Top

Published in:

01-03-2011 | Original Article

Impact of postpartum lumbopelvic pain on disability, pain intensity, health-related quality of life, activity level, kinesiophobia, and depressive symptoms

Authors: Annelie Gutke, Mari Lundberg, Hans Christian Östgaard, Birgitta Öberg

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 3/2011

Abstract

The majority of women recover from pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain within 3 months of delivery. Since biomechanical and hormonal changes from pregnancy are largely reversed by 3 months postpartum, consequently, it is assumed that other factors might interfere with recovery. Relative to the fear-avoidance model and with reference to previous studies, we chose to investigate some pre-decided factors to understand persistent lumbopelvic pain. The evaluation of lumbopelvic pain postpartum is mostly based on self-administered questionnaires or interviews. Clinical classification of the lumbopelvic pain may increase our knowledge about postpartum subgroups. Two hundred and seventy-two consecutively registered pregnant women evaluated at 3 months postpartum, answered questionnaires concerning disability (Oswestry disability index), pain intensity on visual analog scale, health-related quality of life (HRQL, EQ5D), activity level, depressive symptoms (Edinburgh postnatal Depression Scale) and kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia). Women were classified into lumbopelvic pain subgroups according to mechanical assessment of the lumbar spine, pelvic pain provocation tests, standard history, and pain drawings. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to explain the variance of disability. Thirty-three percent of postpartum women were classified with lumbopelvic pain; 40% reported moderate to severe disability. The impacts were similar among subgroups. Pain intensity, HRQL and kinesiophobia explained 53% of postpartum disability due to lumbopelvic pain. In conclusion, one of three postpartum women still had some lumbopelvic pain and the impacts were equivalent irrespective of symptoms in lumbar or pelvic areas. The additional explanations of variance in disability by HRQL and kinesiophobia were minor, suggesting that pain intensity was the major contributing factor.

Albert H, Godskesen M, Westergaard J (2001) Prognosis in four syndromes of pregnancy-related pelvic pain. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:505–510PubMedCrossRef

Bastiaenen CH, de Bie RA, Vlaeyen JW, Goossens ME, Leffers P, Wolters PM et al (2008) Long-term effectiveness and costs of a brief self-management intervention in women with pregnancy-related low back pain after delivery. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 8:19PubMedCrossRef

Bastiaenen CH, de Bie RA, Wolters PM, Vlaeyen JW, Leffers P, Stelma F et al (2006) Effectiveness of a tailor-made intervention for pregnancy-related pelvic girdle and/or low back pain after delivery: short-term results of a randomized clinical trial [ISRCTN08477490]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7:19PubMedCrossRef

Brynhildsen J, Hansson A, Persson A, Hammar M (1998) Follow-up of patients with low back pain during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 91:182–186PubMedCrossRef

Burstrom K, Johannesson M, Diderichsen F (2001) Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res 10:621–635PubMedCrossRef

Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R (1987) Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry 150:782–786PubMedCrossRef

Enthoven P, Skargren E, Oberg B (2004) Clinical course in patients seeking primary care for back or neck pain: a prospective 5-year follow-up of outcome and health care consumption with subgroup analysis. Spine 29:2458–2465PubMedCrossRef

Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The Oswestry disability index. Spine 25:2940–2952 (discussion 2952)PubMedCrossRef

Fritz JM, Delitto A, Erhard RE (2003) Comparison of classification-based physical therapy with therapy based on clinical practice guidelines for patients with acute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Spine 28:1363–1371 (discussion 1372)PubMedCrossRef

10.

Grimby G (1986) Physical activity and muscle training in the elderly. Acta Med Scand Suppl 711:233–237PubMed

11.

Gustafsson J, Nilsson-Wikmar L (2008) Influence of specific muscle training on pain, activity limitation and kinesiophobia in women with back pain post-partum—a single-subject research design. Physiother Res Int 13:18–30PubMedCrossRef

12.

Gutke A, Josefsson A, Oberg B (2007) Pelvic girdle pain and lumbar pain in relation to postpartum depressive symptoms. Spine 32:1430–1436PubMedCrossRef

13.

Gutke A, Kjellby-Wendt G, Oberg B (2009) The inter-rater reliability of a standardised classification system for pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain. Man Ther 15(1):13–18PubMedCrossRef

14.

Gutke A, Ostgaard HC, Oberg B (2006) Pelvic girdle pain and lumbar pain in pregnancy: a cohort study of the consequences in terms of health and functioning. Spine 31:E149–E155PubMedCrossRef

15.

