Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 3/2011

01-03-2011 | Original Article

Development of a documentation instrument for the conservative treatment of spinal disorders in the International Spine Registry, Spine Tango

Authors: J. T. Kessler, M. Melloh, Thomas Zweig, E. Aghayev, C. Röder

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Spine Tango is the first and only International Spine Registry in operation to date. So far, only surgical spinal interventions have been recorded and no comparable structured and comprehensive documentation instrument for conservative treatments of spinal disorders is available. This study reports on the development of a documentation instrument for the conservative treatment of spinal disorders by using the Delphi consensus method. It was conducted with a group of international experts in the field. We also assessed the usability of this new assessment tool with a prospective feasibility study on 97 outpatients and inpatients with low back or neck pain undergoing conservative treatment. The new ‘Spine Tango conservative’ questionnaire proved useful and suitable for the documentation of pathologies, conservative treatments and outcomes of patients with low back or neck problems. A follow-up questionnaire seemed less important in the predominantly outpatient setting. In the feasibility study, between 43 and 63% of patients reached the minimal clinically important difference in pain relief and Core Outcome Measures Index at 3 months after therapy; 87% of patients with back pain and 85% with neck pain were satisfied with the received treatment. With ‘Spine Tango conservative’ a first step has been taken to develop and implement a complementary system for documentation and evaluation of non-surgical spinal interventions and outcomes within the framework of the International Spine Registry. It proved useful and feasible in a first pilot study, but it will take the experience of many more cases and therapists to develop a version similarly mature as the surgical instruments of Spine Tango.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aebi M, Grob D (2004) SSE Spine Tango: a European Spine Registry promoted by the Spine Society of Europe (SSE). Eur Spine J 13:661–662PubMedCrossRef Aebi M, Grob D (2004) SSE Spine Tango: a European Spine Registry promoted by the Spine Society of Europe (SSE). Eur Spine J 13:661–662PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ahmad N, Boutron I, Moher D, Pitrou I, Roy C, Ravaud P (2009) Neglected external validity in reports of randomized trials: the example of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 61:361–369PubMedCrossRef Ahmad N, Boutron I, Moher D, Pitrou I, Roy C, Ravaud P (2009) Neglected external validity in reports of randomized trials: the example of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 61:361–369PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, Mannion AF, Reis S, Staal JB, Ursin H, Zanoli G (2006) Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 2):S192–S300PubMedCrossRef Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, Mannion AF, Reis S, Staal JB, Ursin H, Zanoli G (2006) Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 2):S192–S300PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Albright J, Allman R, Bonfiglio RP, Conill A, Dobkin B, Guccione AA et al (2001) Philadelphia panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on selected rehabilitation interventions for low back pain. Phys Ther 81:1641–1674 Albright J, Allman R, Bonfiglio RP, Conill A, Dobkin B, Guccione AA et al (2001) Philadelphia panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on selected rehabilitation interventions for low back pain. Phys Ther 81:1641–1674
6.
go back to reference Audige L, Hanson B, Kopjar B (2006) Issues in the planning and conduct of non-randomised studies. Injury 37:340–348PubMedCrossRef Audige L, Hanson B, Kopjar B (2006) Issues in the planning and conduct of non-randomised studies. Injury 37:340–348PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Baldwin ML (2004) Reducing the costs of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: targeting strategies to chronic disability cases. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 14:33–41PubMedCrossRef Baldwin ML (2004) Reducing the costs of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: targeting strategies to chronic disability cases. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 14:33–41PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bronfort G, Haas M, Evans RL, Bouter LM (2004) Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for low back pain and neck pain: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis. Spine J 4:335–356PubMedCrossRef Bronfort G, Haas M, Evans RL, Bouter LM (2004) Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for low back pain and neck pain: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis. Spine J 4:335–356PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Cote P (1998) The Saskatchewan health and back pain survey. The prevalence of low back pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults. Spine 23:1860–1866 (discussion 1867).PubMedCrossRef Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Cote P (1998) The Saskatchewan health and back pain survey. The prevalence of low back pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults. Spine 23:1860–1866 (discussion 1867).PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Deyo RA, Shekelle PG (2003) A review of the evidence for the effectiveness, safety, and cost of acupuncture, massage therapy, and spinal manipulation for back pain. Ann Intern Med 138:898–906PubMed Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Deyo RA, Shekelle PG (2003) A review of the evidence for the effectiveness, safety, and cost of acupuncture, massage therapy, and spinal manipulation for back pain. Ann Intern Med 138:898–906PubMed
13.
go back to reference Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, Casey D, Cross JT Jr, Shekelle P, Owens DK (2007) Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med 147:478–491PubMed Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, Casey D, Cross JT Jr, Shekelle P, Owens DK (2007) Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med 147:478–491PubMed
14.
go back to reference Daykin AR, Richardson B (2004) Physiotherapists’ pain beliefs and their influence on the management of patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 29:783–795PubMedCrossRef Daykin AR, Richardson B (2004) Physiotherapists’ pain beliefs and their influence on the management of patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 29:783–795PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ferrer M, Pellise F, Escudero O, Alvarez L, Pont A, Alonso J, Deyo R (2006) Validation of a minimum outcome core set in the evaluation of patients with back pain. Spine 31:1372–1379 (discussion 1380)PubMedCrossRef Ferrer M, Pellise F, Escudero O, Alvarez L, Pont A, Alonso J, Deyo R (2006) Validation of a minimum outcome core set in the evaluation of patients with back pain. Spine 31:1372–1379 (discussion 1380)PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Fritzell P, Stromqvist B, Hagg O (2006) A practical approach to spine registers in Europe: the Swedish experience. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 1):S57–S63PubMedCrossRef Fritzell P, Stromqvist B, Hagg O (2006) A practical approach to spine registers in Europe: the Swedish experience. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 1):S57–S63PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Frymoyer JW, Cats-Baril WL (1991) An overview of the incidences and costs of low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am 22:263–271PubMed Frymoyer JW, Cats-Baril WL (1991) An overview of the incidences and costs of low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am 22:263–271PubMed
19.
go back to reference Giles LG (2001) Evidence-based clinical guidelines submitted to the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council for the management of acute low back pain: a critical review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 24:131–139PubMedCrossRef Giles LG (2001) Evidence-based clinical guidelines submitted to the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council for the management of acute low back pain: a critical review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 24:131–139PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hart LG, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC (1995) Physician office visits for low back pain. Frequency, clinical evaluation, and treatment patterns from a US national survey. Spine 20:11–19PubMedCrossRef Hart LG, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC (1995) Physician office visits for low back pain. Frequency, clinical evaluation, and treatment patterns from a US national survey. Spine 20:11–19PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kendall NAS, Linton SJ, Main CJ (1997) Guide to assessing psychosocial yellow flags in acute low back pain: risk factors for long-term disability and work loss. Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation of New Zealand and the National Health Committee, Wellington Kendall NAS, Linton SJ, Main CJ (1997) Guide to assessing psychosocial yellow flags in acute low back pain: risk factors for long-term disability and work loss. Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation of New Zealand and the National Health Committee, Wellington
22.
go back to reference Kirkaldy-Willis WH (1984) The relationship of structural pathology to the nerve root. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 9:49–52 Kirkaldy-Willis WH (1984) The relationship of structural pathology to the nerve root. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 9:49–52
23.
go back to reference Koes BW, van Tulder MW, Ostelo R, Kim Burton A, Waddell G (2001) Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison. Spine 26:2504–2513 (discussion 2513–2504)PubMedCrossRef Koes BW, van Tulder MW, Ostelo R, Kim Burton A, Waddell G (2001) Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison. Spine 26:2504–2513 (discussion 2513–2504)PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Linstone HA, Turoff M (2002) The Delphi method: techniques and applications. 621 Linstone HA, Turoff M (2002) The Delphi method: techniques and applications. 621
25.
go back to reference Luck J, Peabody JW, Lewis BL (2006) An automated scoring algorithm for computerized clinical vignettes: evaluating physician performance against explicit quality criteria. Int J Med Inform 75:701–707PubMedCrossRef Luck J, Peabody JW, Lewis BL (2006) An automated scoring algorithm for computerized clinical vignettes: evaluating physician performance against explicit quality criteria. Int J Med Inform 75:701–707PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Maetzel A, Li L (2002) The economic burden of low back pain: a review of studies published between 1996 and 2001. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 16:23–30PubMedCrossRef Maetzel A, Li L (2002) The economic burden of low back pain: a review of studies published between 1996 and 2001. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 16:23–30PubMedCrossRef
28.
