Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica 12/2023

Open Access 06-09-2023 | Ultrasound | Original Article

Methodological and ethical challenges in the use of focused ultrasound for blood–brain barrier disruption in neuro-oncology

Authors: Santhosh G. Thavarajasingam, John L. Kilgallon, Daniele S. C. Ramsay, Leila Motedayen Aval, Ishaan Ashwini Tewarie, Andreas Kramer, Dannis Van Vuurden, Marike L. D. Broekman

Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica | Issue 12/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Focused ultrasound (FUS) shows promise for enhancing drug delivery to the brain by temporarily opening the blood–brain barrier (BBB), and it is increasingly used in the clinical setting to treat brain tumours. It remains however unclear whether FUS is being introduced in an ethically and methodologically sound manner. The IDEAL-D framework for the introduction of surgical innovations and the SYRCLE and ROBINS-I tools for assessing the risk of bias in animal studies and non-randomized trials, respectively, provide a comprehensive evaluation for this.

Objectives and methods

A comprehensive literature review on FUS in neuro-oncology was conducted. Subsequently, the included studies were evaluated using the IDEAL-D framework, SYRCLE, and ROBINS-I tools.

Results

In total, 19 published studies and 12 registered trials were identified. FUS demonstrated successful BBB disruption, increased drug delivery, and improved survival rates. However, the SYRCLE analysis revealed a high risk of bias in animal studies, while the ROBINS-I analysis found that most human studies had a high risk of bias due to a lack of blinding and heterogeneous samples. Of the 15 pre-clinical stage 0 studies, only six had formal ethical approval, and only five followed animal care policies. Both stage 1 studies and stage 1/2a studies failed to provide information on patient data confidentiality. Overall, no animal or human study reached the IDEAL-D stage endpoint.

Conclusion

FUS holds promise for enhancing drug delivery to the brain, but its development and implementation must adhere to rigorous safety standards using the established ethical and methodological frameworks. The complementary use of IDEAL-D, SYRCLE, and ROBINS-I tools indicates a high risk of bias and ethical limitations in both animal and human studies, highlighting the need for further improvements in study design for a safe implementation of FUS in neuro-oncology.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
35.
go back to reference R Core Team (n.d.) R: a language and environment for statistical. R Foundation for statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria R Core Team (n.d.) R: a language and environment for statistical. R Foundation for statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Metadata
Title
Methodological and ethical challenges in the use of focused ultrasound for blood–brain barrier disruption in neuro-oncology
Authors
Santhosh G. Thavarajasingam
John L. Kilgallon
Daniele S. C. Ramsay
Leila Motedayen Aval
Ishaan Ashwini Tewarie
Andreas Kramer
Dannis Van Vuurden
Marike L. D. Broekman
Publication date
06-09-2023
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica / Issue 12/2023
Print ISSN: 0001-6268
Electronic ISSN: 0942-0940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05782-5

Other articles of this Issue 12/2023

Acta Neurochirurgica 12/2023 Go to the issue