Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 5/2015

01-05-2015 | Original Article

Development and validation of a risk prediction model for tracheostomy in acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury patients

Authors: Yun Fei Hou, Yang Lv, Fang Zhou, Yun Tian, Hong Quan Ji, Zhi Shan Zhang, Yan Guo

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Tracheostomy may become indispensable for patients with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injuries. However, the early prediction of a tracheostomy is often difficult. Previous prediction models using the pulmonary function test (PFT) have limitations because some severely injured patients could not provide acceptable PFT results. We aim to develop an alternative model for predicting tracheostomy using accessible data obtained from the bedside.

Method

Clinical, neurological and radiological data from 345 consecutive patients with acute tetraplegia were retrospectively reviewed. We applied multiple logistic regression analysis (MLRA) and classification and regression tree (CART) analysis to develop the prediction model for tracheostomy. By train-test cross-validation, we used the sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) and correction rate to evaluate the performance of these models.

Results

According to the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) standards, an admission ASIA motor score (AAMS) ≤ 22, ASIA grade A and presence of respiratory complications were identified as independent predictors of tracheostomy by both models. The model derived by CART suggested that the highest signal change (HSC) in the spinal cord on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) also affected a patient’s requirement for a tracheostomy, while MLRA demonstrated that tracheostomy was also influenced by the presence of an ASIA grade B injury. The CART model had a sensitivity of 73.7 %, specificity of 89.7 %, AUC of 0.909 and overall correction rate of 87.3 %. The sensitivity, specificity, AUC and correction rate of the MLRA model were 81.8, 86.4, 0.889 and 85.7 %, respectively.

