Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 1/2011

Open Access 01-01-2011 | Original Article

Results of 131 consecutive operated patients with a displaced proximal humerus fracture: an analysis with more than two years follow-up

Authors: D. Faraj, B. W. Kooistra, W. A. H. vd Stappen, A. J. Werre

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of the open reduction and fixation of a dislocated proximal humerus fracture with a locking plate, also evaluating the incidence of complications and functional recovery of the shoulder. A retrospective study focusing on patients who had suffered a fracture of the proximal humerus and were treated by means of an open reduction and internal fixation with a locking plate, using either the Philos or the LPHP plate. We have also included a comparison of these two plates.

Method

Ninety-two patients were found to be eligible and were included in our study. These patients had all been treated for a proximal humerus fracture between 2002 and 2008. We included those patients who could be classified as a class 2, 3, or 4 according to the Neer classification. Demographic data, surgical technique, and peri/post-operative complications were collected from medical records. Patients were followed-up and the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) was filled in by phone. The mean age of our patient population was 66.2 (15–97), with a male: female ratio of 1:5 (15:77). (The median follow-up was 2.4 years (0.2–5.8). Fourteen of our patients died during follow-up, while 25 patients were otherwise lost to follow-up. For this study, out of the original 131 patients, this finally resulted in 92 patients whom we followed-up post-operatively.

