Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 10/2013

01-10-2013 | Original Article

AO spine injury classification system: a revision proposal for the thoracic and lumbar spine

Authors: Maximilian Reinhold, Laurent Audigé, Klaus John Schnake, Carlo Bellabarba, Li-Yang Dai, F. Cumhur Oner

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 10/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The AO Spine Classification Group was established to propose a revised AO spine injury classification system. This paper provides details on the rationale, methodology, and results of the initial stage of the revision process for injuries of the thoracic and lumbar (TL) spine.

Methods

In a structured, iterative process involving five experienced spine trauma surgeons from various parts of the world, consecutive cases with TL injuries were classified independently by members of the classification group, and analyzed for classification reliability using the Kappa coefficient (κ) and for accuracy using latent class analysis. The reasons for disagreements were examined systematically during review meetings. In four successive sessions, the system was revised until consensus and sufficient reproducibility were achieved.

Results

The TL spine injury system is based on three main injury categories adapted from the original Magerl AO concept: A (compression), B (tension band), and C (displacement) type injuries. Type-A injuries include four subtypes (wedge-impaction/split-pincer/incomplete burst/complete burst); B-type injuries are divided between purely osseous and osseo-ligamentous disruptions; and C-type injuries are further categorized into three subtypes (hyperextension/translation/separation). There is no subgroup division. The reliability of injury types (A, B, C) was good (κ = 0.77). The surgeons’ pairwise Kappa ranged from 0.69 to 0.90. Kappa coefficients κ for reliability of injury subtypes ranged from 0.26 to 0.78.

Conclusions

The proposed TL spine injury system is based on clinically relevant parameters. Final evaluation data showed reasonable reliability and accuracy. Further validation of the proposed revised AO Classification requires follow-up evaluation sessions and documentation by more surgeons from different countries and backgrounds and is subject to modification based on clinical parameters during subsequent phases.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Holdsworth F (1970) Fractures, dislocations, and fracture-dislocations of the spine. J Bone Jt Surg (Am) 52:1534–1551 Holdsworth F (1970) Fractures, dislocations, and fracture-dislocations of the spine. J Bone Jt Surg (Am) 52:1534–1551
2.
go back to reference Whitesides TE Jr (1977) Traumatic kyphosis of the thoracolumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 128:78–92PubMed Whitesides TE Jr (1977) Traumatic kyphosis of the thoracolumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 128:78–92PubMed
3.
go back to reference Denis F (1983) The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine 8:817–831PubMedCrossRef Denis F (1983) The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine 8:817–831PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wood KB, Khanna G, Vaccaro AR, Arnold PM, Harris MB, Mehbod AA (2005) Assessment of two thoracolumbar fracture classification systems as used by multiple surgeons. J Bone Jt Surg (Am) 87:1423–1429CrossRef Wood KB, Khanna G, Vaccaro AR, Arnold PM, Harris MB, Mehbod AA (2005) Assessment of two thoracolumbar fracture classification systems as used by multiple surgeons. J Bone Jt Surg (Am) 87:1423–1429CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Oner FC, Ramos LM, Simmermacher RK, Kingma PT, Diekerhof CH, Dhert WJ, Verbout AJ (2002) Classification of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: problems of reproducibility. A study of 53 patients using CT and MRI. Eur Spine J 11:235–245PubMedCrossRef Oner FC, Ramos LM, Simmermacher RK, Kingma PT, Diekerhof CH, Dhert WJ, Verbout AJ (2002) Classification of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: problems of reproducibility. A study of 53 patients using CT and MRI. Eur Spine J 11:235–245PubMedCrossRef
6.
7.
go back to reference Audigé L (2009) Development and validation of a new generation for spine injury classification. In: Chapman JR, Dettori JR, Norvell DC (eds) Spine classification and severity measures, 1st edn. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 503–507 Audigé L (2009) Development and validation of a new generation for spine injury classification. In: Chapman JR, Dettori JR, Norvell DC (eds) Spine classification and severity measures, 1st edn. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 503–507
8.
go back to reference Audigé L, Bhandari M, Hanson B, Kellam J (2005) A concept for the validation of fracture classifications. J Orthop Trauma 19:404–409CrossRef Audigé L, Bhandari M, Hanson B, Kellam J (2005) A concept for the validation of fracture classifications. J Orthop Trauma 19:404–409CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chapman JR, Dettori JR, Norvell DC (2009) Spine classifications and severity measures. Thieme, Stuttgart Chapman JR, Dettori JR, Norvell DC (2009) Spine classifications and severity measures. Thieme, Stuttgart
10.
go back to reference Mirza SK, Mirza AJ, Chapman JR, Anderson PA (2002) Classifications of thoracic and lumbar fractures: rationale and supporting data. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 10:364–377PubMed Mirza SK, Mirza AJ, Chapman JR, Anderson PA (2002) Classifications of thoracic and lumbar fractures: rationale and supporting data. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 10:364–377PubMed
11.
go back to reference van Middendorp JJ, Audigé L, Hanson B, Chapman JR, Hosman AJ (2010) What should an ideal spinal injury classification system consist of? A methodological review and conceptual proposal for future classifications. Eur Spine J 19:1238–1249PubMedCrossRef van Middendorp JJ, Audigé L, Hanson B, Chapman JR, Hosman AJ (2010) What should an ideal spinal injury classification system consist of? A methodological review and conceptual proposal for future classifications. Eur Spine J 19:1238–1249PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Slongo T, Audigé L, AO Pediatric Classification Group (2007) Fracture and dislocation classification compendium for children: the AO pediatric comprehensive classification of long bone fractures (PCCF). J Orthop Trauma 21:S135–S160PubMedCrossRef Slongo T, Audigé L, AO Pediatric Classification Group (2007) Fracture and dislocation classification compendium for children: the AO pediatric comprehensive classification of long bone fractures (PCCF). J Orthop Trauma 21:S135–S160PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Diaz JJ Jr, Cullinane DC, Altman DT et al (2007) Practice management guidelines for the screening of thoracolumbar spine fracture. J Trauma 63:709–718PubMedCrossRef Diaz JJ Jr, Cullinane DC, Altman DT et al (2007) Practice management guidelines for the screening of thoracolumbar spine fracture. J Trauma 63:709–718PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3:184–201PubMedCrossRef Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3:184–201PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Blauth M, Bastian L, Knop C, Lange U, Tusch G (1999) Inter-observer reliability in the classification of thoraco-lumbar spinal injuries. Orthopade 28:662–681PubMed Blauth M, Bastian L, Knop C, Lange U, Tusch G (1999) Inter-observer reliability in the classification of thoraco-lumbar spinal injuries. Orthopade 28:662–681PubMed
16.
go back to reference Böhler L (1951) Die Technik der Knochenbruchbehandlung. Maudrich, Wien Böhler L (1951) Die Technik der Knochenbruchbehandlung. Maudrich, Wien
17.
go back to reference Nicoll EA (1949) Fractures of the dorso-lumbar spine. J Bone Jt Surg (Br) 31:376–394 Nicoll EA (1949) Fractures of the dorso-lumbar spine. J Bone Jt Surg (Br) 31:376–394
18.
go back to reference Watson-Jones R (1938) The results of postural reduction of fractures of the spine. J Bone Jt Surg (Am) 20:567–586 Watson-Jones R (1938) The results of postural reduction of fractures of the spine. J Bone Jt Surg (Am) 20:567–586
19.
go back to reference Grunhagen J, Egbers HJ, Heller M, Reuter M (2005) Comparison of spine injuries by means of CT and MRI according to the classification of Magerl. Rofo 177:828–834PubMedCrossRef Grunhagen J, Egbers HJ, Heller M, Reuter M (2005) Comparison of spine injuries by means of CT and MRI according to the classification of Magerl. Rofo 177:828–834PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lee HM, Kim HS, Kim DJ, Suk KS, Park JO, Kim NH (2000) Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting posterior ligament complex injury in thoracolumbar spinal fractures. Spine 25:2079–2084PubMedCrossRef Lee HM, Kim HS, Kim DJ, Suk KS, Park JO, Kim NH (2000) Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting posterior ligament complex injury in thoracolumbar spinal fractures. Spine 25:2079–2084PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Audigé L, Bhandari M, Kellam J (2004) How reliable are reliability studies of fracture classifications? A systematic review of their methodologies. Acta Orthop Scand 75:184–194PubMedCrossRef Audigé L, Bhandari M, Kellam J (2004) How reliable are reliability studies of fracture classifications? A systematic review of their methodologies. Acta Orthop Scand 75:184–194PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schnake KJ, Von Scotti F, Haas NP, Kandziora F (2008) Type-B injuries of the thoracolumbar spine: misinterpretations of the integrity of the posterior ligament complex using radiologic diagnostics. Unfallchirurg 111:977–984PubMedCrossRef Schnake KJ, Von Scotti F, Haas NP, Kandziora F (2008) Type-B injuries of the thoracolumbar spine: misinterpretations of the integrity of the posterior ligament complex using radiologic diagnostics. Unfallchirurg 111:977–984PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Vaccaro AR, Lehman RA Jr, Hurlbert RJ et al (2005) A new classification of thoracolumbar injuries: the importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status. Spine 30:2325–2333PubMedCrossRef Vaccaro AR, Lehman RA Jr, Hurlbert RJ et al (2005) A new classification of thoracolumbar injuries: the importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status. Spine 30:2325–2333PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lee JY, Vaccaro AR, Lim MR et al (2005) Thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score: a new paradigm for the treatment of thoracolumbar spine trauma. J Orthop Sci 10:671–675PubMedCrossRef Lee JY, Vaccaro AR, Lim MR et al (2005) Thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score: a new paradigm for the treatment of thoracolumbar spine trauma. J Orthop Sci 10:671–675PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Schweitzer KM Jr, Vaccaro AR, Lee JY, Grauer JN (2006) Confusion regarding mechanisms of injury in the setting of thoracolumbar spinal trauma: a survey of The Spine Trauma Study Group (STSG). J Spinal Disord Tech 19:528–530PubMedCrossRef Schweitzer KM Jr, Vaccaro AR, Lee JY, Grauer JN (2006) Confusion regarding mechanisms of injury in the setting of thoracolumbar spinal trauma: a survey of The Spine Trauma Study Group (STSG). J Spinal Disord Tech 19:528–530PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Vaccaro AR, Zeiller SC, Hulbert RJ et al (2005) The thoracolumbar injury severity score: a proposed treatment algorithm. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:209–215PubMed Vaccaro AR, Zeiller SC, Hulbert RJ et al (2005) The thoracolumbar injury severity score: a proposed treatment algorithm. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:209–215PubMed
27.
go back to reference Whang PG, Vaccaro AR, Poelstra KA et al (2007) The influence of fracture mechanism and morphology on the reliability and validity of two novel thoracolumbar injury classification systems. Spine 32:791–795PubMedCrossRef Whang PG, Vaccaro AR, Poelstra KA et al (2007) The influence of fracture mechanism and morphology on the reliability and validity of two novel thoracolumbar injury classification systems. Spine 32:791–795PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Patel AA, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ et al (2007) The adoption of a new classification system: time-dependent variation in interobserver reliability of the thoracolumbar injury severity score classification system. Spine 32:E105–E110PubMedCrossRef Patel AA, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ et al (2007) The adoption of a new classification system: time-dependent variation in interobserver reliability of the thoracolumbar injury severity score classification system. Spine 32:E105–E110PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Raja RY, Fisher C, Wilsey J et al (2006) Agreement between orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons regarding a new algorithm for the treatment of thoracolumbar injuries: a multicenter reliability study. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:477–482CrossRef Raja RY, Fisher C, Wilsey J et al (2006) Agreement between orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons regarding a new algorithm for the treatment of thoracolumbar injuries: a multicenter reliability study. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:477–482CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Reinhold M, Knop C, Beisse R et al (2009) Operative treatment of traumatic fractures of the thorax and lumbar spine. Part II: surgical treatment and radiological findings. Unfallchirurg 112:149–167PubMedCrossRef Reinhold M, Knop C, Beisse R et al (2009) Operative treatment of traumatic fractures of the thorax and lumbar spine. Part II: surgical treatment and radiological findings. Unfallchirurg 112:149–167PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
AO spine injury classification system: a revision proposal for the thoracic and lumbar spine
Authors
Maximilian Reinhold
Laurent Audigé
Klaus John Schnake
Carlo Bellabarba
Li-Yang Dai
F. Cumhur Oner
Publication date
01-10-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 10/2013
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2738-0

Other articles of this Issue 10/2013

European Spine Journal 10/2013 Go to the issue