Conclusions

We suggest using the CART model in clinical applications. Patients with AAMS ≤ 1 exhibit an increased likelihood of requiring a tracheostomy. For patients with an AAMS in the range of 2–22, surgeons should consider giving these patients a tracheostomy once respiratory complications occur. Surgeons should be cautious to give a tracheostomy to patients with an AAMS ≥ 23, if the patient experiences an incomplete spinal cord injury and the HSC in the spinal cord is at C3 level or lower based on MRI. For other patients, close observation is necessary; generally, patients with complete SCI might require a tracheostomy more frequently.
Literature
1.
go back to reference [No authors listed]. Spinal cord injury facts and figures at a glance. (2014) J Spinal Cord Med 37(4):479–480 [No authors listed]. Spinal cord injury facts and figures at a glance. (2014) J Spinal Cord Med 37(4):479–480
2.
go back to reference Berney S, Bragge P, Granger C, Opdam H, Denehy L (2011) The acute respiratory management of cervical spinal cord injury in the first 6 weeks after injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord 49(1):17–29CrossRefPubMed Berney S, Bragge P, Granger C, Opdam H, Denehy L (2011) The acute respiratory management of cervical spinal cord injury in the first 6 weeks after injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord 49(1):17–29CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Griffiths J, Barber VS, Morgan L, Young JD (2005) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of the timing of tracheostomy in adult patients undergoing artificial ventilation. BMJ 330(7502):1243CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Griffiths J, Barber VS, Morgan L, Young JD (2005) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of the timing of tracheostomy in adult patients undergoing artificial ventilation. BMJ 330(7502):1243CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference Durbin CG Jr (2010) Tracheostomy: why, when, and how? Respir Care 55(8):1056–1068PubMed Durbin CG Jr (2010) Tracheostomy: why, when, and how? Respir Care 55(8):1056–1068PubMed
7.
go back to reference Berney SC, Gordon IR, Opdam HI, Denehy L (2011) A classification and regression tree to assist clinical decision making in airway management for patients with cervical spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 49(2):244–250CrossRefPubMed Berney SC, Gordon IR, Opdam HI, Denehy L (2011) A classification and regression tree to assist clinical decision making in airway management for patients with cervical spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 49(2):244–250CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Yugué I, Okada S, Ueta T et al (2012) Analysis of the risk factors for tracheostomy in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(26):E1633–E1638CrossRef Yugué I, Okada S, Ueta T et al (2012) Analysis of the risk factors for tracheostomy in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(26):E1633–E1638CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Menaker J, Kufera JA, Glaser J, Stein DM, Scalea TM (2013) Admission ASIA motor score predicting the need for tracheostomy after cervical spinal cord injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 75(4):629–634CrossRefPubMed Menaker J, Kufera JA, Glaser J, Stein DM, Scalea TM (2013) Admission ASIA motor score predicting the need for tracheostomy after cervical spinal cord injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 75(4):629–634CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Harrop JS, Sharan AD, Scheid EH Jr, Vaccaro AR, Przybylski GJ (2004) Tracheostomy placement in patients with complete cervical spinal cord injuries: American Spinal Injury Association Grade A. J Neurosurg 100(1 Suppl Spine):20–23PubMed Harrop JS, Sharan AD, Scheid EH Jr, Vaccaro AR, Przybylski GJ (2004) Tracheostomy placement in patients with complete cervical spinal cord injuries: American Spinal Injury Association Grade A. J Neurosurg 100(1 Suppl Spine):20–23PubMed
11.
go back to reference Leelapattana P, Fleming JC, Gurr KR, Bailey SI, Parry N, Bailey CS (2012) Predicting the need for tracheostomy in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73(4):880–884CrossRefPubMed Leelapattana P, Fleming JC, Gurr KR, Bailey SI, Parry N, Bailey CS (2012) Predicting the need for tracheostomy in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73(4):880–884CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Nakashima H, Yukawa Y, Imagama S et al (2013) Characterizing the need for tracheostomy placement and decannulation after cervical spinal cord injury. Eur Spine J 22(7):1526–1532CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Nakashima H, Yukawa Y, Imagama S et al (2013) Characterizing the need for tracheostomy placement and decannulation after cervical spinal cord injury. Eur Spine J 22(7):1526–1532CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
13.
go back to reference Maynard FM Jr, Bracken MB, Creasey G et al (1997) International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. American Spinal Injury Association. Spinal Cord 35(5):266–274PubMed Maynard FM Jr, Bracken MB, Creasey G  et al (1997) International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. American Spinal Injury Association. Spinal Cord 35(5):266–274PubMed
14.
go back to reference Fehlings MG, Rao SC, Tator CH et al (1999) The optimal radiologic method for assessing spinal canal compromise and cord compression in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. Part II: results of a multicenter study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24(6):605–613CrossRef Fehlings MG, Rao SC, Tator CH et al (1999) The optimal radiologic method for assessing spinal canal compromise and cord compression in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. Part II: results of a multicenter study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24(6):605–613CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Furlan JC, Fehlings MG, Massicotte EM et al (2007) A quantitative and reproducible method to assess cord compression and canal stenosis after cervical spine trauma: a study of interrater and intrarater reliability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(19):2083–2091CrossRef Furlan JC, Fehlings MG, Massicotte EM et al (2007) A quantitative and reproducible method to assess cord compression and canal stenosis after cervical spine trauma: a study of interrater and intrarater reliability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(19):2083–2091CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Miyanji F, Furlan JC, Aarabi B, Arnold PM, Fehlings MG (2007) Acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury: MR imaging findings correlated with neurologic outcome—prospective study with 100 consecutive patients. Radiology 243(3):820–827CrossRefPubMed Miyanji F, Furlan JC, Aarabi B, Arnold PM, Fehlings MG (2007) Acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury: MR imaging findings correlated with neurologic outcome—prospective study with 100 consecutive patients. Radiology 243(3):820–827CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kulkarni MV, McArdle CB, Kopanicky D et al (1987) Acute spinal cord injury: MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 164(3):837–843CrossRefPubMed Kulkarni MV, McArdle CB, Kopanicky D et al (1987) Acute spinal cord injury: MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 164(3):837–843CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Book Breiman L, Friedman J, Stone C et al (1984) Classification and regression trees. Chapman and Hall, London Book Breiman L, Friedman J, Stone C et al (1984) Classification and regression trees. Chapman and Hall, London
19.
20.
go back to reference Ditunno JF, Little JW, Tessler A, Burns AS (2004) Spinal shock revisited: a four-phase model. Spinal Cord 42(7):383–395CrossRefPubMed Ditunno JF, Little JW, Tessler A, Burns AS (2004) Spinal shock revisited: a four-phase model. Spinal Cord 42(7):383–395CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Dohoo IR, Ducrot C, Fourichon C (1997) An overview of techniques for dealing with large numbers of independent variables in epidemiologic studies. Prev Vet Med. 29(3):221–239CrossRefPubMed Dohoo IR, Ducrot C, Fourichon C (1997) An overview of techniques for dealing with large numbers of independent variables in epidemiologic studies. Prev Vet Med. 29(3):221–239CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Winslow C, Bode RK, Felton D, Chen D, Meyer PR Jr (2002) Impact of respiratory complications on length of stay and hospital costs in acute cervical spine injury. Chest 121(5):1548–1554CrossRefPubMed Winslow C, Bode RK, Felton D, Chen D, Meyer PR Jr (2002) Impact of respiratory complications on length of stay and hospital costs in acute cervical spine injury. Chest 121(5):1548–1554CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Tator CH (1994) Ischemia as a secondary neural injury. In: Salzman SK, Faden AI (eds) Neurobiology of central nervous system trauma. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 209–215 Tator CH (1994) Ischemia as a secondary neural injury. In: Salzman SK, Faden AI (eds) Neurobiology of central nervous system trauma. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 209–215
24.
go back to reference Roquilly A, Seguin P, Mimoz O et al (2014) Risk factors for prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation in acute traumatic tetraplegic patients—a retrospective cohort study. J Crit Care 29(2):313.e7–313.e13CrossRef Roquilly A, Seguin P, Mimoz O et al (2014) Risk factors for prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation in acute traumatic tetraplegic patients—a retrospective cohort study. J Crit Care 29(2):313.e7–313.e13CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Aarabi B, Harrop JS, Tator CH et al (2012) Predictors of pulmonary complications in blunt traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg Spine 17(1 Suppl):38–45PubMed Aarabi B, Harrop JS, Tator CH et al (2012) Predictors of pulmonary complications in blunt traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg Spine 17(1 Suppl):38–45PubMed
Metadata
Title
Development and validation of a risk prediction model for tracheostomy in acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury patients
Authors
Yun Fei Hou
Yang Lv
Fang Zhou
Yun Tian
Hong Quan Ji
Zhi Shan Zhang
Yan Guo
Publication date
01-05-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3731-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

European Spine Journal 5/2015 Go to the issue