Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 1/2011

01-05-2011 | Original Article

A minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spine instabilities

Authors: C. A. Logroscino, L. Proietti, E. Pola, L. Scaramuzzo, F. C. Tamburrelli

Published in: European Spine Journal | Special Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Percutaneous techniques may be helpful to reduce approach-related morbidity of conventional open surgery. The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of mini-open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for instabilities and degenerative disc diseases. From May 2005 until October 2008, 20 patients affected by monosegmental instability and disc herniation underwent mini-open lumbar interbody fusion combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine. Clinical outcome was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form Health Survey-36. The mean follow-up was 24 months. The mean estimated blood loss was 126 ml; the mean length of stay was 5.3 days; the mean operative time was 171 min. At 24-month follow-up, the mean VAS score was 2.1, mean ODI was 27.1%, and mean SF-36 was 85.2%. 80 screws were implanted in 20 patients. 74 screws showed very good position, 5 screws acceptable, and 1 screw unacceptable. A solid fusion was achieved in 17 patients (85%). In our opinion, mini-open TLIF is a valid and safe treatment of lumbar instability and degenerative disc diseases in order to obtain faster return to daily activities.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Thomsen K, Christensen FB, Eiskjaer SP et al (1997) Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. The effects of pedicle screw instrumentation on functional outcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective, randomized, clinical study. Spine 22:2813–2822PubMedCrossRef Thomsen K, Christensen FB, Eiskjaer SP et al (1997) Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. The effects of pedicle screw instrumentation on functional outcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective, randomized, clinical study. Spine 22:2813–2822PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Styf J, Willen J (1998) The effects of external compression by three different retractors on pressure in the erector spine muscles during and after posterior lumbar spine surgery in humans. Spine 23:354–358PubMedCrossRef Styf J, Willen J (1998) The effects of external compression by three different retractors on pressure in the erector spine muscles during and after posterior lumbar spine surgery in humans. Spine 23:354–358PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kawaguchi Y, Yabuki S, Styf J et al (1996) Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery: topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery. Spine 21:2683–2688PubMedCrossRef Kawaguchi Y, Yabuki S, Styf J et al (1996) Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery: topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery. Spine 21:2683–2688PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kim KT, Lee SH, Suk KS, Bae SC (2006) The quantitative analysis of tissue injury markers after mini-open lumbar fusion. Spine 31:712–716PubMedCrossRef Kim KT, Lee SH, Suk KS, Bae SC (2006) The quantitative analysis of tissue injury markers after mini-open lumbar fusion. Spine 31:712–716PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fessler RG, Guiot BH, Khoo LT (2002) A minimally invasive technique for decompression of the lumbar spine. Spine 27:432–438PubMedCrossRef Fessler RG, Guiot BH, Khoo LT (2002) A minimally invasive technique for decompression of the lumbar spine. Spine 27:432–438PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD (2003) Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine 15:S26–S35 Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD (2003) Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine 15:S26–S35
7.
go back to reference Foley KT, Gupta SK (2002) Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine: preliminary clinical results. J Neurosurg 97:S7–S12 Foley KT, Gupta SK (2002) Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine: preliminary clinical results. J Neurosurg 97:S7–S12
8.
go back to reference Isaacs RE, Podichetty VK, Santiago P et al (2005) Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg Spine 3:98–105PubMedCrossRef Isaacs RE, Podichetty VK, Santiago P et al (2005) Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg Spine 3:98–105PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Khoo LT, Palmer S, Laich DT, Fessler RG (2002) Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery 51:S166–S181PubMed Khoo LT, Palmer S, Laich DT, Fessler RG (2002) Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery 51:S166–S181PubMed
10.
go back to reference Logroscino CA, Proietti L, Tamburrelli FC (2009) Minimally invasive stabilization with long implants. Eur Spine J 75(Suppl 1):81 Logroscino CA, Proietti L, Tamburrelli FC (2009) Minimally invasive stabilization with long implants. Eur Spine J 75(Suppl 1):81
11.
go back to reference Youkilis AS, Quint DJ, McGillicuddy JE, Papadopoulos S (2001) Stererotactic navigation for placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Neurosurgery 48:771–778PubMed Youkilis AS, Quint DJ, McGillicuddy JE, Papadopoulos S (2001) Stererotactic navigation for placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Neurosurgery 48:771–778PubMed
12.
go back to reference Foley KT, Smith MM (1997) Microendoscopic discectomy. Tech Neurosurg 3:301–307 Foley KT, Smith MM (1997) Microendoscopic discectomy. Tech Neurosurg 3:301–307
Metadata
Title
A minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spine instabilities
Authors
C. A. Logroscino
L. Proietti
E. Pola
L. Scaramuzzo
F. C. Tamburrelli
Publication date
01-05-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue Special Issue 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1762-1

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2011

European Spine Journal 1/2011 Go to the issue