Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 8/2018

01-08-2018 | Original Article

Prolonged versus short infusion rates for intravenous magnesium sulfate administration in hematopoietic cell transplant patients

Authors: Pam M. Ku, Jennifer L. Waller, Claude Sportès, Amber B. Clemmons

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 8/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients often require intravenous (IV) magnesium repletion due to poor dietary intake, gastrointestinal loss, and use of concomitant magnesium wasting medications. Prolonging the IV magnesium infusion rate has been postulated to reduce renal clearance and improve retention; however, limited evidence supports this hypothesis.

Methods

We reviewed autologous and allogeneic HCT recipients (n = 82) who received IV magnesium at our institution between 2014 and 2016: 41 patients received IV magnesium at a prolonged rate of 0.5 g/h and 41 patients at > 0.5 g/h (mean 2.07 g/h). Primary outcome was percent of days in which magnesium levels were in desired therapeutic range (2–2.7 mg/dL) during hospitalization.

Results

Baseline characteristics were similar between cohorts: no difference existed between groups in incidence of gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease or the percentage of patients who received magnesium replacement in maintenance fluids, received concomitant oral magnesium supplementation, or received parenteral nutrition. Percent of days in desired therapeutic range was not different between groups (p = 0.3). No difference existed between groups with respect to total amount of IV magnesium repletion (22.5 vs. 21.4 g, p = 0.81) or number of days of IV replacement (7.2 vs. 6.2 days, p = 0.41). In terms of safety, there was no difference between groups with respect to incidence of hypomagnesemia or hypermagnesemia (p = 0.43 each).

Conclusions

Overall, prolonging the infusion rate did not correlate with improved magnesium retention based on amount and frequency of magnesium repletion or attainment of goal levels in HCT patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aisa Y, Mori T, Nakazato T, Shimizu T, Yamazaki R, Ikeda Y, Okamoto S (2005) Effects of immunosuppressive agents on magnesium metabolism early after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Transplantation 80(8):1046–1050CrossRefPubMed Aisa Y, Mori T, Nakazato T, Shimizu T, Yamazaki R, Ikeda Y, Okamoto S (2005) Effects of immunosuppressive agents on magnesium metabolism early after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Transplantation 80(8):1046–1050CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Snyder M, Shillingburg A, Newton M, Hamadani M, Kanate AS, Craig M, Cumpston A (2016) Impact of intravenous magnesium infusion rate during ambulatory replacements on serum magnesium concentrations after allogeneic stem cell transplant. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer 24(10):4237–4240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3252-9 CrossRef Snyder M, Shillingburg A, Newton M, Hamadani M, Kanate AS, Craig M, Cumpston A (2016) Impact of intravenous magnesium infusion rate during ambulatory replacements on serum magnesium concentrations after allogeneic stem cell transplant. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer 24(10):4237–4240. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00520-016-3252-9 CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prolonged versus short infusion rates for intravenous magnesium sulfate administration in hematopoietic cell transplant patients
Authors
Pam M. Ku
Jennifer L. Waller
Claude Sportès
Amber B. Clemmons
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4127-z

Other articles of this Issue 8/2018

Supportive Care in Cancer 8/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine