Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 6/2010

01-06-2010 | Ideas and Technical Innovations

Segment-by-segment stabilization for degenerative disc disease: a hybrid technique

Authors: Othmar Schwarzenbach, Nathalie Rohrbach, Ulrich Berlemann

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 6/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Patients with multisegmental degenerative disc disease (DDD) resistant to conservative therapy are typically treated with either fusion or non-fusion surgical techniques. The two techniques can be applied at adjacent levels using Dynesys® (Zimmer GmbH, Winterthur, Switzerland) implants in a segment-by-segment treatment of multiple level DDD. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome of patients treated using this segment-by-segment application of Dynesys in some levels as a non-fusion device and in other segments in combination with a PLIF as a fusion device. A consecutive case series is reported. The sample included 16 females and 15 males with a mean age of 53.6 years (range 26.3–76.4 years). Mean follow-up time was 39 months (range 24–90 months). Preoperative Oswestry disability index (ODI), back- and leg-pain scores (VAS) were compared to postoperative status. Fusion success and system failure were assessed by an independent reviewer who analyzed AP and lateral X-rays. Back pain improved from 7.3 ± 1.7 to 3.4 ± 2.7 (p < 0.000002), leg pain from 6.0 ± 2.9 to 2.3 ± 2.9 (p < 0.00006), and ODI from 51.6 ± 13.2% to 28.7 ± 18.0% (p < 0.00001). Screw loosening occurred in one of a total of 222 implanted screws (0.45%). The results indicate that segment-by-segment treatment with Dynesys® in combination with interbody fusion is technically feasible, safe, and effective for the surgical treatment of multilevel DDD.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Battié M, Videman T, Parent E (2004) Lumbar disk degeneration: epidemiology and genetic influences. Spine 29:2679–2690CrossRefPubMed Battié M, Videman T, Parent E (2004) Lumbar disk degeneration: epidemiology and genetic influences. Spine 29:2679–2690CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bertagnoli R, Tropiano P, Zigler J, Karg A, Voigt S (2005) Hybrid constructs. Orthop Clin N Am 36:379–388CrossRef Bertagnoli R, Tropiano P, Zigler J, Karg A, Voigt S (2005) Hybrid constructs. Orthop Clin N Am 36:379–388CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, Patronas NJ, Wiesel SW (1990) Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg 72:403–408PubMed Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, Patronas NJ, Wiesel SW (1990) Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg 72:403–408PubMed
5.
go back to reference Bono CM, Lee CK (2004) Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the past 20 years. Spine 29:455–463CrossRefPubMed Bono CM, Lee CK (2004) Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the past 20 years. Spine 29:455–463CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bono CM, Lee CK (2005) The influence of subdiagnosis on radiographic and clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion for degenerative disc disorders: an analysis of the literature from two decades. Spine 30:227–234CrossRefPubMed Bono CM, Lee CK (2005) The influence of subdiagnosis on radiographic and clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion for degenerative disc disorders: an analysis of the literature from two decades. Spine 30:227–234CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Boos N, Rieder R, Schade V, Spratt K, Semmer N, Aebi M (1995) Volvo award in clinical sciences. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, work perception and psychosocial factors in identifying symptomatic disk herniations. Spine 20:2613–2625CrossRefPubMed Boos N, Rieder R, Schade V, Spratt K, Semmer N, Aebi M (1995) Volvo award in clinical sciences. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, work perception and psychosocial factors in identifying symptomatic disk herniations. Spine 20:2613–2625CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Brislin B, Vaccaro A (2002) Advances in posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Orthop Clin N Am 33:367–374CrossRef Brislin B, Vaccaro A (2002) Advances in posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Orthop Clin N Am 33:367–374CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Carragee EJ, Paragioudakis StJ, Khurana S (2000) Lumbar high-intensity zone and discography in subjects without low back problems. Spine 25:2987–2992CrossRefPubMed Carragee EJ, Paragioudakis StJ, Khurana S (2000) Lumbar high-intensity zone and discography in subjects without low back problems. Spine 25:2987–2992CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Cheng BC, Gordon J, Cheng J, Welch WC (2007) Immediate biomechanical effects of lumbar posterior dynamic stabilization above a circumferential fusion. Spine 