Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 11/2016

01-11-2016 | Original Article

Global tilt: a single parameter incorporating spinal and pelvic sagittal parameters and least affected by patient positioning

Authors: I. Obeid, L. Boissière, C. Yilgor, D. Larrieu, F. Pellisé, A. Alanay, E. Acaroglu, F. J. Perez-Grueso, F. Kleinstück, J. M. Vital, A. Bourghli, on behalf of European Spine Study Group, ESSG

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 11/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Regarding the close interaction between the spinal alignment and the pelvis orientation, no parameter is routinely used to describe and to evaluate the global spinopelvic balance, taking into account simultaneously the spinal part and the pelvic part of the global alignment. We described the global tilt (GT) that could analyze malalignment considering the spine and the pelvis simultaneously. From a geometrical point of view, the global tilt is the sum of the pelvic tilt (PT) and the C7 vertical tilt (angular value of sagittal vertical axis). The aim of this study is to evaluate the global tilt with comparison to PT and sagittal vertical axis (SVA), with the hypothesis that GT would be the least sensitive to positional changes.

Methods

A cohort of 22 patients with sagittal malalignment was identified from a multicentric database of adult spinal deformities (ASD). Inclusion criteria were age >30 years, SVA > 40 mm and/or PT > 20°. All patients had full spine EOS radiographs in positions 1 and 2 (P1 and P2), in which the patient was asked to stand and put his hands on his shoulders without any effort (P1), or to make an effort to be as straight as possible (P2). PT, SVA and GT were measured in both positions and changes between P1 and P2 were calculated and compared using Student’s t test with significance level at p < 0.05.

Results

No significant changes were observed for GT; SVA and PT were significantly influenced by patient positioning. SVA decreased and PT increased for all cases in P2 whereas the changes in GT were in either direction. The average increase in PT was 7.1° (±5.4) or 30.8 % (±24.9); decrease in SVA was 45.1 mm (±25.6) or 60.0 % (±44.2) while the change in GT was 4.4° (±3.3) or 12.6 % (±9.3).

Discussion

GT appears to be less affected by the patient’s position compared to SVA and PT. This seems logical because GT contains both spinal alignment and pelvic compensation; it is not affected by their changes in opposing directions.

