Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 4/2012

01-05-2012 | Original Article

Proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) for treatment of osteoporotic proximal femoral fractures

Authors: A. Raviraj, Ashish Anand, Murali Chakravarthy, Sanjay Pai

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Unstable trochanteric fractures have been an enigma for the orthopedic surgeon in the community because of unpredictable results. Cephalic intramedullary nails with proximal antirotation device are the treatment of choice for such patients.

Purpose

To report outcomes of 36 consecutive patients treated with a proximal femoral nail (PFNA) for osteoporotic trochanteric femoral fractures.

Methods

The patients included 20 men and 16 women, aged 55–78 years (mean 65.3 years) years with trochanteric/proximal femoral fractures, which underwent PFNA fixation using an intramedullary nail and a spiral blade into the femoral head. We used AO system of classification of the fractures. Pertrochanteric (31 A1 and 31 A2), intertrochanteric fractures (31 A3), and high subtrochanteric (32 A1) fractures were included in the study. We had 16 A2 fractures, 12 A3 fractures, and 6 A1 fractures and 2 cases of 32 A1 fractures. 31 A2 was the commonest type. The operative time, the overall fluoroscopy time, intraoperative blood loss, the duration of hospitalization, and the surgical complications were noted. Patients were followed up for a mean of 24 months (range 18–36 months). Functional outcomes were assessed according to the Harris hip scoring system.

Results

One patient required open reduction. The mean duration of surgery was 45 min (range 25–55 min). The mean image intensifier usage time was 70 ms with a range between 44 and 98 ms. The mean time of hospital stays was 5 days (4–10). Postoperative radiographs showed good reduction in 32 cases (out of 34) or acceptable in the 2 cases. There were three postoperative complications (one myocardial infarction, one patient developed DVT, and one patient developed bedsore). There were no cutouts of the spiral blade. Two patients expired due to medical illness unrelated to the fracture. All 34 patients available for follow-up had healed fractures without any implant-related complications, such as bending, breaking, or implant cutout. The average bone healing time was 18 weeks (12–22 weeks). At the time of the latest follow-up, all the 34 patients were full weight bearing on affected site, with return to their preinjury activity level. The mean Harris hip score was 96.4 points (range 69–100 points). A total of 32 patients had excellent or good outcome, and 2 patients had satisfactory outcome and none had poor outcome.

Conclusion

PFNA is useful for the treatment of osteoporotic proximal femoral fractures, and our initial experience suggest that it has low implant-related complications.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kannus P, Parkari J, Sievanen H, Heinonen A et al (1996) Epidemiology of hip fractures. Bone 18:57S–63SPubMedCrossRef Kannus P, Parkari J, Sievanen H, Heinonen A et al (1996) Epidemiology of hip fractures. Bone 18:57S–63SPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Koval KJ, Aharonoff GB, Rokito AS et al (1996) Patients with femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures. Are the same? Clin Orthop 330:166–172PubMedCrossRef Koval KJ, Aharonoff GB, Rokito AS et al (1996) Patients with femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures. Are the same? Clin Orthop 330:166–172PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Haynes RC, Polls RG, Miles AW, Weston RB (1997) Failure of femoral head fixation: a cadaveric analysis of lag screw cut out with gamma locking nail and AO dynamic hip screw. Injury 28:337–341PubMedCrossRef Haynes RC, Polls RG, Miles AW, Weston RB (1997) Failure of femoral head fixation: a cadaveric analysis of lag screw cut out with gamma locking nail and AO dynamic hip screw. Injury 28:337–341PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Madsen JE, Naess L, Aune AK, Alho A (1998) Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a comparative study with gamma nail and compression hip screw. J Orthop Trauma 12(4):241–248PubMedCrossRef Madsen JE, Naess L, Aune AK, Alho A (1998) Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a comparative study with gamma nail and compression hip screw. J Orthop Trauma 12(4):241–248PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bess RJ, Jolly SA (1997) Comparison of compression hip screw and gamma nail for treatment of pertrochanteric fractures. J South Orthop Assoc 6:173–179PubMed Bess RJ, Jolly SA (1997) Comparison of compression hip screw and gamma nail for treatment of pertrochanteric fractures. J South Orthop Assoc 6:173–179PubMed
6.
go back to reference Goldhagen PR, O’Connor Dr, Schwarze D, Schwartz E (1994) A prospective study of the compression hip screw and gamma nail. J Orthop Trauma 8:367–372PubMedCrossRef Goldhagen PR, O’Connor Dr, Schwarze D, Schwartz E (1994) A prospective study of the compression hip screw and gamma nail. J Orthop Trauma 8:367–372PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Halder SC (1992) The gamma nail for peritrochanteric fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:340–344PubMed Halder SC (1992) The gamma nail for peritrochanteric fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:340–344PubMed
8.
go back to reference Leung KS, So WS, Shen WY, Hui PW (1992) Gamma nails and dynamic hip screw for peritrochanteric fractures: a randomized prospective study in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:345–351PubMed Leung KS, So WS, Shen WY, Hui PW (1992) Gamma nails and dynamic hip screw for peritrochanteric fractures: a randomized prospective study in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:345–351PubMed
9.
go back to reference Rosenblum SF, Zuckerman JD, Kummer FJ, Tam BS (1992) A biomechanical evaluation of the gamma nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:352–357PubMed Rosenblum SF, Zuckerman JD, Kummer FJ, Tam BS (1992) A biomechanical evaluation of the gamma nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:352–357PubMed
10.
go back to reference Schipper IB, Bresina S, Wahl D, Linke B, van Vugt AB, Schneider E (2002) Biomechanical evaluation of the proximal femoral nail. Clin Orthop Relat Res 405:277–286PubMedCrossRef Schipper IB, Bresina S, Wahl D, Linke B, van Vugt AB, Schneider E (2002) Biomechanical evaluation of the proximal femoral nail. Clin Orthop Relat Res 405:277–286PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fogagnolo F, Kfuri M, Paccola CA (2004) Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures with the short AO-ASIF proximal femoral nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:31–37PubMedCrossRef Fogagnolo F, Kfuri M, Paccola CA (2004) Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures with the short AO-ASIF proximal femoral nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:31–37PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Baumgartner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskg DM, Keggi JM (1995) The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1058–1064 Baumgartner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskg DM, Keggi JM (1995) The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1058–1064
13.
go back to reference Albareda J, Laderiga A, Palanca D et al (1996) Complications and technical problems with gamma nail. Int Orthop 20:47–50PubMedCrossRef Albareda J, Laderiga A, Palanca D et al (1996) Complications and technical problems with gamma nail. Int Orthop 20:47–50PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Butt MS, Krikler SJ, Nafie S, Ali MS (1995) Comparison of dynamic hip screw and gamma nail: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Injury 26:615–618PubMedCrossRef Butt MS, Krikler SJ, Nafie S, Ali MS (1995) Comparison of dynamic hip screw and gamma nail: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Injury 26:615–618PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Herrera A, Domingo LJ, Calvo A, Martinez A (2002) A comparative study of trochanteric fractures treated with gamma nail or the proximal