Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2015

01-10-2015 | Original Article

Enhancing the experience of carers in the chemotherapy outpatient setting: an exploratory randomised controlled trial to test impact, acceptability and feasibility of a complex intervention co-designed by carers and staff

Authors: V. Tsianakas, G. Robert, A. Richardson, R. Verity, C. Oakley, T. Murrells, M. Flynn, E. Ream

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 10/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Supporting someone through chemotherapy can be emotionally and physically demanding. However, research has yet to establish the type of support carers require or the best way to provide this. This study tested the feasibility and acceptability of a complex intervention for carers that was co-designed by staff and carers of patients starting chemotherapy.

Methods

Forty-seven carers were recruited, randomised between the intervention (n = 24) and control (n = 23) groups. A questionnaire was completed pre- and post-intervention measuring knowledge of chemotherapy and its side effects, experience of care, satisfaction with outpatient services, coping and emotional wellbeing. The intervention process was evaluated by carers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) in focus groups.

Results

Recruitment to the study was unproblematic and attrition from it was low, suggesting the intervention and study processes were acceptable to patients and carers. Carers in receipt of the ‘Take Care’ intervention reported statistically significantly better understanding of symptoms and side effects and their information needs being more frequently met than carers in the control. Confidence in coping improved between baseline and follow-up for the intervention group and declined for the control although differences were insufficient to achieve statistical significance. There was no significant difference between the two groups’ emotional wellbeing. HCP and carer focus groups confirmed the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention.

Conclusions

The ‘Take Care’ intervention proved acceptable to carers and HCPs and demonstrates considerable promise and utility in practice. Study findings support the conduct of a fully powered RCT to determine the intervention’s effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wiseman T, Verity R, Ream E, Alderman E, Richardson A (2005) Exploring the work of nurses who administer chemotherapy: a multi-method study. King’s College London, UK Wiseman T, Verity R, Ream E, Alderman E, Richardson A (2005) Exploring the work of nurses who administer chemotherapy: a multi-method study. King’s College London, UK
2.
go back to reference McIlfatrick S, Sullivan K, McKenna H (2006) What about the carers?: exploring the experience of caregivers in a chemotherapy day hospital setting. Eur J Oncol Nurs 10(4):294–303CrossRefPubMed McIlfatrick S, Sullivan K, McKenna H (2006) What about the carers?: exploring the experience of caregivers in a chemotherapy day hospital setting. Eur J Oncol Nurs 10(4):294–303CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Mitchell T (2007) The social and emotional toll of chemotherapy—patients’ perspectives. Eur J Cancer Care 16:39–47CrossRef Mitchell T (2007) The social and emotional toll of chemotherapy—patients’ perspectives. Eur J Cancer Care 16:39–47CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Stenberg U, Ruland CM, Miaskowski C (2009) Review of the literature on the effects of caring for a patient with cancer. Psycho-Oncology. doi:10.1002/pon.1670 Stenberg U, Ruland CM, Miaskowski C (2009) Review of the literature on the effects of caring for a patient with cancer. Psycho-Oncology. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​1670
5.
go back to reference Ream E, Pedersen VH, Oakley C, Richardson A, Taylor C, Verity R (2013) Informal carers’ experiences and needs when supporting patients through chemotherapy: a mixed method study. Eur J Cancer Care 22(6):797–806CrossRef Ream E, Pedersen VH, Oakley C, Richardson A, Taylor C, Verity R (2013) Informal carers’ experiences and needs when supporting patients through chemotherapy: a mixed method study. Eur J Cancer Care 22(6):797–806CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Northouse L, Williams A, Given B, McCorkle R (2012) Psychosocial care for family caregivers of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(11):1227–1234CrossRefPubMed Northouse L, Williams A, Given B, McCorkle R (2012) Psychosocial care for family caregivers of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(11):1227–1234CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference NICE (2004) Guidance on cancer services: improving supportive and palliative care for adults. London. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London NICE (2004) Guidance on cancer services: improving supportive and palliative care for adults. London. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London
8.
go back to reference Adler NE, Page AEK (2008) Cancer care for the whole patient: meeting psychosocial health needs. Washington (DC) National Academies Press, USA Adler NE, Page AEK (2008) Cancer care for the whole patient: meeting psychosocial health needs. Washington (DC) National Academies Press, USA
9.
go back to reference Turnbull Macdonald GC, Baldassarre F, Brown P, Hatton-Bauer J, Green E, Lebel S (2012) Psychosocial care for cancer: a framework to guide practice and actionable recommendations for Ontario. Curr Oncol 19(4):209–216PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Turnbull Macdonald GC, Baldassarre F, Brown P, Hatton-Bauer J, Green E, Lebel S (2012) Psychosocial care for cancer: a framework to guide practice and actionable recommendations for Ontario. Curr Oncol 19(4):209–216PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Surbone A, Baider L, Weitzman TS, Brames MJ, Rittenberg CN, Johnson J (2009) Psychosocial care for patients and their families is integral to supportive care in cancer: MASCC position statement. Support Cancer Care 18:255–263CrossRef Surbone A, Baider L, Weitzman TS, Brames MJ, Rittenberg CN, Johnson J (2009) Psychosocial care for patients and their families is integral to supportive care in cancer: MASCC position statement. Support Cancer Care 18:255–263CrossRef
12.
go back to reference NHS England (2013) Cancer patient experience survey 2013 national report. Quality Health NHS England (2013) Cancer patient experience survey 2013 national report. Quality Health
13.
go back to reference McCarthy B (2011) Family members of patients with cancer: what they know, how they know and what they want to know. Eur J Oncol Nurs 15(5):428–441CrossRefPubMed McCarthy B (2011) Family members of patients with cancer: what they know, how they know and what they want to know. Eur J Oncol Nurs 15(5):428–441CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Nijboer C, Triemstra M, Tempelaar R, Sanderman R, van den Bos GAM (1999) Determinants of caregiving experiences and mental health of partners of cancer patients. Cancer 86(4):577–588CrossRefPubMed Nijboer C, Triemstra M, Tempelaar R, Sanderman R, van den Bos GAM (1999) Determinants of caregiving experiences and mental health of partners of cancer patients. Cancer 86(4):577–588CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Grinyer A (2006) Caring for a young adult with cancer: the impact on mothers’ health. Health Social Care Community 14(4):311–318CrossRef Grinyer A (2006) Caring for a young adult with cancer: the impact on mothers’ health. Health Social Care Community 14(4):311–318CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Macmillan (2006) Worried sick: the emotional impact of cancer. Macmillan Cancer Support, London Macmillan (2006) Worried sick: the emotional impact of cancer. Macmillan Cancer Support, London
17.
go back to reference Thomas C, Morris SM, Soothill K, McIllmurray M, Francis B, Harman J (2001) What are the psychosocial needs of cancer patients and their main carers? A study of user experience of cancer services with particular reference to psychosocial need. The Institute of for Health Research, Lancaster University Thomas C, Morris SM, Soothill K, McIllmurray M, Francis B, Harman J (2001) What are the psychosocial needs of cancer patients and their main carers? A study of user experience of cancer services with particular reference to psychosocial need. The Institute of for Health Research, Lancaster University
18.
go back to reference Isaksen AS, Thuen F, Hanestad B (2003) Patients with cancer and their close relatives: experiences with treatment, care, and support. Cancer Nurs 26(1):68–74CrossRefPubMed Isaksen AS, Thuen F, Hanestad B (2003) Patients with cancer and their close relatives: experiences with treatment, care, and support. Cancer Nurs 26(1):68–74CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Honea NJ, Britnall RA, Given B, Sherwood P, Colao DB, Somers SC, Northouse LL (2008) Putting evidence into practice: nursing assessment and interventions to reduce family caregiver strain and burden. Clin J Oncol Nurs 12(3):507–516CrossRefPubMed Honea NJ, Britnall RA, Given B, Sherwood P, Colao DB, Somers SC, Northouse LL (2008) Putting evidence into practice: nursing assessment and interventions to reduce family caregiver strain and burden. Clin J Oncol Nurs 12(3):507–516CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Caress AL, Chalmers K, Luker K (2009) A narrative review of interventions to support family carers who provide physical care to family members with cancer. Int J Nurs Stud 46(11):1516–1527CrossRefPubMed Caress AL, Chalmers K, Luker K (2009) A narrative review of interventions to support family carers who provide physical care to family members with cancer. Int J Nurs Stud 46(11):1516–1527CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Ussher JM, Perz J, Hawkins Y, Brack M (2009) Evaluating the efficacy of psycho-social interventions for informal carers of cancer patients: a systematic review of the research literature. Health Psychol Rev 3(1):85–107CrossRef Ussher JM, Perz J, Hawkins Y, Brack M (2009) Evaluating the efficacy of psycho-social interventions for informal carers of cancer patients: a systematic review of the research literature. Health Psychol Rev 3(1):85–107CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hudson PL, Aranda S, Hayman-White K (2005) A psycho-educational intervention for family caregivers of patients receiving palliative care: a randomized controlled trial. J Pain Symptom Manag 30(4):329–341CrossRef Hudson PL, Aranda S, Hayman-White K (2005) A psycho-educational intervention for family caregivers of patients receiving palliative care: a randomized controlled trial. J Pain Symptom Manag 30(4):329–341CrossRef
23.
go back to reference McMillan SC, Small BJ, Weitzner M, Schonwetter R, Tittle M, Moody L, Hayley WE (2006) Impact of coping skills intervention with family caregivers of hospice patients with cancer. Cancer 106(1):214–222CrossRefPubMed McMillan SC, Small BJ, Weitzner M, Schonwetter R, Tittle M, Moody L, Hayley WE (2006) Impact of coping skills intervention with family caregivers of hospice patients with cancer. Cancer 106(1):214–222CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference O’Hara RE, Hull JG, Lyons KD, Bakitas M, Hegel MT, Li Z et al (2010) Impact on caregiver burden of a patient-focused palliative care intervention for patients with advanced cancer. Palliat Support Care 8(04):395–404PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed O’Hara RE, Hull JG, Lyons KD, Bakitas M, Hegel MT, Li Z et al (2010) Impact on caregiver burden of a patient-focused palliative care intervention for patients with advanced cancer. Palliat Support Care 8(04):395–404PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Hudson P, Thomas T, Quinn K, Cockayne M, Braithwaite M (2009) Teaching family carers about home-based palliative care: final results from a group education program. J Pain Symptom Manag 38(2):299–308CrossRef Hudson P, Thomas T, Quinn K, Cockayne M, Braithwaite M (2009) Teaching family carers about home-based palliative care: final results from a group education program. J Pain Symptom Manag 38(2):299–308CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Schildmann EK, Higginson IJ (2011) Evaluating psycho-educational interventions for informal carers of patients receiving cancer care or palliative care: strengths and limitations of different study designs. Palliat Med 25(4):345–356CrossRefPubMed Schildmann EK, Higginson IJ (2011) Evaluating psycho-educational interventions for informal carers of patients receiving cancer care or palliative care: strengths and limitations of different study designs. Palliat Med 25(4):345–356CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Carey M, Lambert S, Smits R, Paul C, Sanson-Fisher R, Clinton-McHarg T (2012) The unfulfilled promise: a systematic review of interventions to reduce the unmet supportive care needs of cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 20(2):207–219PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Carey M, Lambert S, Smits R, Paul C, Sanson-Fisher R, Clinton-McHarg T (2012) The unfulfilled promise: a systematic review of interventions to reduce the unmet supportive care needs of cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 20(2):207–219PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Northouse LL, Katapodi MC, Song L, Zhang L, Mood DW (2010) Interventions with family caregivers of cancer patients: meta-analysis of randomized trials. A Cancer J Clin 60(5):317–339 Northouse LL, Katapodi MC, Song L, Zhang L, Mood DW (2010) Interventions with family caregivers of cancer patients: meta-analysis of randomized trials. A Cancer J Clin 60(5):317–339
