Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 10/2012

01-10-2012 | Original Article

Does anterior shoulder balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correlate with posterior shoulder balance clinically and radiographically?

Authors: Scott Yang, Eric Feuchtbaum, Brian C. Werner, Woojin Cho, Vasantha Reddi, Vincent Arlet

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 10/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) often present with a disfiguring shoulder imbalance. Shoulder balance (Sh.B) is of significant importance to the patient’s self-perception. Previous studies have correlated Sh.B with respect to only the clinical posterior view correlated with radiographs. It is important, however, to address Sh.B with respect to anterior view of the patients’ shoulders as if patients were viewing in a mirror. In this study, we evaluated the anterior Sh.B and correlated it with posterior Sh.B clinically and radiographically in Lenke type 1 and 2 curves.

Method

An online scoliosis database was queried to identify 74 AIS patients with Lenke 1 (n = 55, age 15.28 ± 3.35) and 2 (n = 19, age 15.66 ± 3.72) curves with a complete set of PA radiographs and anterior and posterior photos. Radiographic measures for Sh.B included Cobb angles, T1 tilt, first rib angle, and clavicle-rib intersection angle. Clinical measures for Sh.B included inner shoulder angle, outer shoulder angle, and axillary fold angle. Regression analysis with Pearson’s correlation and ANOVA for statistical significance was used for analysis.

Results

For Lenke 1 curves, there was moderate statistically significant correlation between anterior and posterior clinical Sh.B (R = 0.35–0.41). There was only weak to moderate correlation between radiographic and clinical measures. For Lenke 2 curves, there was a weak to moderate correlation between anterior and posterior clinical Sh.B (R = 0.25–0.45), though not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant correlation between any radiographic measures and posterior Sh.B. There was, however, moderate and significant correlation between radiographic measures and anterior Sh.B.

Conclusion

There is no strong correlation between anterior and posterior clinical Sh.B, and surgeons should evaluate both sides in planning deformity correction, especially in Lenke 2 curves. None of the radiographic measures showed strong correlation (R > 0.8) with anterior or posterior clinical Sh.B. A stronger correlation existed between radiographic measures and anterior Sh.B measurements compared with posterior clinical Sh.B measurements in Lenke 2 curves further necessitating anterior evaluation in this group.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Orvomaa E (1998) Psychological evaluations of patients operated for idiopathic scoliosis by the Harrington method. Int J Rehabil Res 21(2):169–178PubMedCrossRef Orvomaa E (1998) Psychological evaluations of patients operated for idiopathic scoliosis by the Harrington method. Int J Rehabil Res 21(2):169–178PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Danielsson AJ, Wiklund I, Pehrsson K et al (2001) Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery. Eur Spine J 10(4):278–288PubMedCrossRef Danielsson AJ, Wiklund I, Pehrsson K et al (2001) Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery. Eur Spine J 10(4):278–288PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Payne WK III, Ogilvie JW, Resnick MD et al (1997) Does scoliosis have a psychological impact and does gender make a difference? Spine 22(12):1380–1384 Payne WK III, Ogilvie JW, Resnick MD et al (1997) Does scoliosis have a psychological impact and does gender make a difference? Spine 22(12):1380–1384
4.
go back to reference Asher MA, Burton DC (2006) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: natural history and long term treatment effects. Scoliosis 1(1):2PubMedCrossRef Asher MA, Burton DC (2006) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: natural history and long term treatment effects. Scoliosis 1(1):2PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Qiu XS, Ma WW, Li WG, Wang B et al (2009) Discrepancy between radiographic shoulder balance and cosmetic shoulder balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with double thoracic curve. Eur Spine 18(1):45–51CrossRef Qiu XS, Ma WW, Li WG, Wang B et al (2009) Discrepancy between radiographic shoulder balance and cosmetic shoulder balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with double thoracic curve. Eur Spine 18(1):45–51CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Akel I, Pekmezci M, Hayran M, Genc Y et al (2008) Evaluation of shoulder balance in the normal adolescent population and its correlation with radiological parameters. Eur Spine J 3:348–354CrossRef Akel I, Pekmezci M, Hayran M, Genc Y et al (2008) Evaluation of shoulder balance in the normal adolescent population and its correlation with radiological parameters. Eur Spine J 3:348–354CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Margulies JY, Floman Y, Robin GC et al (1998) An algorithm for selection of instrumentation levels in scoliosis. Eur Spine J 7(2):88–94PubMedCrossRef Margulies JY, Floman Y, Robin GC et al (1998) An algorithm for selection of instrumentation levels in scoliosis. Eur Spine J 7(2):88–94PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference King HA (1988) Selection of fusion levels for posterior instrumentation and fusion in idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 19(2):247–255PubMed King HA (1988) Selection of fusion levels for posterior instrumentation and fusion in idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 19(2):247–255PubMed
9.
go back to reference Arlet V, Reddi V (2007) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Lenke type I–VI case studies. Neurosurg Clin N Am 18(2):e1–e24PubMedCrossRef Arlet V, Reddi V (2007) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Lenke type I–VI case studies. Neurosurg Clin N Am 18(2):e1–e24PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bago J, Carrera L, March B et al (1996) Four radiological measures to estimate shoulder balance in scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop B 5(1):31–34PubMedCrossRef Bago J, Carrera L, March B et al (1996) Four radiological measures to estimate shoulder balance in scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop B 5(1):31–34PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Yang S, Jones-Quaidoo SM, Eager M, Griffin JW et al (2011) Right adolescent idiopathic thoracic curve (Lenke 1 A and B): does cost of instrumentation and implant density improve radiographic and cosmetic parameters? Eur Spine J 20(7):1039–1047PubMedCrossRef Yang S, Jones-Quaidoo SM, Eager M, Griffin JW et al (2011) Right adolescent idiopathic thoracic curve (Lenke 1 A and B): does cost of instrumentation and implant density improve radiographic and cosmetic parameters? Eur Spine J 20(7):1039–1047PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ilharreborde B, Even J, Lefevre Y et al (2008) How to determine the upper level of instrumentation in Lenke types 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study of 132 patients. J Pediatr Orthop 28(7):733–739PubMedCrossRef Ilharreborde B, Even J, Lefevre Y et al (2008) How to determine the upper level of instrumentation in Lenke types 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study of 132 patients. J Pediatr Orthop 28(7):733–739PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Does anterior shoulder balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correlate with posterior shoulder balance clinically and radiographically?
Authors
Scott Yang
Eric Feuchtbaum
Brian C. Werner
Woojin Cho
Vasantha Reddi
Vincent Arlet
Publication date
01-10-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 10/2012
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2434-5

Other articles of this Issue 10/2012

European Spine Journal 10/2012 Go to the issue