Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 2/2007

01-02-2007 | Original Article

The effect of duration of symptoms on standard outcome measures in the surgical treatment of spinal stenosis

Authors: Leslie C. L. Ng, Suhayl Tafazal, Philip Sell

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 2/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

The effect of the duration of symptoms on the outcome of lumbar decompression surgery is not known. The aim of our study was to determine the predictors of functional outcome of lumbar decompression surgery for degenerative spinal stenosis with particular emphasis on the duration of symptoms. In this prospective cohort study, we recruited 100 patients with a full data set available at 1-year and 85% at 2-year follow-ups: 49 females and 51 males with an average age of 62 (range 52–82). The pre- and post-operative outcome measures were Oswestry disability index (ODI), low back outcome score (LBOS), pain visual analogue score (VAS), modified somatic perception (MSP) and modified Zung depression (MZD) score. Dural tear occurred in 14%, and there was one post-operative extra-dural heamatoma. Overall, the ODI improved from a pre-operative of 56 (±13) to a 1-year ODI of 40 (±22) and at 2-year ODI of 40 (±21). The VAS improved from an average of 8 to 5.2 at 1 year and 4.9 at 2 years. There was a statistical significant association between symptom duration and the change in ODI (P=0.007 at 1-year follow-up, P=0.001 at 2-year follow-up), LBOS (P=0.001 at 1-year follow-up, P<0.001 at 2-year follow-up) and VAS (P=0.003 at 1-year follow-up, P=0.001 at 2-year follow-up). Subgroup analyses showed that patients with symptom duration of less than 33 months had a more favourable result. In addition, the patients who rated the operation as excellent had a statistically significantly shorter duration of symptoms. We have not found a predictive value for age at operation, MSP or MZD. The number of levels of decompression and the different types of decompression surgery did not influence the surgical results. Our study indicates that the symptom duration of more than 33 months has a less favourable functional outcome.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Airaksinen O, Herno A, Turunen V, Saari T, Suolainen O (1997) Surgical outcome of 438 patients treated surgically for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 22:2278–2282CrossRefPubMed Airaksinen O, Herno A, Turunen V, Saari T, Suolainen O (1997) Surgical outcome of 438 patients treated surgically for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 22:2278–2282CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ, Magnaes B, Abdelnoor M, Lilleas F (2000) Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management? Spine 25(11):1424–1436CrossRefPubMed Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ, Magnaes B, Abdelnoor M, Lilleas F (2000) Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management? Spine 25(11):1424–1436CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Atlas SJ, Deyo RA, Keller RB, Robson D, Deyo RA, Singer DE (2000) Surgical and non-surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four year outcomes from the Maine lumbar spine study. Spine 25:556–562 CrossRefPubMed Atlas SJ, Deyo RA, Keller RB, Robson D, Deyo RA, Singer DE (2000) Surgical and non-surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four year outcomes from the Maine lumbar spine study. Spine 25:556–562 CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Caputy AJ, Luessenhop AJ (1992) Long-term evaluation of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar stenosis. J Neurosurg 77:669–676PubMed Caputy AJ, Luessenhop AJ (1992) Long-term evaluation of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar stenosis. J Neurosurg 77:669–676PubMed
5.
go back to reference De Villiers PD, Booysen EL (1976) Fibrous spinal stenosis: a report on 850 myelograms with a water soluble contrast medium. Clin Orthop 115:140–144PubMed De Villiers PD, Booysen EL (1976) Fibrous spinal stenosis: a report on 850 myelograms with a water soluble contrast medium. Clin Orthop 115:140–144PubMed
6.
go back to reference Eskola A, Pohjolainen T, Alaranta H, Soini J, Tallroth K, Slatis P (1992) Calcitonin treatment in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over study with one year follow-up. Calcif Tissue Int 50(5):400–403CrossRefPubMed Eskola A, Pohjolainen T, Alaranta H, Soini J, Tallroth K, Slatis P (1992) Calcitonin treatment in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over study with one year follow-up. Calcif Tissue Int 50(5):400–403CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Frazier DD, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH, Katz JN (1997) Associations between spinal deformity and outcomes after decompression for spinal stenosis. Spine 22:2025–2029CrossRefPubMed Frazier DD, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH, Katz JN (1997) Associations between spinal deformity and outcomes after decompression for spinal stenosis. Spine 22:2025–2029CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Grabias S (1980) Current concepts review: the treatment of spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 62:308–313 Grabias S (1980) Current concepts review: the treatment of spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 62:308–313
9.
go back to reference Grob D, Humke T, Dvorak J (1995) Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Decompression with and without arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg (AM) 77:1036–1041 Grob D, Humke T, Dvorak J (1995) Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Decompression with and without arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg (AM) 77:1036–1041
10.
go back to reference Herno A, Airaksinen O, Saari T (1993) Long-term results of surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 18:1471–1474PubMedCrossRef Herno A, Airaksinen O, Saari T (1993) Long-term results of surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 18:1471–1474PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Herno A, Airaksinen O, Saari T, Luukkonen M (1996) Lumbar spinal stenosis: a matched-pair study of operated and operated patients. Neurosurgery 10:461–465CrossRef Herno A, Airaksinen O, Saari T, Luukkonen M (1996) Lumbar spinal stenosis: a matched-pair study of operated and operated patients. Neurosurgery 10:461–465CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Herron L, Mangelsdorf C (1991) Lumbar spinal stenosis: results of surgical treatment. J Spinal Disord 4:26–33PubMed Herron L, Mangelsdorf C (1991) Lumbar spinal stenosis: results of surgical treatment. J Spinal Disord 4:26–33PubMed
13.
go back to reference Hurme M, Alaranta H (1987) Factors predicting the results of surgery for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 12:933–938PubMedCrossRef Hurme M, Alaranta H (1987) Factors predicting the results of surgery for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 12:933–938PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Johnsson B, Annertz M, Sjoberg C, Stromqvist B (1997) A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis: part II: five year follow-up by an independent observer. Spine 22(24):2938–2944CrossRefPubMed Johnsson B, Annertz M, Sjoberg C, Stromqvist B (1997) A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis: part II: five year follow-up by an independent observer. Spine 22(24):2938–2944CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Johnsson KE, Rosen I, Uden A (1992) The natural course of lumber spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop 279:82–86PubMed Johnsson KE, Rosen I, Uden A (1992) The natural course of lumber spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop 279:82–86PubMed
16.
go back to reference Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Chang LC, Levine SA, Fossel AH, Liang MH (1994) Seven to ten year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 21:92–98CrossRef Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Chang LC, Levine SA, Fossel AH, Liang MH (1994) Seven to ten year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 21:92–98CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Katz JN, Stucki G, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH, Grobler LJ, Weinstein JN (1999) Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 24:2229–2233CrossRefPubMed Katz JN, Stucki G, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH, Grobler LJ, Weinstein JN (1999) Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 24:2229–2233CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kornblum MB, Fischgrund JS, Herkowitz HN, Abraham DA, Berkower DL, Ditkoff JS (2004) Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective long term study comparing fusion and pseudoarthrosis. Spine 29(7):726–733CrossRefPubMed Kornblum MB, Fischgrund JS, Herkowitz HN, Abraham DA, Berkower DL, Ditkoff JS (2004) Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective long term study comparing fusion and pseudoarthrosis. Spine 29(7):726–733CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lozier AP, Kendig JJ (1995) Long term potentiation in an isolated peripheral nerve-spinal cord preparation. J Neurophysiol 74:1001–1009PubMed Lozier AP, Kendig JJ (1995) Long term potentiation in an isolated peripheral nerve-spinal cord preparation. J Neurophysiol 74:1001–1009PubMed
20.
go back to reference Mardjetko SM, Connolly PJ, Shott S (1994) Degenertative lumbar spondylolisthesis. A meta-analysis of literature 1970–1993. Spine 19:2257S–2265SCrossRef Mardjetko SM, Connolly PJ, Shott S (1994) Degenertative lumbar spondylolisthesis. A meta-analysis of literature 1970–1993. Spine 19:2257S–2265SCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Mcgregor AH, Hughes SPF (2002) The evaluation of the surgical management of nerve root compression in patients with low back pain: Part 1: the assessment of outcome. Spine 27(13):1465–1470CrossRefPubMed Mcgregor AH, Hughes SPF (2002) The evaluation of the surgical management of nerve root compression in patients with low back pain: Part 1: the assessment of outcome. Spine 27(13):1465–1470CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Ng L, Sell P (2004) The predictive value of duration of radiculopathy for the outcome of lumbar discectomy—a prospective cohort study with one-year follow up. J Bone Joint Surg 86(B):546–549PubMed Ng L, Sell P (2004) The predictive value of duration of radiculopathy for the outcome of lumbar discectomy—a prospective cohort study with one-year follow up. J Bone Joint Surg 86(B):546–549PubMed
23.
go back to reference Olmarker K, Lind B, Holm S et al (1991) Continued compression increases impairment of impulse propagation in experimental compression of the porcine cauda equine. Neuro-orthopedics 11:75–81 Olmarker K, Lind B, Holm S et al (1991) Continued compression increases impairment of impulse propagation in experimental compression of the porcine cauda equine. Neuro-orthopedics 11:75–81
24.
go back to reference Pocket S, Figurov A (1993) Long term potentiation and depression in the ventral horn of rat spinal cord in vitro. Neuroreport 4:97–99PubMedCrossRef Pocket S, Figurov A (1993) Long term potentiation and depression in the ventral horn of rat spinal cord in vitro. Neuroreport 4:97–99PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Postachinni F (1996) Management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 78:154–164 Postachinni F (1996) Management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 78:154–164
26.
go back to reference Postacchini F, Cinotti G, Gumina S, Perugia D (1993) Long term results of surgery in lumbar stenosis: 8-year review of 64 patients. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 251:78–80PubMed Postacchini F, Cinotti G, Gumina S, Perugia D (1993) Long term results of surgery in lumbar stenosis: 8-year review of 64 patients. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 251:78–80PubMed
27.
go back to reference Simotas A, Dorey F, Hansraj K, Cammisa F (2000) Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: clinical and outcome results and a 3-year survivorship analysis. Spine 25(2):197–211CrossRefPubMed Simotas A, Dorey F, Hansraj K, Cammisa F (2000) Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: clinical and outcome results and a 3-year survivorship analysis. Spine 25(2):197–211CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Spivak JM (1998) Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg 80(A):1053–1066PubMed Spivak JM (1998) Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg 80(A):1053–1066PubMed
29.
go back to reference Tendon V, Campbell F, Ross ERS (1999) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion: association between disability and psychological disturbance in non-compensation patients. Spine 24:1833–1833CrossRefPubMed Tendon V, Campbell F, Ross ERS (1999) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion: association between disability and psychological disturbance in non-compensation patients. Spine 24:1833–1833CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Trief P, Grant W, Fredrickson B (2000) A prospective study of psychological predictors of lumbar surgery outcome. Spine 25:2616–2621CrossRefPubMed Trief P, Grant W, Fredrickson B (2000) A prospective study of psychological predictors of lumbar surgery outcome. Spine 25:2616–2621CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Turner JA, Erse KM, Herron L (1992) Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine 17:1–8PubMedCrossRef Turner JA, Erse KM, Herron L (1992) Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine 17:1–8PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Watanabe R, Parke WW (1986) Vascular and neural pathology of lumbarsacral spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg 64:64–70PubMedCrossRef Watanabe R, Parke WW (1986) Vascular and neural pathology of lumbarsacral spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg 64:64–70PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Zheng F, Sandhu H, Cammisa F, Girardi F, Khan S (2001) Predictors of functional outcome in elderly patients undergoing posterior lumbar spine surgery. J spinal disord 14(6):518–521CrossRefPubMed Zheng F, Sandhu H, Cammisa F, Girardi F, Khan S (2001) Predictors of functional outcome in elderly patients undergoing posterior lumbar spine surgery. J spinal disord 14(6):518–521CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The effect of duration of symptoms on standard outcome measures in the surgical treatment of spinal stenosis
Authors
Leslie C. L. Ng
Suhayl Tafazal
Philip Sell
Publication date
01-02-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 2/2007
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0078-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2007

European Spine Journal 2/2007 Go to the issue