32(23):2551–2557CrossRefPubMed Cheng BC, Gordon J, Cheng J, Welch WC (2007) Immediate biomechanical effects of lumbar posterior dynamic stabilization above a circumferential fusion. Spine 32(23):2551–2557CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Diwan AD, Parvartaneni H, Cammisa F (2003) Failed degenerative lumbar spine surgery. Orthop Clin N Am 34:309–324CrossRef Diwan AD, Parvartaneni H, Cammisa F (2003) Failed degenerative lumbar spine surgery. Orthop Clin N Am 34:309–324CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Freeman BJC, Licina P, Mehdian SH (2000) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion combined with instrumented postero-lateral fusion: 5-year results in 60 patients. Eur Spine J 9:42–46CrossRefPubMed Freeman BJC, Licina P, Mehdian SH (2000) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion combined with instrumented postero-lateral fusion: 5-year results in 60 patients. Eur Spine J 9:42–46CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A, Swedish Lumbar Spine Group (2002) Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 27:1131–1141CrossRefPubMed Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A, Swedish Lumbar Spine Group (2002) Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 27:1131–1141CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, Hsu WK, Dawson EG (2004) Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(7):1497–1503PubMed Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, Hsu WK, Dawson EG (2004) Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(7):1497–1503PubMed
16.
go back to reference Gillet P (2003) The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(4):338–345PubMed Gillet P (2003) The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(4):338–345PubMed
17.
go back to reference Glassman S, Gornet MF, Branch C, Polly D, Peloza J (2006) MOS short form 36 and Oswestry disability index outcomes in lumbar fusion: a multicenter experience. Spine J 6:21–26CrossRefPubMed Glassman S, Gornet MF, Branch C, Polly D, Peloza J (2006) MOS short form 36 and Oswestry disability index outcomes in lumbar fusion: a multicenter experience. Spine J 6:21–26CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Greiner-Perth R, Boehm H, Allam Y, Elsaghir H, Franke J (2004) Reoperation rate after instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 29:2516–2520CrossRefPubMed Greiner-Perth R, Boehm H, Allam Y, Elsaghir H, Franke J (2004) Reoperation rate after instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 29:2516–2520CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Grob D, Benini A, Junge A, Mannion AF (2005) Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine: surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years. Spine 30(3):324–331CrossRefPubMed Grob D, Benini A, Junge A, Mannion AF (2005) Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine: surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years. Spine 30(3):324–331CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Guiot BH, Fessler RG (2000) Molecular biology of degenerative disc disease. Neurosurgery 47:1034–1040CrossRefPubMed Guiot BH, Fessler RG (2000) Molecular biology of degenerative disc disease. Neurosurgery 47:1034–1040CrossRefPubMed
21.
22.
go back to reference Hioki A, Miyamoto K, Kodama H, Hosoe H, Nishimoto H (2005) Two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative disc disease: improved clinical outcome with restoration of lumbar lordosis. Spine J 5:600–607CrossRefPubMed Hioki A, Miyamoto K, Kodama H, Hosoe H, Nishimoto H (2005) Two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative disc disease: improved clinical outcome with restoration of lumbar lordosis. Spine J 5:600–607CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Jarvik J, Hollingworth W, Haegerty P, Haynor DR, Deyo RA (2001) The longitudinal assessment of imaging and disability of the back (LAIDBack) study: baseline data. Spine 26:1158–1166CrossRefPubMed Jarvik J, Hollingworth W, Haegerty P, Haynor DR, Deyo RA (2001) The longitudinal assessment of imaging and disability of the back (LAIDBack) study: baseline data. Spine 26:1158–1166CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Jayakumar P, Nnadi C, Saifuddin A, MacSweeney E, Casey A (2006) Dynamic degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: diagnosis with axial loaded magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 31:E298–E301CrossRefPubMed Jayakumar P, Nnadi C, Saifuddin A, MacSweeney E, Casey A (2006) Dynamic degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: diagnosis with axial loaded magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 31:E298–E301CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Junghanns H (1968) Die gesunde und die kranke Wirbelsäule in Röntgenbild und Klinik. Thieme, Stuttgart Junghanns H (1968) Die gesunde und die kranke Wirbelsäule in Röntgenbild und Klinik. Thieme, Stuttgart
26.
