Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 5/2014

01-05-2014 | Original Article

A time to weep and a time to laugh: humour in the nurse–patient relationship in an adult cancer setting

Authors: Mary Anne Tanay, Theresa Wiseman, Julia Roberts, Emma Ream

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The literature highlights the value of humour in health-care settings. Humour impacts on the physiological, psychosocial and cognitive well-being of a person. The diagnosis of cancer is extremely stressful, and treatments are difficult. Patients and nurses may use humour as a coping mechanism to contend with the stresses caused directly or indirectly by cancer. This study investigated the use of humour during interactions between patients and nurses in an adult cancer ward.

Methods

This study used a modified ethnographic methodology that included fieldwork participant observation and informal interviews (n = 30 h) and formal interviews (n = 10). In total, 9 nurses and 12 patients participated in participant observation. From these, five nurses and five patients were interviewed. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

Findings highlighted the importance of humour in the nurse–patient relationship. Patients consciously use humour during nurse–patient interactions in an attempt to help nurses cope with the stress they encounter in clinical practice. Patients perceive having a sense of humour as a positive nurse attribute. Nurses expressed concerns regarding compromising professionalism when using humour and felt the need for guidance from senior staff. Constant assessment and reflection help ensure humour is used appropriately in the adult health-care setting.

Conclusion

The benefits of humour are recognised by both adult cancer patients and nurses. A deeper understanding of patient and nurse perceptions of the use of humour can inform strategies for its therapeutic use in the clinical setting.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Corner J, Bailey C (2008) Cancer nursing: care in context, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford Corner J, Bailey C (2008) Cancer nursing: care in context, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford
2.
go back to reference Kearney N, Richardson A (2006) Nursing patients with cancer: principles and practice. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh Kearney N, Richardson A (2006) Nursing patients with cancer: principles and practice. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
3.
go back to reference Kovarsky D, Schiemer C, Murray A (2011) Humour, rapport and uncomfortable moments in interactions with adults with traumatic brain injury. Top Lang Disord 31(4):325–335CrossRef Kovarsky D, Schiemer C, Murray A (2011) Humour, rapport and uncomfortable moments in interactions with adults with traumatic brain injury. Top Lang Disord 31(4):325–335CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Adamle K, Ludwick R (2005) Humor in hospice care: who, where and how much? American Journal of Hospital Palliative Care 22:287–289CrossRef Adamle K, Ludwick R (2005) Humor in hospice care: who, where and how much? American Journal of Hospital Palliative Care 22:287–289CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dean RA, Gregory DM (2004) Humour and laughter in palliative care: an ethnographic investigation. Palliative and Supportive Care 2:139–148PubMedCrossRef Dean RA, Gregory DM (2004) Humour and laughter in palliative care: an ethnographic investigation. Palliative and Supportive Care 2:139–148PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gramling D, Gramling R (2012) Laughing at the dark: tactical humor for autonomous decision making in serious illness. Journal of Palliative Medicine 15(11):1170–1172PubMedCrossRef Gramling D, Gramling R (2012) Laughing at the dark: tactical humor for autonomous decision making in serious illness. Journal of Palliative Medicine 15(11):1170–1172PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Dean R, Gregory D (2005) More than trivial: strategies for using humor in palliative care. Cancer Nurs 28(4):292–300PubMedCrossRef Dean R, Gregory D (2005) More than trivial: strategies for using humor in palliative care. Cancer Nurs 28(4):292–300PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rosqvist HB (2013) The politics of joking: narratives of humour and joking among adults with Asperger's syndrome. Disability and Society 27(2):235–247CrossRef Rosqvist HB (2013) The politics of joking: narratives of humour and joking among adults with Asperger's syndrome. Disability and Society 27(2):235–247CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Walter M, Hanni B, Haug M, Amrhein I, Krebs-Roubicek E, Muller-Sphan F, Savaskan E (2007) Humour therapy in patients with late-life depression or Alzheimer's disease: a pilot study. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 22:77–83PubMedCrossRef Walter M, Hanni B, Haug M, Amrhein I, Krebs-Roubicek E, Muller-Sphan F, Savaskan E (2007) Humour therapy in patients with late-life depression or Alzheimer's disease: a pilot study. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 22:77–83PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Thornton J, White A (1999) A Heideggerian investigation into the lived experience of humour by nurses in an intensive care unit. Intensive and Critical care Nursing 15:266–278PubMedCrossRef Thornton J, White A (1999) A Heideggerian investigation into the lived experience of humour by nurses in an intensive care unit. Intensive and Critical care Nursing 15:266–278PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Chapple A, Ziebland S (2004) The role of humour for men with testicular cancer. Qual Health Res 14(8):1123–1139PubMedCrossRef Chapple A, Ziebland S (2004) The role of humour for men with testicular cancer. Qual Health Res 14(8):1123–1139PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fallon S et al (2008) ‘Pizza, patients and points of view’: involving young people in the design of a post registration module entitled the adolescent with cancer. Nurse Educ Pract 8(2):140–147PubMedCrossRef Fallon S et al (2008) ‘Pizza, patients and points of view’: involving young people in the design of a post registration module entitled the adolescent with cancer. Nurse Educ Pract 8(2):140–147PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Johnson P (2002) The use of humour and its influences on spirituality and coping in breast cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum 29(4):691–695PubMedCrossRef Johnson P (2002) The use of humour and its influences on spirituality and coping in breast cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum 29(4):691–695PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Snowden A (2003) Humour and health promotion. Health Educ J 62(2):143–152CrossRef Snowden A (2003) Humour and health promotion. Health Educ J 62(2):143–152CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Scholl J (2007) The use of humour to promote patient-centred care. Journal of Applied Communications Research 35(2):156–176CrossRef Scholl J (2007) The use of humour to promote patient-centred care. Journal of Applied Communications Research 35(2):156–176CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Greenberg M (2003) Therapeutic play: developing humour in the nurse–patient relationship. Journal of the New York State Nurses Association 34(1):25–31 Greenberg M (2003) Therapeutic play: developing humour in the nurse–patient relationship. Journal of the New York State Nurses Association 34(1):25–31
18.
go back to reference Mc Creaddie M (2010) Ensnared by positivity: a constructivist perspective on ‘being positive’ in cancer care. Eur J Oncol Nurs 14:283–290CrossRef Mc Creaddie M (2010) Ensnared by positivity: a constructivist perspective on ‘being positive’ in cancer care. Eur J Oncol Nurs 14:283–290CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Astedt-Kurki P, Isola A (2001) Humour between nurse and patient, and among staff: analyses of nurses' diaries. J Adv Nurs 35(3):452–458PubMedCrossRef Astedt-Kurki P, Isola A (2001) Humour between nurse and patient, and among staff: analyses of nurses' diaries. J Adv Nurs 35(3):452–458PubMedCrossRef
20.
21.
go back to reference Hammersley M, Atkinson P (2007) Ethnography: principles in practice, 3rd edn. Routledge, London Hammersley M, Atkinson P (2007) Ethnography: principles in practice, 3rd edn. Routledge, London
22.
go back to reference Bowling A (2009) Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. McGraw Hill, Maidenhead Bowling A (2009) Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. McGraw Hill, Maidenhead
23.
go back to reference Coffey A, Atkinson P (1996) Making sense of qualitative data: complementary strategies. Sage, London Coffey A, Atkinson P (1996) Making sense of qualitative data: complementary strategies. Sage, London
24.
go back to reference Olsson H, Backe H, Sorensen S, Kock M (2002) The essence of humour and its effects and functions: a qualitative study. J Nurs Manag 10:21–26PubMedCrossRef Olsson H, Backe H, Sorensen S, Kock M (2002) The essence of humour and its effects and functions: a qualitative study. J Nurs Manag 10:21–26PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Potter P, Deshields T, Divanbeigi J, Berger J, Min D, Cipriano D, Norris L, Olsen S (2013) Compassion fatigue and burnout: prevalence among oncology nurses. Clin J Oncol Nurs 14(5):E56–E62CrossRef Potter P, Deshields T, Divanbeigi J, Berger J, Min D, Cipriano D, Norris L, Olsen S (2013) Compassion fatigue and burnout: prevalence among oncology nurses. Clin J Oncol Nurs 14(5):E56–E62CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Abel M (2002) Humor, stress and coping strategies. International Journal of Humor Research 15(4):365–381CrossRef Abel M (2002) Humor, stress and coping strategies. International Journal of Humor Research 15(4):365–381CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A time to weep and a time to laugh: humour in the nurse–patient relationship in an adult cancer setting
Authors
Mary Anne Tanay
Theresa Wiseman
Julia Roberts
Emma Ream
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-2084-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Supportive Care in Cancer 5/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine