Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 3/2011

01-03-2011 | Original Article

Comparison of radiographic and computed tomographic measurement of pedicle and vertebral body dimensions in Koreans: the ratio of pedicle transverse diameter to vertebral body transverse diameter

Authors: Ki Ser Kang, Kwang-Sup Song, Jong Seok Lee, Jae Jun Yang, In Sup Song

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the characteristics of pedicle transverse diameters (PD), vertebral body transverse diameters (VBD), especially the ratios of PD/VBD (CT ratio), which has never been discussed, in Koreans using computed tomography (CT) scans and to evaluate the possibility of obtaining more accurate estimations of PD from plain radiographs using the CT ratios in each spine level. The T1–L5 vertebrae of 50 participants were analyzed prospectively with CT scans (CT-VBD and CT-PD), and the T9–L5 vertebrae of the same participants were investigated with plain radiographs (X-VBD and X-PD). The CT ratio had a higher correlation with the CT-PD (r 2 = 0.630) from T1 to L5, especially in the lower thoracic and lumbar spine (T9–L5, r 2 = 0.737). The correlation of VBDs between the two radiologic tools (r 2 = 0.896) was higher than that of the PDs (r 2 = 0.665). Based on the data, equations for the estimation of a more accurate PD from plain radiographs were developed as follows: estimated PD = estimated VBD × [1.014 × (X-VBD) + 0.152] × the mean CT ratio at each spinal level. The correlation between the estimated PD and the CT-PD (r 2 = 0.852) was improved compared with that (r 2 = 0.665) between the X-PD and the CT-PD. In conclusion, the CT ratio showed a very similar changing trends to CT-PD from T1 to L5 regardless of sex and body mass, and the measurement error of PD from only plain radiographs could be minimized using estimated VBD and the mean CT ratio at each spinal level.
Literature
1.
go back to reference King D (1948) Internal fixation for lumbosacral fusion. J Bone Joint Surg 30A:560–565PubMed King D (1948) Internal fixation for lumbosacral fusion. J Bone Joint Surg 30A:560–565PubMed
2.
go back to reference Krag MH, Weaver DL, Beynnon BD, Haugh LD (1988) Morphometry of the thoracic and lumbar spine related to transpedicular screw placement for surgical spinal fixation. Spine 13:27–32PubMedCrossRef Krag MH, Weaver DL, Beynnon BD, Haugh LD (1988) Morphometry of the thoracic and lumbar spine related to transpedicular screw placement for surgical spinal fixation. Spine 13:27–32PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Misenhimer GR, Peek RD, Wiltse LL, Rothman SL, Widell EH Jr (1989) Anatomic analysis of pedicle cortical and cancellous diameter as related to screw size. Spine 14:367–372PubMedCrossRef Misenhimer GR, Peek RD, Wiltse LL, Rothman SL, Widell EH Jr (1989) Anatomic analysis of pedicle cortical and cancellous diameter as related to screw size. Spine 14:367–372PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Olsewski JM, Simmons EH, Kallen FC, Mendel FC, Severin CM, Berens DL (1990) Morphometry of the lumbar spine: anatomical perspectives related to transpedicular fixation. J Bone Joint Surg 72:541–549PubMed Olsewski JM, Simmons EH, Kallen FC, Mendel FC, Severin CM, Berens DL (1990) Morphometry of the lumbar spine: anatomical perspectives related to transpedicular fixation. J Bone Joint Surg 72:541–549PubMed
5.
go back to reference Yahiro MA (1994) Comprehensive literature review. Pedicle screw fixation devices. Spine 19:2274S–2278SPubMedCrossRef Yahiro MA (1994) Comprehensive literature review. Pedicle screw fixation devices. Spine 19:2274S–2278SPubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bernard TN Jr, Seibert CE (1992) Pedicle diameter determined by computed tomography. Its relevance to pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine. Spine 17:S160–S163PubMedCrossRef Bernard TN Jr, Seibert CE (1992) Pedicle diameter determined by computed tomography. Its relevance to pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine. Spine 17:S160–S163PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Berry JL, Moran JM, Berg WS, Steffee AD (1987) A morphometric study of human lumbar and selected thoracic vertebrae. Spine 12:362–367PubMedCrossRef Berry JL, Moran JM, Berg WS, Steffee AD (1987) A morphometric study of human lumbar and selected thoracic vertebrae. Spine 12:362–367PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cheung KM, Ruan D, Chan FL, Fang D (1994) Computed tomographic osteometry of Asian lumbar pedicles. Spine 19:1495–1498PubMedCrossRef Cheung KM, Ruan D, Chan FL, Fang D (1994) Computed tomographic osteometry of Asian lumbar pedicles. Spine 19:1495–1498PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hou S, Hu R, Shi Y (1993) Pedicle morphology of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine in a Chinese population. Spine 18:1850–1855PubMedCrossRef Hou S, Hu R, Shi Y (1993) Pedicle morphology of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine in a Chinese population. Spine 18:1850–1855PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Marchesi D, Schneider E, Glauser P, Aebi M (1988) Morphometric analysis of the thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicles, anatomo-radiologic