Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 2/2014

01-02-2014 | Original Article

Multifidus innervation and muscle assessment post-spinal surgery

Authors: Derek T. Cawley, Michael Alexander, Seamus Morris

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Assessment of the integrity of the multifidus muscles and corresponding nerve roots, post-open (OSS) versus minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) for lumbar spine fractures.

Methods

We investigated the first six patients undergoing MISS in our institution and age- and sex-matched them with 6 random patients who previously had OSS. All had a similar lumbar fracture configuration without evidence of spinal cord injury. All were assessed using ultrasound muscle quantification and electromyographic studies at a minimum of 6 months post-operatively. Mean cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured at sequential levels within and adjacent to the operative field. Concentric needle electromyography was performed at instrumented and adjacent non-instrumented levels in each patient.

Results

Mean CSA across all lumbar multifidus muscles was 4.29 cm2 in the MISS group, 2.26 cm2 for OSS (p = 0.08). At the instrumented levels, mean CSA was 4.21 cm2 for MISS and 2.03 cm2 for OSS (p = 0.12). At non-instrumented adjacent levels, mean CSA was 4.46 cm2 in the MISS group, 2.87 cm2 for OSS (p = 0.05).
Electromyography at non-instrumented adjacent levels demonstrated nerve function within normal limits in 5/6 levels in the MISS group compared to 1/6 levels in the OSS (p = 0.03). Instrumented levels demonstrated nerve function within normal limits in 5/12 levels in the MISS group compared with 4/12 in the OSS group, including moderate–severe denervation at 5 levels in the OSS group (p = 0.15).

Conclusions

Posterior instrumented MISS demonstrates a significantly superior preservation of the medial branch of the posterior ramus of the spinal nerve and less muscle atrophy, particularly at adjacent levels when compared to OSS.
Literature
1.
go back to reference MacDonald DA, Moseley GL, Hodges PW (2006) The lumbar multifidus: does the evidence support clinical beliefs? Man Ther 11(4):254–263PubMedCrossRef MacDonald DA, Moseley GL, Hodges PW (2006) The lumbar multifidus: does the evidence support clinical beliefs? Man Ther 11(4):254–263PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Macintosh J, Valencia F, Bogduk N et al (1986) The morphology of the human lumbar multifidus. Clin Biomech 1(4):196–204CrossRef Macintosh J, Valencia F, Bogduk N et al (1986) The morphology of the human lumbar multifidus. Clin Biomech 1(4):196–204CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rantanen J, Hurme M, Falck B et al (1993) The lumbar multifidus muscle five years after surgery for a lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 18:568–574PubMedCrossRef Rantanen J, Hurme M, Falck B et al (1993) The lumbar multifidus muscle five years after surgery for a lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 18:568–574PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljiarvi L et al (1993) Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine 18:575–581PubMedCrossRef Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljiarvi L et al (1993) Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine 18:575–581PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gejo R, Matsui H, Kawaguchi Y et al (1999) Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery. Spine 24:1023–1028PubMedCrossRef Gejo R, Matsui H, Kawaguchi Y et al (1999) Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery. Spine 24:1023–1028PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Weinstein JN, Rydevik BL, Rauschning W (1992) Anatomic and technical considerations of pedicle screw fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 284:34–46PubMed Weinstein JN, Rydevik BL, Rauschning W (1992) Anatomic and technical considerations of pedicle screw fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 284:34–46PubMed
7.
go back to reference Styf JR, Willen J (1998) The effects of external compression by three different retractors on pressure in the erector spine muscles during and after posterior lumbar spine surgery in humans. Spine 23:354–358PubMedCrossRef Styf JR, Willen J (1998) The effects of external compression by three different retractors on pressure in the erector spine muscles during and after posterior lumbar spine surgery in humans. Spine 23:354–358PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nagayama R, Nakamura H, Yamano Y et al (2000) An experimental study of the effects of nerve root retraction on the posterior ramus. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(4):418–424CrossRef Nagayama R, Nakamura H, Yamano Y et al (2000) An experimental study of the effects of nerve root retraction on the posterior ramus. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(4):418–424CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kim KT, Lee SH, Suk KS et al (2006) The quantitative analysis of tissue injury markers after mini-open lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(6):712–716CrossRef Kim KT, Lee SH, Suk KS et al (2006) The quantitative analysis of tissue injury markers after mini-open lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(6):712–716CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rahman M, Summers LE, Richter B et al (2008) Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the “classic” open approach. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 51(2):100–105PubMedCrossRef Rahman M, Summers LE, Richter B et al (2008) Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the “classic” open approach. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 51(2):100–105PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference McGirt MJ, Parker SL, Lerner J et al (2011) Comparative analysis of perioperative surgical site infection after minimally invasive versus open posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of hospital billing and discharge data from 5170 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 14(6):771–778PubMedCrossRef McGirt MJ, Parker SL, Lerner J et al (2011) Comparative analysis of perioperative surgical site infection after minimally invasive versus open posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of hospital billing and discharge data from 5170 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 14(6):771–778PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hides JA, Cooper DH, Stokes MJ (1992) Diagnostic ultrasound imaging for measurement of the lumbar multifidus muscle in normal young adults. Physiother Theory Pract 8(1):19–26 Hides JA, Cooper DH, Stokes MJ (1992) Diagnostic ultrasound imaging for measurement of the lumbar multifidus muscle in normal young adults. Physiother Theory Pract 8(1):19–26
13.
go back to reference Haig AJ, Moffroid M, Henry S et al (1991) A technique for needle localization in paraspinal muscles with cadaveric confirmation. Muscle Nerve 14(6):521–526PubMedCrossRef Haig AJ, Moffroid M, Henry S et al (1991) A technique for needle localization in paraspinal muscles with cadaveric confirmation. Muscle Nerve 14(6):521–526PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hides J, Gilmore C, Stanton W et al (2008) Multifidus size and symmetry among chronic LBP and healthy asymptomatic subjects. Man Ther 13(1):43–49PubMedCrossRef Hides J, Gilmore C, Stanton W et al (2008) Multifidus size and symmetry among chronic LBP and healthy asymptomatic subjects. Man Ther 13(1):43–49PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Payer M (2011) “Minimally invasive” lumbar spine surgery: a critical review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 153(7):1455–1459CrossRef Payer M (2011) “Minimally invasive” lumbar spine surgery: a critical review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 153(7):1455–1459CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Foley KT, Lefkowitz MA (2002) Advances in minimally invasive spine surgery. Clin Neurosurg 49:499–517PubMed Foley KT, Lefkowitz MA (2002) Advances in minimally invasive spine surgery. Clin Neurosurg 49:499–517PubMed
17.
go back to reference Mobbs RJ, Sivabalan P, Li J (2011) Technique, challenges and indications for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. J Clin Neurosci 18(6):741–749PubMedCrossRef Mobbs RJ, Sivabalan P, Li J (2011) Technique, challenges and indications for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. J Clin Neurosci 18(6):741–749PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Koppenhaver SL, Hebert JJ, Fritz JM et al (2009) Reliability of rehabilitative ultrasound imaging of the transversus abdominis and lumbar multifidus muscles. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90(1):87–94PubMed Koppenhaver SL, Hebert JJ, Fritz JM et al (2009) Reliability of rehabilitative ultrasound imaging of the transversus abdominis and lumbar multifidus muscles. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90(1):87–94PubMed
19.
go back to reference Hebert JJ, Koppenhaver SL, Parent EC et al (2009) A systematic review of the reliability of rehabilitative ultrasound imaging for the quantitative assessment of the abdominal and lumbar trunk muscles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(23):E848–E856CrossRef Hebert JJ, Koppenhaver SL, Parent EC et al (2009) A systematic review of the reliability of rehabilitative ultrasound imaging for the quantitative assessment of the abdominal and lumbar trunk muscles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(23):E848–E856CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wallwork TL, Hides JA, Stanton WR (2007) Intrarater and interrater reliability of assessment of lumbar multifidus muscle thickness using rehabilitative ultrasound imaging. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 37(10):608–612PubMedCrossRef Wallwork TL, Hides JA, Stanton WR (2007) Intrarater and interrater reliability of assessment of lumbar multifidus muscle thickness using rehabilitative ultrasound imaging. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 37(10):608–612PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Haig AJ, LeBreck DB, Powley SG (1995) Paraspinal mapping. Quantified needle electromyography of the paraspinal muscles in persons without low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(6):715–721CrossRef Haig AJ, LeBreck DB, Powley SG (1995) Paraspinal mapping. Quantified needle electromyography of the paraspinal muscles in persons without low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(6):715–721CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Haig AJ, Talley C, Grobler LJ et al (1993) Paraspinal mapping: quantified needle electromyography in lumbar radiculopathy. Muscle Nerve 16(5):477–484PubMedCrossRef Haig AJ, Talley C, Grobler LJ et al (1993) Paraspinal mapping: quantified needle electromyography in lumbar radiculopathy. Muscle Nerve 16(5):477–484PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Regev GJ, Lee YP, Taylor WR et al (2009) Nerve injury to the posterior rami medial branch during the insertion of pedicle screws: comparison of mini-open versus percutaneous pedicle screw insertion techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(11):1239–1242CrossRef Regev GJ, Lee YP, Taylor WR et al (2009) Nerve injury to the posterior rami medial branch during the insertion of pedicle screws: comparison of mini-open versus percutaneous pedicle screw insertion techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(11):1239–1242CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kim DY, Lee SH, Chung SK et al (2005) Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(1):123–129CrossRef Kim DY, Lee SH, Chung SK et al (2005) Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(1):123–129CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Li C, Xu HZ, Wang XY et al (2007) Comparison of the paraspinal muscle change of percutaneous and open pedicle screw fixation in the treatment for thoracolumbar fractures. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 45(14):972–975 (In Chinese)PubMed Li C, Xu HZ, Wang XY et al (2007) Comparison of the paraspinal muscle change of percutaneous and open pedicle screw fixation in the treatment for thoracolumbar fractures. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 45(14):972–975 (In Chinese)PubMed
26.
go back to reference Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H (1996) Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymatic analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21(8):941–944CrossRef Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H (1996) Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymatic analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21(8):941–944CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Datta G, McGregor A, Medhi-Zadeh S et al (2010) The impact of intermittent retraction on paraspinal muscle function during lumbar surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(20):E1050–E1057CrossRef Datta G, McGregor A, Medhi-Zadeh S et al (2010) The impact of intermittent retraction on paraspinal muscle function during lumbar surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(20):E1050–E1057CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Mannion AF, Denzler R, Dvorak J et al (2007) A randomised controlled trial of post-operative rehabilitation after surgical decompression of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 16(8):1101–1117PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Mannion AF, Denzler R, Dvorak J et al (2007) A randomised controlled trial of post-operative rehabilitation after surgical decompression of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 16(8):1101–1117PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Mannion AF, Müntener M, Taimela S et al (2001) Comparison of three active therapies for chronic low back pain: results of a randomized clinical trial with one-year follow-up. Rheumatology 40(7):772–778 (Oxford)PubMedCrossRef Mannion AF, Müntener M, Taimela S et al (2001) Comparison of three active therapies for chronic low back pain: results of a randomized clinical trial with one-year follow-up. Rheumatology 40(7):772–778 (Oxford)PubMedCrossRef
30.
31.
go back to reference Dai LY, Jiang LS, Jiang SD (2009) Posterior short-segment fixation with or without fusion for thoracolumbar burst fractures. a five to seven-year prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(5):1033–1041PubMedCrossRef Dai LY, Jiang LS, Jiang SD (2009) Posterior short-segment fixation with or without fusion for thoracolumbar burst fractures. a five to seven-year prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(5):1033–1041PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Hyun SJ, Kim YB, Kim YS et al (2007) Postoperative changes in paraspinal muscle volume: comparison between paramedian interfascial and midline approaches for lumbar fusion. J Korean Med Sci 22(4):646–651PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hyun SJ, Kim YB, Kim YS et al (2007) Postoperative changes in paraspinal muscle volume: comparison between paramedian interfascial and midline approaches for lumbar fusion. J Korean Med Sci 22(4):646–651PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Stevens KJ, Spenciner DB, Griffiths KL et al (2006) Comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open posterolateral lumbar fusion using magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure studies. J Spinal Disord Tech 19(2):77–86PubMedCrossRef Stevens KJ, Spenciner DB, Griffiths KL et al (2006) Comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open posterolateral lumbar fusion using magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure studies. J Spinal Disord Tech 19(2):77–86PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Wood K, Buttermann G, Mehbod A et al (2003) Operative compared with nonoperative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurological deficit. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85(5):773–781PubMed Wood K, Buttermann G, Mehbod A et al (2003) Operative compared with nonoperative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurological deficit. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85(5):773–781PubMed
35.
go back to reference McCormack T, KaraiKovic E, Gaines W (1994) The load sharing classification of spine fracture. Spine 19(15):1741–1744PubMedCrossRef McCormack T, KaraiKovic E, Gaines W (1994) The load sharing classification of spine fracture. Spine 19(15):1741–1744PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Multifidus innervation and muscle assessment post-spinal surgery
Authors
Derek T. Cawley
Michael Alexander
Seamus Morris
Publication date
01-02-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2962-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

European Spine Journal 2/2014 Go to the issue