29.
go back to reference Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Semmer NK, Jacobshagen N, Dvorak J, Boos N (2005) Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J 14:1014–1026PubMedCrossRef Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Semmer NK, Jacobshagen N, Dvorak J, Boos N (2005) Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J 14:1014–1026PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference McGuirk B, King W, Govind J, Lowry J, Bogduk N (2001) Safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute low back pain in primary care. Spine 26:2615–2622PubMedCrossRef McGuirk B, King W, Govind J, Lowry J, Bogduk N (2001) Safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute low back pain in primary care. Spine 26:2615–2622PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Melloh M, Röder C, Staub LP, Zweig T, Barz T, Theis JC, Müller U (2010) Randomized controlled trials for surgical implants—are registries an alternative? J Orthop Sci (accepted for publication) Melloh M, Röder C, Staub LP, Zweig T, Barz T, Theis JC, Müller U (2010) Randomized controlled trials for surgical implants—are registries an alternative? J Orthop Sci (accepted for publication)
32.
33.
go back to reference Mesrian A, Neubauer E, Schiltenwolf M (2007) Reduction in pain intensity after treatment for chronic back pain. When is it clinically meaningful? Schmerz 21:212, 214–217. doi:10.1007/s00482-007-0543-6 Mesrian A, Neubauer E, Schiltenwolf M (2007) Reduction in pain intensity after treatment for chronic back pain. When is it clinically meaningful? Schmerz 21:212, 214–217. doi:10.​1007/​s00482-007-0543-6
34.
go back to reference Nachemson A, Jonsson E (2000) Neck and back pain: the scientific evidence of causes, diagnoses and treatment. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia Nachemson A, Jonsson E (2000) Neck and back pain: the scientific evidence of causes, diagnoses and treatment. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia
35.
go back to reference Oggier W (2007) Volkswirtschaftliche Kosten chronischer Schmerzen in der Schweiz—eine erste Annäherung. Schweizerische Ärztezeitung 88:1265–1269 Oggier W (2007) Volkswirtschaftliche Kosten chronischer Schmerzen in der Schweiz—eine erste Annäherung. Schweizerische Ärztezeitung 88:1265–1269
36.
go back to reference Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M (2000) Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA 283:1715–1722PubMedCrossRef Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M (2000) Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA 283:1715–1722PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Jain S, Hansen J, Spell M, Lee M (2004) Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: a prospective validation study. Ann Intern Med 141:771–780PubMed Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Jain S, Hansen J, Spell M, Lee M (2004) Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: a prospective validation study. Ann Intern Med 141:771–780PubMed
38.
go back to reference Porchet F, Bartanusz V, Kleinstueck FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Grob D, Mannion AF (2009) Microdiscectomy compared with standard discectomy: an old problem revisited with new outcome measures within the framework of a spine surgical registry. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 3):360–366. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-0917-9 PubMedCrossRef Porchet F, Bartanusz V, Kleinstueck FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Grob D, Mannion AF (2009) Microdiscectomy compared with standard discectomy: an old problem revisited with new outcome measures within the framework of a spine surgical registry. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 3):360–366. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-009-0917-9 PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Rivero-Arias O, Campbell H, Gray A, Fairbank J, Frost H, Wilson-MacDonald J (2005) Surgical stabilisation of the spine compared with a programme of intensive rehabilitation for the management of patients with chronic low back pain: cost utility analysis based on a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 330:1239PubMedCrossRef Rivero-Arias O, Campbell H, Gray A, Fairbank J, Frost H, Wilson-MacDonald J (2005) Surgical stabilisation of the spine compared with a programme of intensive rehabilitation for the management of patients with chronic low back pain: cost utility analysis based on a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 330:1239PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Roder C, Blozik E, Muller U, Moulin P, Aebi M (2009) SWISSspine: an outcome and quality registry of orthopaedic implants as condition for reimbursement by basic health insurance. J Manage Market Healthcare 2:94–101 Roder C, Blozik E, Muller U, Moulin P, Aebi M (2009) SWISSspine: an outcome and quality registry of orthopaedic implants as condition for reimbursement by basic health insurance. J Manage Market Healthcare 2:94–101
42.
