Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 5/2013

01-05-2013 | Original Article

Predicting quality of life after breast cancer surgery using ANN-based models: performance comparison with MR

Authors: Jinn-Tsong Tsai, Ming-Feng Hou, Yao-Mei Chen, Thomas T. H. Wan, Hao-Yun Kao, Hon-Yi Shi

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 5/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The goal was to develop models for predicting long-term quality of life (QOL) after breast cancer surgery.

Methods

Data were obtained from 203 breast cancer patients who completed the SF-36 health survey before and 2 years after surgery. Two of the models used to predict QOL after surgery were artificial neural networks (ANNs), which included one multilayer perceptron (MLP) network and one radial basis function (RBF) network. The third model was a multiple regression (MR) model. The criteria for evaluating the accuracy of the system models were mean square error (MSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE).

Results

Compared to the MR model, the ANN-based models generally had smaller MSE values and smaller MAPE values in the test data set. One exception was the second year MSE for the test value. Most MAPE values for the ANN models ranged from 10 to 20 %. The one exception was the 6-month physical component summary score (PCS), which ranged from 23.19 to 26.86 %. Comparison of criteria for evaluating system performance showed that the ANN-based systems outperformed the MR system in terms of prediction accuracy. In both the MLP and RBF networks, surgical procedure type was the most sensitive parameter affecting PCS, and preoperative functional status was the most sensitive parameter affecting mental component summary score.

Conclusion

The three systems can be combined to obtain a conservative prediction, and a combined approach is a potential supplemental tool for predicting long-term QOL after surgical treatment for breast cancer.

