Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 3/2014

01-03-2014 | Original Article

A randomized placebo-controlled trial of manuka honey for radiation-induced oral mucositis

Authors: Philippa Hawley, Allan Hovan, Colleen E. McGahan, Deborah Saunders

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Few treatments have the potential to reduce the severity of radiation-induced mucositis in head and neck cancer patients. Some small studies have suggested that organic honey may be a useful preventive treatment.

Methods

This investigator-initiated double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial investigated whether honey reduced the severity of radiation-induced oral mucositis (ROM). One hundred six head and neck cancer patients from the Vancouver and Sudbury Cancer Centers in Canada were randomized to swish, hold, and swallow either 5 ml of irradiated organic manuka honey or a placebo gel, four times a day throughout radiation treatment, plus seven more days. Severity of oral mucositis according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), World Health Organization (WHO), and Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale scales, weight, and subjects' symptom severity and quality of life were assessed weekly. Sialometry was performed at baseline and at the last study visit.

Results

One hundred six patients were recruited. Twenty-four did not attend any mucositis assessments. One was removed from the study because of off-study consumption of store-bought manuka honey. The remaining 81 patients had at least one mucositis assessment and were included in the analysis. Sixty-two percent of subjects received concurrent chemotherapy; 81 % were male. The groups were well-matched, and blinding was excellent. Dropouts were mostly due to nausea and were similar in both arms, with 78 % being able to tolerate the study products for more than 1 week. The dropout rate was 57 % in those who received honey and 52 % in those who received placebo gel. The dropout rate in those who had concurrent chemotherapy was 59 % and in those who only received radiation was 47 %. There was no statistically significant difference between the honey and placebo arms in any of the outcome indicators. Those who completed the study in both treatment arms had low rates of RTOG greater than or equal to grade 3 mucositis; 35 % in the honey group and 43 % in the placebo group.

