Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica 3/2015

01-03-2015 | Clinical Article - Brain Injury

Updated periodic evaluation of standardized neurointensive care shows that it is possible to maintain a high level of favorable outcome even with increasing mean age

Authors: Samuel Lenell, Lena Nyholm, Anders Lewén, Per Enblad

Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Periodic evaluation of neurointensive care (NIC) is important. There is a risk that quality of daily care declines and there may also be unrecognized changes in patient characteristics and management. The aim of this work was to investigate the characteristics and outcome for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients in the period 2008–2009 in comparison with 1996–1997 and to some extent also with earlier periods.

Methods

TBI patients 16–79 years old admitted from 2008 to 2009 were selected for the study. Glasgow Coma Scale Motor score at admission (GCS M), radiology, surgery, and outcome (Glasgow Outcome Extended Scale) were collected from Uppsala Traumatic Brain Injury Register.

Results

The study included 148 patients (mean age, 45 years). Patients >60 years old increased from 16 % 1996–1997 to 30 % 2008–2009 (p < 0.01). The proportion of GCS M 4–6 were similar, 92 vs. 93 % (NS). In 1996–1997 patients, 73 % had diffuse injury (Marshall classification) compared to 77 % for the 2008–2009 period (NS). More patients underwent surgery during 2008–2009 (43 %) compared to 1996–1997 (32 %, p < 0.05). Good recovery increased and mortality decreased substantially from 1980–1981 to 1987–1988 and to 1996–1997, but then the results were unchanged in the 2008–2009 period, with 73 % favorable outcome and 11 % mortality. Mortality increased in GCS M 6–4, from 2.8 % in 1996–1997 to 10 % in 2008–2009 (p < 0.05); most of the patients that died had aggravating factors, e.g., high age, malignancy.