Relevance

Patients should also be advised that their postoperative QOL might depend not only on the success of their operations but also on their preoperative functional status.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Shi HY, Uen YH, Yen LC, Culbertson R, Juan CH, Hou MF (2011) Two-year quality of life after breast cancer surgery: a comparison of three surgical procedures. Eur J Surg Oncol 37(8):695–702PubMedCrossRef Shi HY, Uen YH, Yen LC, Culbertson R, Juan CH, Hou MF (2011) Two-year quality of life after breast cancer surgery: a comparison of three surgical procedures. Eur J Surg Oncol 37(8):695–702PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bogaarts MP, Den Oudsten BL, Roukema JA, Van Riel JM, Beerepoot LV, De Vries J (2011) Development of the Psychosocial Distress Questionnaire-Breast Cancer (PDQ-BC): a breast cancer-specific screening instrument for psychosocial problems. Support Care Cancer 19(10):1485–1493PubMedCrossRef Bogaarts MP, Den Oudsten BL, Roukema JA, Van Riel JM, Beerepoot LV, De Vries J (2011) Development of the Psychosocial Distress Questionnaire-Breast Cancer (PDQ-BC): a breast cancer-specific screening instrument for psychosocial problems. Support Care Cancer 19(10):1485–1493PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Van Esch L, Roukema JA, Van der Steeg AF, De Vries J (2011) Trait anxiety predicts disease-specific health status in early-stage breast cancer patients. Qual Life Res 20(6):865–873PubMedCrossRef Van Esch L, Roukema JA, Van der Steeg AF, De Vries J (2011) Trait anxiety predicts disease-specific health status in early-stage breast cancer patients. Qual Life Res 20(6):865–873PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cohen M, Mabjish AA, Zidan J (2011) Comparison of Arab breast cancer survivors and healthy controls for spousal relationship, body image, and emotional distress. Qual Life Res 20(2):191–198PubMedCrossRef Cohen M, Mabjish AA, Zidan J (2011) Comparison of Arab breast cancer survivors and healthy controls for spousal relationship, body image, and emotional distress. Qual Life Res 20(2):191–198PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference van Hezewijk M, Hille ET, Scholten AN, Marijnen CA, Stiggelbout AM, van de Velde CJ (2011) Professionals' opinion on follow-up in breast cancer patients; perceived purpose and influence of patients' risk factors. Eur J Surg Oncol 37(3):217–224PubMedCrossRef van Hezewijk M, Hille ET, Scholten AN, Marijnen CA, Stiggelbout AM, van de Velde CJ (2011) Professionals' opinion on follow-up in breast cancer patients; perceived purpose and influence of patients' risk factors. Eur J Surg Oncol 37(3):217–224PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Zimmermann C, Burman D, Swami N, Krzyzanowska MK, Leighl N, Moore M, Rodin G, Tannock I (2011) Determinants of quality of life in patients with advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 19(5):621–629PubMedCrossRef Zimmermann C, Burman D, Swami N, Krzyzanowska MK, Leighl N, Moore M, Rodin G, Tannock I (2011) Determinants of quality of life in patients with advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 19(5):621–629PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Roundtree AK, Giordano SH, Price A, Suarez-Almazor ME (2011) Problems in transition and quality of care: perspectives of breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 19(12):1921–1929PubMedCrossRef Roundtree AK, Giordano SH, Price A, Suarez-Almazor ME (2011) Problems in transition and quality of care: perspectives of breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 19(12):1921–1929PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Taira N, Shimozuma K, Shiroiwa T, Ohsumi S, Kuroi K, Saji S, Saito M, Iha S, Watanabe T, Katsumata N (2011) Associations among baseline variables, treatment-related factors and health-related quality of life 2 years after breast cancer surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat 128(3):735–747PubMedCrossRef Taira N, Shimozuma K, Shiroiwa T, Ohsumi S, Kuroi K, Saji S, Saito M, Iha S, Watanabe T, Katsumata N (2011) Associations among baseline variables, treatment-related factors and health-related quality of life 2 years after breast cancer surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat 128(3):735–747PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Delen D, Walker G, Kadam A (2005) Predicting breast cancer survivability: a comparison of three data mining methods. Artif Intell Med 34(2):113–127PubMedCrossRef Delen D, Walker G, Kadam A (2005) Predicting breast cancer survivability: a comparison of three data mining methods. Artif Intell Med 34(2):113–127PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ayer T, Alagoz O, Chhatwal J, Shavlik JW, Kahn CE Jr, Burnside ES (2010) Breast cancer risk estimation with artificial neural networks revisited: discrimination and calibration. Cancer 116(14):3310–3321PubMedCrossRef Ayer T, Alagoz O, Chhatwal J, Shavlik JW, Kahn CE Jr, Burnside ES (2010) Breast cancer risk estimation with artificial neural networks revisited: discrimination and calibration. Cancer 116(14):3310–3321PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hui EP, Leung LK, Poon TC, Mo F, Chan VT, Ma AT, Poon A, Hui EK, Mak SS, Lai M, Lei KI, Ma BB, Mok TS, Yeo W, Zee BC, Chan AT (2011) Prediction of outcome in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia: a prospective validation of the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk index in a Chinese population and comparison with the Talcott model and artificial neural network. Support Care Cancer 19(10):1625–1635PubMedCrossRef Hui EP, Leung LK, Poon TC, Mo F, Chan VT, Ma AT, Poon A, Hui EK, Mak SS, Lai M, Lei KI, Ma BB, Mok TS, Yeo W, Zee BC, Chan AT (2011) Prediction of outcome in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia: a prospective validation of the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk index in a Chinese population and comparison with the Talcott model and artificial neural network. Support Care Cancer 19(10):1625–1635PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Abernethy AP, Etheredge LM, Ganz PA, Wallace P, German RR, Neti C, Bach PB, Murphy SB (2011) Rapid-learning system for cancer care. J Clin Oncol 28(27):4268–4274CrossRef Abernethy AP, Etheredge LM, Ganz PA, Wallace P, German RR, Neti C, Bach PB, Murphy SB (2011) Rapid-learning system for cancer care. J Clin Oncol 28(27):4268–4274CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, Zee B, Pater J (1998) Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol 16(1):139–144PubMed Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, Zee B, Pater J (1998) Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol 16(1):139–144PubMed
14.
go back to reference Yu J, Coons SJ, Draugalis JR, Ren XS, Hays RD (2003) Equivalence of Chinese and US-English versions of the SF-36 health survey. Qual Life Res 12(4):449–457PubMedCrossRef Yu J, Coons SJ, Draugalis JR, Ren XS, Hays RD (2003) Equivalence of Chinese and US-English versions of the SF-36 health survey. Qual Life Res 12(4):449–457PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Yarlas AS, White MK, Yang M, Saris-Baglama RN, Bech PG, Christensen T (2011) Measuring the health status burden in hemodialysis patients using the SF-36® health survey. Qual Life Res 20(3):383–389PubMedCrossRef Yarlas AS, White MK, Yang M, Saris-Baglama RN, Bech PG, Christensen T (2011) Measuring the health status burden in hemodialysis patients using the SF-36® health survey. Qual Life Res 20(3):383–389PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Fuh JL, Wang SJ, Lu SR, Juang KD, Lee SJ (2000) Psychometric evaluation of a Chinese (Taiwanese) version of the SF-36 health survey amongst middle-aged women from a rural community. Qual Life Res 9(6):675–683PubMedCrossRef Fuh JL, Wang SJ, Lu SR, Juang KD, Lee SJ (2000) Psychometric evaluation of a Chinese (Taiwanese) version of the SF-36 health survey amongst middle-aged women from a rural community. Qual Life Res 9(6):675–683PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL (eds) Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. MIT, Cambridge, pp 318–362 Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL (eds) Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. MIT, Cambridge, pp 318–362
18.
go back to reference Haykin S (1999) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs Haykin S (1999) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
19.
go back to reference Sandberg IW, Lo JT, Fancourt CL, Principe JC, Katagiri S, Haykin S (2001) Nonlinear dynamical systems: feedforward neural network perspectives. Wiley, UK Sandberg IW, Lo JT, Fancourt CL, Principe JC, Katagiri S, Haykin S (2001) Nonlinear dynamical systems: feedforward neural network perspectives. Wiley, UK
20.
go back to reference Lee TY, Chen SA, Hung HY, Ou YY (2011) Incorporating distant sequence features and radial basis function networks to identify ubiquitin conjugation sites. PLoS One 6(3):e17331PubMedCrossRef Lee TY, Chen SA, Hung HY, Ou YY (2011) Incorporating distant sequence features and radial basis function networks to identify ubiquitin conjugation sites. PLoS One 6(3):e17331PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Poggio T, Girosi F (1990) Regularization algorithms for learning that are equivalent to multilayer networks. Science 247(4945):978–982PubMedCrossRef Poggio T, Girosi F (1990) Regularization algorithms for learning that are equivalent to multilayer networks. Science 247(4945):978–982PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Wei CH, Lee Y (2007) Sequential forecast of incident duration using artificial neural network models. Accid Anal Prev 39(5):944–954PubMedCrossRef Wei CH, Lee Y (2007) Sequential forecast of incident duration using artificial neural network models. Accid Anal Prev 39(5):944–954PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Predicting quality of life after breast cancer surgery using ANN-based models: performance comparison with MR
Authors
Jinn-Tsong Tsai
Ming-Feng Hou
Yao-Mei Chen
Thomas T. H. Wan
Hao-Yun Kao
Hon-Yi Shi
Publication date
01-05-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1672-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

Supportive Care in Cancer 5/2013 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine