Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica 7/2013

01-07-2013 | Experimental research - Brain Tumors

The reliability of topographic measurements from navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy volunteers and tumor patients

Authors: Anna Zdunczyk, Robert Fleischmann, Juliane Schulz, Peter Vajkoczy, Thomas Picht

Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica | Issue 7/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is increasingly being used for preoperative mapping of the motor cortex. Any new technology should undergo rigorous validation before being widely adopted in routine clinical practice. The aim of this experimental study was to assess the intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of topographic mapping with nTMS.

Methods

nTMS mapping of the motor cortex for the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle was performed by an expert and a novice examiner, twice in ten healthy volunteers and once in ten tumor patients. The distances between the centers-of-gravity and hotspots were calculated, as were coefficients of variation. This study also compared orthogonal versus variable orientation of the stimulation coil.

Results

The mean (range) distance between centers-of-gravity for the expert examiner in the test–retest protocol with healthy volunteers was 4.40 (1.86–7.68) mm. The mean (range) distance between centers-of-gravity for the expert vs. novice examiner was 4.89 (2.39–9.22) mm. There were no significant differences in this result between healthy volunteers and tumor patients.

Conclusions

nTMS is sufficiently reliable for clinical use, but examiners should make efforts to minimize sources of error. The reliability of nTMS in tumor patients appears comparable to healthy subjects.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Brasil-Neto JP, Cohen LG, Panizza M, Nilsson J, Roth BJ, Hallett M (1992) Optimal focal transcranial magnetic activation of the human motor cortex: effects of coil orientation, shape of the induced current pulse, and stimulus intensity. J Clin Neurophysiol 9:132–136PubMedCrossRef Brasil-Neto JP, Cohen LG, Panizza M, Nilsson J, Roth BJ, Hallett M (1992) Optimal focal transcranial magnetic activation of the human motor cortex: effects of coil orientation, shape of the induced current pulse, and stimulus intensity. J Clin Neurophysiol 9:132–136PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Forster M-T, Hattingen E, Senft C, Gasser T, Seifert V, Szelényi A (2011) Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and funcational magnetic resonance imaging: advanced adjuncts in preoperative planning for central region tumors. Neurosurgery 68:1317–1325PubMed Forster M-T, Hattingen E, Senft C, Gasser T, Seifert V, Szelényi A (2011) Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and funcational magnetic resonance imaging: advanced adjuncts in preoperative planning for central region tumors. Neurosurgery 68:1317–1325PubMed
4.
go back to reference Fox PT, Narayana S, Tandon N, Sandoval H, Fox SP, Kochunov P, Lancaster JL (2004) Column-based model of electric field excitation of cerebral cortex. Hum Brain Mapp 22:1–16PubMedCrossRef Fox PT, Narayana S, Tandon N, Sandoval H, Fox SP, Kochunov P, Lancaster JL (2004) Column-based model of electric field excitation of cerebral cortex. Hum Brain Mapp 22:1–16PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fryback DG, Thornbury JR (1991) The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Dec Making 11:88–94CrossRef Fryback DG, Thornbury JR (1991) The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Dec Making 11:88–94CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gugino LD, Romero JR, Aglio L, Titone D, Ramirez M, Pascual-Leone A, Grimson E, Weisenfeld N, Kikinis R, Shenton M-E (2001) Transcranial magnetic stimulation coregistered with MRI: a comparison of a guided versus blind stimulation technique and its effects on evoked compound muscle action potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 112:1781–1792PubMedCrossRef Gugino LD, Romero JR, Aglio L, Titone D, Ramirez M, Pascual-Leone A, Grimson E, Weisenfeld N, Kikinis R, Shenton M-E (2001) Transcranial magnetic stimulation coregistered with MRI: a comparison of a guided versus blind stimulation technique and its effects on evoked compound muscle action potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 112:1781–1792PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Tugwell PX, Feeny DH, Haynes RB, Drummond M (1986) A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies. CMAJ 134:587–594PubMed Guyatt GH, Tugwell PX, Feeny DH, Haynes RB, Drummond M (1986) A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies. CMAJ 134:587–594PubMed
8.
go back to reference Julkunen P, Säisänen L, Danner N, Niskanen E, Hukkanen T, Mervaala E, Könönen M (2009) Comparison of navigated and non-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor cortex mapping, motor threshold and motor evoked potentials. NeuroImage 44:790–795PubMedCrossRef Julkunen P, Säisänen L, Danner N, Niskanen E, Hukkanen T, Mervaala E, Könönen M (2009) Comparison of navigated and non-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor cortex mapping, motor threshold and motor evoked potentials. NeuroImage 44:790–795PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Jung NH, Delvendahl I, Kuhnke NG, Hauschke D, Stolle S, Mall V (2010) Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation does not decrease the variability of motor-evoked potentials. Brain Stimul 3:87–94PubMedCrossRef Jung NH, Delvendahl I, Kuhnke NG, Hauschke D, Stolle S, Mall V (2010) Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation does not decrease the variability of motor-evoked potentials. Brain Stimul 3:87–94PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Koski L, Schrader LM, Wu AD, Stern JM (2005) Normative data on changes in transcranial magnetic stimulation measures over a ten hour period. Clin Neurophysiol 116:2099–2109PubMedCrossRef Koski L, Schrader LM, Wu AD, Stern JM (2005) Normative data on changes in transcranial magnetic stimulation measures over a ten hour period. Clin Neurophysiol 116:2099–2109PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Livingston SC, Ingersoll CD (2008) Intra-rater reliability of a transcranial magnetic stimulation technique to obtain motor evoked potentials. Int J Neurosci 118:239–256PubMedCrossRef Livingston SC, Ingersoll CD (2008) Intra-rater reliability of a transcranial magnetic stimulation technique to obtain motor evoked potentials. Int J Neurosci 118:239–256PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Miranda PC, de Carvalho M, Conceição I, Sales Luis ML, Ducla-Soares E (1997) A new method for reproducible coil positioning in transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping. Electroencepalogr Clin Neurophysiol 105:116–123CrossRef Miranda PC, de Carvalho M, Conceição I, Sales Luis ML, Ducla-Soares E (1997) A new method for reproducible coil positioning in transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping. Electroencepalogr Clin Neurophysiol 105:116–123CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mortifee P, Stewart H, Schulzer M, Eisen A (1994) Reliability of transcranial magnetic stimulation for mapping the human motor cortex. Electroencepalogr Clin Neurophysiol 93:131–137CrossRef Mortifee P, Stewart H, Schulzer M, Eisen A (1994) Reliability of transcranial magnetic stimulation for mapping the human motor cortex. Electroencepalogr Clin Neurophysiol 93:131–137CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Pearl WS (1991) A hierarchical outcomes approach to test assessment. Ann Emerg Med 33:77–84CrossRef Pearl WS (1991) A hierarchical outcomes approach to test assessment. Ann Emerg Med 33:77–84CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Picht T, Schmidt S, Brandt S, Frey D, Hannula H, Neuvonen T, Karhu J, Vajkoczy P, Suess O (2011) Preoperative funcational mapping for rolandic brain tumor surgery: comparison of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation to direct cortical stimulation. Neurosurgery 69:581–589PubMedCrossRef Picht T, Schmidt S, Brandt S, Frey D, Hannula H, Neuvonen T, Karhu J, Vajkoczy P, Suess O (2011) Preoperative funcational mapping for rolandic brain tumor surgery: comparison of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation to direct cortical stimulation. Neurosurgery 69:581–589PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Picht T, Schulz J, Hanna M, Schmidt S, Suess O, Vajkoczy P (2012) Assessment of the influence of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation on surgical planning for tumors in or near the motor cortex. Neurosurgery 70:1248–1257PubMedCrossRef Picht T, Schulz J, Hanna M, Schmidt S, Suess O, Vajkoczy P (2012) Assessment of the influence of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation on surgical planning for tumors in or near the motor cortex. Neurosurgery 70:1248–1257PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ruohonen J, Karhu J (2010) Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurophysiol Clin 40:7–17PubMedCrossRef Ruohonen J, Karhu J (2010) Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurophysiol Clin 40:7–17PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Sparing R, Buelte D, Meister IG, Pauš T, Fink GR (2008) Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the challenge of coil placement: a comparison of conventional and stereotaxic neuronavigational strategies. Hum Brain Mapp 29:82–96PubMedCrossRef Sparing R, Buelte D, Meister IG, Pauš T, Fink GR (2008) Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the challenge of coil placement: a comparison of conventional and stereotaxic neuronavigational strategies. Hum Brain Mapp 29:82–96PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Uy J, Ridding MC, Miles TS (2002) Stability of maps of human motor cortex made with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Topogr 14:293–297PubMedCrossRef Uy J, Ridding MC, Miles TS (2002) Stability of maps of human motor cortex made with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Topogr 14:293–297PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wolf SL, Butler AJ, Campana GI, Parris TA, Struys DM, Weinstein SR, Weiss P (2004) Intra-subject reliability of parameters contributing to maps generated y transcranial magnetic stimulation in able-bodied adults. Clin Neurophysiol 115:1740–1747PubMedCrossRef Wolf SL, Butler AJ, Campana GI, Parris TA, Struys DM, Weinstein SR, Weiss P (2004) Intra-subject reliability of parameters contributing to maps generated y transcranial magnetic stimulation in able-bodied adults. Clin Neurophysiol 115:1740–1747PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The reliability of topographic measurements from navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy volunteers and tumor patients
Authors
Anna Zdunczyk
Robert Fleischmann
Juliane Schulz
Peter Vajkoczy
Thomas Picht
Publication date
01-07-2013
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica / Issue 7/2013
Print ISSN: 0001-6268
Electronic ISSN: 0942-0940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1665-5

Other articles of this Issue 7/2013

Acta Neurochirurgica 7/2013 Go to the issue