study. Surg Radiol Anat 10:317–322PubMedCrossRef Marchesi D, Schneider E, Glauser P, Aebi M (1988) Morphometric analysis of the thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicles, anatomo-radiologic study. Surg Radiol Anat 10:317–322PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Panjabi MM, Goel V, Oxland T, Takata K, Duranceau J, Krag M, Price M (1992) Human lumbar vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 17:299–306PubMedCrossRef Panjabi MM, Goel V, Oxland T, Takata K, Duranceau J, Krag M, Price M (1992) Human lumbar vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 17:299–306PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Robertson PA, Stewart NR (2000) The radiologic anatomy of the lumbar and lumbosacral pedicles. Spine 25:709–715PubMedCrossRef Robertson PA, Stewart NR (2000) The radiologic anatomy of the lumbar and lumbosacral pedicles. Spine 25:709–715PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Doornik A, Widell EH, Knight GW, Patwardhan AG, Thomas JC, Rothman SL, Fields BT (1987) Analysis of the morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles. Spine 12:160–166PubMedCrossRef Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Doornik A, Widell EH, Knight GW, Patwardhan AG, Thomas JC, Rothman SL, Fields BT (1987) Analysis of the morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles. Spine 12:160–166PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Chadha M, Balain B, Maini L, Dhaon BK (2003) Pedicle morphology of the lower thoracic, lumbar, and S1 vertebrae: an Indian perspective. Spine 28:744–749PubMedCrossRef Chadha M, Balain B, Maini L, Dhaon BK (2003) Pedicle morphology of the lower thoracic, lumbar, and S1 vertebrae: an Indian perspective. Spine 28:744–749PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Krag MH, Beynnon BD, Pope MH, Frymoyer JW, Haugh LD, Weaver DL (1986) An internal fixator for posterior application to short segments of the thoracic, lumbar, or lumbosacral spine. Design and testing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 203:75–98 Krag MH, Beynnon BD, Pope MH, Frymoyer JW, Haugh LD, Weaver DL (1986) An internal fixator for posterior application to short segments of the thoracic, lumbar, or lumbosacral spine. Design and testing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 203:75–98
16.
go back to reference Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Widell EH, Thomas JC, Holland WR, Field BT, Spencer CW (1986) A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 203:99–112 Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Widell EH, Thomas JC, Holland WR, Field BT, Spencer CW (1986) A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 203:99–112
17.
go back to reference Kim NH, Lee HM, Chung IH, Kim HJ, Kim SJ (1994) Morphometric study of the pedicles of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae in Koreans. Spine 19:1390–1394PubMedCrossRef Kim NH, Lee HM, Chung IH, Kim HJ, Kim SJ (1994) Morphometric study of the pedicles of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae in Koreans. Spine 19:1390–1394PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference McLain RF, Ferrara L, Kabins M (2002) Pedicle morphometry in the upper thoracic spine: limits to safe screw placement in older patients. Spine 27:2467–2471PubMedCrossRef McLain RF, Ferrara L, Kabins M (2002) Pedicle morphometry in the upper thoracic spine: limits to safe screw placement in older patients. Spine 27:2467–2471PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Datir SP, Mitra SR (2004) Morphometric study of the thoracic vertebral pedicle in an Indian population. Spine 29:1174–1181 Datir SP, Mitra SR (2004) Morphometric study of the thoracic vertebral pedicle in an Indian population. Spine 29:1174–1181
20.
go back to reference Mitra SR, Datir SP, Jadhav SO (2002) Morphometric study of the lumbar pedicle in the Indian population as related to pedicular screw fixation. Spine 27:453–459PubMedCrossRef Mitra SR, Datir SP, Jadhav SO (2002) Morphometric study of the lumbar pedicle in the Indian population as related to pedicular screw fixation. Spine 27:453–459PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference van Schaik JJ, Verbiest H, van Schaik FD (1985) Morphometry of lower lumbar vertebrae as seen on CT scans: newly recognized characteristics. AJR 145:327–335PubMed van Schaik JJ, Verbiest H, van Schaik FD (1985) Morphometry of lower lumbar vertebrae as seen on CT scans: newly recognized characteristics. AJR 145:327–335PubMed
22.
go back to reference Ursu TR, Porter RW, Navaratnam V (1996) Development of the lumbar and sacral vertebral canal in utero. Spine 21:2705–2708 Ursu TR, Porter RW, Navaratnam V (1996) Development of the lumbar and sacral vertebral canal in utero. Spine 21:2705–2708
Metadata
Title
Comparison of radiographic and computed tomographic measurement of pedicle and vertebral body dimensions in Koreans: the ratio of pedicle transverse diameter to vertebral body transverse diameter
Authors
Ki Ser Kang
Kwang-Sup Song
Jong Seok Lee
Jae Jun Yang
In Sup Song
Publication date
01-03-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1560-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

European Spine Journal 3/2011 Go to the issue