Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 5/2019

01-05-2019 | Original Article

The influence of partner involvement in the decision-making process on body image and decision regret among women receiving breast reconstruction

Authors: Nai-Tzu Kuo, Yao-Lung Kuo, Hung-Wen Lai, Nai-Ying Ko, Su-Ying Fang

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study examines the influence of partner involvement in decision-making for breast reconstruction (BR) on women’s body image and post-BR decision regret.

Methods

A cross-sectional and correlational approach was used in a convenience sample of 105 women in Taiwan who had breast cancer (BC) whose partners were involved in decision-making for BR. A structured questionnaire including the Involvement in the Breast Reconstruction Decision-Making Process Scale, the Body Image Scale, and the Decision Regret Scale was administered. Pearson’s r and path analysis were used to examine the relationships among the dyadic BR decision-making process, women’s body image, and decision regret.

Results

The greater the amount of medical information women had, the better their body image and the less decision regret they experienced. Moreover, partner involvement was not related to women’s body image, though it was inversely related to women’s decision regret. The final path model showed that the amount of medical information women obtained was directly related to body image and decision regret, while body image also directly influenced decision regret. Overall, the amount of medical information women obtained and their body image explained 45% of the variance in decision regret.

Conclusions

Medical teams should provide female BC patients with complete medical information, and through partner involvement, women can be supported to make an appropriate decision regarding BR to achieve optimal levels of body image and lower levels of decision regret.
Literature
13.
go back to reference Drigotas SM, Rusbult CE, Wieselquist J, Whitton SW (1999) Close partner as sculptor of the ideal self: behavioral affirmation and the Michelangelo phenomenon. J Pers Soc Psychol 77(2):293–323CrossRefPubMed Drigotas SM, Rusbult CE, Wieselquist J, Whitton SW (1999) Close partner as sculptor of the ideal self: behavioral affirmation and the Michelangelo phenomenon. J Pers Soc Psychol 77(2):293–323CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Hopwood P, Fletcher I, Lee A, Al Ghazal S (2001) A body image scale for use with cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 37(2):189–197CrossRefPubMed Hopwood P, Fletcher I, Lee A, Al Ghazal S (2001) A body image scale for use with cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 37(2):189–197CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Gomez-Campelo P, Bragado-Alvarez C, Hernandez-Lloreda MJ, Sanchez-Bernardos ML (2015) The Spanish version of the Body Image Scale (S-BIS): psychometric properties in a sample of breast and gynaecological cancer patients. Supportive Care Cancer: Official J Multinational Assoc Supportive Care Cancer 23(2):473–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2383-0 CrossRef Gomez-Campelo P, Bragado-Alvarez C, Hernandez-Lloreda MJ, Sanchez-Bernardos ML (2015) The Spanish version of the Body Image Scale (S-BIS): psychometric properties in a sample of breast and gynaecological cancer patients. Supportive Care Cancer: Official J Multinational Assoc Supportive Care Cancer 23(2):473–481. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00520-014-2383-0 CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kline RB (2011) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rd edn. The Guilford Press, London Kline RB (2011) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rd edn. The Guilford Press, London
33.
go back to reference Stanton AL, Ganz PA, Kwan L, Meyerowitz BE, Bower JE, Krupnick JL, Rowland JH, Leedham B, Belin TR (2005) Outcomes from the Moving Beyond Cancer psychoeducational, randomized, controlled trial with breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 23(25):6009–6018. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.09.101 CrossRef Stanton AL, Ganz PA, Kwan L, Meyerowitz BE, Bower JE, Krupnick JL, Rowland JH, Leedham B, Belin TR (2005) Outcomes from the Moving Beyond Cancer psychoeducational, randomized, controlled trial with breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 23(25):6009–6018. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​jco.​2005.​09.​101 CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Muhamad M, Afshari M, Kazilan F (2011) Family support in cancer survivorship. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prevention: APJCP 12(6):1389–1397 Muhamad M, Afshari M, Kazilan F (2011) Family support in cancer survivorship. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prevention: APJCP 12(6):1389–1397
38.
Metadata
Title
The influence of partner involvement in the decision-making process on body image and decision regret among women receiving breast reconstruction
Authors
Nai-Tzu Kuo
Yao-Lung Kuo
Hung-Wen Lai
Nai-Ying Ko
Su-Ying Fang
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4416-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

Supportive Care in Cancer 5/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine