Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 9/2014

01-09-2014 | Original Article

Exploring the role of the partner in couples’ sexual recovery after surgery for prostate cancer

Authors: Daniela Wittmann, Marsha Carolan, Barbara Given, Ted A. Skolarus, Lawrence An, Ganesh Palapattu, James E. Montie

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 9/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Prostate cancer survivors’ post-surgery sexual problems are well documented and long lasting. Partners’ distress in this context leads to psychological morbidity which is poorly understood. Given the prevalence of prostate cancer diagnoses in older men, partners’ distress represents a public health concern. This study elucidates an important aspect of partners’ distress which has hitherto been undocumented. It can lead to further research and health-care provisions that will support couples in prostate cancer survivorship towards improved mental health and health outcomes.

Purpose

Partner sexual function has been viewed as a factor in men’s erectile function recovery after prostatectomy for prostate cancer. However, patients’ and partners’ perceptions on the role of the partner in couples’ sexual recovery has not been studied. We wanted to understand those perceptions and to see whether their perceptions were congruent.

Methods

Men and partners were recruited from a previous study and interviewed separately about the role of the partner. Interview transcripts were analyzed using grounded theory with the help of NVivo software.

Results

Ten men and nine partners participated; most were more than 1 year past surgery. Men were 62, and partners were 58 years old on average. Nine men had erectile dysfunction. Six female partners were post-menopausal, and a participating male partner had post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction. Men and partners agreed that partners provide emotional and logistical support. Both perceived the partner’s own sexual interest, not function, as critical to the couple’s sexual recovery. Some men felt pressured by partners’ initiative, feeling insecure about sexual performance. Men were unaware of partners’ sexual needs or needs for support. Partners expressed those needs but were unsure of what kind of support they needed.

Conclusion

Partners’ sexual and support needs during couples’ sexual recovery after prostatectomy should be acknowledged and addressed as a legitimate aspect of research and care for men recovering from prostatectomy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Given BA, Northouse L (2011) Who cares for family caregivers of patients with cancer? Clin J Oncol Nurs 15(5):451–2PubMedCrossRef Given BA, Northouse L (2011) Who cares for family caregivers of patients with cancer? Clin J Oncol Nurs 15(5):451–2PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Palapattu GS et al (2004) Assessment of perioperative psychological distress in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Urol 172:1814–1817PubMedCrossRef Palapattu GS et al (2004) Assessment of perioperative psychological distress in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Urol 172:1814–1817PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Northouse L et al (2012) Psychosocial care for family caregivers of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(11):1227–34PubMedCrossRef Northouse L et al (2012) Psychosocial care for family caregivers of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(11):1227–34PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Couper J (2006) W., et al., Psychosocial adjustment of female partners of men with prostate cancer: a review of the literature. Psychooncology 15(11):937–53PubMedCrossRef Couper J (2006) W., et al., Psychosocial adjustment of female partners of men with prostate cancer: a review of the literature. Psychooncology 15(11):937–53PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bruun P et al (2011) The lonely female partner: a central aspect of prostate cancer. Urol Nurs 31(5):294–9PubMed Bruun P et al (2011) The lonely female partner: a central aspect of prostate cancer. Urol Nurs 31(5):294–9PubMed
6.
go back to reference Thomas KS, Bower JE, Williamson TJ, Hoyt MA, Wellisch D, Stanton AL, Irwin M (2012) Post-traumatic disorder symptoms and blunted diurnal cortisol production in partners of prostate cancer patients. Psychoneuroendocrinology 37(8):1181–90. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.12.008 Thomas KS, Bower JE, Williamson TJ, Hoyt MA, Wellisch D, Stanton AL, Irwin M (2012) Post-traumatic disorder symptoms and blunted diurnal cortisol production in partners of prostate cancer patients. Psychoneuroendocrinology 37(8):1181–90. doi:10.​1016/​j.​psyneuen.​2011.​12.​008
7.
go back to reference Tanner T, Galbraith M, Hays L (2011) From a woman’s perspective: life as a partner of a prostate cancer survivor. J Midwifery Womens Health 56(2):154–60PubMedCrossRef Tanner T, Galbraith M, Hays L (2011) From a woman’s perspective: life as a partner of a prostate cancer survivor. J Midwifery Womens Health 56(2):154–60PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Navon L, Morag A (2003) Advanced prostate cancer patients’ ways of coping with the hormonal therapy’s effect on body, sexuality, and spousal ties. Qual Health Res 13(10):1378–92PubMedCrossRef Navon L, Morag A (2003) Advanced prostate cancer patients’ ways of coping with the hormonal therapy’s effect on body, sexuality, and spousal ties. Qual Health Res 13(10):1378–92PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cliff AM, MacDonagh RP (2000) Psychosocial morbidity in prostate cancer: II. A comparison of patients and partners. BJU Int 86(7):834–9PubMedCrossRef Cliff AM, MacDonagh RP (2000) Psychosocial morbidity in prostate cancer: II. A comparison of patients and partners. BJU Int 86(7):834–9PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chambers SK et al (2013) Couple distress after localised prostate cancer. Support Care Cancer 21(11):2967–76PubMedCrossRef Chambers SK et al (2013) Couple distress after localised prostate cancer. Support Care Cancer 21(11):2967–76PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sanda MG et al (2008) Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med 358(12):1250–61PubMedCrossRef Sanda MG et al (2008) Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med 358(12):1250–61PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Garos S, Kluck A, Aronoff D (2007) Prostate cancer patients and their partners: differences in satisfaction indices and psychological variables. J Sex Med 4(5):1394–403PubMedCrossRef Garos S, Kluck A, Aronoff D (2007) Prostate cancer patients and their partners: differences in satisfaction indices and psychological variables. J Sex Med 4(5):1394–403PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Moskovic DJ et al (2010) The female factor: predicting compliance with a post-prostatectomy erectile preservation program. J Sex Med 7(11):3659–65PubMedCrossRef Moskovic DJ et al (2010) The female factor: predicting compliance with a post-prostatectomy erectile preservation program. J Sex Med 7(11):3659–65PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Shindel A et al (2005) Sexual dysfunction in female partners of men who have undergone radical prostatectomy correlates with sexual dysfunction of the male partner. J Sex Med 2(6):833–41, discussion 841PubMedCrossRef Shindel A et al (2005) Sexual dysfunction in female partners of men who have undergone radical prostatectomy correlates with sexual dysfunction of the male partner. J Sex Med 2(6):833–41, discussion 841PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Schover LR et al (2011) A randomized trial of internet-based versus traditional sexual counseling for couples after localized prostate cancer treatment. Cancer 118(2):500–9PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Schover LR et al (2011) A randomized trial of internet-based versus traditional sexual counseling for couples after localized prostate cancer treatment. Cancer 118(2):500–9PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Schover LR et al (2002) Defining sexual outcomes after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer 95(8):1773–85PubMedCrossRef Schover LR et al (2002) Defining sexual outcomes after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer 95(8):1773–85PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sanders S et al (2006) Couples surviving prostate cancer: Long-term intimacy needs and concerns following treatment. Clin J Oncol Nurs 10(4):503–8PubMedCrossRef Sanders S et al (2006) Couples surviving prostate cancer: Long-term intimacy needs and concerns following treatment. Clin J Oncol Nurs 10(4):503–8PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ramsey SD et al (2013) Impact of prostate cancer on sexual relationships: a longitudinal perspective on intimate partners’ experiences. J Sex Med 10(12):3135–43PubMedCrossRef Ramsey SD et al (2013) Impact of prostate cancer on sexual relationships: a longitudinal perspective on intimate partners’ experiences. J Sex Med 10(12):3135–43PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wittmann D et al (2013) A one-day couple group intervention to enhance sexual recovery for surgically treated men with prostate cancer and their partners: a pilot study. Urol Nurs 33(3):140–7PubMed Wittmann D et al (2013) A one-day couple group intervention to enhance sexual recovery for surgically treated men with prostate cancer and their partners: a pilot study. Urol Nurs 33(3):140–7PubMed
21.
go back to reference Canada AL et al (2005) Pilot intervention to enhance sexual rehabilitation for couples after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer 104(12):2689–700PubMedCrossRef Canada AL et al (2005) Pilot intervention to enhance sexual rehabilitation for couples after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer 104(12):2689–700PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Davison BJ et al (2005) Development and evaluation of a prostate sexual rehabilitation clinic: a pilot project. BJU Int 96(9):1360–4PubMedCrossRef Davison BJ et al (2005) Development and evaluation of a prostate sexual rehabilitation clinic: a pilot project. BJU Int 96(9):1360–4PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference WHO, S.H.D.S (2002) Defining sexual health: a report of a technical consultation on sexual health. 28-31 January, 2002. World Health Organization, Sexual Health Document Series WHO, S.H.D.S (2002) Defining sexual health: a report of a technical consultation on sexual health. 28-31 January, 2002. World Health Organization, Sexual Health Document Series
24.
25.
go back to reference Wittmann D, Foley S, Balon R (2011) A biopsychosocial approach to sexual recovery after prostate cancer surgery: the role of grief and mourning. J Sex Marital Ther 37(2):130–44PubMedCrossRef Wittmann D, Foley S, Balon R (2011) A biopsychosocial approach to sexual recovery after prostate cancer surgery: the role of grief and mourning. J Sex Marital Ther 37(2):130–44PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Wittmann D, et al (2013) A pilot study of potential pre-operative barriers to couples’ sexual recovery after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy. Epub ahead of publication Wittmann D, et al (2013) A pilot study of potential pre-operative barriers to couples’ sexual recovery after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy. Epub ahead of publication
27.
go back to reference Charmaz K (2006) Construction grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi Charmaz K (2006) Construction grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi
28.
go back to reference LaRossa R (2005) Grounded theory methods and qualitative family research. J Marriage Fam 67(4):837–857CrossRef LaRossa R (2005) Grounded theory methods and qualitative family research. J Marriage Fam 67(4):837–857CrossRef
29.
go back to reference NVivo 9. 2012, QSR International (Americas) Inc., 55 Cambridge Street, Burlington, MA 01803 USA NVivo 9. 2012, QSR International (Americas) Inc., 55 Cambridge Street, Burlington, MA 01803 USA
30.
go back to reference Reese JB et al (2010) Coping with sexual concerns after cancer: the use of flexible coping. Support Care Cancer 18(7):785–800PubMedCrossRef Reese JB et al (2010) Coping with sexual concerns after cancer: the use of flexible coping. Support Care Cancer 18(7):785–800PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Manne S, Badr H (2008) Intimacy and relationship processes in couples’ psychosocial adaptation to cancer. Cancer 112(11 Suppl):2541–55PubMedCrossRef Manne S, Badr H (2008) Intimacy and relationship processes in couples’ psychosocial adaptation to cancer. Cancer 112(11 Suppl):2541–55PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Exploring the role of the partner in couples’ sexual recovery after surgery for prostate cancer
Authors
Daniela Wittmann
Marsha Carolan
Barbara Given
Ted A. Skolarus
Lawrence An
Ganesh Palapattu
James E. Montie
Publication date
01-09-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 9/2014
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2244-x

Other articles of this Issue 9/2014

Supportive Care in Cancer 9/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine