Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 3/2016

01-03-2016 | Ideas and Technical Innovations

Virtually bloodless posterior midline exposure of the lumbar spine using the “para-midline” fatty plane

Authors: Michael H. Moghimi, Dana A. Leonard, Charles H. Cho, Andrew J. Schoenfeld, Philippe Phan, Mitchel B. Harris, Christopher M. Bono

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The authors have developed a “para-midline” approach to the posterior lumbar spine using a virtually avascular surgical plane not previously described in the literature. It was their purpose to document consistent MRI presence of this plane and to prospectively evaluate its clinical use in terms of blood loss.

Methods

Fifty consecutive patients undergoing primary lumbar surgery on 1–3 levels were prospectively enrolled from September 2014 to May 2015. The para-midline approach was used in all cases. The deep lumbar fascia is longitudinally incised on either side of the spinous processes instead of directly in the midline, which reveals the para-midline fatty plane. Blood loss during the approach and overall blood loss were recorded for all patients. MRIs from each patient were reviewed by an experienced neuroradiologist to determine the presence of the para-midline fatty plane.

Results

There was no recorded blood loss during the approach for all procedures. The average overall blood loss was 60 cc (20–200 cc). No patient required a transfusion intraoperatively or postoperatively. The fatty para-midline plane was noted on preoperative MRI at all operated levels in all patients. The average width of this plane was 6.5 mm (2–17 mm).

Conclusions

The para-midline approach for lumbar surgery is associated with less blood loss than traditional, subperiosteal exposure techniques. The fatty interval through which this approach is made is universally present and identifiable on MRI. The authors offer this approach as a means of decreasing the risks associated with blood loss and transfusion with posterior lumbar surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Knoeller SM, Seifried C (2000) Historical perspective: history of spinal surgery. Spine 25(21):2838–2843CrossRefPubMed Knoeller SM, Seifried C (2000) Historical perspective: history of spinal surgery. Spine 25(21):2838–2843CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Weinstein SL (1994) The Pediatric spine: principles and practice. Raven Press, New York Weinstein SL (1994) The Pediatric spine: principles and practice. Raven Press, New York
3.
go back to reference Hoppenfeld S, DeBoer P, Buckley R (2009) Surgical exposures in orthopaedics: the anatomic approach, 4th edn. Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health, Philadelphia Hoppenfeld S, DeBoer P, Buckley R (2009) Surgical exposures in orthopaedics: the anatomic approach, 4th edn. Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health, Philadelphia
4.
go back to reference Herkowitz HN, Rothman RH (2011) Rothman-Simeone the spine, 6th edn. Saunders/Elsevier, Philadelphia Herkowitz HN, Rothman RH (2011) Rothman-Simeone the spine, 6th edn. Saunders/Elsevier, Philadelphia
5.
go back to reference Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, Nelson WE (1968) The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American 50(5):919–926 Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, Nelson WE (1968) The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American 50(5):919–926
6.
go back to reference Dazley JM, Deering RM, Bono CM (2013) Recurrent lumbar spinal stenosis: etiology and surgical management. Sem Spine Surg 25(4):283–294CrossRef Dazley JM, Deering RM, Bono CM (2013) Recurrent lumbar spinal stenosis: etiology and surgical management. Sem Spine Surg 25(4):283–294CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fritzell P, Hägg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A (2002) Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group: chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine 27(11):1131–1141CrossRefPubMed Fritzell P, Hägg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A (2002) Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group: chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine 27(11):1131–1141CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Humphreys SC, Hodges SD, Patwardhan AG, Eck JC, Murphy RB, Covington LA (2001) Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 26(5):567–571CrossRefPubMed Humphreys SC, Hodges SD, Patwardhan AG, Eck JC, Murphy RB, Covington LA (2001) Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 26(5):567–571CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kakuchi M (1997) Reduction of blood loss during spinal surgery by epidural blockade under normotensive general anesthesia. Spine 22(8):889–894CrossRef Kakuchi M (1997) Reduction of blood loss during spinal surgery by epidural blockade under normotensive general anesthesia. Spine 22(8):889–894CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cha CW, Deible C, Muzzonigro T, Lopez-Plaza I, Vogt M, Kang JD (2002) Allogeneic transfusion requirements after autologous donations in posterior lumbar surgeries. Spine 27(1):99–104CrossRefPubMed Cha CW, Deible C, Muzzonigro T, Lopez-Plaza I, Vogt M, Kang JD (2002) Allogeneic transfusion requirements after autologous donations in posterior lumbar surgeries. Spine 27(1):99–104CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Pradhan BB, Nassar JA, Delamarter RB, Wang JC (2002) Single-level lumbar spine fusion: a comparison of anterior and posterior approaches. J Spinal Disord Tech 15(5):355–361CrossRefPubMed Pradhan BB, Nassar JA, Delamarter RB, Wang JC (2002) Single-level lumbar spine fusion: a comparison of anterior and posterior approaches. J Spinal Disord Tech 15(5):355–361CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Moller H, Hedlund R (2000) Instrumented and noninstrumented posterolateral fusion in adult spondylolisthesis–a prospective randomized study: part 2. Spine 25(13):1716–1721CrossRefPubMed Moller H, Hedlund R (2000) Instrumented and noninstrumented posterolateral fusion in adult spondylolisthesis–a prospective randomized study: part 2. Spine 25(13):1716–1721CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hostin R, McCarthy I, O’Brien M, Bess S, Line B, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton D, Gupta M, Ames C, Deviren V et al (2013) Incidence, mode, and location of acute proximal junctional failures after surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity. Spine 38(12):1008–1015CrossRefPubMed Hostin R, McCarthy I, O’Brien M, Bess S, Line B, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton D, Gupta M, Ames C, Deviren V et al (2013) Incidence, mode, and location of acute proximal junctional failures after surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity. Spine 38(12):1008–1015CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ekman P, Moller H, Shalabi A, Yu YX, Hedlund R (2009) A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration. Eur Spine J 18(8):1175–1186CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ekman P, Moller H, Shalabi A, Yu YX, Hedlund R (2009) A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration. Eur Spine J 18(8):1175–1186CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Buttermann GR, Mullin WJ (2013) Two-Level Circumferential Lumbar Fusion Comparing Midline and Paraspinal Posterior Approach: 5-Year Interim Outcomes of a Randomized, Blinded, Prospective Study. J Spinal Disorders Techn Buttermann GR, Mullin WJ (2013) Two-Level Circumferential Lumbar Fusion Comparing Midline and Paraspinal Posterior Approach: 5-Year Interim Outcomes of a Randomized, Blinded, Prospective Study. J Spinal Disorders Techn
16.
go back to reference Fraser RD, Hall DJ (1993) Laminectomy combined with posterolateral stabilisation: a muscle-sparing approach to the lumbosacral spine. Europ Spine J Off Publ Europ Spine Soc Europ Spinal Deform Soc Europ Sect Cervical Spine Res Soc 1(4):249–253CrossRef Fraser RD, Hall DJ (1993) Laminectomy combined with posterolateral stabilisation: a muscle-sparing approach to the lumbosacral spine. Europ Spine J Off Publ Europ Spine Soc Europ Spinal Deform Soc Europ Sect Cervical Spine Res Soc 1(4):249–253CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mirza SK, Deyo RA, Heagerty PJ, Konodi MA, Lee LA, Turner JA, Goodkin R (2008) Development of an index to characterize the “invasiveness” of spine surgery. Spine 33(24):2651–2661CrossRefPubMed Mirza SK, Deyo RA, Heagerty PJ, Konodi MA, Lee LA, Turner JA, Goodkin R (2008) Development of an index to characterize the “invasiveness” of spine surgery. Spine 33(24):2651–2661CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Zheng F, Cammisa FP Jr, Sandhu HS, Girardi FP, Khan SN (2002) Factors predicting hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, and transfusion in patients undergoing revision posterior lumbar spine decompression, fusion, and segmental instrumentation. Spine 27(8):818–824CrossRefPubMed Zheng F, Cammisa FP Jr, Sandhu HS, Girardi FP, Khan SN (2002) Factors predicting hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, and transfusion in patients undergoing revision posterior lumbar spine decompression, fusion, and segmental instrumentation. Spine 27(8):818–824CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Virtually bloodless posterior midline exposure of the lumbar spine using the “para-midline” fatty plane
Authors
Michael H. Moghimi
Dana A. Leonard
Charles H. Cho
Andrew J. Schoenfeld
Philippe Phan
Mitchel B. Harris
Christopher M. Bono
Publication date
01-03-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4319-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

European Spine Journal 3/2016 Go to the issue