go back to reference Roder C, El-Kerdi A, Eggli S, Aebi M (2004) A centralized total joint replacement registry using web-based technologies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:2077–2079 (discussion 2079–2080)PubMed Roder C, El-Kerdi A, Eggli S, Aebi M (2004) A centralized total joint replacement registry using web-based technologies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:2077–2079 (discussion 2079–2080)PubMed
43.
45.
go back to reference Rothwell PM (2005) External validity of randomised controlled trials: “to whom do the results of this trial apply?”. Lancet 365:82–93PubMedCrossRef Rothwell PM (2005) External validity of randomised controlled trials: “to whom do the results of this trial apply?”. Lancet 365:82–93PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Schluessmann E, Diel P, Aghayev E, Zweig T, Moulin P, Roder C (2009) SWISSspine: a nationwide registry for health technology assessment of lumbar disc prostheses. Eur Spine J 18:851–861PubMedCrossRef Schluessmann E, Diel P, Aghayev E, Zweig T, Moulin P, Roder C (2009) SWISSspine: a nationwide registry for health technology assessment of lumbar disc prostheses. Eur Spine J 18:851–861PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Selkowitz DM, Kulig K, Poppert EM, Flanagan SP, Matthews ND, Beneck GJ, Popovich JM Jr, Lona JR, Yamada KA, Burke WS, Ervin C, Powers CM (2006) The immediate and long-term effects of exercise and patient education on physical, functional, and quality-of-life outcome measures after single-level lumbar microdiscectomy: a randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7:70PubMedCrossRef Selkowitz DM, Kulig K, Poppert EM, Flanagan SP, Matthews ND, Beneck GJ, Popovich JM Jr, Lona JR, Yamada KA, Burke WS, Ervin C, Powers CM (2006) The immediate and long-term effects of exercise and patient education on physical, functional, and quality-of-life outcome measures after single-level lumbar microdiscectomy: a randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7:70PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference van der Roer N, Ostelo RW, Bekkering GE, van Tulder MW, de Vet HC (2006) Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity, functional status, and general health status in patients with nonspecific low back pain. Spine 31:578–582PubMedCrossRef van der Roer N, Ostelo RW, Bekkering GE, van Tulder MW, de Vet HC (2006) Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity, functional status, and general health status in patients with nonspecific low back pain. Spine 31:578–582PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference van Tulder M, Koes B, Bombardier C (2002) Low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 16:761–775PubMedCrossRef van Tulder M, Koes B, Bombardier C (2002) Low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 16:761–775PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference van Tulder MW, Koes B, Seitsalo S, Malmivaara A (2006) Outcome of invasive treatment modalities on back pain and sciatica: an evidence-based review. Eur Spine J 15:S82–S92 (Epub 2005 Dec 2001)PubMedCrossRef van Tulder MW, Koes B, Seitsalo S, Malmivaara A (2006) Outcome of invasive treatment modalities on back pain and sciatica: an evidence-based review. Eur Spine J 15:S82–S92 (Epub 2005 Dec 2001)PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference van Tulder MW, Tuut M, Pennick V, Bombardier C, Assendelft WJ (2004) Quality of primary care guidelines for acute low back pain. Spine 29:E357–E362PubMedCrossRef van Tulder MW, Tuut M, Pennick V, Bombardier C, Assendelft WJ (2004) Quality of primary care guidelines for acute low back pain. Spine 29:E357–E362PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development of a documentation instrument for the conservative treatment of spinal disorders in the International Spine Registry, Spine Tango
Authors
J. T. Kessler
M. Melloh
Thomas Zweig
E. Aghayev
C. Röder
Publication date
01-03-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1474-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

European Spine Journal 3/2011 Go to the issue