Conclusion

Despite promising earlier reports, manuka honey was not tolerated well by our patients and, even when used as directed, did not have a significant impact on the severity of ROM.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Worthington H et al (2011) Interventions for preventing oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD000978 Worthington H et al (2011) Interventions for preventing oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD000978
2.
go back to reference Clarkson J et al (2000) Interventions for treating oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (8):CD001973 Clarkson J et al (2000) Interventions for treating oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (8):CD001973
3.
go back to reference Keefe D, Murphy BA (2007) Clinical and economic consequences of mucositis induced by chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. J Support Oncol 5:13–21 Keefe D, Murphy BA (2007) Clinical and economic consequences of mucositis induced by chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. J Support Oncol 5:13–21
4.
go back to reference Vera-Llonch M et al (2006) Oral mucositis in patients undergoing radiation treatment for head and neck carcinoma. Cancer 106:329–336PubMedCrossRef Vera-Llonch M et al (2006) Oral mucositis in patients undergoing radiation treatment for head and neck carcinoma. Cancer 106:329–336PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sonis ST et al (2004) Perspectives on cancer therapy-induced mucosal injury. Cancer 100(9 Suppl):1995–2025PubMedCrossRef Sonis ST et al (2004) Perspectives on cancer therapy-induced mucosal injury. Cancer 100(9 Suppl):1995–2025PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bjarnason GA et al (2005) A randomized prospective phase-III study comparing the acute oral mucositis of morning vs. afternoon radiotherapy (RT) in patients (pts) with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN): NCIC-CTG HN.3. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2005 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings 23(16S, June 1 Supplement):LBA5500 Bjarnason GA et al (2005) A randomized prospective phase-III study comparing the acute oral mucositis of morning vs. afternoon radiotherapy (RT) in patients (pts) with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN): NCIC-CTG HN.3. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2005 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings 23(16S, June 1 Supplement):LBA5500
7.
go back to reference Brizel DM et al (2000) Phase III randomized trial of amifostine as a radioprotector in head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:3339–3345PubMed Brizel DM et al (2000) Phase III randomized trial of amifostine as a radioprotector in head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:3339–3345PubMed
8.
go back to reference Trotti A et al (2004) A multinational, randomized phase III trial of iseganan HCl oral solution for reducing the severity of oral mucositis in patients receiving radiotherapy for head-and-neck malignancy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 3:674–681CrossRef Trotti A et al (2004) A multinational, randomized phase III trial of iseganan HCl oral solution for reducing the severity of oral mucositis in patients receiving radiotherapy for head-and-neck malignancy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 3:674–681CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dörr E, Dörr W, Herrmann T et al (2007) Gender effects on oral mucositis during radiotherapy of malignancies in the head and neck region. Proceedings from the 20th Anniversary International MASCC/ISOO Symposium, St. Gallen, Switzerland, Abstract No. P-41 Dörr E, Dörr W, Herrmann T et al (2007) Gender effects on oral mucositis during radiotherapy of malignancies in the head and neck region. Proceedings from the 20th Anniversary International MASCC/ISOO Symposium, St. Gallen, Switzerland, Abstract No. P-41
10.
go back to reference Keefe D et al (2007) Updated clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of mucositis. Cancer 109(5):820–831PubMedCrossRef Keefe D et al (2007) Updated clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of mucositis. Cancer 109(5):820–831PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Garden A, Chambers M (2007) Head and neck radiation and mucositis. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 1:30–34PubMedCrossRef Garden A, Chambers M (2007) Head and neck radiation and mucositis. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 1:30–34PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference El S et al (2002) Prophylaxis of radiation-associated mucositis in conventionally treated patients with head and neck cancer: a double-blind, phase 3, randomized, controlled trial evaluating the clinical efficacy of an antimicrobial lozenge using a validated scoring system. J Clin Oncol 20(19):3956–39643CrossRef El S et al (2002) Prophylaxis of radiation-associated mucositis in conventionally treated patients with head and neck cancer: a double-blind, phase 3, randomized, controlled trial evaluating the clinical efficacy of an antimicrobial lozenge using a validated scoring system. J Clin Oncol 20(19):3956–39643CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Stokman M et al (2003) Oral mucositis and selective elimination of oral flora in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Br J Cancer 88(7):1012–1016PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Stokman M et al (2003) Oral mucositis and selective elimination of oral flora in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Br J Cancer 88(7):1012–1016PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Biswal B, Zakaria A, Ahmad N (2003) Topical application of honey in the management of radiation mucositis: a preliminary study. Support Care Cancer 11(4):242–248PubMed Biswal B, Zakaria A, Ahmad N (2003) Topical application of honey in the management of radiation mucositis: a preliminary study. Support Care Cancer 11(4):242–248PubMed
15.
