Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences 5/2010

01-09-2010 | Original Article

Cholecystectomy using single-incision laparoscopic surgery with a new SILS port

Authors: Masahiro Ito, Yukio Asano, Akihiko Horiguchi, Tomohiro Shimizu, Toshiyuki Yamamoto, Ichiro Uyama, Shuichi Miyakawa

Published in: Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences | Issue 5/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) offers the potential advantages of reduced postoperative pain and a lower incidence of port-site complications. Moreover, careful attention to closure can reduce the scarring after surgery. Consequently, this method is a promising technique for reducing postoperative pain, decreasing complications, and improving cosmesis. We have performed cholecystectomy in eight patients by SILS. The umbilicus was the point of entry to the abdomen in all patients.

Methods

Between May 2009 and October 2009, 31 patients underwent cholecystectomy at our hospital. The umbilicus was the point of entry to the abdomen in all patients. Three SILSs were performed using a new SILS port, and five SILSs were performed by the conventional method in which three ports are inserted into the umbilicus; the remaining ten patients underwent multiple-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (standard cholecystectomy). The results for the patients who underwent standard cholecystectomy, conventional SILS, and SILS using the new port were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. The data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.

Result

Of the eight cholecystectomies carried out, three were performed by SILS using the new port. No complications or mortalities were associated with this technique. The mean operating times for conventional SILS, SILS with the new port, and standard cholecystectomy were 154 ± 57, 120 ± 11, and 100 ± 51 min, respectively; these inter-group differences are not significant. The blood loss in conventional SILS, SILS with the new port, and standard cholecystectomy was 9 ± 16, 1, and 6.1 ± 11 g, respectively; these inter-group differences are not significant. All umbilical incisions were concealed within the umbilicus.

Conclusion

Cholecystectomy performed using SILS with the new port is a safe and feasible approach with reasonable operation times.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Osborne D, Boe B, Rosemurgy AS, Zervos EE. Twenty-millimeter laparoscopic cholecystectomy: fewer ports results in less pain, shorter hospitalization, and faster recovery. Am Surg. 2005:71(4):298–302. Osborne D, Boe B, Rosemurgy AS, Zervos EE. Twenty-millimeter laparoscopic cholecystectomy: fewer ports results in less pain, shorter hospitalization, and faster recovery. Am Surg. 2005:71(4):298–302.
2.
go back to reference Tagaya N, Kita J, Takagi K, Imada T, Ishikawa K, Kogure H, et al. Experience with three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1998;5(3):309–11.CrossRefPubMed Tagaya N, Kita J, Takagi K, Imada T, Ishikawa K, Kogure H, et al. Experience with three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1998;5(3):309–11.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Wattiez A, Mutter D, Coumaros D. Surgery without scars: report of transluminal chlecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg. 2007;142:823–7.CrossRefPubMed Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Wattiez A, Mutter D, Coumaros D. Surgery without scars: report of transluminal chlecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg. 2007;142:823–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cuesta M, Berends F, Veenhof A. The “invisible cholecystectomy”: a transumbilical laparoscopic operation without a scare. Surg Endosc. 2007;22:1211–3.CrossRefPubMed Cuesta M, Berends F, Veenhof A. The “invisible cholecystectomy”: a transumbilical laparoscopic operation without a scare. Surg Endosc. 2007;22:1211–3.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kagaya T. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy via two ports, using the “twin-port” system. J Hepatobiliary Panceat Surg. 2001;8:76–80.CrossRef Kagaya T. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy via two ports, using the “twin-port” system. J Hepatobiliary Panceat Surg. 2001;8:76–80.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Vechio R, MacFayden BV, Palazzo F. History of laparoscopic surgery. Panminerva Med. 2000;42:87–90. Vechio R, MacFayden BV, Palazzo F. History of laparoscopic surgery. Panminerva Med. 2000;42:87–90.
7.
go back to reference Abe N, Takeuchi H, Ueki H. Single-port endoscopic cholecystectomy: a bridge between laparoscopic and translumenal endoscopic surgery. J Hepatobiliary Panceat Surg. 2009;16(5):633–8.CrossRef Abe N, Takeuchi H, Ueki H. Single-port endoscopic cholecystectomy: a bridge between laparoscopic and translumenal endoscopic surgery. J Hepatobiliary Panceat Surg. 2009;16(5):633–8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Carvalho GL, Silva FW, Silva JS, de Albuquerque PP, Coelho Rde M, Vilaça TG, et al. Needlescopic clipless cholecystectomy as an efficient, safe, and cost-effective alternative with diminutive scars: the first 1000 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19(5):368–72.CrossRefPubMed Carvalho GL, Silva FW, Silva JS, de Albuquerque PP, Coelho Rde M, Vilaça TG, et al. Needlescopic clipless cholecystectomy as an efficient, safe, and cost-effective alternative with diminutive scars: the first 1000 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19(5):368–72.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Dutta S. Early experience with single incision laparoscopic surgery: eliminating the scar from abdominal operations. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44(9):1741–5. CrossRefPubMed Dutta S. Early experience with single incision laparoscopic surgery: eliminating the scar from abdominal operations. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44(9):1741–5. CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ersin S, Firat O, Sozbilen M. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it more than a challenge? Surg Endosc. 2010;24:68–71. Ersin S, Firat O, Sozbilen M. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it more than a challenge? Surg Endosc. 2010;24:68–71.
11.
go back to reference Chow A, Purkayastha S, Paraskeva P. Appendicectomy and cholecystectomy using single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS): the first UK experience. Surg Innov. 2009;16(3):211–7. CrossRefPubMed Chow A, Purkayastha S, Paraskeva P. Appendicectomy and cholecystectomy using single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS): the first UK experience. Surg Innov. 2009;16(3):211–7. CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Cholecystectomy using single-incision laparoscopic surgery with a new SILS port
Authors
Masahiro Ito
Yukio Asano
Akihiko Horiguchi
Tomohiro Shimizu
Toshiyuki Yamamoto
Ichiro Uyama
Shuichi Miyakawa
Publication date
01-09-2010
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences / Issue 5/2010
Print ISSN: 1868-6974
Electronic ISSN: 1868-6982
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-010-0266-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2010

Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences 5/2010 Go to the issue