Top

European Spine Journal

Published in:

01-12-2015 | Original Article

Delayed postoperative C5 root palsy and the use of neurophysiologic monitoring

Authors: Steven Spitz, Daniel Felbaum, Nima Aghdam, Faheem Sandhu

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 12/2015

Abstract

Introduction

Although advances have been made in surgical technique and intraoperative monitoring, the rate of postoperative C5 palsy remains the same. We attempt to define characteristics which may predict risk of developing postoperative C5 palsy.

Methods

Retrospective chart review identified 644 patients undergoing cervical procedures. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion was performed in 456, anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) in 78, posterior laminectomy and fusion (PLF) in 106, and posterior open-door laminoplasty in 4 patients. All patients had neurophysiologic monitoring [somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP), spontaneous electromyogram (EMG), and/or motor-evoked potential (MEP)].

Results

Postoperative C5 root palsy occurred in 5 (2 with ACCF and 3 with PLF) cases (1.4 %). In all cases, there were no changes in intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring. C5 palsy did not occur before postoperative day 2.

Conclusions

Patients undergoing cervical decompression remain at risk for C5 root palsy despite use of monitoring. Given that all patients experienced delayed onset of C5 palsy, MEP, SSEP, and EMG may not be sensitive enough to assess the risk of developing C5 palsy.

Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y et al (2003) C5 palsy after decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:2447–2451. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000090833.96168.3F CrossRef

May DM, Jones SJ, Crockard HA (1996) Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in cervical surgery: identification of pre- and intraoperative risk factors associated with neurological deterioration. J Neurosurg 85:566–573. doi:10.3171/jns.1996.85.4.0566 CrossRefPubMed

Kelleher MO, Tan G, Sarjeant R, Fehlings MG (2008) Predictive value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during cervical spine surgery: a prospective analysis of 1055 consecutive patients. J Neurosurg Spine 8:215–221. doi:10.3171/SPI/2008/8/3/215 CrossRefPubMed

Bose B, Sestokas AK, Schwartz DM (2007) Neurophysiological detection of iatrogenic C-5 nerve deficit during anterior cervical spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 6:381–385. doi:10.3171/spi.2007.6.5.381 CrossRefPubMed

Fan D, Schwartz DM, Vaccaro AR et al (2002) Intraoperative neurophysiologic detection of iatrogenic C5 nerve root injury during laminectomy for cervical compression myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:2499–2502. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000031313.90883.29 CrossRef

Bhalodia VM, Schwartz DM, Sestokas AK, Bloomgarden G, Arkins T, Tomak P, Gorelick J, Wijesekera S, Beiner J, Goodrich I (2013) Efficacy of intraoperative monitoring of transcranial electrical stimulation-induced motor evoked potentials and spontaneous electromyography activity to identify acute-versus delayed-onset C-5 nerve root palsy during cervical spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 19:395–402

Tanaka N, Nakanishi K, Fujiwara Y et al (2006) Postoperative segmental C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty may occur without intraoperative nerve injury: a prospective study with transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:3013–3017. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000250303.17840.96 CrossRef

Jimenez JC, Sani S, Braverman B et al (2005) Palsies of the fifth cervical nerve root after cervical decompression: prevention using continuous intraoperative electromyography monitoring. J Neurosurg Spine 3:92–97. doi:10.3171/spi.2005.3.2.0092 CrossRefPubMed

Bydon M, Macki M, Kaloostian P et al (2014) Incidence and prognostic factors of c5 palsy: a clinical study of 1001 cases and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 74:595–604. doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000322 (discussion 604–605) CrossRefPubMed

10.

Greiner-Perth R, Elsaghir H, Böhm H, El-Meshtawy M (2005) The incidence of C5–C6 radiculopathy as a complication of extensive cervical decompression: own results and review of literature. Neurosu.rg Rev 28:137–142. doi:10.1007/s10143-004-0352-7 CrossRef

11.

Hasegawa K, Homma T, Chiba Y (2007) Upper extremity palsy following cervical decompression surgery results from a transient spinal cord lesion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:E197–E202. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000257576.84646.49 CrossRef

12.

Hashimoto M, Mochizuki M, Aiba A et al (2010) C5 palsy following anterior decompression and spinal fusion for cervical degenerative diseases. Eur Spine J 19:1702–1710. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1427-5 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

13.

Stecker M (2012) A review of intraoperative monitoring for spinal surgery. Surg Neurol Int 3:174. doi:10.4103/2152-7806.98579 CrossRef

14.

Lawrence BD, Jacobs WB, Norvell DC et al (2013) Anterior versus posterior approach for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:S173–S182. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7eaaf CrossRef

15.

Komagata M, Nishiyama M, Endo K et al (2004) Prophylaxis of C5 palsy after cervical expansive laminoplasty by bilateral partial foraminotomy. Spine J 4:650–655. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2004.03.022 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Karpova A, Ranganathan A, Davis AM et al (2012) Reliability of quantitative MRI methods in the assessment of spinal canal stenosis and cord compression in cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182672307

17.

Nouri A, Tetreault L, Zamorano JJ et al (2015) Role of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting surgical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:171–178. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000678 CrossRef

Title: Delayed postoperative C5 root palsy and the use of neurophysiologic monitoring
Authors: Steven Spitz
Daniel Felbaum
Nima Aghdam
Faheem Sandhu
Publication date: 01-12-2015
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: European Spine Journal / Issue 12/2015
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4252-z

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Springer Medicine

Delayed postoperative C5 root palsy and the use of neurophysiologic monitoring

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 12/2015

Construct stability of an instrumented 2-level cervical corpectomy model following fatigue testing: biomechanical comparison of circumferential antero-posterior instrumentation versus a novel anterior-only transpedicular screw–plate fixation technique

Minimally invasive cervical foraminotomy and diskectomy for laterally located soft disk herniation

EuroSpine Task Force on Research: support for spine researchers

Retrospective review of 22 surgically treated adults with congenital anomalies of the upper cervical spine: a clinical and radiological review

Responsiveness and minimal important changes for the Neck Disability Index and the Neck Pain Disability Scale in Italian subjects with chronic neck pain

Photographic measurement of head and cervical posture when viewing mobile phone: a pilot study