femoral nail. Int Orthop 26:365–369PubMedCrossRef Herrera A, Domingo LJ, Calvo A, Martinez A (2002) A comparative study of trochanteric fractures treated with gamma nail or the proximal femoral nail. Int Orthop 26:365–369PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Domingo LJ, Cecilia D, Herrera A, Resines C (2001) Trochanteric fractures treated with a proximal femoral nail. Int Orthop 25:298–301PubMedCrossRef Domingo LJ, Cecilia D, Herrera A, Resines C (2001) Trochanteric fractures treated with a proximal femoral nail. Int Orthop 25:298–301PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Simmermacher RKJ, Bosch AM, van der Werken C (1999) The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury 30:327–332PubMedCrossRef Simmermacher RKJ, Bosch AM, van der Werken C (1999) The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury 30:327–332PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Al-yassari G, Langstaff RJ, Jones JW, Al Lami M (2002) The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN) for the treatment of unstable trochanteric fracture. Injury 16:386–393 Al-yassari G, Langstaff RJ, Jones JW, Al Lami M (2002) The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN) for the treatment of unstable trochanteric fracture. Injury 16:386–393
19.
go back to reference Sommers MB, Roth C, Hall H et al (2004) A laboratory model to evaluate cutout resistance of implants for pertrochanteric fracture fixation. J Orthop Trauma 18:361–368PubMedCrossRef Sommers MB, Roth C, Hall H et al (2004) A laboratory model to evaluate cutout resistance of implants for pertrochanteric fracture fixation. J Orthop Trauma 18:361–368PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Takigami I, Matsumoto K, O’Hara A, Yamanaka K, Naganawa T, Ohashi M, Date K, Shmizu K (2008) Treatment of trochanteric fractures with the PFNA (proximal femoral nail antirotation) nail system. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 66(4):276–279PubMed Takigami I, Matsumoto K, O’Hara A, Yamanaka K, Naganawa T, Ohashi M, Date K, Shmizu K (2008) Treatment of trochanteric fractures with the PFNA (proximal femoral nail antirotation) nail system. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 66(4):276–279PubMed
21.
go back to reference Kristek D, Lovrić I, Kristek J, Biljan M, Kristek G, Sakić K (2010) The proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures. Coll Antropol Sep 34(3):937–940 Kristek D, Lovrić I, Kristek J, Biljan M, Kristek G, Sakić K (2010) The proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures. Coll Antropol Sep 34(3):937–940
22.
go back to reference Lenich A, Vester H, Nerlich M, Mayr E, Stöckle U, Füchtmeier B (2010) Clinical comparison of the second and third generation of intramedullary devices for trochanteric fractures of the hip-blade versus screw. Injury 41(12):1292–1296 Lenich A, Vester H, Nerlich M, Mayr E, Stöckle U, Füchtmeier B (2010) Clinical comparison of the second and third generation of intramedullary devices for trochanteric fractures of the hip-blade versus screw. Injury 41(12):1292–1296
23.
go back to reference Sahin S, Ertürer E, Oztürk I, Toker S, Seçkin F, Akman S (2010) Radiographic and functional results of osteosynthesis using the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 44(2):127–134PubMedCrossRef Sahin S, Ertürer E, Oztürk I, Toker S, Seçkin F, Akman S (2010) Radiographic and functional results of osteosynthesis using the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 44(2):127–134PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Mereddy P, Kamath S, Ramakrishnan M, Malik H, Donnachie N (2009) The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA): a new design for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury 40(4):428–432 Epub 2009 Feb 20PubMedCrossRef Mereddy P, Kamath S, Ramakrishnan M, Malik H, Donnachie N (2009) The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA): a new design for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury 40(4):428–432 Epub 2009 Feb 20PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Liu Y, Tao R, Liu F, Wang Y, Zhou Z, Cao Y, Wang H (2010) Mid-term outcomes after intramedullary fixation of peritrochanteric femoral fractures using the new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). Injury 41(8):810–817 Epub 2010 May 15PubMedCrossRef Liu Y, Tao R, Liu F, Wang Y, Zhou Z, Cao Y, Wang H (2010) Mid-term outcomes after intramedullary fixation of peritrochanteric femoral fractures using the new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). Injury 41(8):810–817 Epub 2010 May 15PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Simmermacher RK, Ljungqvist J, Bail H, Hockertz T, Vochteloo AJ, Ochs U, Werken C (2008) AO-PFNA study group. the new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in daily practice: results of a multicentre clinical study. Injury 39(8):932–939 Epub 2008 Jun 25PubMedCrossRef Simmermacher RK, Ljungqvist J, Bail H, Hockertz T, Vochteloo AJ, Ochs U, Werken C (2008) AO-PFNA study group. the new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in daily practice: results of a multicentre clinical study. Injury 39(8):932–939 Epub 2008 Jun 25PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) for treatment of osteoporotic proximal femoral fractures
Authors
A. Raviraj
Ashish Anand
Murali Chakravarthy
Sanjay Pai
Publication date
01-05-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-011-0840-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 4/2012 Go to the issue