go back to reference Mavric E et al (2008) Identification and quantification of methylglyoxal as the dominant antibacterial constituent of manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) honeys from New Zealand. Mol Nutr Food Res 52:483–489PubMedCrossRef Mavric E et al (2008) Identification and quantification of methylglyoxal as the dominant antibacterial constituent of manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) honeys from New Zealand. Mol Nutr Food Res 52:483–489PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Willix DJ, Molan PC, Harfoot CG (1992) A comparison of the sensitivity of wound-infecting species of bacteria to the antibacterial activity of manuka honey and other honey. J Appl Bacteriol 73(5):388–394PubMedCrossRef Willix DJ, Molan PC, Harfoot CG (1992) A comparison of the sensitivity of wound-infecting species of bacteria to the antibacterial activity of manuka honey and other honey. J Appl Bacteriol 73(5):388–394PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference English HK, Pack AP, Molan PC (2004) The effects of manuka honey on plaque and gingivitis: a pilot study. J Int Acad Periodontol 6(2):63–67PubMed English HK, Pack AP, Molan PC (2004) The effects of manuka honey on plaque and gingivitis: a pilot study. J Int Acad Periodontol 6(2):63–67PubMed
18.
go back to reference Molan PC (2006) The evidence supporting the use of honey as a wound dressing. Int J Lower Extrem Wounds 5(1):40–54CrossRef Molan PC (2006) The evidence supporting the use of honey as a wound dressing. Int J Lower Extrem Wounds 5(1):40–54CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bang LM, Buntting C, Molan P (2003) The effect of dilution on the rate of hydrogen peroxide production in honey and its implications for wound healing. J Altern Complement Med 9(2):267–273PubMedCrossRef Bang LM, Buntting C, Molan P (2003) The effect of dilution on the rate of hydrogen peroxide production in honey and its implications for wound healing. J Altern Complement Med 9(2):267–273PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Molan PC, Allan KL (1996) The effect of gamma irradiation on the antibacterial activity of honey. J Pharm Pharmacol 48:1206–1209PubMedCrossRef Molan PC, Allan KL (1996) The effect of gamma irradiation on the antibacterial activity of honey. J Pharm Pharmacol 48:1206–1209PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Postmes T, vanden Bogaard A, Hazen M (1995) The sterilization of honey with cobalt 60 gamma radiation: a study of honey spiked with spores of Clostridium botulinum and Bacillus subtilis. Experientia 51:986–989PubMedCrossRef Postmes T, vanden Bogaard A, Hazen M (1995) The sterilization of honey with cobalt 60 gamma radiation: a study of honey spiked with spores of Clostridium botulinum and Bacillus subtilis. Experientia 51:986–989PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sonis ST et al (1999) Validation of a new scoring system for the assessment of clinical trial research of oral mucositis induced by radiation or chemotherapy. Cancer 85:2103–2113PubMedCrossRef Sonis ST et al (1999) Validation of a new scoring system for the assessment of clinical trial research of oral mucositis induced by radiation or chemotherapy. Cancer 85:2103–2113PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Motallebnejad M et al (2008) The effect of topical application of pure honey on radiation-induced mucositis: a randomized clinical trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 9(3):40–47PubMed Motallebnejad M et al (2008) The effect of topical application of pure honey on radiation-induced mucositis: a randomized clinical trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 9(3):40–47PubMed
24.
go back to reference Rashad U et al (2009) Honey as topical prophylaxis against radiochemotherapy-induced mucositis in head and neck cancer. J Laryngol Otol 123:223–228PubMedCrossRef Rashad U et al (2009) Honey as topical prophylaxis against radiochemotherapy-induced mucositis in head and neck cancer. J Laryngol Otol 123:223–228PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Khanal B, Baliga M, Uppal N (2010) Effect of topical honey on limitation of radiation-induced oral mucositis: an intervention study. Intl J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:1181–1185CrossRef Khanal B, Baliga M, Uppal N (2010) Effect of topical honey on limitation of radiation-induced oral mucositis: an intervention study. Intl J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:1181–1185CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Song JJ, Twumasi-Ankrah P, Salcido R (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of honey to protect from the effects of radiation-induced oral mucositis. Adv Skin Wound Care 25(1):23–28PubMedCrossRef Song JJ, Twumasi-Ankrah P, Salcido R (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of honey to protect from the effects of radiation-induced oral mucositis. Adv Skin Wound Care 25(1):23–28PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Parsons E, Begley A, Herst P (2012) Manuka honey mouthwash does not affect oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients in New Zealand. Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice 11(4):249–256. doi:10.1017/S1460396911000410 CrossRef Parsons E, Begley A, Herst P (2012) Manuka honey mouthwash does not affect oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients in New Zealand. Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice 11(4):249–256. doi:10.​1017/​S146039691100041​0 CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bardy J et al (2012) A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of active manuka honey and standard oral care for radiation-induced oral mucositis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50(3):221–226PubMedCrossRef Bardy J et al (2012) A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of active manuka honey and standard oral care for radiation-induced oral mucositis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50(3):221–226PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A randomized placebo-controlled trial of manuka honey for radiation-induced oral mucositis
Authors
Philippa Hawley
Allan Hovan
Colleen E. McGahan
Deborah Saunders
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-2031-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Supportive Care in Cancer 3/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine