Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-10-2020 | Original Article

Segmented lordotic angles to assess lumbosacral transitional vertebra on EOS

Authors: Domenico Albano, Carmelo Messina, Angelo Gambino, Martina Gurgitano, Carmelo Sciabica, Giordano Remo Oliveira Pavan, Salvatore Gitto, Luca Maria Sconfienza

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 10/2020

Abstract

Purpose

To test the vertical posterior vertebral angles (VPVA) of the most caudal lumbar segments measured on EOS to identify and classify the lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV).

Methods

We reviewed the EOS examinations of 906 patients to measure the VPVA at the most caudal lumbar segment (cVPVA) and at the immediately proximal segment (pVPVA), with dVPVA being the result of their difference. Mann–Whitney, Chi-square, and ROC curve statistics were used.

Results

172/906 patients (19%) had LSTV (112 females, mean age: 43 ± 21 years), and 89/172 had type I LSTV (52%), 42/172 type II (24%), 33/172 type III (19%), and 8/172 type IV (5%). The cVPVA and dVPVA in non-articulated patients were significantly higher than those of patients with LSTV, patients with only accessory articulations, and patients with only bony fusion (all p < .001). The cVPVA and dVPVA in L5 sacralization were significantly higher than in S1 lumbarization (p < .001). The following optimal cutoff was found: cVPVA of 28.2° (AUC = 0.797) and dVPVA of 11.1° (AUC = 0.782) to identify LSTV; cVPVA of 28.2° (AUC = 0.665) and dVPVA of 8° (AUC = 0.718) to identify type II LSTV; cVPVA of 25.5° (AUC = 0.797) and dVPVA of − 7.5° (AUC = 0.831) to identify type III–IV LSTV; cVPVA of 20.4° (AUC = 0.693) and dVPVA of − 1.8° (AUC = 0.665) to differentiate type II from III–IV LSTV; cVPVA of 17.9° (AUC = 0.741) and dVPVA of − 4.5° (AUC = 0.774) to differentiate L5 sacralization from S1 lumbarization.

Conclusion

The cVPVA and dVPVA measured on EOS showed good diagnostic performance to identify LSTV, to correctly classify it, and to differentiate L5 sacralization from S1 lumbarization.

Apazidis A, Ricart PA, Diefenbach CM, Spivak JM (2011) The prevalence of transitional vertebrae in the lumbar spine. Spine J 11:858–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2011.08.005CrossRefPubMed

Malanga GA, Cooke PM (2004) Segmental anomaly leading to wrong level disc surgery in cauda equina syndrome. Pain Physician 7:107–110PubMed

Luoma K, Vehmas T, Raininko R, Luukkonen R, Riihimäki H (2004) Lumbosacral transitional vertebra: relation to disc degeneration and low back pain. Spine 29:200–205. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000107223.02346.A8CrossRefPubMed

Nardo L, Alizai H, Virayavanich W et al (2012) Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: association with low back pain. Radiology 265:497–503. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12112747CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mahato NK (2011) Pedicular anatomy of the first sacral segment in transitional variations of the lumbo-sacral junction. Spine 36(18):E1187–E1192. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318206bdf7CrossRefPubMed

Mahato NK (2013) Pars inter-articularis and laminar morphology of the terminal lumbar vertebra in lumbosacral transitional variations. N Am J Med Sci 5:357–361. https://doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.114167CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Castellvi AE, Goldstein LA, Chan DP (1984) Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and their relationship with lumbar extradural defects. Spine 9:493–495. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198407000-00014CrossRefPubMed

Quinlan JF, Duke D, Eustace S (2006) Bertolotti's syndrome. A cause of back pain in young people. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:1183–1186. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88B9.17211CrossRefPubMed

Yavuz U, Bayhan AI, Beng K, Emrem K, Uzun M (2012) Low back complaints worse, but not more frequent in subjects with congenital lumbosacral malformations: a study on 5000 recruits. Acta Orthop Belg 78:668–671PubMed

10.

Tang M, Yang XF, Yang SW et al (2014) Lumbosacral transitional vertebra in a population-based study of 5860 individuals: prevalence and relationship to low back pain. Eur J Radiol 83:1679–1682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.05.036CrossRefPubMed

11.