Gutke A, Ostgaard HC, Oberg B (2008) Predicting persistent pregnancy-related low back pain. Spine 33:E386–E393PubMedCrossRef

16.

Kori S, Miller R, Todd D (1990) Kinesiophobia: a new view of chronic pain behavior. Pain Manag 3:35–43

17.

Kristiansson P, Svardsudd K, von Schoultz B (1996) Back pain during pregnancy: a prospective study. Spine 21:702–709PubMedCrossRef

18.

Larsen EC, Wilken-Jensen C, Hansen A, Jensen DV, Johansen S, Minck H et al (1999) Symptom-giving pelvic girdle relaxation in pregnancy. I. Prevalence and risk factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 78:105–110PubMedCrossRef

19.

Long A, Donelson R, Fung T (2004) Does it matter which exercise? A randomized control trial of exercise for low back pain. Spine 29:2593–2602PubMedCrossRef

20.

Mattiasson-Nilo I, Sonn U, Johannesson K, Gosman-Hedstrom G, Persson GB, Grimby G (1990) Domestic activities and walking in the elderly: evaluation from a 30-hour heart rate recording. Aging (Milano) 2:191–198

21.

McKenzie R, May S (2003) The lumbar spine. Mechanical diagnosis & therapy. Spinal Publications New Zealand Ltd, Waikanae

22.

Melzack R, Wall PD (1965) Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science 150:971–979PubMedCrossRef

23.

Mens JM, Vleeming A, Stoeckart R, Stam HJ, Snijders CJ (1996) Understanding peripartum pelvic pain. Implications of a patient survey. Spine 21:1363–1369 (discussion 1369–1370)PubMedCrossRef

24.

Mogren IM (2005) Previous physical activity decreases the risk of low back pain and pelvic pain during pregnancy. Scand J Public Health 33:300–306PubMed

25.

Noren L, Ostgaard S, Johansson G, Ostgaard HC (2002) Lumbar back and posterior pelvic pain during pregnancy: a 3-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 11:267–271PubMedCrossRef

26.

Olsson C, Nilsson-Wikmar L (2004) Health-related quality of life and physical ability among pregnant women with and without back pain in late pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83:351–357PubMedCrossRef

27.

Ostgaard HC, Zetherstrom G, Roos-Hansson E (1997) Back pain in relation to pregnancy: a 6-year follow-up. Spine 22:2945–2950PubMedCrossRef

28.

Picavet HS, Schouten JS (2003) Musculoskeletal pain in the Netherlands: prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC(3)-study. Pain 102:167–178PubMedCrossRef

29.

Rabin R, de Charro F (2001) EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 33:337–343PubMedCrossRef

30.

Stuge B, Veierod MB, Laerum E, Vollestad N (2004) The efficacy of a treatment program focusing on specific stabilizing exercises for pelvic girdle pain after pregnancy: a two-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Spine 29:E197–E203PubMedCrossRef

31.

Svensson HO, Andersson GB, Hagstad A, Jansson PO (1990) The relationship of low-back pain to pregnancy and gynecologic factors. Spine 15:371–375PubMedCrossRef

32.

Sydsjo A, Sydsjo G, Wijma B (1998) Increase in sick leave rates caused by back pain among pregnant Swedish women after amelioration of social benefits. A paradox. Spine 23:1986–1990PubMedCrossRef

33.

Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijders AM, Boeren RG, van Eek H (1995) Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance. Pain 62:363–372PubMedCrossRef

Title: Impact of postpartum lumbopelvic pain on disability, pain intensity, health-related quality of life, activity level, kinesiophobia, and depressive symptoms
Authors: Annelie Gutke
Mari Lundberg
Hans Christian Östgaard
Birgitta Öberg
Publication date: 01-03-2011
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: European Spine Journal / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1487-6

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Impact of postpartum lumbopelvic pain on disability, pain intensity, health-related quality of life, activity level, kinesiophobia, and depressive symptoms

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Expert’s comment concerning Grand Rounds case entitled “Closing–Opening Wedge Osteotomy for Severe, Rigid Thoraco-Lumbar Post-tubercular Kyphosis” (by S. Rajasekaran, P. Rishimugesh Kanna and Ajoy Prasad Shetty)

Predictive ability of a modified Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire in an acute/subacute low back pain working population

Delayed presentation and diagnosis of cervical spine injuries in long-standing ankylosing spondylitis

Cervical spondylotic amyotrophy

Development of a documentation instrument for the conservative treatment of spinal disorders in the International Spine Registry, Spine Tango

Responsiveness of the Chinese version of the Oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain