Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 1/2014

01-07-2014 | Original Article

Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the lumbar spine: indications, technical aspects, results and complications

Authors: Cedric Barrey, Gilles Perrin, Frederic Michel, Jean-Marc Vital, Ibrahim Obeid

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Special Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) consists of creating posteriorly trapezoidal shape of a vertebra, usually L3 or L4, in order to recreate lordosis in the lumbar spine. It is usually indicated to treat rigid kyphotic lumbar spine associated with sagittal imbalance and due to degenerative changes or to iatrogenic flat back. PSO is technically demanding with high rates of complications and should be performed by experienced teams. We presently report our experience about PSO performed in the lumbar spine (below L1) through a series of 25 cases with a special focus on technical aspects and complications associated with the surgical procedure. Mean age was 64 ± 11 years old. PSO was performed at L4 in the majority of cases. Mean blood loss was 1,070 ± 470 ml, and mean duration of the surgery was 241 ± 44 min. VAS decreased from 7.5 ± 2 preoperatively to 3.2 ± 2.5 at 1 year, and ODI decreased from 64 ± 12 preoperatively to 32 ± 18 at 1 year, p < 0.05. Mean gain of lordosis after PSO varies from 20° to 40° and was measured to 27° ± 10° on average. Lumbar lordosis (T12-S1) was measured to 21° ± 10° preoperatively to 50° ± 11° postoperatively at 1 year, p < 0.05. A total of five major complications (20 %) were observed (two mechanical, one neurological and two infections) necessitating five reoperations. In conclusion, PSO was highly efficient to restore lumbar lordosis and correct sagittal imbalance. It was associated with a non-negligible, but acceptable rate of complications. To limit the risk of mechanical complications, we recommend fusing the adjacent disks whatever the approach (PLIF/TLIF/XLIF). Most complications can be reduced with adequate environment, informed anesthesiologists and experienced surgical team.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Thomasen E (1985) Vertebral osteotomy for correction of kyphosis in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 194:142–152PubMed Thomasen E (1985) Vertebral osteotomy for correction of kyphosis in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 194:142–152PubMed
2.
go back to reference Herbert JJ (1954) Considerations on the technique and results of 42 cases of vertebral osteotomy. Rev Chir 73(11–12):357–377 [in French]PubMed Herbert JJ (1954) Considerations on the technique and results of 42 cases of vertebral osteotomy. Rev Chir 73(11–12):357–377 [in French]PubMed
3.
go back to reference Debeyre J, Juteau B (1962) A propos of a case of lumbar osteotomy for ankylosing spondylitis. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic 29:291–293 [in French]PubMed Debeyre J, Juteau B (1962) A propos of a case of lumbar osteotomy for ankylosing spondylitis. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic 29:291–293 [in French]PubMed
5.
go back to reference Barrey C, Jund J, Noseda O, Roussouly P (2007) Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases. Eur Spine J 16:1459–1467PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Barrey C, Jund J, Noseda O, Roussouly P (2007) Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases. Eur Spine J 16:1459–1467PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Smith-Petersen MN, Larson CB, Aufranc OE (1969) Osteotomy of the spine for correction of flexion deformity in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 66:6–9PubMed Smith-Petersen MN, Larson CB, Aufranc OE (1969) Osteotomy of the spine for correction of flexion deformity in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 66:6–9PubMed
7.
go back to reference Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Boachie-Adjei O, Hamill C, Kim YB. Sagittal spinopelvic alignment change after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a multicenter analysis of 114 patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up. SRS 2008: Proceedings of the 43rd annual meeting of scoliosis research society, 2008, Salt Lake City, Utah (USA) Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Boachie-Adjei O, Hamill C, Kim YB. Sagittal spinopelvic alignment change after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a multicenter analysis of 114 patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up. SRS 2008: Proceedings of the 43rd annual meeting of scoliosis research society, 2008, Salt Lake City, Utah (USA)
8.
go back to reference Suk SI, Kim JH, Lee SM, Chung ER, Lee JH (2003) Anterior-posterior surgery versus posterior closing wedge osteotomy in post-traumatic kyphosis with neurologica compromised osteoporotic fracture. Spine 28:2170–2175PubMedCrossRef Suk SI, Kim JH, Lee SM, Chung ER, Lee JH (2003) Anterior-posterior surgery versus posterior closing wedge osteotomy in post-traumatic kyphosis with neurologica compromised osteoporotic fracture. Spine 28:2170–2175PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bridwell KH (2006) Decision making regarding Smith-Petersen versus pedicle subtraction osteotomy versus vertebral column resection for spinal deformity. Spine 31:S171–S178PubMedCrossRef Bridwell KH (2006) Decision making regarding Smith-Petersen versus pedicle subtraction osteotomy versus vertebral column resection for spinal deformity. Spine 31:S171–S178PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Schwab F, Blondel B, Chay E, Demakakos J, Lenke L, Tropiano P, Ames C, Smith JS, Shaffrey C, Glassman S, Farcy JP, Lafage V (2014) The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy classification. Neurosurgery 74:112–120PubMedCrossRef Schwab F, Blondel B, Chay E, Demakakos J, Lenke L, Tropiano P, Ames C, Smith JS, Shaffrey C, Glassman S, Farcy JP, Lafage V (2014) The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy classification. Neurosurgery 74:112–120PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Amzallag J (2008) Complications of spinal osteotomies: multicenter study of 402 cases [in French]. Paris Val-de-Marne University, Créteil Amzallag J (2008) Complications of spinal osteotomies: multicenter study of 402 cases [in French]. Paris Val-de-Marne University, Créteil
12.
go back to reference Hyun SJ, Rhim SC (2010) Clinical outcomes and complications after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance patients: a long-term follow-up data. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 47:95–101PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hyun SJ, Rhim SC (2010) Clinical outcomes and complications after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance patients: a long-term follow-up data. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 47:95–101PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Barrey C, Roussouly P, LeHuec JC, D’Acunzi G, Perrin G (2013) Compensatory mechanisms contributing to keep the sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J 22:S834–S841PubMedCrossRef Barrey C, Roussouly P, LeHuec JC, D’Acunzi G, Perrin G (2013) Compensatory mechanisms contributing to keep the sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J 22:S834–S841PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy JP, Lafage V (2010) Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine 35:2224–2231PubMedCrossRef Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy JP, Lafage V (2010) Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine 35:2224–2231PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Edwards C, Lenke LG, Iffrig TM, Berra A, Baldus C, Blanke K (2003) Complications and outcomes of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance. Spine 28:2093–2101PubMedCrossRef Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Edwards C, Lenke LG, Iffrig TM, Berra A, Baldus C, Blanke K (2003) Complications and outcomes of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance. Spine 28:2093–2101PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Buchowski JM, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Kuhns CA, Lehman RA, Kim YJ, Stewart D, Baldus C (2007) Neurologic complications of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a 10-year assessment. Spine 32:2245–2252PubMedCrossRef Buchowski JM, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Kuhns CA, Lehman RA, Kim YJ, Stewart D, Baldus C (2007) Neurologic complications of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a 10-year assessment. Spine 32:2245–2252PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gavaret M, Jouve JL, Pereon Y, Accadbled F, Andre-Obadia N, Blondel B, Bollini G, Delecrin J, Farcy J, Fournet-Fayard J, Garin C, Henry P, Manel V, Mutschler V, Perrin G, Sales de Gauzy J, French Society of Spine Surgery SFCR (2013) Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring in spine surgery. Development and state of the art in France in 2011. Orthop Traum Surg Res 99:S319–S327CrossRef Gavaret M, Jouve JL, Pereon Y, Accadbled F, Andre-Obadia N, Blondel B, Bollini G, Delecrin J, Farcy J, Fournet-Fayard J, Garin C, Henry P, Manel V, Mutschler V, Perrin G, Sales de Gauzy J, French Society of Spine Surgery SFCR (2013) Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring in spine surgery. Development and state of the art in France in 2011. Orthop Traum Surg Res 99:S319–S327CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the lumbar spine: indications, technical aspects, results and complications
Authors
Cedric Barrey
Gilles Perrin
Frederic Michel
Jean-Marc Vital
Ibrahim Obeid
Publication date
01-07-2014
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Issue Special Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-014-1470-8

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2014

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 1/2014 Go to the issue