go back to reference Kang CH, Shin MJ, Kim SM, Lee SH, Lee CS (2007) MRI of paraspinal muscles in lumbar degenerative kyphosis patients and control patients with chronic low back pain. Clin Radiol 62:479–486CrossRefPubMed Kang CH, Shin MJ, Kim SM, Lee SH, Lee CS (2007) MRI of paraspinal muscles in lumbar degenerative kyphosis patients and control patients with chronic low back pain. Clin Radiol 62:479–486CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Keller TS, Harrison DE, Colloca CJ, Harrison DD, Janik TJ (2003) Prediction of osteoporotic spinal deformity. Spine 28:455–462CrossRefPubMed Keller TS, Harrison DE, Colloca CJ, Harrison DD, Janik TJ (2003) Prediction of osteoporotic spinal deformity. Spine 28:455–462CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Kim KT, Lee SH, Lee YH, Bae SC, Suk KS (2006) Clinical outcomes of 3 fusion methods through the posterior approach in the lumbar spine. Spine 31:1351–1357CrossRefPubMed Kim KT, Lee SH, Lee YH, Bae SC, Suk KS (2006) Clinical outcomes of 3 fusion methods through the posterior approach in the lumbar spine. Spine 31:1351–1357CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Farfan HF (1982) Instability of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop 165:110–123PubMed Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Farfan HF (1982) Instability of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop 165:110–123PubMed
30.
go back to reference Kjaer P, Ch Leboeuf-Yde, Korsholm L, Sorensen JS, Bendix T (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging and low back pain in adults: a diagnostic imaging study of 40-year-old men and women. Spine 30:1173–1180CrossRefPubMed Kjaer P, Ch Leboeuf-Yde, Korsholm L, Sorensen JS, Bendix T (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging and low back pain in adults: a diagnostic imaging study of 40-year-old men and women. Spine 30:1173–1180CrossRefPubMed
31.
32.
go back to reference Madan SS, Boeree NR (2003) Comparison of instrumented anterior interbody fusion with instrumented circumferential lumbar fusion. Eur Spine J 2:567–575CrossRef Madan SS, Boeree NR (2003) Comparison of instrumented anterior interbody fusion with instrumented circumferential lumbar fusion. Eur Spine J 2:567–575CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Maghout-Jurati S, Franklin GM, Mirza SK, Wickizer TM, Fulton-Kehoe D (2006) Lumbar fusion outcomes in Washington State workers’ compensation. Spine 31:2715–2723CrossRef Maghout-Jurati S, Franklin GM, Mirza SK, Wickizer TM, Fulton-Kehoe D (2006) Lumbar fusion outcomes in Washington State workers’ compensation. Spine 31:2715–2723CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Masui T, Yukawa Y, Nakamura S, Kajino G, Matsubara Y, Kshiguro N (2005) Natural history of patients with lumbar disc herniation observed by magnetic resonance imaging for minimum 7 years. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:121–126CrossRefPubMed Masui T, Yukawa Y, Nakamura S, Kajino G, Matsubara Y, Kshiguro N (2005) Natural history of patients with lumbar disc herniation observed by magnetic resonance imaging for minimum 7 years. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:121–126CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Niosi CA, Zhu QA, Wilson DC, Keynan O, Wilson DR, Oxland TR (2006) Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study. Eur Spine J 15(6):913–922CrossRefPubMed Niosi CA, Zhu QA, Wilson DC, Keynan O, Wilson DR, Oxland TR (2006) Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study. Eur Spine J 15(6):913–922CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Ohlin A, Karlsson M, Düppe H, Hasserius R, Redlund-Johnell I (1994) Complications after transpedicular stabilization of the spine. A survivorship analysis of 163 cases. Spine 19(24):2774–2779CrossRefPubMed Ohlin A, Karlsson M, Düppe H, Hasserius R, Redlund-Johnell I (1994) Complications after transpedicular stabilization of the spine. A survivorship analysis of 163 cases. Spine 19(24):2774–2779CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Pappou IP, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP (2007) Correlation of end plate shape on MRI and disc degeneration in surgically treated patients with degenerative disc disease and herniated nucleus pulposus. Spine J 7:32–38CrossRefPubMed Pappou IP, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP (2007) Correlation of end plate shape on MRI and disc degeneration in surgically treated patients with degenerative disc disease and herniated nucleus pulposus. Spine J 7:32–38CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 26(17):1873–1878CrossRefPubMed Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 26(17):1873–1878CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Podichetty VK (2007) The aging spine: the role of inflammatory mediators in intervertebral disc degeneration. Cell Mol Biol 53:4–18PubMed Podichetty VK (2007) The aging spine: the role of inflammatory mediators in intervertebral disc degeneration. Cell Mol Biol 53:4–18PubMed
40.
go back to reference Putzier M, Schneider SV, Funk JF, Tohtz SW, Perka C (2005) The surgical treatment of the lumbar disc prolapse: nucleotomy with additional transpedicular dynamic stabilization versus nucleotomy alone. Spine 30(5):E109–E114CrossRefPubMed Putzier M, Schneider SV, Funk JF, Tohtz SW, Perka C (2005) The surgical treatment of the lumbar disc prolapse: nucleotomy with additional transpedicular dynamic stabilization versus nucleotomy alone. Spine 30(5):E109–E114CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Schaeren S, Broger I, Jeanneret B (2008) Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization. Spine 33(18):E636–E642CrossRefPubMed Schaeren S, Broger I, Jeanneret B (2008) Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization. Spine 33(18):E636–E642CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Schmoelz W, Huber JF, Nydegger T, Claes L, Wilke HJ (2003) Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(4):418–423PubMed Schmoelz W, Huber JF, Nydegger T, Claes L, Wilke HJ (2003) Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(4):418–423PubMed
43.
go back to reference Schnake KJ, Schaeren S, Jeanneret B (2006) Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine 31(4):442–449CrossRefPubMed Schnake KJ, Schaeren S, Jeanneret B (2006) Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine 31(4):442–449CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Schwarzenbach O, Berlemann U, Stoll TM, Dubois G (2005) Posterior dynamic stabilization systems: Dynesys. Orthop Clin N Am 36:363–372CrossRef Schwarzenbach O, Berlemann U, Stoll TM, Dubois G (2005) Posterior dynamic stabilization systems: Dynesys. Orthop Clin N Am 36:363–372CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Solovieva S, Lohiniva J, Leino-Arjas P, Raininko R, Luoma K, Ala-Kokko L, Riihimaki H (2006) Intervertebral disc degeneration in relation to the COL9A3 and the IL-1β gene polymorphisms. Eur Spine J 15:613–619CrossRefPubMed Solovieva S, Lohiniva J, Leino-Arjas P, Raininko R, Luoma K, Ala-Kokko L, Riihimaki H (2006) Intervertebral disc degeneration in relation to the COL9A3 and the IL- gene polymorphisms. Eur Spine J 15:613–619CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Stoll TM, Dubois G, Schwarzenbach O (2002) The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S170–S178PubMed Stoll TM, Dubois G, Schwarzenbach O (2002) The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S170–S178PubMed
47.
go back to reference Suk S, Lee CK, Kim WJ, Lee JH, Cho KJ (1997) Adding posterior lumbar interbody fusion to pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression in spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Spine 22:210–219CrossRefPubMed Suk S, Lee CK, Kim WJ, Lee JH, Cho KJ (1997) Adding posterior lumbar interbody fusion to pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression in spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Spine 22:210–219CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Symmons DP, van Hemert AM, Vandenbroucke JP, Valkenburg HA (1991) A longitudinal study of back pain and radiological changes in the lumbar spines of middle aged women. II. Radiological findings. Ann Rheum Dis 50:162–166CrossRefPubMed Symmons DP, van Hemert AM, Vandenbroucke JP, Valkenburg HA (1991) A longitudinal study of back pain and radiological changes in the lumbar spines of middle aged women. II. Radiological findings. Ann Rheum Dis 50:162–166CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Videman T, Battie MC, Ripatti S, Gill K, Manninen H, Kaprio J (2006) Determinants of the progression in lumbar degeneration: a 5-year follow-up of adult male monozygotic twins. Spine 31(6):671–678CrossRefPubMed Videman T, Battie MC, Ripatti S, Gill K, Manninen H, Kaprio J (2006) Determinants of the progression in lumbar degeneration: a 5-year follow-up of adult male monozygotic twins. Spine 31(6):671–678CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Vishteh AG, Crawford NR, Chamberlain RH, Thramann JJ, Park SC (2005) Biomechanical comparison of anterior versus posterior lumbar threaded interbody fusion cages. Spine 30:302–310CrossRefPubMed Vishteh AG, Crawford NR, Chamberlain RH, Thramann JJ, Park SC (2005) Biomechanical comparison of anterior versus posterior lumbar threaded interbody fusion cages. Spine 30:302–310CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Welch WC, Cheng BC, Awad TE, Davis R, Maxwell JH, Delamarter R, Wingate JK, Sherman J, Macenski MM (2007) Clinical outcomes of the Dynesys dynamic neutralization system: 1-year preliminary results. Neurosurg Focus 22(1):E8CrossRefPubMed Welch WC, Cheng BC, Awad TE, Davis R, Maxwell JH, Delamarter R, Wingate JK, Sherman J, Macenski MM (2007) Clinical outcomes of the Dynesys dynamic neutralization system: 1-year preliminary results. Neurosurg Focus 22(1):E8CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference White AA, Panjabi MM (1978) The basic kinematics of the human spine: a review of past and current knowledge. Spine 3:12–20CrossRefPubMed White AA, Panjabi MM (1978) The basic kinematics of the human spine: a review of past and current knowledge. Spine 3:12–20CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Wimmer C, Gluch H, Krismer M, Ogon M, Jesenko R (1997) AP-translation in the proximal disc adjacent to lumbar spine fusion. A retrospective comparison of mono- and polysegmental fusion in 120 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 68(3):269–272CrossRefPubMed Wimmer C, Gluch H, Krismer M, Ogon M, Jesenko R (1997) AP-translation in the proximal disc adjacent to lumbar spine fusion. A retrospective comparison of mono- and polysegmental fusion in 120 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 68(3):269–272CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Zanoli G, Strömqvist B, Jönsson B (2001) Visual analog scales for interpretation of back and leg pain intensity in patients operated for degenerative lumbar spine disorders. Spine 26:2375–2380CrossRefPubMed Zanoli G, Strömqvist B, Jönsson B (2001) Visual analog scales for interpretation of back and leg pain intensity in patients operated for degenerative lumbar spine disorders. Spine 26:2375–2380CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Segment-by-segment stabilization for degenerative disc disease: a hybrid technique
Authors
Othmar Schwarzenbach
Nathalie Rohrbach
Ulrich Berlemann
Publication date
01-06-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 6/2010
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1282-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2010

European Spine Journal 6/2010 Go to the issue

Announcements

Announcements