Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 8/2015

Open Access 01-08-2015 | Original Article

Relationship between the laminoplasty opening size and the laminoplasty opening angle, increased sagittal canal diameter and the prediction of spinal canal expansion following open-door cervical laminoplasty

Authors: Zhenfang Gu, Aili Zhang, Yong Shen, Feng Li, Xianze Sun, Wenyuan Ding

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 8/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To clarify the relationship between the laminoplasty opening size (LOS), the laminoplasty opening angle (LOA) and the increase in sagittal canal diameter (SCD) and to predict the amount of canal enlargement during open-door cervical laminoplasty (ODCL).

Methods

Formula describing the relationship between LOS and LOA, the increase in SCD was deduced. The parameters of pre- and postoperative computed tomography scans of 36 patients who had undergone laminoplasty surgery were measured by picture archiving and communication system (PACS) software, and the amount of canal enlargement of these patients was predicted when the opening size of laminoplasty was 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 mm according to the formula.

Results

For equivalent LOS, the amount of canal enlargement with each opening size differed throughout the cervical region. When the C3–C7 LOS was 10 mm the SCD increased >4.1 mm, and the canal area increased in C3–C6 >88 mm2, and the canal area increased in C7 > 80 mm2. When the C3–C7 LOS was 12 mm, the SCD increased >5.2 mm, and the canal area increased in C3–C6 >104 mm2, and the canal area increased in C7 > 94 mm2.

Conclusion

Formula accurately showed the relationship between the LOS and the increase in SCD achieved by ODCL. The amount of canal enlargement following ODCL could be predicted by the formula. LOS of 10–12 mm at C3–C7 might be optimal during ODCL.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, Suzuki N, Satomi K, Ishii Y (1983) Expansive ODCL for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine 8(7):693–699PubMedCrossRef Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, Suzuki N, Satomi K, Ishii Y (1983) Expansive ODCL for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine 8(7):693–699PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hirabayashi K, Satomi K (1988) Operative procedure and results of expansive ODCL. Spine 13:870–876PubMedCrossRef Hirabayashi K, Satomi K (1988) Operative procedure and results of expansive ODCL. Spine 13:870–876PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Satomi K, Nishu Y, Kohno T et al (1994) Long-term follow-up studies of open-door expansive laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine 19:507–510PubMedCrossRef Satomi K, Nishu Y, Kohno T et al (1994) Long-term follow-up studies of open-door expansive laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine 19:507–510PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kimura I, Shingu H, Nasu Y (1995) Long-term follow-up of cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by canal-expansive laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:956–961PubMed Kimura I, Shingu H, Nasu Y (1995) Long-term follow-up of cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by canal-expansive laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:956–961PubMed
5.
go back to reference Ogawa Y, Toyama Y, Chiba K, Matsumoto M, Nakamura M, Takaishi H, Hirabayashi H, Hirabayashi K (2004) Long-term results of expansive ODCL for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. J Neurosurg Spine 1(2):168–174PubMedCrossRef Ogawa Y, Toyama Y, Chiba K, Matsumoto M, Nakamura M, Takaishi H, Hirabayashi H, Hirabayashi K (2004) Long-term results of expansive ODCL for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. J Neurosurg Spine 1(2):168–174PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chiba K, Ogawa Y, Ishii K et al (2006) Long-term results of expansive open -door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy average 14-year follow-up study. Spine 31(26):2998–3005PubMedCrossRef Chiba K, Ogawa Y, Ishii K et al (2006) Long-term results of expansive open -door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy average 14-year follow-up study. Spine 31(26):2998–3005PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Matsumoto M, Watanabe K, Hosogane N, Tsuji T, Ishii K, Nakamura M, Chiba K, Toyama Y (2012) Impact of lamina closure on long-term outcomes of ODCL in patients with cervical myelopathy: minimum 5-year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(15):1288–1291. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182498434 CrossRef Matsumoto M, Watanabe K, Hosogane N, Tsuji T, Ishii K, Nakamura M, Chiba K, Toyama Y (2012) Impact of lamina closure on long-term outcomes of ODCL in patients with cervical myelopathy: minimum 5-year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(15):1288–1291. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e3182498434​ CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Herkowitz HN (1988) A comparison of anterior cervical fusion, cervical laminectomy, and cervical laminoplasty for the surgical management of multiple level spondylotic radiculopathy. Spine 13:774–780PubMedCrossRef Herkowitz HN (1988) A comparison of anterior cervical fusion, cervical laminectomy, and cervical laminoplasty for the surgical management of multiple level spondylotic radiculopathy. Spine 13:774–780PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kaminsky SB, Clark CR, Traynelis VC (2004) Operative treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy. A comparison of laminectomy and laminoplasty at five year average follow-up. Iowa Orthop J 24:95–105PubMedCentralPubMed Kaminsky SB, Clark CR, Traynelis VC (2004) Operative treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy. A comparison of laminectomy and laminoplasty at five year average follow-up. Iowa Orthop J 24:95–105PubMedCentralPubMed
11.
go back to reference Manzano GR, Casella G, Wang MY, Vanni S, Levi AD (2012) A prospective, randomized trial comparing expansile cervical laminoplasty and cervical laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy. Neurosurgery 70:264–277PubMedCrossRef Manzano GR, Casella G, Wang MY, Vanni S, Levi AD (2012) A prospective, randomized trial comparing expansile cervical laminoplasty and cervical laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy. Neurosurgery 70:264–277PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tsuzuki N, Zhogshi L, Abe R, Saiki K (1993) Paralysis of the arm after posterior decompression of the spinal cord: 1. Anatomical investigation of the mechanism of paralysis: analysis of clinical findings. Eur Spine J 2(4):191–196PubMedCrossRef Tsuzuki N, Zhogshi L, Abe R, Saiki K (1993) Paralysis of the arm after posterior decompression of the spinal cord: 1. Anatomical investigation of the mechanism of paralysis: analysis of clinical findings. Eur Spine J 2(4):191–196PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Uematsu Y, Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H (1998) Radiculopathy after laminoplasty of the cervical spine. Spine 23(19):2057–2062PubMedCrossRef Uematsu Y, Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H (1998) Radiculopathy after laminoplasty of the cervical spine. Spine 23(19):2057–2062PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hatta Y, Shiraishi T, Hase H et al (2005) Is posterior spinal cord shifting by extensive posterior decompression clinically significant for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy? Spine 30(21):2414–2419PubMedCrossRef Hatta Y, Shiraishi T, Hase H et al (2005) Is posterior spinal cord shifting by extensive posterior decompression clinically significant for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy? Spine 30(21):2414–2419PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tsuzuki N, Abe R, Saiki K, Zhongshi L (1996) Extradural tethering effect as one mechanism of radiculopathy complicating posterior decompression of the cervical spinal cord. Spine 21(2):203–211PubMedCrossRef Tsuzuki N, Abe R, Saiki K, Zhongshi L (1996) Extradural tethering effect as one mechanism of radiculopathy complicating posterior decompression of the cervical spinal cord. Spine 21(2):203–211PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dai L, Ni B, Yuan W, Jia L (1998) Radiculopathy after laminectomy for cervical compression myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(5):846–849PubMedCrossRef Dai L, Ni B, Yuan W, Jia L (1998) Radiculopathy after laminectomy for cervical compression myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(5):846–849PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wang XY, Dai LY, Xu HZ, Chi YL (2006) Prediction of spinal canal expansion following cervical laminoplasty: a computer-simulated comparison between single and double-door techniques. Spine 31(24):2863–2870PubMedCrossRef Wang XY, Dai LY, Xu HZ, Chi YL (2006) Prediction of spinal canal expansion following cervical laminoplasty: a computer-simulated comparison between single and double-door techniques. Spine 31(24):2863–2870PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Itoh T, Tsuji H (1985) Technical improvements and results of laminoplasty for compressive myelopathy in the cervical spine. Spine 10(8):729–736PubMedCrossRef Itoh T, Tsuji H (1985) Technical improvements and results of laminoplasty for compressive myelopathy in the cervical spine. Spine 10(8):729–736PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kohno K, Kumon Y, Oka Y, Matsui S, Ohue S, Sakaki S (1997) Evaluation of prognostic factors following expansive laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol 48(3):237–245PubMedCrossRef Kohno K, Kumon Y, Oka Y, Matsui S, Ohue S, Sakaki S (1997) Evaluation of prognostic factors following expansive laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol 48(3):237–245PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Patel CK, Cunningham BJ, Herkowitz HN (2002) Techniques in cervical laminoplasty. Spine J 2:450–455PubMedCrossRef Patel CK, Cunningham BJ, Herkowitz HN (2002) Techniques in cervical laminoplasty. Spine J 2:450–455PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference O’Brien MF, Peterson D, Casey AT et al (1996) A novel technique for laminoplasty augmentation of spinal canal area using titanium miniplate stabilization: a computerized morphometric analysis. Spine 21:474–483PubMedCrossRef O’Brien MF, Peterson D, Casey AT et al (1996) A novel technique for laminoplasty augmentation of spinal canal area using titanium miniplate stabilization: a computerized morphometric analysis. Spine 21:474–483PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kimura S, Gomibuchi F, Shimoda H et al (2000) Boomerang deformity of cervical spinal cord migrating between split laminae after laminoplasty. Eur Spine J 9:144–151PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kimura S, Gomibuchi F, Shimoda H et al (2000) Boomerang deformity of cervical spinal cord migrating between split laminae after laminoplasty. Eur Spine J 9:144–151PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Maezumi H (1989) Cervical radiculopathy after the posterior decompression of the cervical cord. Kanto J Orthopedic Traumatol 20:324–328 Maezumi H (1989) Cervical radiculopathy after the posterior decompression of the cervical cord. Kanto J Orthopedic Traumatol 20:324–328
26.
go back to reference Tsuzuki N, Abe R, Saiki K, Okai K (1993) Paralysis of the arm after posterior decompression of the cervical spinal cord. II. Analyses of clinical findings. Eur Spine J 2(4):197–202PubMedCrossRef Tsuzuki N, Abe R, Saiki K, Okai K (1993) Paralysis of the arm after posterior decompression of the cervical spinal cord. II. Analyses of clinical findings. Eur Spine J 2(4):197–202PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Relationship between the laminoplasty opening size and the laminoplasty opening angle, increased sagittal canal diameter and the prediction of spinal canal expansion following open-door cervical laminoplasty
Authors
Zhenfang Gu
Aili Zhang
Yong Shen
Feng Li
Xianze Sun
Wenyuan Ding
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 8/2015
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3779-3

Other articles of this Issue 8/2015

European Spine Journal 8/2015 Go to the issue