Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 9/2010

Open Access 01-09-2010 | Original Article

Daily functioning and self-management in patients with chronic low back pain after an intensive cognitive behavioral programme for pain management

Authors: Miranda L. van Hooff, Johannes D. van der Merwe, John O’Dowd, Paul W. Pavlov, Maarten Spruit, Marinus de Kleuver, Jacques van Limbeek

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 9/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is associated with persistent or recurrent disability which results in high costs for society. Cognitive behavioral treatments produce clinically relevant benefits for patients with CLBP. Nevertheless, no clear evidence for the most appropriate intervention is yet available. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the mid-term effects of treatment in a cohort of patients with CLBP participating in an intensive pain management programme. The programme provided by RealHealth-Netherlands is based on cognitive behavioral principles and executed in collaboration with orthopedic surgeons. Main outcome parameters were daily functioning (Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Questionnaire), self-efficacy (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire) and quality of life (Short Form 36 Physical Component Score). All parameters were measured at baseline, last day of residential programme and at 1 and 12 months follow-up. Repeated measures analysis was applied to examine changes over time. Clinical relevance was examined using minimal clinical important differences (MCID) estimates for main outcomes. To compare results with literature effect sizes (Cohen’s d) and Standardized Morbidity Ratios (SMR) were determined. 107 patients with CLBP participated in this programme. Mean scores on outcome measures showed a similar pattern: improvement after residential programme and maintenance of results over time. Effect sizes were 0.9 for functioning, 0.8 for self-efficacy and 1.3 for physical functioning related quality of life. Clinical relevancy: 79% reached MCID on functioning, 53% on self-efficacy and 80% on quality of life. Study results on functioning were found to be 36% better and 2% worse when related to previous research on, respectively, rehabilitation programmes and spinal surgery for similar conditions (SMR 136 and 98%, respectively). The participants of this evidence-based programme learned to manage CLBP, improved in daily functioning and quality of life. The study results are meaningful and comparable with results of spinal surgery and even better than results from less intensive rehabilitation programmes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM (1995) A cost-of-illness study of back pain in The Netherlands. Pain 62:233–240CrossRefPubMed van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM (1995) A cost-of-illness study of back pain in The Netherlands. Pain 62:233–240CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference van Tulder MW, Ostelo R, Vlaeyen JW et al (2000) Behavioral treatment for chronic low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine 25:2688–2699CrossRefPubMed van Tulder MW, Ostelo R, Vlaeyen JW et al (2000) Behavioral treatment for chronic low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine 25:2688–2699CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Smeets RJ, Wade D, Hidding A et al (2006) The association of physical deconditioning and chronic low back pain: a hypothesis-oriented systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 28:673–693CrossRefPubMed Smeets RJ, Wade D, Hidding A et al (2006) The association of physical deconditioning and chronic low back pain: a hypothesis-oriented systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 28:673–693CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Picavet HS, Schouten JS (2003) Musculoskeletal pain in the Netherlands: prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC(3)-study. Pain 102:167–178CrossRefPubMed Picavet HS, Schouten JS (2003) Musculoskeletal pain in the Netherlands: prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC(3)-study. Pain 102:167–178CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Fairbank J, Frost H, Wilson-MacDonald J et al (2005) Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: the MRC spine stabilisation trial. BMJ 330:1233CrossRefPubMed Fairbank J, Frost H, Wilson-MacDonald J et al (2005) Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: the MRC spine stabilisation trial. BMJ 330:1233CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Koes BW (2005) Surgery versus intensive rehabilitation programmes for chronic low back pain. BMJ 330:1220–1221CrossRefPubMed Koes BW (2005) Surgery versus intensive rehabilitation programmes for chronic low back pain. BMJ 330:1220–1221CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mirza SK, Deyo RA (2007) Systematic review of randomized trials comparing lumbar fusion surgery to nonoperative care for treatment of chronic back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976.) 32:816–823 Mirza SK, Deyo RA (2007) Systematic review of randomized trials comparing lumbar fusion surgery to nonoperative care for treatment of chronic back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976.) 32:816–823
8.
go back to reference Guzman J, Esmail R, Karjalainen K et al (2002) Multidisciplinary bio-psycho-social rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD000963 Guzman J, Esmail R, Karjalainen K et al (2002) Multidisciplinary bio-psycho-social rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD000963
9.
go back to reference Smeets RJ, Vlaeyen JW, Hidding A et al (2008) Chronic low back pain: physical training, graded activity with problem solving training, or both? The one-year post-treatment results of a randomized controlled trial. Pain 134:263–276CrossRefPubMed Smeets RJ, Vlaeyen JW, Hidding A et al (2008) Chronic low back pain: physical training, graded activity with problem solving training, or both? The one-year post-treatment results of a randomized controlled trial. Pain 134:263–276CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2009) Low back pain: early management of persistent non-specific low back pain. National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care, London National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2009) Low back pain: early management of persistent non-specific low back pain. National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care, London
11.
go back to reference Chou R, Loeser JD, Owens DK et al (2009) Interventional therapies, surgery, and interdisciplinary rehabilitation for low back pain: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society. Spine (Phila Pa 1976.) 34:1066–1077 Chou R, Loeser JD, Owens DK et al (2009) Interventional therapies, surgery, and interdisciplinary rehabilitation for low back pain: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society. Spine (Phila Pa 1976.) 34:1066–1077
12.
go back to reference McCracken LM, Turk DC (2002) Behavioral and cognitive-behavioral treatment for chronic pain: outcome, predictors of outcome, and treatment process. Spine 27:2564–2573CrossRefPubMed McCracken LM, Turk DC (2002) Behavioral and cognitive-behavioral treatment for chronic pain: outcome, predictors of outcome, and treatment process. Spine 27:2564–2573CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Smeets RJ, Vlaeyen JW, Hidding A et al (2006) Active rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: cognitive-behavioral, physical, or both? First direct post-treatment results from a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7:5 Smeets RJ, Vlaeyen JW, Hidding A et al (2006) Active rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: cognitive-behavioral, physical, or both? First direct post-treatment results from a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7:5
14.
go back to reference Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 8:141–144CrossRefPubMed Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 8:141–144CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Roland M, Fairbank J (2000) The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 25:3115–3124CrossRefPubMed Roland M, Fairbank J (2000) The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 25:3115–3124CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ostelo RW, de Vet HC, Knol DL et al (2004) 24-Item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire was preferred out of six functional status questionnaires for post-lumbar disc surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 57:268–276CrossRefPubMed Ostelo RW, de Vet HC, Knol DL et al (2004) 24-Item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire was preferred out of six functional status questionnaires for post-lumbar disc surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 57:268–276CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ostelo RW, Deyo RA, Stratford P et al (2008) Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine 33:90–94CrossRefPubMed Ostelo RW, Deyo RA, Stratford P et al (2008) Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine 33:90–94CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB et al (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273PubMed Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB et al (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273PubMed
19.
go back to reference Wilson-MacDonald J, Fairbank J, Frost H et al (2008) The MRC spine stabilization trial: surgical methods, outcomes, costs, and complications of surgical stabilization. Spine 33:2334–2340CrossRefPubMed Wilson-MacDonald J, Fairbank J, Frost H et al (2008) The MRC spine stabilization trial: surgical methods, outcomes, costs, and complications of surgical stabilization. Spine 33:2334–2340CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ostelo RW, de Vet HC (2005) Clinically important outcomes in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 19:593–607CrossRefPubMed Ostelo RW, de Vet HC (2005) Clinically important outcomes in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 19:593–607CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Tafazal SI, Sell PJ (2006) Outcome scores in spinal surgery quantified: excellent, good, fair and poor in terms of patient-completed tools. Eur Spine J 15:1653–1660CrossRefPubMed Tafazal SI, Sell PJ (2006) Outcome scores in spinal surgery quantified: excellent, good, fair and poor in terms of patient-completed tools. Eur Spine J 15:1653–1660CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Glassman SD, Gornet MF, Branch C et al (2006) MOS Short Form 36 and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes in lumbar fusion: a multicenter experience. Spine J 6:21–26CrossRefPubMed Glassman SD, Gornet MF, Branch C et al (2006) MOS Short Form 36 and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes in lumbar fusion: a multicenter experience. Spine J 6:21–26CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Nicholas MK (2007) The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: taking pain into account. Eur J Pain 11:153–163CrossRefPubMed Nicholas MK (2007) The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: taking pain into account. Eur J Pain 11:153–163CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483CrossRefPubMed Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Redelmeier DA, Guyatt GH, Goldstein RS (1996) Assessing the minimal important difference in symptoms: a comparison of two techniques. J Clin Epidemiol 49:1215–1219CrossRefPubMed Redelmeier DA, Guyatt GH, Goldstein RS (1996) Assessing the minimal important difference in symptoms: a comparison of two techniques. J Clin Epidemiol 49:1215–1219CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
27.
go back to reference Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL (2008) Modern epidemiology, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 664–681 Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL (2008) Modern epidemiology, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 664–681
Metadata
Title
Daily functioning and self-management in patients with chronic low back pain after an intensive cognitive behavioral programme for pain management
Authors
Miranda L. van Hooff
Johannes D. van der Merwe
John O’Dowd
Paul W. Pavlov
Maarten Spruit
Marinus de Kleuver
Jacques van Limbeek
Publication date
01-09-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 9/2010
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1435-5

Other articles of this Issue 9/2010

European Spine Journal 9/2010 Go to the issue