Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 1/2011

01-05-2011 | Original Article

Critical analysis of lumbar interspinous devices failures: a retrospective study

Authors: Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli, Luca Proietti, Carlo Ambrogio Logroscino

Published in: European Spine Journal | Special Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Interspinous devices (IDs) were introduced in the 90s. Since then, they have rapidly become very popular for the minimally invasive treatment of lumbar pain disorders. They feature different shapes and biomechanical characteristics, and are used in the spine degenerative pathologies or as motion segment stabilizers (dynamic stabilization) or to obtain the decompression of neurological structures. The indications seem to be rather narrow and still to be verified in terms of their clinical efficacy. However, IDs are being extensively utilized beyond their classical indications with the inevitable risk of a clinical failure. The aim of the present work was to carry out a critical analysis of the causes of failure in a series of 19 patients. From January 2007 to March 2009, 19 patients with residual painful syndrome after the implantation of IDs were observed. The series includes 11 males and 8 females with a mean age of 53.6 years (range 38–84 years) who were operated on elsewhere and who underwent revision surgery at our hospital. The inclusion criteria were low back pain and/or radiculopathy after the device implantation without improvement of the painful symptomatology, radiculopathy with signs of sensory and motor deficit, intermittent neurogenic claudication, and infection. All patients were thoroughly re-assessed with new standard imaging examinations such as MRI and CT scans, considering the following image features: the position of the device with respect to the spinous processes (X-ray), the intervertebral disc disease of the level operated upon or of the adjacent levels (MRI), the segmental instability (dynamic X-rays), the severity of the canal stenosis (CT). The accurate evaluation of the clinical and imaging parameters revealed three main causes of failure: errors of indication, technical errors and the structural failure of the ID. The most frequent cause of failure was a wrong indication. The results of the study are presented and the causes of failure are discussed in detail.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Senegas J, Vital JM, Pointillart V, Mangione P (2007) Long-term actuarial survivorship analysis of an interspinous stabilization system. Eur Spine J 16:1279–1287PubMedCrossRef Senegas J, Vital JM, Pointillart V, Mangione P (2007) Long-term actuarial survivorship analysis of an interspinous stabilization system. Eur Spine J 16:1279–1287PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA et al (2004) A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results. Eur Spine J 13:22–31PubMedCrossRef Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA et al (2004) A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results. Eur Spine J 13:22–31PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Phillips FM, Voronov LI, Gaitanis IN et al (2006) Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy. Spine J 6:714–722PubMedCrossRef Phillips FM, Voronov LI, Gaitanis IN et al (2006) Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy. Spine J 6:714–722PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gunzburg R, Szpalski M, Callary SA et al (2009) Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion. Eur Spine J 18(5):696–703PubMedCrossRef Gunzburg R, Szpalski M, Callary SA et al (2009) Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion. Eur Spine J 18(5):696–703PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lindsey DP, Swanson KE, Fuchs P et al (2003) The effects of an interspinous implant on the kinematics of the instrumented and adjacent levels in the lumbar spine. Spine 28:2192–2197PubMedCrossRef Lindsey DP, Swanson KE, Fuchs P et al (2003) The effects of an interspinous implant on the kinematics of the instrumented and adjacent levels in the lumbar spine. Spine 28:2192–2197PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jerosch J, Moursi MG (2008) Foreign body reaction due to polyethylene’s wear after implantation of an interspinal segment. Acta Orthop Trauma Surg 128:1–4CrossRef Jerosch J, Moursi MG (2008) Foreign body reaction due to polyethylene’s wear after implantation of an interspinal segment. Acta Orthop Trauma Surg 128:1–4CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Dai LY, Xu YK, Zhang WM et al (1989) The effect of flexion-extension motion of the lumbar spine on the capacity of the spinal canal: an experimental study. Spine 14:523–525PubMedCrossRef Dai LY, Xu YK, Zhang WM et al (1989) The effect of flexion-extension motion of the lumbar spine on the capacity of the spinal canal: an experimental study. Spine 14:523–525PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Floman Y, Millgram MA, Smorgick Y et al (2007) Failure of the Wallis interspinous implant to lower the incidence of recurrent lumbar disc herniations in patients undergoing primary disc excision. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:337–341PubMedCrossRef Floman Y, Millgram MA, Smorgick Y et al (2007) Failure of the Wallis interspinous implant to lower the incidence of recurrent lumbar disc herniations in patients undergoing primary disc excision. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:337–341PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Barbagallo GMV, Olindo G, Corbino L et al (2009) Analysis of complications in patients treated with the X-Stop interspinous process decompression system: proposal for a novel anatomic scoring system for patient selection and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 65:11–120CrossRef Barbagallo GMV, Olindo G, Corbino L et al (2009) Analysis of complications in patients treated with the X-Stop interspinous process decompression system: proposal for a novel anatomic scoring system for patient selection and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 65:11–120CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Critical analysis of lumbar interspinous devices failures: a retrospective study
Authors
Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli
Luca Proietti
Carlo Ambrogio Logroscino
Publication date
01-05-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue Special Issue 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1763-0

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2011

European Spine Journal 1/2011 Go to the issue