Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 1/2010

01-01-2010 | Original Article

Safety of thoracic pedicle screw application using the funnel technique in Asians: a cadaveric evaluation

Authors: Chris Yin Wei Chan, Mun Keong Kwan, Lim Beng Saw

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

The objective of this cadaveric study is to determine the safety and outcome of thoracic pedicle screw placement in Asians using the funnel technique. Pedicle screws have superior biomechanical as well as clinical data when compared to other methods of instrumentation. However, misplacement in the thoracic spine can result in major neurological implications. There is great variability of the thoracic pedicle morphometry between the Western and the Asian population. The feasibility of thoracic pedicle screw insertion in Asians has not been fully elucidated yet. A pre-insertion radiograph was performed and surgeons were blinded to the morphometry of the thoracic pedicles. 240 pedicle screws were inserted in ten Asian cadavers from T1 to T12 using the funnel technique. 5.0 mm screws were used from T1 to T6 while 6.0 mm screws were used from T7 to T12. Perforations were detected by direct visualization via a wide laminectomy. The narrowest pedicles are found between T3 and T6. T5 pedicle width is smallest measuring 4.1 ± 1.3 mm. There were 24 (10.0%) Grade 1 perforations and only 1 (0.4%) Grade 2 perforation. Grade 2 or worse perforation is considered significant perforation which would threaten the neural structures. There were twice as many lateral and inferior perforations compared to medial perforations. 48.0% of the perforations occurred at T1, T2 and T3 pedicles. Pedicle fracture occurred in 10.4% of pedicles. Intra-operatively, the absence of funnel was found in 24.5% of pedicles. In conclusion, thoracic pedicle screws using 5.0 mm at T1–T6 and 6.0 mm at T7–T12 can be inserted safely in Asian cadavers using the funnel technique despite having smaller thoracic pedicle morphometry.
Literature
1.
go back to reference An HS, Singh K, Vaccaro AR et al (2004) Biomechanical evaluation of contemporary posterior spinal internal fixation configurations in an unstable burst-fracture calf spine model: special references of hook configurations and pedicle screws. Spine 29:257–262CrossRefPubMed An HS, Singh K, Vaccaro AR et al (2004) Biomechanical evaluation of contemporary posterior spinal internal fixation configurations in an unstable burst-fracture calf spine model: special references of hook configurations and pedicle screws. Spine 29:257–262CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bransford R, Bellabarba C, Thompson JH et al (2006) The safety of fluoroscopically-assisted thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation for spine trauma. J Trauma 60:1047–1052CrossRefPubMed Bransford R, Bellabarba C, Thompson JH et al (2006) The safety of fluoroscopically-assisted thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation for spine trauma. J Trauma 60:1047–1052CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cahill P, Rinella AS, Ghanayem A et al (2004) Thoracic pedicle expansion after pedicle screw insertion in a pediatric cadaveric spine: a biomechanical analysis. Spine J 4:S93CrossRef Cahill P, Rinella AS, Ghanayem A et al (2004) Thoracic pedicle expansion after pedicle screw insertion in a pediatric cadaveric spine: a biomechanical analysis. Spine J 4:S93CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cinotti G, Stefano G, Ripani M et al (1999) Pedicle instrumentation in the thoracic spine: a morphometric and cadaveric study for placement of screws. Spine 24:114–119CrossRefPubMed Cinotti G, Stefano G, Ripani M et al (1999) Pedicle instrumentation in the thoracic spine: a morphometric and cadaveric study for placement of screws. Spine 24:114–119CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Datir SP, Mitra SR (2004) Morphometric study of the thoracic vertebral pedicle in an indian population. Spine 29:1174–1181CrossRefPubMed Datir SP, Mitra SR (2004) Morphometric study of the thoracic vertebral pedicle in an indian population. Spine 29:1174–1181CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Dickman CA, Yahiro MA, Lu HT et al (1994) Surgical treatment alternatives for fixation of unstable fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. A meta-analysis. Spine 19:S2266–S2273 Dickman CA, Yahiro MA, Lu HT et al (1994) Surgical treatment alternatives for fixation of unstable fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. A meta-analysis. Spine 19:S2266–S2273
7.
go back to reference Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, Kim YJ et al (2006) Selective posterior thoracic fusions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of hooks versus pedicle screws. Spine 31:2400–2404CrossRefPubMed Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, Kim YJ et al (2006) Selective posterior thoracic fusions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of hooks versus pedicle screws. Spine 31:2400–2404CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Gaines RW (2000) Current concepts review: the use of pedicle-screw internal fixation for the operative treatment of spinal disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:1458–1476PubMed Gaines RW (2000) Current concepts review: the use of pedicle-screw internal fixation for the operative treatment of spinal disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:1458–1476PubMed
9.
go back to reference Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK et al (2004) Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 29:2040–2048CrossRefPubMed Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK et al (2004) Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 29:2040–2048CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Kim J et al (2006) Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 31:291–298CrossRefPubMed Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Kim J et al (2006) Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 31:291–298CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Korovessis P, Baikousis A, Zacharatos S et al (2006) Combined anterior plus posterior stabilization versus posterior short-segment instrumentation and fusion for mid-lumbar (L2–L4) burst fractures. Spine 31:859–868CrossRefPubMed Korovessis P, Baikousis A, Zacharatos S et al (2006) Combined anterior plus posterior stabilization versus posterior short-segment instrumentation and fusion for mid-lumbar (L2–L4) burst fractures. Spine 31:859–868CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Panjabi MM, Takata K, Goel V et al (1991) Thoracic human vertebrae: quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 16:888–901PubMedCrossRef Panjabi MM, Takata K, Goel V et al (1991) Thoracic human vertebrae: quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 16:888–901PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Parker JW, Lane JR, Karaikovic E et al (2000) Successful short-segment instrumentation and fusion for thoracolumbar spine fractures: a consecutive 4½-year series. Spine 25:1157–1170CrossRefPubMed Parker JW, Lane JR, Karaikovic E et al (2000) Successful short-segment instrumentation and fusion for thoracolumbar spine fractures: a consecutive 4½-year series. Spine 25:1157–1170CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Payer M (2005) Unstable upper and middle thoracic fractures. Preliminary experience with a posterior transpedicular correction-fixation method. J Clin Neurochir 12:529–533CrossRef Payer M (2005) Unstable upper and middle thoracic fractures. Preliminary experience with a posterior transpedicular correction-fixation method. J Clin Neurochir 12:529–533CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rajasekaran S, Vidyadhara S, Perumal M et al (2007) Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries. Spine 32:E56–E64CrossRefPubMed Rajasekaran S, Vidyadhara S, Perumal M et al (2007) Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries. Spine 32:E56–E64CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Rao G, Brodke DS, Rondina M et al (2002) Comparison of computerized tomography and direct visualization in thoracic pedicle screw placement. J Neurosurg 97:223s–226s Rao G, Brodke DS, Rondina M et al (2002) Comparison of computerized tomography and direct visualization in thoracic pedicle screw placement. J Neurosurg 97:223s–226s
17.
go back to reference Scoles PV, Linton AE, Latimer B et al (1988) Vertebral body and posterior element morphology: the normal spine in middle life. Spine 13:1082–1086CrossRefPubMed Scoles PV, Linton AE, Latimer B et al (1988) Vertebral body and posterior element morphology: the normal spine in middle life. Spine 13:1082–1086CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Tan SH, Teo EC, Chua HC (2004) Quantitative three dimensional anatomy of cervical, thoracic and lumbar vertebrae in Chinese Singaporean. Eur Spine J 13:137–146CrossRefPubMed Tan SH, Teo EC, Chua HC (2004) Quantitative three dimensional anatomy of cervical, thoracic and lumbar vertebrae in Chinese Singaporean. Eur Spine J 13:137–146CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Thanapipatsiri S, Meknavin S, Chavisiri C et al (1996) Pedicle sizes of the thoracic vertebrae from T1 to T12 in Thai adults. J Asian Orthop Assoc 10:5–8 Thanapipatsiri S, Meknavin S, Chavisiri C et al (1996) Pedicle sizes of the thoracic vertebrae from T1 to T12 in Thai adults. J Asian Orthop Assoc 10:5–8
20.
go back to reference Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Allardyce TJ et al (1995) Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part 1. Morphometric analysis of the thoracic vertebrae. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1193–1199PubMed Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Allardyce TJ et al (1995) Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part 1. Morphometric analysis of the thoracic vertebrae. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1193–1199PubMed
21.
go back to reference Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo S, Balderston RA et al (1995) Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part 2. An anatomical and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1200–1206PubMed Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo S, Balderston RA et al (1995) Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part 2. An anatomical and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1200–1206PubMed
22.
go back to reference Viau M, Tarbox BB, Wonglertsiri S et al (2002) Thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation using the “funnel technique”. Part 2. Clinical experience. J Spinal Disord 15:450–453 Viau M, Tarbox BB, Wonglertsiri S et al (2002) Thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation using the “funnel technique”. Part 2. Clinical experience. J Spinal Disord 15:450–453
23.
go back to reference Yingsakmonkol W, Karaikovic E, Gaines RW (2002) The accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine using the “funnel technique”. Part 1. A cadaveric study. J Spinal Disord 15:445–449 Yingsakmonkol W, Karaikovic E, Gaines RW (2002) The accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine using the “funnel technique”. Part 1. A cadaveric study. J Spinal Disord 15:445–449
24.
go back to reference Yue JJ, Sossan A, Selgrath C et al (2002) The treatment of unstable thoracic spine fractures with transpedicular screw instrumentation: a 3-year consecutive series. Spine 27:2782–2787CrossRefPubMed Yue JJ, Sossan A, Selgrath C et al (2002) The treatment of unstable thoracic spine fractures with transpedicular screw instrumentation: a 3-year consecutive series. Spine 27:2782–2787CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Doornik A et al (1987) Analysis of morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles. Spine 12:160–166CrossRefPubMed Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Doornik A et al (1987) Analysis of morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles. Spine 12:160–166CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Safety of thoracic pedicle screw application using the funnel technique in Asians: a cadaveric evaluation
Authors
Chris Yin Wei Chan
Mun Keong Kwan
Lim Beng Saw
Publication date
01-01-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1157-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

European Spine Journal 1/2010 Go to the issue