Conclusions

A large-proportion favorable outcome was maintained despite that patients >60 years with poorer prognosis doubled, indicating that the quality of NIC has increased or at least is unchanged. More surgery may have contributed to maintaining the large proportion of favorable outcome. For future improvements, more knowledge about TBI management in the elderly is required.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Andrews BT, Pitts LH (1991) Functional recovery after traumatic transtentorial herniation. Neurosurgery 29:227–231CrossRefPubMed Andrews BT, Pitts LH (1991) Functional recovery after traumatic transtentorial herniation. Neurosurgery 29:227–231CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Becker DP, Miller JD, Ward JD, Greenberg RP, Young HF, Sakalas R (1977) The outcome from severe head injury with early diagnosis and intensive management. J Neurosurg 47:491–502CrossRefPubMed Becker DP, Miller JD, Ward JD, Greenberg RP, Young HF, Sakalas R (1977) The outcome from severe head injury with early diagnosis and intensive management. J Neurosurg 47:491–502CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bowers SA, Marshall LF (1980) Outcome in 200 consecutive cases of severe head injury treated in San Diego County: a prospective analysis. Neurosurgery 6:237–242CrossRefPubMed Bowers SA, Marshall LF (1980) Outcome in 200 consecutive cases of severe head injury treated in San Diego County: a prospective analysis. Neurosurgery 6:237–242CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Combes P, Fauvage B, Colonna M, Passagia JG, Chirossel JP, Jacquot C (1996) Severe head injuries: an outcome prediction and survival analysis. Intensive Care Med 22:1391–1395CrossRefPubMed Combes P, Fauvage B, Colonna M, Passagia JG, Chirossel JP, Jacquot C (1996) Severe head injuries: an outcome prediction and survival analysis. Intensive Care Med 22:1391–1395CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Eker C, Asgeirsson B, Grande PO, Schalen W, Nordstrom CH (1998) Improved outcome after severe head injury with a new therapy based on principles for brain volume regulation and preserved microcirculation. Crit Care Med 26:1881–1886CrossRefPubMed Eker C, Asgeirsson B, Grande PO, Schalen W, Nordstrom CH (1998) Improved outcome after severe head injury with a new therapy based on principles for brain volume regulation and preserved microcirculation. Crit Care Med 26:1881–1886CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Elf K, Nilsson P, Enblad P (2002) Outcome after traumatic brain injury improved by an organized secondary insult program and standardized neurointensive care. Crit Care Med 30:2129–2134CrossRefPubMed Elf K, Nilsson P, Enblad P (2002) Outcome after traumatic brain injury improved by an organized secondary insult program and standardized neurointensive care. Crit Care Med 30:2129–2134CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Fischerström A, Nyholm L, Lewén A, Enblad P (2014) Acute neurosurgery for traumatic brain injury by general surgeons in Swedish county hospitals: a regional study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156:177–185CrossRef Fischerström A, Nyholm L, Lewén A, Enblad P (2014) Acute neurosurgery for traumatic brain injury by general surgeons in Swedish county hospitals: a regional study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156:177–185CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Marshall LF, Marshall SB, Klauber MR, Clark MB, Eisenberg HM, Jane JA, Luerssen TG, Marmarou A, Foulkes MA (1991) A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. J Neurosurg 75:S14–S20 Marshall LF, Marshall SB, Klauber MR, Clark MB, Eisenberg HM, Jane JA, Luerssen TG, Marmarou A, Foulkes MA (1991) A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. J Neurosurg 75:S14–S20
9.
go back to reference Marshall LF, Smith RW, Shapiro HM (1979) The outcome with aggressive treatment in severe head injuries. Part I: the significance of intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurosurg 50:20–25CrossRefPubMed Marshall LF, Smith RW, Shapiro HM (1979) The outcome with aggressive treatment in severe head injuries. Part I: the significance of intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurosurg 50:20–25CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Marshall LF, Smith RW, Shapiro HM (1979) The outcome with aggressive treatment in severe head injuries. Part II: acute and chronic barbiturate administration in the management of head injury. J Neurosurg 50:26–30CrossRefPubMed Marshall LF, Smith RW, Shapiro HM (1979) The outcome with aggressive treatment in severe head injuries. Part II: acute and chronic barbiturate administration in the management of head injury. J Neurosurg 50:26–30CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference McConeghy KW, Hatton J, Hughes L, Cook AM (2012) A review of neuroprotection pharmacology and therapies in patients with acute traumatic brain injury. CNS Drugs 26:613–636CrossRefPubMed McConeghy KW, Hatton J, Hughes L, Cook AM (2012) A review of neuroprotection pharmacology and therapies in patients with acute traumatic brain injury. CNS Drugs 26:613–636CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Nordstrom CH, Sundbarg G, Messeter K, Schalen W (1989) Severe traumatic brain lesions in Sweden. Part 2: Impact of aggressive neurosurgical intensive care. Brain Inj 3:267–281CrossRefPubMed Nordstrom CH, Sundbarg G, Messeter K, Schalen W (1989) Severe traumatic brain lesions in Sweden. Part 2: Impact of aggressive neurosurgical intensive care. Brain Inj 3:267–281CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Nyholm L, Howells T, Enblad P, Lewén A (2013) Introduction of the Uppsala Traumatic Brain Injury register for regular surveillance of patient characteristics and neurointensive care management including secondary insult quantification and clinical outcome. Ups J Med Sci 118:169–180CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Nyholm L, Howells T, Enblad P, Lewén A (2013) Introduction of the Uppsala Traumatic Brain Injury register for regular surveillance of patient characteristics and neurointensive care management including secondary insult quantification and clinical outcome. Ups J Med Sci 118:169–180CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
14.
go back to reference Nyholm L, Lewén A, Fröjd C, Howells T, Nilsson P, Enblad P (2012) The use of nurse checklists in a bedside computer-based information system to focus on avoiding secondary insults in neurointensive care. ISRN Neurol 2012:903954CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Nyholm L, Lewén A, Fröjd C, Howells T, Nilsson P, Enblad P (2012) The use of nurse checklists in a bedside computer-based information system to focus on avoiding secondary insults in neurointensive care. ISRN Neurol 2012:903954CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
16.
go back to reference Skoglund K, Hillered L, Purins K, Tsitsopoulos PP, Flygt J, Engquist H, Lewén A, Enblad P, Marklund N (2014) The neurological wake-up test does not alter cerebral energy metabolism and oxygenation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care 20:413–426CrossRefPubMed Skoglund K, Hillered L, Purins K, Tsitsopoulos PP, Flygt J, Engquist H, Lewén A, Enblad P, Marklund N (2014) The neurological wake-up test does not alter cerebral energy metabolism and oxygenation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care 20:413–426CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Teasdale GM, Pettigrew LE, Wilson JT, Murray G, Jennett B (1998) Analyzing outcome of treatment of severe head injury: a review and update on advancing the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurotrauma 15:587–597CrossRefPubMed Teasdale GM, Pettigrew LE, Wilson JT, Murray G, Jennett B (1998) Analyzing outcome of treatment of severe head injury: a review and update on advancing the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurotrauma 15:587–597CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM (1998) Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma 15:573–585CrossRefPubMed Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM (1998) Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma 15:573–585CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Wärme PE, Bergström R, Persson L (1991) Neurosurgical intensive care improves outcome after severe head injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 110:57–64CrossRef Wärme PE, Bergström R, Persson L (1991) Neurosurgical intensive care improves outcome after severe head injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 110:57–64CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Updated periodic evaluation of standardized neurointensive care shows that it is possible to maintain a high level of favorable outcome even with increasing mean age
Authors
Samuel Lenell
Lena Nyholm
Anders Lewén
Per Enblad
Publication date
01-03-2015
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0001-6268
Electronic ISSN: 0942-0940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2329-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Acta Neurochirurgica 3/2015 Go to the issue