Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 11/2012

01-11-2012 | Original Article

The evaluation of lumbosacral dysplasia in young patients with lumbosacral spondylolisthesis: comparison with controls and relationship with the severity of slip

Authors: Abhijit Pawar, Hubert Labelle, Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 11/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Comparison of lumbosacral dysplasia between normal individuals and patients with low and high grade spondylolisthesis has not been done previously. The objective of this study is to evaluate the relationship between lumbosacral dysplasia and severity of slip in young patients with lumbosacral spondylolisthesis.

Methods

Postero-anterior and lateral radiographs of 120 normal individuals and 131 patients with developmental spondylolisthesis (91 low and 40 high grades) were reviewed. Quantitative evaluation of lumbosacral dysplasia was done using 6 criteria involving the degree of laminar dysplasia, degree of facet dysplasia, size of L5 transverse processes, L5/S1 disc height, type of sacral doming and L5 lumbar index. Subjects were categorized as having no/low, moderate or severe dysplasia based on the total dysplasia score. Comparisons in total dysplasia score between normal, low grade and high grade groups were performed and the correlation between degree of dysplasia and percentage of slip was assessed.

Results

Most normal individuals (88.3%) had no/low dysplasia; most patients with low grade spondylolisthesis (61.5%) had moderate dysplasia, while most patients with high grade spondylolisthesis (72.5%) had severe dysplasia. There was a significant difference in dysplasia between normal individuals and patients with spondylolisthesis. Dysplasia also varied significantly between low and high grade spondylolisthesis. There was a strong positive correlation (r = 0.63) between severity of dysplasia and percentage of slip.

Conclusion

There is a significant relationship between the severity of spondylolisthesis and lumbosacral dysplasia, with mainly no/low dysplasia observed in controls and increasing total dysplasia scores in higher grades of spondylolisthesis. In addition, a variable degree of dysplasia was found within groups with low or high grade spondylolisthesis, suggesting that different subgroups of patients exist with regard to dysplasia. Thus the degree of dysplasia varies in spondylolisthesis and it is possible that different grades of dysplasia could relate to different prognoses or outcomes with treatment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Curylo LJ, Edwards C, DeWald RW (2002) Radiographic markers in spondyloptosis: implications for spondylolisthesis progression. Spine 27:2021–2025PubMedCrossRef Curylo LJ, Edwards C, DeWald RW (2002) Radiographic markers in spondyloptosis: implications for spondylolisthesis progression. Spine 27:2021–2025PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hammerberg KW (2005) New concepts on the pathogenesis and classification of spondylolisthesis. Spine 30:S4–S11PubMedCrossRef Hammerberg KW (2005) New concepts on the pathogenesis and classification of spondylolisthesis. Spine 30:S4–S11PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wiltse LL, Newman PH, Macnab I (1976) Classification of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 117:23–29PubMed Wiltse LL, Newman PH, Macnab I (1976) Classification of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 117:23–29PubMed
4.
go back to reference Marchetti PG, Bartolozzi P (1997) Classification of spondylolisthesis as a guideline for treatment. In: Bridwell KH, Dewald RL (eds) The textbook of spinal surgery, 2nd edn, chap 69. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 1211–1254 Marchetti PG, Bartolozzi P (1997) Classification of spondylolisthesis as a guideline for treatment. In: Bridwell KH, Dewald RL (eds) The textbook of spinal surgery, 2nd edn, chap 69. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 1211–1254
5.
go back to reference Lamartina C, Zavatsky JM, Petruzzi M et al (2009) Novel concepts in the evaluation and treatment of high-dysplastic spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 18:S133–S142CrossRef Lamartina C, Zavatsky JM, Petruzzi M et al (2009) Novel concepts in the evaluation and treatment of high-dysplastic spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 18:S133–S142CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Vialle R, Schmit P, Dauzac C et al (2005) Radiological assessment of lumbosacral dystrophic changes in high-grade spondylolisthesis. Skeletal Radiol 34:528–535PubMedCrossRef Vialle R, Schmit P, Dauzac C et al (2005) Radiological assessment of lumbosacral dystrophic changes in high-grade spondylolisthesis. Skeletal Radiol 34:528–535PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yue WM, Brodner W, Gaines RW (2005) Abnormal spinal anatomy in 27 cases of surgically corrected spondyloptosis: proximal sacral endplate damage as a possible cause of spondyloptosis. Spine 30:S22–S26PubMedCrossRef Yue WM, Brodner W, Gaines RW (2005) Abnormal spinal anatomy in 27 cases of surgically corrected spondyloptosis: proximal sacral endplate damage as a possible cause of spondyloptosis. Spine 30:S22–S26PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mac-Thiong JM, Labelle H (2006) A proposal for a surgical classification of pediatric lumbosacral spondylolisthesis based on current literature. Eur Spine J 15:1425–1435PubMedCrossRef Mac-Thiong JM, Labelle H (2006) A proposal for a surgical classification of pediatric lumbosacral spondylolisthesis based on current literature. Eur Spine J 15:1425–1435PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Molinari RW, Bridwell KH, Lenke L et al (1999) Complications in the surgical treatment of pediatric high-grade, isthmic dysplastic spondylolisthesis. A comparison of three surgical approaches. Spine 24:1701–1711PubMedCrossRef Molinari RW, Bridwell KH, Lenke L et al (1999) Complications in the surgical treatment of pediatric high-grade, isthmic dysplastic spondylolisthesis. A comparison of three surgical approaches. Spine 24:1701–1711PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Faro FD, Marks MC, Pawelek J et al (2004) Evaluation of a functional position for lateral radiograph acquisition in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 29:2284–2289PubMedCrossRef Faro FD, Marks MC, Pawelek J et al (2004) Evaluation of a functional position for lateral radiograph acquisition in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 29:2284–2289PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Saraste H, Brostrom LA, Aparisi T (1984) Prognostic radiographic aspects of spondylolisthesis. Acta Radiol Diagn 25:427–432 Saraste H, Brostrom LA, Aparisi T (1984) Prognostic radiographic aspects of spondylolisthesis. Acta Radiol Diagn 25:427–432
Metadata
Title
The evaluation of lumbosacral dysplasia in young patients with lumbosacral spondylolisthesis: comparison with controls and relationship with the severity of slip
Authors
Abhijit Pawar
Hubert Labelle
Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong
Publication date
01-11-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 11/2012
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2181-7

Other articles of this Issue 11/2012

European Spine Journal 11/2012 Go to the issue