Tokgoz N, Ucar M, Erdogan AB, Kilic K, Ozcan C (2014) Are spinal or paraspinal anatomic markers helpful for vertebral numbering and diagnosing lumbosacral transitional vertebrae? Korean J Radiol 15:258–266. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.2.258CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Jancuska JM, Spivak JM, Bendo JA (2015) A review of symptomatic lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: Bertolotti's syndrome. Int J Spine Surg 9:42. https://doi.org/10.14444/2042CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Mahato NK (2011) Disc spaces, vertebral dimensions, and angle values at the lumbar region: a radioanatomical perspective in spines with L5–S1 transitions: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 15:371–379. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.6.SPINE11113CrossRefPubMed

14.

Farshad M, Aichmair A, Hughes AP, Herzog RJ, Farshad-Amacker NA (2013) A reliable measurement for identifying a lumbosacral transitional vertebra with a solid bony bridge on a single-slice midsagittal MRI or plain lateral radiograph. Bone Joint J 95:1533–1537. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32331CrossRefPubMed

15.

Girdler S, Cho B, Mikhail CM, Cheung ZB, Maza N, Kang-Wook Cho S (2020) Emerging techniques in diagnostic imaging for idiopathic scoliosis in children and adolescents: a review of the literature. World Neurosurg 136:128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.043CrossRefPubMed

16.

Redaelli A, Langella F, Dziubak M et al (2020) Useful and innovative methods for the treatment of postoperative coronal malalignment in adult scoliosis: the "kickstand rod" and "tie rod" procedures. Eur Spine J 29:849–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06285-7CrossRefPubMed

17.

Berjano P, Cecchinato R, Sinigaglia A et al (2015) Anterior column realignment from a lateral approach for the treatment of severe sagittal imbalance: a retrospective radiographic study. Eur Spine J 24(Suppl 3):433–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3930-1CrossRefPubMed

18.

Kaneko K, Aota Y, Sekiya T, Yamada K, Saito T (2016) Validation study of arm positions for evaluation of global spinal balance in EOS imaging. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26:725–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-016-1813-8CrossRefPubMed

19.

Di Leo G, Sardanelli F (2020) Statistical significance: p value, 005 threshold, and applications to radiomics-reasons for a conservative approach. Eur Radiol Exp 4:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-020-0145-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Delport EG, Cucuzzella TR, Kim N, Marley J, Pruitt C, Delport AG (2006) Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: incidence in a consecutive patient series. Pain Physician 9:53–56PubMed

21.

Matson DM, Maccormick LM, Sembrano JN, Polly DW (2020) Sacral dysmorphism and lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) review. Int J Spine Surg 14(1):14–19. https://doi.org/10.14444/6075CrossRefPubMed

22.

Hughes RJ, Saifuddin A (2004) Imaging of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae. Clin Radiol 59:984–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2004.02.019CrossRefPubMed

23.

Carrino JA, Campbell PD Jr, Lin DC et al (2011) Effect of spinal segment variants on numbering vertebral levels at lumbar MR imaging. Radiology 259:196–202. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11081511CrossRefPubMed

24.

Melhem E, Assi A, El Rachkidi R, Ghanem I (2016) EOS(®) biplanar X-ray imaging: concept, developments, benefits, and limitations. J Child Orthop 10:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-016-0713-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Dubousset J, Charpak G, Dorion I et al (2005) A new 2D and 3D imaging approach to musculoskeletal physiology and pathology with low-dose radiation and the standing position: the EOS system. Bull Acad Natl Med 189:287–297PubMed

Title: Segmented lordotic angles to assess lumbosacral transitional vertebra on EOS
Authors: Domenico Albano
Carmelo Messina
Angelo Gambino
Martina Gurgitano
Carmelo Sciabica
Giordano Remo Oliveira Pavan
Salvatore Gitto
Luca Maria Sconfienza
Publication date: 01-10-2020
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: European Spine Journal / Issue 10/2020
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06565-7

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Segmented lordotic angles to assess lumbosacral transitional vertebra on EOS

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 10/2020

Pedicle screw fixation of thoracolumbar fractures: conventional short segment versus short segment with intermediate screws at the fracture level—a systematic review and meta-analysis

Vertebral, intraspinal and other organ anomalies in congenital scoliosis

Development and reliability of the AOSpine CROST (Clinician Reported Outcome Spine Trauma): a tool to evaluate and predict outcomes from clinician’s perspective

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for the back (COMI-back) in patients with non-specific low back pain

Announcements

Morphological features of thoracolumbar burst fractures associated with neurological outcome in thoracolumbar traumatic spinal cord injury