Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Anesthesia 3/2012

01-06-2012 | Original Article

Dexmedetomidine and hydroxyzine synergistically potentiate the hypnotic activity of propofol in mice

Authors: Kaori Kimura-Kuroiwa, Yushi U. Adachi, Yukako Obata, Mikito Kawamata, Shigehito Sato, Naoyuki Matsuda

Published in: Journal of Anesthesia | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Investigation into the characteristics of anesthetic interactions may provide clues to anesthesia mechanisms. Dexmedetomidine, an α2-adrenergic receptor agonist, has become a popular sedative in intensive care, and hydroxyzine, a histamine receptor antagonist, is well known as a tranquilizing premedication for anesthesia. However, no experimental or pharmacological evaluation has been reported concerning their combination with propofol. Thus, we studied their combined effect with a hypnotic dose of propofol in ddY mice.

Methods

Male adult mice were intravenously administered either dexmedetomidine (30 μg/kg) or hydroxyzine (5 mg/kg) with propofol (3.75–10 mg/kg) to induce hypnosis, defined as a loss of the righting reflex (LRR). Other mice were intravenously administered propofol, dexmedetomidine (300 μg/kg), or hydroxyzine (50 mg/kg) alone, and subsequent behavioral changes were observed. The 50% effective dose (ED50) for LRR was calculated, and the duration of LRR was determined.

Results

The hypnotic dose of propofol was 9.95 ± 1.04 mg/kg (ED50 ± SEM) without combination. Dexmedetomidine and hydroxyzine reduced the ED50 of propofol to 5.32 ± 0.57 and 5.63 ± 0.57 mg/kg, respectively. Coadministration of dexmedetomidine significantly extended LRR duration compared with propofol alone, whereas hydroxyzine significantly shortened LRR duration. A maximal dose of dexmedetomidine or hydroxyzine alone did not induce hypnosis.

Conclusions

Dexmedetomidine and hydroxyzine demonstrated no hypnotic action alone; however, their coadministration potentiated the hypnotic activity of propofol. Although reduction in the dose of propofol was similar, only dexmedetomidine prolonged the duration of hypnosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hendrickx JFA, Eger EI II, Sonner JM, Shafer SL. Is synergy the rule? A review of anesthetic interactions producing hypnosis and immobility. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:494–506.PubMedCrossRef Hendrickx JFA, Eger EI II, Sonner JM, Shafer SL. Is synergy the rule? A review of anesthetic interactions producing hypnosis and immobility. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:494–506.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Grass PS. Anesthetic drug interactions: an insight into general anesthesia—its mechanism and dosing strategies. Anesthesiology. 1998;88:5–6. Grass PS. Anesthetic drug interactions: an insight into general anesthesia—its mechanism and dosing strategies. Anesthesiology. 1998;88:5–6.
3.
go back to reference Rosow C. Anesthetic drug interaction: an overview. J Clin Anesth. 1997;9:S27–32.CrossRef Rosow C. Anesthetic drug interaction: an overview. J Clin Anesth. 1997;9:S27–32.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Adachi YU, Watanabe K, Higuchi H, Satoh T. A small dose of midazolam decreases the time to achieve hypnosis without delaying emergence during short-term propofol anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2001;13:277–80.PubMedCrossRef Adachi YU, Watanabe K, Higuchi H, Satoh T. A small dose of midazolam decreases the time to achieve hypnosis without delaying emergence during short-term propofol anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2001;13:277–80.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Adachi YU, Watanabe K, Higuchi H, Satoh T. Flumazenil reduces the hypnotic dose of propofol in male patients under spinal anesthesia. J Anesth. 2002;16:9–12.PubMedCrossRef Adachi YU, Watanabe K, Higuchi H, Satoh T. Flumazenil reduces the hypnotic dose of propofol in male patients under spinal anesthesia. J Anesth. 2002;16:9–12.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Shafer SL, Hendrickx JFA, Flood P, Sonner J, Eger EI II. Additivity versus synergy: a theoretical analysis of implications for anesthetic mechanisms. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:507–24.PubMedCrossRef Shafer SL, Hendrickx JFA, Flood P, Sonner J, Eger EI II. Additivity versus synergy: a theoretical analysis of implications for anesthetic mechanisms. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:507–24.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Eger EI 2nd, Tang M, Liao M, Laster MJ, Slot K, Flood P, Jenkins A, Raines D, Hendrickx JF, Shafer SL, Yasumasa T, Sonner JM. Inhaled anesthetics do not combine to produce synergistic effects regarding minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration in rats. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:479–85.PubMedCrossRef Eger EI 2nd, Tang M, Liao M, Laster MJ, Slot K, Flood P, Jenkins A, Raines D, Hendrickx JF, Shafer SL, Yasumasa T, Sonner JM. Inhaled anesthetics do not combine to produce synergistic effects regarding minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration in rats. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:479–85.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Venn RM, Bradshaw CJ, Spencer R, Brealey D, Caudwell E, Naughton C, Vedio A, Singer M, Feneck R, Treacher D, Willatts SM, Grounds RM. Preliminary UK experience of dexmedetomidine, a novel agent for postoperative sedation in the intensive care unit. Anaesthesia. 1999;54:1136–42.PubMedCrossRef Venn RM, Bradshaw CJ, Spencer R, Brealey D, Caudwell E, Naughton C, Vedio A, Singer M, Feneck R, Treacher D, Willatts SM, Grounds RM. Preliminary UK experience of dexmedetomidine, a novel agent for postoperative sedation in the intensive care unit. Anaesthesia. 1999;54:1136–42.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gozal D, Gozal Y. Pediatric sedation/anesthesia outside the operating room. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008;21:494–8.PubMedCrossRef Gozal D, Gozal Y. Pediatric sedation/anesthesia outside the operating room. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008;21:494–8.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Millan MJ, Lejeune F, Gobert A, Brocco M, Auclair A, Bosc C, Rivet JM, Lacoste JM, Cordi A, Dekeyne A. S18616, a highly potent spiroimidazoline agonist at alpha(2)-adrenoceptors: II. Influence on monoaminergic transmission, motor function, and anxiety in comparison with dexmedetomidine and clonidine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2000;295:1206–22.PubMed Millan MJ, Lejeune F, Gobert A, Brocco M, Auclair A, Bosc C, Rivet JM, Lacoste JM, Cordi A, Dekeyne A. S18616, a highly potent spiroimidazoline agonist at alpha(2)-adrenoceptors: II. Influence on monoaminergic transmission, motor function, and anxiety in comparison with dexmedetomidine and clonidine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2000;295:1206–22.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Gengo FM, Dabronzo J, Yurchak A, Love S, Miller JK. The relative antihistaminic and psychomotor effects of hydroxyzine and cetirizine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1987;42:265–72.PubMedCrossRef Gengo FM, Dabronzo J, Yurchak A, Love S, Miller JK. The relative antihistaminic and psychomotor effects of hydroxyzine and cetirizine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1987;42:265–72.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tornetta FJ. A comparison of droperidol, diazepam, and hydroxyzine hydrochloride as premedication. Anesth Analg. 1977;56:496–500.PubMedCrossRef Tornetta FJ. A comparison of droperidol, diazepam, and hydroxyzine hydrochloride as premedication. Anesth Analg. 1977;56:496–500.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mojdehi E, Mauro AL, Labartino L, Reynolds B. Clinical evaluation of hydroxyzine hydrochloride in pediatric anesthesia and its effect on arousal time. Anesth Analg. 1968;47:685–8.PubMedCrossRef Mojdehi E, Mauro AL, Labartino L, Reynolds B. Clinical evaluation of hydroxyzine hydrochloride in pediatric anesthesia and its effect on arousal time. Anesth Analg. 1968;47:685–8.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Zsigmond EK, Patterson RL. Double-blind evaluation of hydroxyzine hydrochloride in obstetric anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1967;46:275–80.PubMedCrossRef Zsigmond EK, Patterson RL. Double-blind evaluation of hydroxyzine hydrochloride in obstetric anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1967;46:275–80.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Adachi YU, Watanabe K, Higuchi H, Satoh T. The determinants of propofol induction of anesthesia dose. Anesth Analg. 2001;92:656–61.PubMedCrossRef Adachi YU, Watanabe K, Higuchi H, Satoh T. The determinants of propofol induction of anesthesia dose. Anesth Analg. 2001;92:656–61.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hans P, Deby-Dupont G, Deby C, Pieron F, Verbesselt R, Franssen C, Lamy M. Increase in antioxidant capacity of plasma during propofol anesthesia. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1997;9:234–6.PubMedCrossRef Hans P, Deby-Dupont G, Deby C, Pieron F, Verbesselt R, Franssen C, Lamy M. Increase in antioxidant capacity of plasma during propofol anesthesia. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1997;9:234–6.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hans P, Coussaert E, Cantraine F, Dewandre PY, Brichant JF, Grevesse M, Lamy M. Effects of target-controlled anesthesia with propofol and sufentanil on the hemodynamic response to Mayfield head holder application. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1998;49:7–11.PubMed Hans P, Coussaert E, Cantraine F, Dewandre PY, Brichant JF, Grevesse M, Lamy M. Effects of target-controlled anesthesia with propofol and sufentanil on the hemodynamic response to Mayfield head holder application. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1998;49:7–11.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Souron V, Delaunay L, Bonner F. Sedation with target-controlled propofol infusion during shoulder surgery under interscalene brachial plexus block in the sitting position: report of a series of 140 patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005;22:853–7.PubMedCrossRef Souron V, Delaunay L, Bonner F. Sedation with target-controlled propofol infusion during shoulder surgery under interscalene brachial plexus block in the sitting position: report of a series of 140 patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005;22:853–7.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Adachi YU, Watanabe K, Higuchi H, Satoh T. High-dose flumazenil potentiates the hypnotic activity of propofol, but not that of thiopental, in ddY mice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001;45:848–52.PubMedCrossRef Adachi YU, Watanabe K, Higuchi H, Satoh T. High-dose flumazenil potentiates the hypnotic activity of propofol, but not that of thiopental, in ddY mice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001;45:848–52.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Salonen M, Reid K, Maze M. Synergistic interaction between alpha 2-adrenergic agonists and benzodiazepines in rats. Anesthesiology. 1992;76:1004–11.PubMedCrossRef Salonen M, Reid K, Maze M. Synergistic interaction between alpha 2-adrenergic agonists and benzodiazepines in rats. Anesthesiology. 1992;76:1004–11.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Garfield JM, Bukusoglu C. Propofol and ethanol produce additive hypnotic and anesthetic effects in the mouse. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:156–61.PubMed Garfield JM, Bukusoglu C. Propofol and ethanol produce additive hypnotic and anesthetic effects in the mouse. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:156–61.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Nelson LE, Lu J, Guo T, Saper CB, Franks NP, Maze M. The alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine converges on an endogenous sleep-promoting pathway to exert its sedative effects. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:428–36.PubMedCrossRef Nelson LE, Lu J, Guo T, Saper CB, Franks NP, Maze M. The alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine converges on an endogenous sleep-promoting pathway to exert its sedative effects. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:428–36.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lin J. Brain structures and mechanisms involved in the control of cortical activation and wakefulness, with emphasis on the posterior hypothalamus and histaminergic neurons. Sleep Med Rev. 2000;4:471–503.PubMedCrossRef Lin J. Brain structures and mechanisms involved in the control of cortical activation and wakefulness, with emphasis on the posterior hypothalamus and histaminergic neurons. Sleep Med Rev. 2000;4:471–503.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Luo T, Leung LS. Involvement of tuberomamillary histaminergic neurons in isoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2011;115:36–43.PubMedCrossRef Luo T, Leung LS. Involvement of tuberomamillary histaminergic neurons in isoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2011;115:36–43.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Gepts E, Camu F, Cockshott ID, Douglas EJ. Disposition of propofol administered as constant rate intravenous infusions in humans. Anesth Analg. 1987;66:1256–63.PubMedCrossRef Gepts E, Camu F, Cockshott ID, Douglas EJ. Disposition of propofol administered as constant rate intravenous infusions in humans. Anesth Analg. 1987;66:1256–63.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Gupta A, Stierer T, Zuckerman R, Sakima N, Parker SD, Fleisher LA. Comparison of recovery profile after ambulatory anesthesia with propofol, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane: a systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:632–41.PubMedCrossRef Gupta A, Stierer T, Zuckerman R, Sakima N, Parker SD, Fleisher LA. Comparison of recovery profile after ambulatory anesthesia with propofol, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane: a systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:632–41.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hoffman WE, Cunningham F, James MK, Baughman VL, Albrecht RF. Effects of remifentanil, a new short-acting opioid, on cerebral blood flow, brain electrical activity, and intracranial pressure in dogs anesthetized with isoflurane and nitrous oxide. Anesthesiology. 1993;79:107–13.PubMedCrossRef Hoffman WE, Cunningham F, James MK, Baughman VL, Albrecht RF. Effects of remifentanil, a new short-acting opioid, on cerebral blood flow, brain electrical activity, and intracranial pressure in dogs anesthetized with isoflurane and nitrous oxide. Anesthesiology. 1993;79:107–13.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Egan TD, Lemmens HJ, Fiset P, Hermann DJ, Muir KT, Stanski DR, Shafer SL. The pharmacokinetics of the new short-acting opioid remifentanil (GI87084B) in healthy adult male volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1993;79:881–92.PubMedCrossRef Egan TD, Lemmens HJ, Fiset P, Hermann DJ, Muir KT, Stanski DR, Shafer SL. The pharmacokinetics of the new short-acting opioid remifentanil (GI87084B) in healthy adult male volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1993;79:881–92.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kilpatrick GJ, McIntyre MS, Cox RF, Stafford JA, Pacofsky GJ, Lovell GG, Wiard RP, Feldman PL, Collins H, Waszczak BL, Tilbrook GS. CNS 7056: a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:60–6.PubMedCrossRef Kilpatrick GJ, McIntyre MS, Cox RF, Stafford JA, Pacofsky GJ, Lovell GG, Wiard RP, Feldman PL, Collins H, Waszczak BL, Tilbrook GS. CNS 7056: a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:60–6.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Upton RN, Somogyi AA, Martinez AM, Colvill J, Grant C. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the short-acting sedative CNS 7056 in sheep. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105:798–809.PubMedCrossRef Upton RN, Somogyi AA, Martinez AM, Colvill J, Grant C. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the short-acting sedative CNS 7056 in sheep. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105:798–809.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Ngwenyama NE, Anderson J, Hoernschemeyer DG, Tobias JD. Effects of dexmedetomidine on propofol and remifentanil infusion rates during total intravenous anesthesia for spine surgery in adolescents. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008;18:1190–5.PubMed Ngwenyama NE, Anderson J, Hoernschemeyer DG, Tobias JD. Effects of dexmedetomidine on propofol and remifentanil infusion rates during total intravenous anesthesia for spine surgery in adolescents. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008;18:1190–5.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Peden CJ, Cloote AH, Stratford N, Prys-Roberts C. The effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine premedication on the dose requirement of propofol to induce loss of consciousness in patients receiving alfentanil. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:408–13.PubMedCrossRef Peden CJ, Cloote AH, Stratford N, Prys-Roberts C. The effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine premedication on the dose requirement of propofol to induce loss of consciousness in patients receiving alfentanil. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:408–13.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Boussofara M, Bracco D, Ravussin P. Comparison of the effects of clonidine and hydroxyzine on haemodynamic and catecholamine reactions to microlaryngoscopy. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2001;18:75–8.PubMed Boussofara M, Bracco D, Ravussin P. Comparison of the effects of clonidine and hydroxyzine on haemodynamic and catecholamine reactions to microlaryngoscopy. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2001;18:75–8.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Guglielminotti J, Descraques C, Petitmaire S, Almenza L, Grenapin O, Mantz J. Effects of premedication on dose requirements for propofol: comparison of clonidine and hydroxyzine. Br J Anaesth. 1998;80:733–6.PubMedCrossRef Guglielminotti J, Descraques C, Petitmaire S, Almenza L, Grenapin O, Mantz J. Effects of premedication on dose requirements for propofol: comparison of clonidine and hydroxyzine. Br J Anaesth. 1998;80:733–6.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Higuchi H, Adachi Y, Arimura S, Ogata M, Satoh T. Oral clonidine premedication reduces the awakening concentration of propofol. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:609–14.PubMedCrossRef Higuchi H, Adachi Y, Arimura S, Ogata M, Satoh T. Oral clonidine premedication reduces the awakening concentration of propofol. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:609–14.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Richards MJ, Skues MA, Javis AP, Prys-Roberts C. Total i.v. anaesthesia with propofol and alfentanil: dose requirements for propofol and the effect of premedication with clonidine. Br J Anaesth. 1990;65:157–63.PubMedCrossRef Richards MJ, Skues MA, Javis AP, Prys-Roberts C. Total i.v. anaesthesia with propofol and alfentanil: dose requirements for propofol and the effect of premedication with clonidine. Br J Anaesth. 1990;65:157–63.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Kelz MB, Sun Y, Chen J, Cheng Meng Q, Moore JT, Veasey SC, Dixon S, Thornton M, Funato H, Yanagisawa M. An essential role for orexins in emergence from general anesthesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:1309–14.PubMedCrossRef Kelz MB, Sun Y, Chen J, Cheng Meng Q, Moore JT, Veasey SC, Dixon S, Thornton M, Funato H, Yanagisawa M. An essential role for orexins in emergence from general anesthesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:1309–14.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Du C, Tully M, Volkow ND, Schiffer WK, Yu M, Luo Z, Koretsky AP, Benveniste H. Differential effects of anesthetics on cocaine’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects in brain. Eur J Neurosci. 2009;30:1565–75.PubMedCrossRef Du C, Tully M, Volkow ND, Schiffer WK, Yu M, Luo Z, Koretsky AP, Benveniste H. Differential effects of anesthetics on cocaine’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects in brain. Eur J Neurosci. 2009;30:1565–75.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Kent AP, Dodson ME, Bower S. The pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of a low dose of alfentanil in elderly patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1988;39:25–33.PubMed Kent AP, Dodson ME, Bower S. The pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of a low dose of alfentanil in elderly patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1988;39:25–33.PubMed
40.
go back to reference Mertens MJ, Olofsen E, Burm AG, Bovill JG, Vuyk J. Mixed-effects modeling of the influence of alfentanil on propofol pharmacokinetics. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:795–805.PubMedCrossRef Mertens MJ, Olofsen E, Burm AG, Bovill JG, Vuyk J. Mixed-effects modeling of the influence of alfentanil on propofol pharmacokinetics. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:795–805.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Norberg A, Hahn RG, Li H, Olsson J, Prough DS, Børsheim E, Wolf S, Minton RK, Svensén CH. Population volume kinetics predicts retention of 0.9% saline infused in awake and isoflurane-anesthetized volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:24–32.PubMedCrossRef Norberg A, Hahn RG, Li H, Olsson J, Prough DS, Børsheim E, Wolf S, Minton RK, Svensén CH. Population volume kinetics predicts retention of 0.9% saline infused in awake and isoflurane-anesthetized volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:24–32.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Dexmedetomidine and hydroxyzine synergistically potentiate the hypnotic activity of propofol in mice
Authors
Kaori Kimura-Kuroiwa
Yushi U. Adachi
Yukako Obata
Mikito Kawamata
Shigehito Sato
Naoyuki Matsuda
Publication date
01-06-2012
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0913-8668
Electronic ISSN: 1438-8359
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-012-1344-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Journal of Anesthesia 3/2012 Go to the issue