Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Anesthesia 4/2015

01-08-2015 | Original Article

Impact of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy on the management of general anesthesia: efficacy of blood withdrawal during a steep Trendelenburg position

Authors: Junichi Saito, Satoko Noguchi, Anna Matsumoto, Kei Jinushi, Toshinori Kasai, Tomoyuki Kudo, Masahiro Sawada, Futoshi Kimura, Tetsuya Kushikata, Kazuyoshi Hirota

Published in: Journal of Anesthesia | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) is being increasingly used. However, a steep Trendelenburg position and pneumoperitoneum during RALP has an impact on the respiratory, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular systems. To prevent complications, restrictive fluid management and blood withdrawal have been utilized in our hospital. We examined differences in the anesthetic management between RALP and radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP), and the efficacy of blood withdrawal.

Methods

Medical records of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy in our hospital between January 2012 and October 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, intraoperative blood and fluid administration, perioperative complications and the length of hospital stay were compared among patients receiving RRP, and those receiving RALP with and without blood withdrawal (n = 78, 46 and 68, respectively).

Results

Patients receiving RALP with and without blood withdrawal received a smaller volume of crystalloid during surgery than those receiving RRP (mean ± SD, 5.8 ± 2.3 and 4.2 ± 1.6 vs 14.3 ± 4.1 ml/kg/h, p < 0.001). Median estimated blood loss was 885 g (80–2,800 g) for RRP and 50 g for RALP (3–950 g and 3–550 g, respectively), p < 0.001. None of the patients undergoing RALP received red blood cells, but three patients undergoing RRP did so. RALP with blood withdrawal reduced postoperative hospital stay by 45 % (6 vs 11 days). Four patients receiving RALP without blood withdrawal had delayed extubation due to severe laryngeal edema, which did not occur in any of the patients receiving RALP who had blood withdrawal. Renal function did not differ among the groups.

Conclusions

RALP was associated with less blood loss, no allogeneic transfusion and shorter postoperative hospital stay. This study indicated that blood withdrawal could prevent severe laryngeal edema.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Parsons JK, Bennett JL. Outcomes of retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Urology. 2008;72:412–6.CrossRefPubMed Parsons JK, Bennett JL. Outcomes of retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Urology. 2008;72:412–6.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kalmar AF, Foubert L, Hendrickx JF, Mottrie A, Absalom A, Mortier EP, Struys MM. Influence of steep Trendelenburg position and CO2 pneumoperitoneum on cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and respiratory homeostasis during robotic prostatectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104:433–9.CrossRefPubMed Kalmar AF, Foubert L, Hendrickx JF, Mottrie A, Absalom A, Mortier EP, Struys MM. Influence of steep Trendelenburg position and CO2 pneumoperitoneum on cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and respiratory homeostasis during robotic prostatectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104:433–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Phong SV, Koh LK. Anaesthesia for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: considerations for laparoscopy in the Trendelenburg position. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007;35:281–5.PubMed Phong SV, Koh LK. Anaesthesia for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: considerations for laparoscopy in the Trendelenburg position. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007;35:281–5.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Gainsburg DM. Anesthetic concerns for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78:596–604.PubMed Gainsburg DM. Anesthetic concerns for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78:596–604.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Awad H, Walker CM, Shaikh M, Dimitrova GT, Abaza R, O’Hara J. Anesthetic considerations for robotic prostatectomy: a review of the literature. J Clin Anesth. 2012;24:494–504.CrossRefPubMed Awad H, Walker CM, Shaikh M, Dimitrova GT, Abaza R, O’Hara J. Anesthetic considerations for robotic prostatectomy: a review of the literature. J Clin Anesth. 2012;24:494–504.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Danic MJ, Chow M, Gayload A, Bhandari A, Menon M, Brown M. Anesthesia consideration for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a review of 1500 cases. J Robotic Surg. 2007;1:119–23.CrossRef Danic MJ, Chow M, Gayload A, Bhandari A, Menon M, Brown M. Anesthesia consideration for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a review of 1500 cases. J Robotic Surg. 2007;1:119–23.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mikaeili H, Yazdchi M, Tarzamni MK, Ansarin K, Ghasemzadeh M. Laryngeal ultrasonography versus cuff leak test in predicting postextubation stridor. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2014;6:25–8.PubMedCentralPubMed Mikaeili H, Yazdchi M, Tarzamni MK, Ansarin K, Ghasemzadeh M. Laryngeal ultrasonography versus cuff leak test in predicting postextubation stridor. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2014;6:25–8.PubMedCentralPubMed
8.
go back to reference Siu W, Seifman BD, Wolf JS Jr. Subcutaneous emphysema, pneumomediastinum and bilateral pneumothoraces after laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2003;170:1936–7.CrossRefPubMed Siu W, Seifman BD, Wolf JS Jr. Subcutaneous emphysema, pneumomediastinum and bilateral pneumothoraces after laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2003;170:1936–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Cho JE, Shim JK, Chang JH, Oh YJ, Kil HK, Rha KH, Kwak YL. Effect of nicardipine on renal function after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2009;73:1056–60.CrossRefPubMed Cho JE, Shim JK, Chang JH, Oh YJ, Kil HK, Rha KH, Kwak YL. Effect of nicardipine on renal function after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2009;73:1056–60.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Dunn MD, McDougall EM. Renal physiology. Laparoscopic considerations. Urol Clin N Am. 2000;27:609–14.CrossRef Dunn MD, McDougall EM. Renal physiology. Laparoscopic considerations. Urol Clin N Am. 2000;27:609–14.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference D’Alonzo RC, Gan TJ, Moul JW, Albala DM, Polascik TJ, Robertson CN, Sun L, Dahm P, Habib AS. A retrospective comparison of anesthetic management of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Clin Anesth. 2009;21:322–8.CrossRefPubMed D’Alonzo RC, Gan TJ, Moul JW, Albala DM, Polascik TJ, Robertson CN, Sun L, Dahm P, Habib AS. A retrospective comparison of anesthetic management of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Clin Anesth. 2009;21:322–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int. 2003;92:205–10.CrossRefPubMed Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int. 2003;92:205–10.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Farnham SB, Webster TM, Herrell SD, Smith JA Jr. Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 2006;67:360–3.CrossRefPubMed Farnham SB, Webster TM, Herrell SD, Smith JA Jr. Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 2006;67:360–3.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ahlering TE. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2004;1:58–9.CrossRefPubMed Ahlering TE. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2004;1:58–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Impact of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy on the management of general anesthesia: efficacy of blood withdrawal during a steep Trendelenburg position
Authors
Junichi Saito
Satoko Noguchi
Anna Matsumoto
Kei Jinushi
Toshinori Kasai
Tomoyuki Kudo
Masahiro Sawada
Futoshi Kimura
Tetsuya Kushikata
Kazuyoshi Hirota
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0913-8668
Electronic ISSN: 1438-8359
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-015-1989-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Journal of Anesthesia 4/2015 Go to the issue