Conclusion

GT appears to be the most reliable single sagittal plane parameter in ASD. It is the least affected by patient position and incorporates both the pelvic and the spinal alignment within one measure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dubousset J, Challier V, Farcy J (2014) Spinal alignment versus spinal balance. In: Global spinal alignment: principles, pathologies, and procedures book. Quality Medical Publishing, pp 3–9 Dubousset J, Challier V, Farcy J (2014) Spinal alignment versus spinal balance. In: Global spinal alignment: principles, pathologies, and procedures book. Quality Medical Publishing, pp 3–9
2.
go back to reference Mac-Thiong JM, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Guigui P (2010) Sagittal parameters of global spinal balance: normative values from a prospective cohort of 709 Caucasian asymptomatic adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(22):E1193–E1198. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e50808 CrossRef Mac-Thiong JM, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Guigui P (2010) Sagittal parameters of global spinal balance: normative values from a prospective cohort of 709 Caucasian asymptomatic adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(22):E1193–E1198. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e3181e50808​ CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dubousset J, Charpak G, Dorion I, Skalli W, Lavaste F, Deguise J, Kalifa G, Ferey S (2005) A new 2D and 3D imaging approach to musculoskeletal physiology and pathology with low-dose radiation and the standing position: the EOS system. Bull Acad Natl Med 189(2):287–297 (discussion 297–300) PubMed Dubousset J, Charpak G, Dorion I, Skalli W, Lavaste F, Deguise J, Kalifa G, Ferey S (2005) A new 2D and 3D imaging approach to musculoskeletal physiology and pathology with low-dose radiation and the standing position: the EOS system. Bull Acad Natl Med 189(2):287–297 (discussion 297–300) PubMed
5.
go back to reference Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, Horton W, Dimar JR (2005) Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(6):682–688CrossRef Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, Horton W, Dimar JR (2005) Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(6):682–688CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F (2005) The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(18):2024–2029CrossRef Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F (2005) The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(18):2024–2029CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Labelle H, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, O’Brien M (2005) The importance of spino-pelvic balance in L5-s1 developmental spondylolisthesis: a review of pertinent radiologic measurements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(6 Suppl):S27–S34CrossRef Labelle H, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, O’Brien M (2005) The importance of spino-pelvic balance in L5-s1 developmental spondylolisthesis: a review of pertinent radiologic measurements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(6 Suppl):S27–S34CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2005) Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(3):346–353CrossRef Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2005) Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(3):346–353CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L, Templier A, Skalli W, Guigui P (2005) Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(2):260–267. doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02043 CrossRefPubMed Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L, Templier A, Skalli W, Guigui P (2005) Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(2):260–267. doi:10.​2106/​JBJS.​D.​02043 CrossRefPubMed
12.
14.
go back to reference Banno T, Togawa D, Arima H, Hasegawa T, Yamato Y, Kobayashi S, Yasuda T, Oe S, Hoshino H, Matsuyama Y (2016) The cohort study for the determination of reference values for spinopelvic parameters (T1 pelvic angle and global tilt) in elderly volunteers. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4411-x Banno T, Togawa D, Arima H, Hasegawa T, Yamato Y, Kobayashi S, Yasuda T, Oe S, Hoshino H, Matsuyama Y (2016) The cohort study for the determination of reference values for spinopelvic parameters (T1 pelvic angle and global tilt) in elderly volunteers. Eur Spine J. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-016-4411-x
15.
go back to reference Protopsaltis T, Schwab F, Bronsard N, Smith JS, Klineberg E, Mundis G, Ryan DJ, Hostin R, Hart R, Burton D, Ames C, Shaffrey C, Bess S, Errico T, Lafage V, International Spine Study G (2014) TheT1 pelvic angle, a novel radiographic measure of global sagittal deformity, accounts for both spinal inclination and pelvic tilt and correlates with health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(19):1631–1640. doi:10.2106/JBJS.M.01459 CrossRefPubMed Protopsaltis T, Schwab F, Bronsard N, Smith JS, Klineberg E, Mundis G, Ryan DJ, Hostin R, Hart R, Burton D, Ames C, Shaffrey C, Bess S, Errico T, Lafage V, International Spine Study G (2014) TheT1 pelvic angle, a novel radiographic measure of global sagittal deformity, accounts for both spinal inclination and pelvic tilt and correlates with health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(19):1631–1640. doi:10.​2106/​JBJS.​M.​01459 CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Qiao J, Zhu F, Xu L, Liu Z, Zhu Z, Qian B, Sun X, Qiu Y (2014) T1 pelvic angle: a new predictor for postoperative sagittal balance and clinical outcomes in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39(25):2103–2107. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000635 CrossRef Qiao J, Zhu F, Xu L, Liu Z, Zhu Z, Qian B, Sun X, Qiu Y (2014) T1 pelvic angle: a new predictor for postoperative sagittal balance and clinical outcomes in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39(25):2103–2107. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0000000000000635​ CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ryan DJ, Protopsaltis TS, Ames CP, Hostin R, Klineberg E, Mundis GM, Obeid I, Kebaish K, Smith JS, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton DC, Hart RA, Gupta M, Schwab FJ, Lafage V (2014) T1 pelvic angle (TPA) effectively evaluates sagittal deformity and assesses radiographical surgical outcomes longitudinally. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39(15):1203–1210. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000382 CrossRef Ryan DJ, Protopsaltis TS, Ames CP, Hostin R, Klineberg E, Mundis GM, Obeid I, Kebaish K, Smith JS, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton DC, Hart RA, Gupta M, Schwab FJ, Lafage V (2014) T1 pelvic angle (TPA) effectively evaluates sagittal deformity and assesses radiographical surgical outcomes longitudinally. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39(15):1203–1210. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0000000000000382​ CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Global tilt: a single parameter incorporating spinal and pelvic sagittal parameters and least affected by patient positioning
Authors
I. Obeid
L. Boissière
C. Yilgor
D. Larrieu
F. Pellisé
A. Alanay
E. Acaroglu
F. J. Perez-Grueso
F. Kleinstück
J. M. Vital
A. Bourghli
on behalf of European Spine Study Group, ESSG
Publication date
01-11-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 11/2016
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4649-3

Other articles of this Issue 11/2016

European Spine Journal 11/2016 Go to the issue