Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 8/2015

01-12-2015 | Original Article • HIP - ARTHROPLASTY

Evaluation of radiological methods of assessing cup anteversion in total hip replacement

Authors: K. S. Manjunath, Vijaya Soruban, K. G. Gopalakrishna

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Issue 8/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Study design

Prospective clinical study.

Back ground

In total hip replacement, the placement of the cup is critical as inaccurate placement can cause impingement, accelerated wear and dislocations. The position of the cup is assessed by abduction and anteversion. There are many radiological methods available for this purpose, while the reliability and validity of the methods have not been adequately done. Calculation by CT method is a gold standard. The aim of study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of all the methods.

Methods

In 30 hips of 25 consecutive patients, 13 females and 12 males who underwent primary total hip replacement in our institution, the component version in all the five radiological methods was calculated and compared with CT evaluation of angles. The intra- and interobserver reliabilities were assessed.

Results

Average CT measurement was 23.28 for anteversion. Lewinnek, Liaw, Hassan, Widmer and Ritun methods had average deviation of 4.330, 4.390, 4.880, 6.840 and 6.220, respectively. All the radiographic and CT methods had excellent intra- and interobserver reliabilities (C.I. 0.894–0.960 and 0.861–0.953). All the methods except Widmer had a significant validity against CT.

Conclusion

Plain X-rays (AP) are reliable for measuring cup anteversion. Lewinnek, Liaw, Riten and Hassans methods for calculation of cup anteversion are closer to CT in accuracy (p value >0.05). Widmer method varies significantly (p value <0.05) from CT.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Murray DW (1993) The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 75-B:228–232 Murray DW (1993) The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 75-B:228–232
2.
go back to reference Lu M, Zhou YX, Du H, Zhang J, Liu J (2013) Reliability and validity of measuring acetabular component orientation by plain antero–posterior radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:2987–2994PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Lu M, Zhou YX, Du H, Zhang J, Liu J (2013) Reliability and validity of measuring acetabular component orientation by plain antero–posterior radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:2987–2994PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Nishino H, Nakamura S, Arai N, Matsushita T (2013) Accuracy and precision of version angle measurements of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 28:1644–1647CrossRefPubMed Nishino H, Nakamura S, Arai N, Matsushita T (2013) Accuracy and precision of version angle measurements of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 28:1644–1647CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR (1978) Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 60-A:217–220 Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR (1978) Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 60-A:217–220
5.
go back to reference Widmer KH (2004) A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J Arthroplasty 19:387–390CrossRefPubMed Widmer KH (2004) A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J Arthroplasty 19:387–390CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hassan DM, Johnston GH, Dust WN, Watson LG, Cassidy D (1995) Radiographic calculation of anteversion in acetabular prostheses. J Arthroplasty 10:369–372CrossRefPubMed Hassan DM, Johnston GH, Dust WN, Watson LG, Cassidy D (1995) Radiographic calculation of anteversion in acetabular prostheses. J Arthroplasty 10:369–372CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Liaw CK, Hou SM, Yang RS, Wu TY, Fuh CS (2006) A new tool for measuring cup orientation in total hip arthroplasties from plain radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 451:134–139CrossRefPubMed Liaw CK, Hou SM, Yang RS, Wu TY, Fuh CS (2006) A new tool for measuring cup orientation in total hip arthroplasties from plain radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 451:134–139CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Pradhan R (1999) Planar anteversion of the acetabular cup as determined from plain antero-posterior radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 81-B:431–435CrossRef Pradhan R (1999) Planar anteversion of the acetabular cup as determined from plain antero-posterior radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 81-B:431–435CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Charnley J (1970) Total hip replacement by low friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 72:7–21PubMed Charnley J (1970) Total hip replacement by low friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 72:7–21PubMed
10.
go back to reference McArthur B, Cross M, Geatrakas C, Mayman D, Ghelman B (2012) Measuring acetabular component version after THA: CT or plain radiograph? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:2810–2818PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed McArthur B, Cross M, Geatrakas C, Mayman D, Ghelman B (2012) Measuring acetabular component version after THA: CT or plain radiograph? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:2810–2818PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Marx A, von Knoch M, Pförtner J, Wiese M, Saxler G (2006) Misinterpretation of cup anteversion in total hip arthroplasty using planar radiography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126:487–492CrossRefPubMed Marx A, von Knoch M, Pförtner J, Wiese M, Saxler G (2006) Misinterpretation of cup anteversion in total hip arthroplasty using planar radiography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126:487–492CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Visser JD, Konings JG (1981) A new method for measuring angles after total hip arthroplasty. A study of the acetabular cup and femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 63-B:556–559 Visser JD, Konings JG (1981) A new method for measuring angles after total hip arthroplasty. A study of the acetabular cup and femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 63-B:556–559
13.
go back to reference Woo RY, Morrey BF (1982) Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 64-A:1295–1306 Woo RY, Morrey BF (1982) Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 64-A:1295–1306
14.
go back to reference Nho JH, Lee YK, Kim HJ et al (2012) Reliability and validity of measuring version of the acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 94-B:32–36CrossRef Nho JH, Lee YK, Kim HJ et al (2012) Reliability and validity of measuring version of the acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 94-B:32–36CrossRef
15.
go back to reference McKibbin B (1970) Anatomical factors in the stability of the hip joint in the newborn. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 52-B:148–159 McKibbin B (1970) Anatomical factors in the stability of the hip joint in the newborn. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 52-B:148–159
16.
go back to reference Ackland MK, Bourne WB, Uhthoff HK (1986) Ante-version of the acetabular cup. Measurement of angle after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 68-B:409–413 Ackland MK, Bourne WB, Uhthoff HK (1986) Ante-version of the acetabular cup. Measurement of angle after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 68-B:409–413
17.
go back to reference Mian SW, Truchly G, Pflum FA (1992) Computed tomography measurement of acetabular cup anteversion and retroversion in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 276:206–209PubMed Mian SW, Truchly G, Pflum FA (1992) Computed tomography measurement of acetabular cup anteversion and retroversion in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 276:206–209PubMed
18.
go back to reference Babisch JW, Layher F, Amiot LP (2008) The rationale for tilt-adjusted acetabular cup navigation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 90:357–365CrossRef Babisch JW, Layher F, Amiot LP (2008) The rationale for tilt-adjusted acetabular cup navigation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 90:357–365CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Widmer KH, Zurfluh B (2004) Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 22:815–821CrossRefPubMed Widmer KH, Zurfluh B (2004) Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 22:815–821CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF (2002) Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J Arthroplasty 17:282–288CrossRefPubMed Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF (2002) Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J Arthroplasty 17:282–288CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Olivecrona H, Weidenhielm L, Olivecrona L et al (2004) A new CT method for measuring cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 10 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 75:252–260CrossRefPubMed Olivecrona H, Weidenhielm L, Olivecrona L et al (2004) A new CT method for measuring cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 10 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 75:252–260CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of radiological methods of assessing cup anteversion in total hip replacement
Authors
K. S. Manjunath
Vijaya Soruban
K. G. Gopalakrishna
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Issue 8/2015
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-015-1702-6

Other articles of this Issue 8/2015

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 8/2015 Go to the issue