC (2005) An introduction to clinical significance: an alternative index of intervention effect for group experimental designs. J Early Interv 27:210–227CrossRef
go back to reference Cox J, Holden J, Sagovsky R (1987) Detection of postnatal depression: development of the 10 item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Brit J Psychiatry 150:782–786CrossRef Cox J, Holden J, Sagovsky R (1987) Detection of postnatal depression: development of the 10 item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Brit J Psychiatry 150:782–786CrossRef
go back to reference Crowne DP, Marlowe D (1960) A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. J Consult Psychol 24:349–354CrossRefPubMed Crowne DP, Marlowe D (1960) A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. J Consult Psychol 24:349–354CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cubison J, Munro J (2005) Acceptability of using a postnatal questionnaire derived from the EPDS as a screening tool for postnatal depression. In: Henshaw C, Elliott S (eds) Screening for perinatal depression. Ch. 15. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London, pp 152–161 Cubison J, Munro J (2005) Acceptability of using a postnatal questionnaire derived from the EPDS as a screening tool for postnatal depression. In: Henshaw C, Elliott S (eds) Screening for perinatal depression. Ch. 15. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London, pp 152–161
go back to reference Curtis R, Robertson P, Forst A, Bradford C (2007) Postpartum mood disorders: results of an online survey. Counsel Psychother Res 7:203–210CrossRef Curtis R, Robertson P, Forst A, Bradford C (2007) Postpartum mood disorders: results of an online survey. Counsel Psychother Res 7:203–210CrossRef
go back to reference Eysenck HJ, Eysenck SBG (1975) Manual of the eysenck personality questionnaire. Hodder and Stoughton, London Eysenck HJ, Eysenck SBG (1975) Manual of the eysenck personality questionnaire. Hodder and Stoughton, London
go back to reference Field T, Morrow C, Healy B, Foster T, Adlestein D, Goldstein S (1991) Mothers with zero Beck Depression scores act more ‘depressed’ with their infants. Develop Psychopathol 3:253–262CrossRef Field T, Morrow C, Healy B, Foster T, Adlestein D, Goldstein S (1991) Mothers with zero Beck Depression scores act more ‘depressed’ with their infants. Develop Psychopathol 3:253–262CrossRef
go back to reference Hall P (2006) Mothers’ experiences of postnatal depression: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Comm Practitioner 79:256–260 Hall P (2006) Mothers’ experiences of postnatal depression: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Comm Practitioner 79:256–260
go back to reference Hathaway SR, McKinley JC (1951) Revised manual for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. The Psychological Corporation, New York Hathaway SR, McKinley JC (1951) Revised manual for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. The Psychological Corporation, New York
go back to reference Holmes JD (2009) Transparency of self-report racial attitude scales. Basic Appl Social Psychol 31:95–101CrossRef Holmes JD (2009) Transparency of self-report racial attitude scales. Basic Appl Social Psychol 31:95–101CrossRef
go back to reference Jaccard J, Becker MA (1997) Statistics for the behavioral sciences, 3rd edn. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove Jaccard J, Becker MA (1997) Statistics for the behavioral sciences, 3rd edn. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove
go back to reference Kline RB (2004) Beyond significance testing: reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research. American Psychological Association, Washington, DCCrossRef Kline RB (2004) Beyond significance testing: reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research. American Psychological Association, Washington, DCCrossRef
go back to reference Leigh B, Milgrom J (2007) Acceptability of antenatal screening for depression in routine antenatal care. Aust J Adv Nurs 24:14–18PubMed Leigh B, Milgrom J (2007) Acceptability of antenatal screening for depression in routine antenatal care. Aust J Adv Nurs 24:14–18PubMed
go back to reference Lipsey MW (1990) Design sensitivity. Sage Publications, Newbury Park Lipsey MW (1990) Design sensitivity. Sage Publications, Newbury Park
go back to reference Lykken DT (1991) What’s wrong with psychology anyway? In: Cicchetti D, Grove W (eds) Thinking clearly about psychology: personality and psychopathology, Chap. 1. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 3–39 Lykken DT (1991) What’s wrong with psychology anyway? In: Cicchetti D, Grove W (eds) Thinking clearly about psychology: personality and psychopathology, Chap. 1. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 3–39
go back to reference Massoudi P, Wickberg B, Hwang P (2007) Screening for postnatal depression in Swedish child health care. Acta Paediatr 96:897–901CrossRefPubMed Massoudi P, Wickberg B, Hwang P (2007) Screening for postnatal depression in Swedish child health care. Acta Paediatr 96:897–901CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Matthey S (1998) p < .05—but is it clinically significant? Practical examples for clinicians. Behav Change 15:140–146 Matthey S (1998) p < .05—but is it clinically significant? Practical examples for clinicians. Behav Change 15:140–146
go back to reference Matthey S (2009) Women’s perceptions of the causes of their postnatal distress: development of the reasons for postnatal distress checklist. Depress Anxiety 26:938–948CrossRefPubMed Matthey S (2009) Women’s perceptions of the causes of their postnatal distress: development of the reasons for postnatal distress checklist. Depress Anxiety 26:938–948CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Matthey S, Speyer J (2008) Changes in unsettled infant sleep and maternal mood following admission to a parentcraft residential unit. Early Hum Dev 84:623–629CrossRefPubMed Matthey S, Speyer J (2008) Changes in unsettled infant sleep and maternal mood following admission to a parentcraft residential unit. Early Hum Dev 84:623–629CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Matthey S, White T, Phillips J, Taouk R, Chee TT, Barnett B (2005) Acceptability of routine antenatal psychosocial assessments to women from English and non-English speaking backgrounds. Arch Womens Ment Health 8:171–180CrossRefPubMed Matthey S, White T, Phillips J, Taouk R, Chee TT, Barnett B (2005) Acceptability of routine antenatal psychosocial assessments to women from English and non-English speaking backgrounds. Arch Womens Ment Health 8:171–180CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference O'Hara MW, Swain AM (1996) Rates and risk of postpartum depression—a meta-analysis. Int Rev Psychiatry 8:37–54CrossRef O'Hara MW, Swain AM (1996) Rates and risk of postpartum depression—a meta-analysis. Int Rev Psychiatry 8:37–54CrossRef
go back to reference Quigley J, Myer M, Howland K (2006) Evaluating the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Aust Nurs J 13:23–26PubMed Quigley J, Myer M, Howland K (2006) Evaluating the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Aust Nurs J 13:23–26PubMed
go back to reference Russell S (2006) Barriers to care in postnatal depression. Comm Practitioner 79:110–111 Russell S (2006) Barriers to care in postnatal depression. Comm Practitioner 79:110–111
go back to reference Tourangeau R, Yan T (2007) Sensitive questions in surveys. Psycholog Bulletin 133:859–883CrossRef Tourangeau R, Yan T (2007) Sensitive questions in surveys. Psycholog Bulletin 133:859–883CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Women’s responses to postnatal self-report mood and experience measures: does anonymity make a difference?
Authors
Stephen Matthey
Tracey White
Sarah Rice
Publication date
01-12-2010
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Archives of Women's Mental Health / Issue 6/2010
Print ISSN: 1434-1816
Electronic ISSN: 1435-1102
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-010-0159-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2010

Archives of Women's Mental Health 6/2010 Go to the issue