Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 5/2008

Open Access 01-05-2008 | Original Article

Mini-open anterior spine surgery for anterior lumbar diseases

Authors: Ruey-Mo Lin, Kuo-Yuan Huang, Kuo-An Lai

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 5/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgeries including endoscopic surgery and mini-open surgery are current trend of spine surgery, and its main advantages are shorter recovery time and cosmetic benefits, etc. However, mini-open surgery is easier and less technique demanding than endoscopic surgery. Besides, anterior spinal fusion is better than posterior spinal fusion while considering the physiological loading, back muscle function, etc. Therefore, we aimed to introduce the modified “mini-open anterior spine surgery” (MOASS) and to evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness and safety in the treatment of various anterior lumbar diseases with this technique. A total of 61 consecutive patients (46 female, 15 male; mean age 58.2 years) from 1997 to 2004 were included in this study, with an average follow-up of 24–52 (mean 43) months. The disease entities included vertebral fracture (20), failed back surgery (13), segmental instability or spondylolisthesis (10), infection (8), herniated disc (5), undetermined lesion for biopsy (4), and hemivertebra (1). Lesions involved 13 cases at T12–L1, 18 at L1–L2, 18 at L2–L3, 22 at L3–L4 and 11 at L4–L5 levels. All patients received a single stage anterior-only procedure for their anterior lumbar disease. We used the subjective clinical results, Oswestry disability index, fusion rate, and complications to evaluate our clinical outcome. Most patients (91.8%) were subjectively satisfied with the surgery and had good-to-excellent outcomes. Mean operation time was 85 (62–124) minutes, and mean blood loss was 136 (minimal-250) ml in the past 6 years. Hospital stay ranged from 4–26 (mean 10.6) days. Nearly all cases had improved back pain (87%), physical function (90%) and life quality (85%). Most cases (95%) achieved solid or probable solid bony fusion. There were no major complications. Therefore, MOASS is feasible, effective and safe for patients with various anterior lumbar diseases.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Baker JK, Reardon PR, Reardon MJ et al (1993) Vascular injury in anterior lumbar surgery. Spine 18:2227–2230PubMedCrossRef Baker JK, Reardon PR, Reardon MJ et al (1993) Vascular injury in anterior lumbar surgery. Spine 18:2227–2230PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bonaldi G (2003) Automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy: technique, indications and clinical follow-up in over 1000 patients. Neuroradiology 45:735–743PubMedCrossRef Bonaldi G (2003) Automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy: technique, indications and clinical follow-up in over 1000 patients. Neuroradiology 45:735–743PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Burkus JK, Foley K, Haid RW et al (2001) Surgical Interbody Research Group-radiographic assessment of interbody fusion devices: fusion criteria for anterior lumbar interbody surgery. Neurosurg Focus 10:E11PubMedCrossRef Burkus JK, Foley K, Haid RW et al (2001) Surgical Interbody Research Group-radiographic assessment of interbody fusion devices: fusion criteria for anterior lumbar interbody surgery. Neurosurg Focus 10:E11PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cheung KM, Zhang YG, Lu DS et al (2003) Reduction of disc space distraction after anterior lumbar interbody fusion with autologous iliac crest graft. Spine 28:1385–1389PubMedCrossRef Cheung KM, Zhang YG, Lu DS et al (2003) Reduction of disc space distraction after anterior lumbar interbody fusion with autologous iliac crest graft. Spine 28:1385–1389PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Dewald CJ, Millikan KW, Hammerberg KW et al (1999) An open, minimally invasive approach to the lumbar spine. Am Surg 65:61–68PubMed Dewald CJ, Millikan KW, Hammerberg KW et al (1999) An open, minimally invasive approach to the lumbar spine. Am Surg 65:61–68PubMed
7.
go back to reference Duffield RC, Carson WL, Chen LY et al (1993) Longitudinal element size effect on load sharing, internal loads, and fatigue life of tri-level spinal implant constructs. Spine 18:1695–1703PubMedCrossRef Duffield RC, Carson WL, Chen LY et al (1993) Longitudinal element size effect on load sharing, internal loads, and fatigue life of tri-level spinal implant constructs. Spine 18:1695–1703PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB et al (1980) The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273PubMed Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB et al (1980) The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273PubMed
9.
10.
go back to reference Fraser RD (1982) A wide muscle-splitting approach to the lumbosacral spine. J Bone Joint Surg 64:44–46 Fraser RD (1982) A wide muscle-splitting approach to the lumbosacral spine. J Bone Joint Surg 64:44–46
11.
go back to reference German JW, Foley KT (2005) Minimal access surgical techniques in the management of the painful lumbar motion segment. Spine 30:S52–S59PubMedCrossRef German JW, Foley KT (2005) Minimal access surgical techniques in the management of the painful lumbar motion segment. Spine 30:S52–S59PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Goel VK, Kim YE, Lim TH et al (1988) An analytical investigation of the mechanics of spinal instrumentation. Spine 13:1003–10011PubMedCrossRef Goel VK, Kim YE, Lim TH et al (1988) An analytical investigation of the mechanics of spinal instrumentation. Spine 13:1003–10011PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Greenough CG, Peterson MD, Hadlow S et al (1998) Instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion. Results and comparison with anterior interbody fusion. Spine 23:479–486PubMedCrossRef Greenough CG, Peterson MD, Hadlow S et al (1998) Instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion. Results and comparison with anterior interbody fusion. Spine 23:479–486PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Heniford BT, Matthews BD, Lieberman IH (2000) Laparoscopic lumbar interbody spinal fusion. Surg Clin N Am 80:1487–1500PubMedCrossRef Heniford BT, Matthews BD, Lieberman IH (2000) Laparoscopic lumbar interbody spinal fusion. Surg Clin N Am 80:1487–1500PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ito H, Tsuchiya J, Asami G (1934) A new radical operation for Pott’s disease. J Bone J Surg 16B:499–515 Ito H, Tsuchiya J, Asami G (1934) A new radical operation for Pott’s disease. J Bone J Surg 16B:499–515
16.
go back to reference Kozak JA, O’Brien JP (1990) Simultaneous combined anterior and posterior fusion. An independent analysis of a treatment for the disabled low-back pain patient. Spine 15:322–328PubMedCrossRef Kozak JA, O’Brien JP (1990) Simultaneous combined anterior and posterior fusion. An independent analysis of a treatment for the disabled low-back pain patient. Spine 15:322–328PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ley EB, Thurston WD (1954) Retroperitoneal approach to lumbar disc. Rocky Mt Med J 51:121–123PubMed Ley EB, Thurston WD (1954) Retroperitoneal approach to lumbar disc. Rocky Mt Med J 51:121–123PubMed
18.
go back to reference Lin SI, Lin RM (2005) Disability and walking capacity in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: association with sensorimotor function, balance, and functional performance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 35:220–226PubMed Lin SI, Lin RM (2005) Disability and walking capacity in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: association with sensorimotor function, balance, and functional performance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 35:220–226PubMed
19.
go back to reference Liu JC, Ondra SL, Angelos P et al (2002) Is laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion a useful minimally invasive procedure? Neurosugery 51:155–158 Liu JC, Ondra SL, Angelos P et al (2002) Is laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion a useful minimally invasive procedure? Neurosugery 51:155–158
20.
go back to reference Mayer HM (1997) A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 22:691–699PubMedCrossRef Mayer HM (1997) A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 22:691–699PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Nakagawa H, Kamimura M, Uchiyama S et al (2003) Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) for lumbar disc prolapse. J Clin Neurosci 10:231–235PubMedCrossRef Nakagawa H, Kamimura M, Uchiyama S et al (2003) Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) for lumbar disc prolapse. J Clin Neurosci 10:231–235PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Penta M, Fraser RD (1997) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion—a minimum 10-year follow-up. Spine 22:2429–2434PubMedCrossRef Penta M, Fraser RD (1997) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion—a minimum 10-year follow-up. Spine 22:2429–2434PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pradhan BB, Nassar JA, Delamarter RB et al (2002) Single-level lumbar spinal fusion: a comparison of anterior and posterior approaches. J Spinal Disord Tech15:355–361PubMed Pradhan BB, Nassar JA, Delamarter RB et al (2002) Single-level lumbar spinal fusion: a comparison of anterior and posterior approaches. J Spinal Disord Tech15:355–361PubMed
24.
go back to reference Rajaraman V, Vingan R, Roth P et al (1999) Visceral and vascular complications resulting from anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg 91:60–64PubMed Rajaraman V, Vingan R, Roth P et al (1999) Visceral and vascular complications resulting from anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg 91:60–64PubMed
25.
go back to reference Rauzzino MJ, Shaffrey CI, Nockels RP et al (1999) Anterior lumbar fusion with titanium threaded and mesh interbody cages. Neurosurg Focus 7:e7PubMedCrossRef Rauzzino MJ, Shaffrey CI, Nockels RP et al (1999) Anterior lumbar fusion with titanium threaded and mesh interbody cages. Neurosurg Focus 7:e7PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Saraph V, Lerch C, Walochnik N et al (2004) Comparison of conventional versus minimally invasive extraperitoneal approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 13:425–431PubMedCrossRef Saraph V, Lerch C, Walochnik N et al (2004) Comparison of conventional versus minimally invasive extraperitoneal approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 13:425–431PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Stauffer RN, Coventry MB (1972) Posteriolateral lumbar spine fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 54:1195–1204PubMed Stauffer RN, Coventry MB (1972) Posteriolateral lumbar spine fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 54:1195–1204PubMed
Metadata
Title
Mini-open anterior spine surgery for anterior lumbar diseases
Authors
Ruey-Mo Lin
Kuo-Yuan Huang
Kuo-An Lai
Publication date
01-05-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 5/2008
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0644-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2008

European Spine Journal 5/2008 Go to the issue

Announcements

Announcements