Results

Ninety-two patients (70%, 92/131) were interviewed. The mean Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) was 19.76 (11–54). The overall complication rate was 39.1% (36/92). The most frequently occurring complications in our patient population were hemorrhage 3.3%; dislocation of the caput humeri and/or tuberculum majus 2.2%; persistent pain 3.3%; Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the humeral head 0%; Loss of reduction and screw cutout 6.5%; Plate breakout 6.5%; Subacromial Impingement 11.9%; Frozen shoulder 3.3%; rotator cuff rupture 1.1%, and infection 1.1%. Of the entire group of patients originally included in this study, 29% was re-operated due to one of the above-mentioned complications.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the locking plate provides satisfactory functional outcomes after a mid-term follow-up in patients with displaced proximal humerus fractures. The incidence of complications and subsequent re-operation is relatively high, however, comparable to or slightly better when compared to data found in literature. Subacromial Impingement seems to occur more frequently when a Philos plate is implemented. We therefore suggest that randomized clinical trials determining the possible superiority of one specific type of plate in patients with a displaced proximal humerus fracture are to be performed in future.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Baker P, Nanda R, Goodchild L, Finn P, Rangan A (2008) A comparison of the constant and Oxford shoulder scores in patients with conservatively treated proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17(1):37–41CrossRefPubMed Baker P, Nanda R, Goodchild L, Finn P, Rangan A (2008) A comparison of the constant and Oxford shoulder scores in patients with conservatively treated proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17(1):37–41CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Zyto K, Ahrengart L, Sperber A, Törnkvist H (1997) Treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint surg [Br] 79(3):412–417CrossRef Zyto K, Ahrengart L, Sperber A, Törnkvist H (1997) Treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint surg [Br] 79(3):412–417CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Horak J, Nilsson BE (1975) Epidemiology of fracture of the upper end of the humerus. Clin Orthop 112:250–253PubMed Horak J, Nilsson BE (1975) Epidemiology of fracture of the upper end of the humerus. Clin Orthop 112:250–253PubMed
4.
go back to reference Lind T, Kroner K, Jensen J (1989) The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal humerus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 108:285–287CrossRefPubMed Lind T, Kroner K, Jensen J (1989) The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal humerus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 108:285–287CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rose SH, Melton U, Morrey BF (1982) Epidemiologic features of proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 168:24–30PubMed Rose SH, Melton U, Morrey BF (1982) Epidemiologic features of proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 168:24–30PubMed
6.
go back to reference Baron JA, Barrett JA, Karagas MR (1996) The epidemiology of peripheral fractures. Bone 18(3 suppl):209S–213sCrossRefPubMed Baron JA, Barrett JA, Karagas MR (1996) The epidemiology of peripheral fractures. Bone 18(3 suppl):209S–213sCrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Gaebler C, McQueen MM, Court-Browm CM (2003) Minimaly displaced proximal humeral fractures: epidemiology and outcome in 507 cases. Acta orthop Scand 74:580–585CrossRefPubMed Gaebler C, McQueen MM, Court-Browm CM (2003) Minimaly displaced proximal humeral fractures: epidemiology and outcome in 507 cases. Acta orthop Scand 74:580–585CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Koval KJ, Gallagher MA, Marisicano JG, Cuomo F, McShinawy A, Zuckerman JD (1997) Functional outcome after minimally displaced fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:1647–1655 Koval KJ, Gallagher MA, Marisicano JG, Cuomo F, McShinawy A, Zuckerman JD (1997) Functional outcome after minimally displaced fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:1647–1655
9.
go back to reference Thalhammer G, Platzer P, Oberleitner G, Fialka C, Greitbauer M, Vécsei V (2009) Angular fixation of proximal humeral fractures. J Trauma 66(1):204–210CrossRefPubMed Thalhammer G, Platzer P, Oberleitner G, Fialka C, Greitbauer M, Vécsei V (2009) Angular fixation of proximal humeral fractures. J Trauma 66(1):204–210CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Szyszkowitz R, Seggl W, Schleifer P, Cundy PJ (1993) Proximal humeral fractures. Management techniques and expected results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 292:13–25PubMed Szyszkowitz R, Seggl W, Schleifer P, Cundy PJ (1993) Proximal humeral fractures. Management techniques and expected results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 292:13–25PubMed
11.
go back to reference Sommer C, Gautier E, Muller M, Helfet DL, Wagner M (2003) First clinical results of the locking compression plate (LCP). Injury 34:B43–B54CrossRefPubMed Sommer C, Gautier E, Muller M, Helfet DL, Wagner M (2003) First clinical results of the locking compression plate (LCP). Injury 34:B43–B54CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Agudelo J, Schürmann M, Stahel P, Helwig P, Morgan SJ, Zechel W, Bahrs C, Parekh A, Ziran B, Williams A, Smith W (2007) Analysis of efficacy and failure in proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plates. Orthopedics 21(10):676–681 Agudelo J, Schürmann M, Stahel P, Helwig P, Morgan SJ, Zechel W, Bahrs C, Parekh A, Ziran B, Williams A, Smith W (2007) Analysis of efficacy and failure in proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plates. Orthopedics 21(10):676–681
13.
go back to reference Helmy N, Hintermann B (2006) New trends in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Clin Orthop 442:100–108CrossRefPubMed Helmy N, Hintermann B (2006) New trends in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Clin Orthop 442:100–108CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Neer CS 2nd (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52(6):1077–1089PubMed Neer CS 2nd (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52(6):1077–1089PubMed
15.
go back to reference Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A (1996) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78(4):593–600PubMed Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A (1996) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78(4):593–600PubMed
16.
go back to reference Fankhauser F, Boldin C, Schippinger G, Haunschmid C, Szyszkowitz R (2005) A new locking plate for unstable fractures of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 430:176–181CrossRefPubMed Fankhauser F, Boldin C, Schippinger G, Haunschmid C, Szyszkowitz R (2005) A new locking plate for unstable fractures of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 430:176–181CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Frigg R (2001) Locking compression plate (LCP). An osteosynthesis plate based on the dynamic compression plate and the point contact fixator (PC-Fix). Injury 32(Suppl 2):63–66CrossRefPubMed Frigg R (2001) Locking compression plate (LCP). An osteosynthesis plate based on the dynamic compression plate and the point contact fixator (PC-Fix). Injury 32(Suppl 2):63–66CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Thanasas C, Kontakis G, Angoules A, Limb D, Giannoudis P (2009) Treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates: a systematic review. Shoulder Elbow Surg 18(6):837–844CrossRef Thanasas C, Kontakis G, Angoules A, Limb D, Giannoudis P (2009) Treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates: a systematic review. Shoulder Elbow Surg 18(6):837–844CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gautier E, Sommer C (2003) Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. Injury 34(Suppl 2):B63–B76 (Review)CrossRefPubMed Gautier E, Sommer C (2003) Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. Injury 34(Suppl 2):B63–B76 (Review)CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Brunner F, Sommer C, Bahrs C, Heuwinkel R, Hafner C, Rillmann P, Kohut G, Ekelund A, Muller M, Audigé L, Babst R (2009) Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using a proximal humeral locked plate: a prospective multicenter analysis. J Orthop Trauma 23(3):163–172CrossRefPubMed Brunner F, Sommer C, Bahrs C, Heuwinkel R, Hafner C, Rillmann P, Kohut G, Ekelund A, Muller M, Audigé L, Babst R (2009) Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using a proximal humeral locked plate: a prospective multicenter analysis. J Orthop Trauma 23(3):163–172CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Siwach R, Singh R, Rohilla RK, Kadian VS, Sangwan SS, Dhanda M (2008) Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with locking proximal humeral plate (LPHP) in elderly patients with osteoporosis. J Orthop Traumatol 9(3):149–153CrossRefPubMed Siwach R, Singh R, Rohilla RK, Kadian VS, Sangwan SS, Dhanda M (2008) Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with locking proximal humeral plate (LPHP) in elderly patients with osteoporosis. J Orthop Traumatol 9(3):149–153CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164PubMed Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164PubMed
23.
go back to reference Hente R, Kampshoff J, Kinner B, Füchtmeier B, Nerlich M (2004) Treatment of dislocated 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus with an angle-stabilizing fixation plate. Unfallchirurg 107(9):769–782CrossRefPubMed Hente R, Kampshoff J, Kinner B, Füchtmeier B, Nerlich M (2004) Treatment of dislocated 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus with an angle-stabilizing fixation plate. Unfallchirurg 107(9):769–782CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Voigt C, Woltmann A, Partenheimer A, Lill H (2007) Management of complications after angularly stable locking proximal humerus plate fixation. Chirurg 78(1):40–46CrossRefPubMed Voigt C, Woltmann A, Partenheimer A, Lill H (2007) Management of complications after angularly stable locking proximal humerus plate fixation. Chirurg 78(1):40–46CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Results of 131 consecutive operated patients with a displaced proximal humerus fracture: an analysis with more than two years follow-up
Authors
D. Faraj
B. W. Kooistra
W. A. H. vd Stappen
A. J. Werre
Publication date
01-01-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Issue 1/2011
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-010-0655-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 1/2011 Go to the issue

Up-to date Review and Case Report

Why we still punish school kids?