29.
go back to reference Medical Research Council (2008) Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. Medical Research Council, London Medical Research Council (2008) Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. Medical Research Council, London
30.
go back to reference Bate S, Robert G (2007) Bringing user experience to health care improvement: the concepts, methods and practices of experience-based design. Radcliffe Publishing, Oxford Bate S, Robert G (2007) Bringing user experience to health care improvement: the concepts, methods and practices of experience-based design. Radcliffe Publishing, Oxford
31.
go back to reference Donetto S, Tsianakas V, Robert G (2014) Using experience-based co-design (EBCD) to improve the quality of healthcare: mapping where we are now and establishing future directions. King’s College London, UK Donetto S, Tsianakas V, Robert G (2014) Using experience-based co-design (EBCD) to improve the quality of healthcare: mapping where we are now and establishing future directions. King’s College London, UK
32.
go back to reference Julious S (2005) Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharm Stat 4:287–291CrossRef Julious S (2005) Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharm Stat 4:287–291CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Sim J, Lewis M (2012) The size of a pilot study for a clinical trial should be calculated in relation to considerations of precision and efficiency. J Clin Epidemiol 65:301–308CrossRefPubMed Sim J, Lewis M (2012) The size of a pilot study for a clinical trial should be calculated in relation to considerations of precision and efficiency. J Clin Epidemiol 65:301–308CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray (2013) F GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet] Lyon France. International Agency for Research on Cancer. http://globocan.iarc.fr. Accessed on 4th June 2007 Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray (2013) F GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet] Lyon France. International Agency for Research on Cancer. http://​globocan.​iarc.​fr. Accessed on 4th June 2007
35.
go back to reference Girgis A, Lambert S, Lecathelinais C (2011) The supportive care needs survey for partners and caregivers of cancer survivors: development and psychometric evaluation. Psycho-Oncology 20(4):387–393CrossRefPubMed Girgis A, Lambert S, Lecathelinais C (2011) The supportive care needs survey for partners and caregivers of cancer survivors: development and psychometric evaluation. Psycho-Oncology 20(4):387–393CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Schwarzer R, Fuchs R (1996) Self-efficacy and health behaviors. In: Connor M, Norman P (eds) Predicting health behavior: research and practice with social cognition models. Open University Press, Buckingham, pp 163–196 Schwarzer R, Fuchs R (1996) Self-efficacy and health behaviors. In: Connor M, Norman P (eds) Predicting health behavior: research and practice with social cognition models. Open University Press, Buckingham, pp 163–196
37.
go back to reference Goldberg DP, Williams P (1988) A user’s guide to the general health questionnaire. NFER-Nelson, Windsor Goldberg DP, Williams P (1988) A user’s guide to the general health questionnaire. NFER-Nelson, Windsor
38.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Lewis J (2003) Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. Sage Publications Ltd, Windsor Ritchie J, Lewis J (2003) Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. Sage Publications Ltd, Windsor
39.
go back to reference Vodermaier A, Wolfgang L, Christopher S (2009) Screening for emotional distress in cancer patients: a systematic review of assessment instruments. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:1464–1488PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Vodermaier A, Wolfgang L, Christopher S (2009) Screening for emotional distress in cancer patients: a systematic review of assessment instruments. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:1464–1488PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Henriksson A, Andershed B, Benzein E, Årestedt K (2012) Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the preparedness for caregiving scale, caregiver competence scale and rewards of caregiving scale in a sample of Swedish family members of patients with life-threatening illness. Palliat Med 26:930CrossRefPubMed Henriksson A, Andershed B, Benzein E, Årestedt K (2012) Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the preparedness for caregiving scale, caregiver competence scale and rewards of caregiving scale in a sample of Swedish family members of patients with life-threatening illness. Palliat Med 26:930CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Enhancing the experience of carers in the chemotherapy outpatient setting: an exploratory randomised controlled trial to test impact, acceptability and feasibility of a complex intervention co-designed by carers and staff
Authors
V. Tsianakas
G. Robert
A. Richardson
R. Verity
C. Oakley
T. Murrells
M. Flynn
E. Ream
Publication date
01-10-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 10/2015
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2677-x

Other articles of this Issue 10/2015

Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine